Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 47 results by fanisk21
Re: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏
May join https://cryptoknight.cc/sumo/ when I'm back from work, something like 20kh for a start for testing. We will see.
Pool looks nice.
Awesome! Thx. Yeah, it has the best stats I've seen. I use it for other CN coins too.Pool looks nice.
Fairpool is good pool, I like it, but the dominance is too high!
https://cryptoknight.cc/sumo/#
and i think that it's the main reason why fairpool have almost 100% of the network
alredy noticed that. i'm using it and i will give it a 24h test . so far so good . thanks !
Re: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏
pool doesn't support sub-adress
and i think that it's the main reason why fairpool have almost 100% of the network
sumokoin.hashvault.pro 3MH/s (40% of the network)
yeah. the time i said that the total hash was 8mhs and fair was at 7,80 xD
Re: [ANN] [SUMO] SUMOKOIN - 🔏 Digital Cash For Highly-Confidential Transactions 🔏
May join https://cryptoknight.cc/sumo/ when I'm back from work, something like 20kh for a start for testing. We will see.
Pool looks nice.
Awesome! Thx. Yeah, it has the best stats I've seen. I use it for other CN coins too.Pool looks nice.
Edit: There are 10 more miners and we have 80kH/s already. 100kH/s here we go, 500kH/s on Sunday?
Fairpool is good pool, I like it, but the dominance is too high!
https://cryptoknight.cc/sumo/#
Edit 2: above
pool doesn't support sub-adress
and i think that it's the main reason why fairpool have almost 100% of the network
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.7 (Windows/Linux)
hi,
please submit your updated hashrates to
https://gpustats.com
thank you
please submit your updated hashrates to
https://gpustats.com
thank you
good idea. but need more improvements. like how can i see the images of the rig after post the result? and the additional notes? and why 512KB rom is to big?
You should have login to users edit their results and etc.
But i think it will be done soon.
GJ anyways
Let it run for a while! On rx580 the difference is 950 Claymore to 1050 SRB
Have you tried use T= 1/2? and W=8/16?
I runned for several minutes. How much it must be run to achieve max speed?Have you tried use T= 1/2? and W=8/16?
T - 1 slower, W=16 didn't tried, but I don't think that worksize on 270X gives any difference.
On RX 580 8Gb I use GGS - it gives much more than Claymore.
What parameters is best for 580 for SRB?
Well, yeah, i don't know, because i don't have a 270x card xD.
It deppends i'm using I=58 , W=16, T=2 on 6 MSI ARMOR 580 8G (Micron) and got 1050+ on each.
HI everybody i am having a issue on my Claymore config.
I am minning on Nanopool to a Coinpayments wallet.
My start is:
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool stratum+ssl://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433 -xwal wallet-adress.paymentID.rig_name/my@email -xpsw x -pow7 1
I have 6 RX570n and driver 17.11.1 with all cards in compute mode, it claymore ethereum is working properly
Any one has an idea of what this is ?
My command line output is:
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
XMR: 6 pools are specified
Main Monero pool is xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
OpenCL initializing...
AMD Cards available: 6
GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 4:0:0)
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #5: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 7:0:0)
GPU #5 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
POOL version
GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #2 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #3 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #4 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #5 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
Total cards: 6
XMR: Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-eu1.nanopool.org' <217.182.169.148> port 14433 (SSL/TLS)
"-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
Watchdog enabled
Monero Pow7 algorithm enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
XMR: Stratum - Connected (xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433) (SSL/TLS)
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
XMR: 04/20/18-22:40:47 - New job from xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
XMR - Total Speed: 3002 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
XMR: GPU0 0 H/s, GPU1 749 H/s, GPU2 755 H/s, GPU3 752 H/s, GPU4 746 H/s, GPU5 0 H/s
XMR: 04/20/18-22:40:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2; share value 0x000034c0)
Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=44C fan=0%, GPU1 t=51C fan=0%, GPU2 t=53C fan=21%, GPU3 t=51C fan=26%, GPU4 t=52C fan=0%, GPU5 t=45C fan=0%
WATCHDOG: GPU error, you need to restart miner
Quit, please wait...
Restarting OK, exit...
I am minning on Nanopool to a Coinpayments wallet.
My start is:
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool stratum+ssl://xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433 -xwal wallet-adress.paymentID.rig_name/my@email -xpsw x -pow7 1
I have 6 RX570n and driver 17.11.1 with all cards in compute mode, it claymore ethereum is working properly
Any one has an idea of what this is ?
My command line output is:
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
XMR: 6 pools are specified
Main Monero pool is xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems
Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
OpenCL initializing...
AMD Cards available: 6
GPU #0: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 1:0:0)
GPU #0 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #1: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 3:0:0)
GPU #1 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #2: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 4:0:0)
GPU #2 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #3: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 5:0:0)
GPU #3 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #4: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 6:0:0)
GPU #4 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
GPU #5: Ellesmere (Radeon RX 570 Series), 4096 MB available, 32 compute units (pci bus 7:0:0)
GPU #5 recognized as Radeon RX 470/570
POOL version
GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #2 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #3 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #4 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
GPU #5 algorithm ASM, -h 896, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3672MB)
Total cards: 6
XMR: Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-eu1.nanopool.org' <217.182.169.148> port 14433 (SSL/TLS)
"-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
Watchdog enabled
Monero Pow7 algorithm enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SSL/TLS encryption is enabled
XMR: Stratum - Connected (xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433) (SSL/TLS)
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 0, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
GPU 5, GpuMiner dk2an0 failed -4
XMR: 04/20/18-22:40:47 - New job from xmr-eu1.nanopool.org:14433
XMR - Total Speed: 3002 H/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
XMR: GPU0 0 H/s, GPU1 749 H/s, GPU2 755 H/s, GPU3 752 H/s, GPU4 746 H/s, GPU5 0 H/s
XMR: 04/20/18-22:40:53 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2; share value 0x000034c0)
Share accepted (78 ms)!
