Most of the ICO now are worthless because most of them are scam or failed at the end. I hope your ICO is a legitimate one and not only use for self purposes.
You will see the ICO for yourself when it is launched. I have been in the crypto space for 5+ years, so has the CEO and CTO of our project. In the most recent years we have been scouting for good ICO's to contribute in. We invested in ICO's that offer a solution to a big problem in a sector where there is a lot of money flow. We looked for something that can also scale globally and is here to stay long term. While looking and working with such projects we have developed a vision for our ICO in a similar fashion. I am looking forward to hearing your feedback on the ICO once launched