GPU0 t=44C fan=0%, GPU1 t=51C fan=0%, GPU2 t=53C fan=21%, GPU3 t=51C fan=26%, GPU4 t=52C fan=0%, GPU5 t=45C fan=0%
WATCHDOG: GPU error, you need to restart miner
Quit, please wait...
Restarting OK, exit...
try to use -dmem 0
if still persist, reduce your -h value and check your OC settings, XMR has different clocks config over Eth
Are you using Windows?
Increase virtual memory to 48000MB since you have 6*8GB graphics
Claymore's CN miner 11.3 gives on my 270X 4Gb 550-551 h/s.
SRB max 546 h/s.
Not bad result, but Claymore's miner without fee and gives a bit higher speed.
SRB can't read hardware sensors from 270X, Claymore's do that...
SRB max 546 h/s.
Not bad result, but Claymore's miner without fee and gives a bit higher speed.
SRB can't read hardware sensors from 270X, Claymore's do that...
Have you tweaked itensity yet?
0% fee to 0,85% fee is not such a big difference to put a negative point on it.
And SRB is still in developing, Claymore not and that is a big difference .
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.8.7.2, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
Hi there,
I love your miner for YescryptR16 algo. I have some interesting observations.
On my i7-2600, if I use 8 threads I only have like 40h/s per thread. But if I drop down to two I have 90h/s instead per thread
On my miners which mostly feature dual core CPU, I have 100-150h/thread.
I wonder if Hyper-threading hurts the hashrate per thread, or the algorithm doesn't scale well on multi-core CPU. The CPU usage on 8 threads are like 97% on average. SO as the one in dual-core CPU.
Did I miss something I need to optimize, or that's it? I'd love to upgrade my miners to quad-core or even i7 (Sandy bridge CPUs are cheap these days), but I want it to be worth of my investment.
Thanks
I love your miner for YescryptR16 algo. I have some interesting observations.
On my i7-2600, if I use 8 threads I only have like 40h/s per thread. But if I drop down to two I have 90h/s instead per thread
On my miners which mostly feature dual core CPU, I have 100-150h/thread.
I wonder if Hyper-threading hurts the hashrate per thread, or the algorithm doesn't scale well on multi-core CPU. The CPU usage on 8 threads are like 97% on average. SO as the one in dual-core CPU.
Did I miss something I need to optimize, or that's it? I'd love to upgrade my miners to quad-core or even i7 (Sandy bridge CPUs are cheap these days), but I want it to be worth of my investment.
Thanks
That it's because the L3 cache of the processors i think that is the reason why that happens. More threads dont always mean best perfomance.
where do we write Rig name (worker) in V1.4.6 ?
I don't know if the miner have a specific command for that. but i use WALLETADDRESS.rigname. It works dpending on the pool
Hi Guys,
anyone have settings for RX580 8giga?
not only intensity, also threads, worksize etc...
Thx for help
Luisa
anyone have settings for RX580 8giga?
not only intensity, also threads, worksize etc...
Thx for help
Luisa
I'm using I=58, W=16, T=2 on 6 MSI RX580 ARMOR 8G (Micron) with 1500+ straps. And i'm getting 1050+hs with CN-Heavy.
clocks - 1200/2200 - 900/900 mv
Can you explain me what u mean with 1500+ Straps? my cards are flash with coustom bios about ETH! (1 year ago!!)
ok,
i get 920Hs with Haven! 1200/2250Mem und 920mV
{ "id" : 0, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2}, that what i have and also only like 920Hash
Thx all for help
Luisa
straps are the timings of the memorys. when i say 1500+ it means that i copied the 1500 value of the original bios to each other next.
Try to use worksize 8
Hi Guys,
anyone have settings for RX580 8giga?
not only intensity, also threads, worksize etc...
Thx for help
Luisa
anyone have settings for RX580 8giga?
not only intensity, also threads, worksize etc...
Thx for help
Luisa
I'm using I=58, W=16, T=2 on 6 MSI RX580 ARMOR 8G (Micron) with 1500+ straps. And i'm getting 1050+hs with CN-Heavy.
clocks - 1200/2200 - 900/900 mv
excuse me , noob question, what is ADL ?
AMD Display Library, or an interface that can control the fans, clocks etc on the GPU.
Yeah, and later if you could use ADL to use clocks and voltage control like Claymore's miners use, would be very nice xD!
Blockchain drivers are so annoying , always resetting voltage values. Need to flash them on bios and i don't like it to much.
Hi guys, one question, i have 6 rx580 8g doing 1050hs in CN Heavy . It's stable, without memory erros and etc. But when dev fee starts hashrate drops to 800/900+ and stays instable and after some 1 hour+ all cards stays at 1050 again. Wich could be the problem? Or is that a normal?
Thanks
Edit:
I'm using { "id" : x, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2}, for all.
It's happening now:
http://i.imgur.com/P9GRh2r.png
Thanks
Edit:
I'm using { "id" : x, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2}, for all.
It's happening now:
http://i.imgur.com/P9GRh2r.png
its normal, and its not because of devfee. heavy algo fluctuates a few hundred mhs.
Ok , thanks
Gj btw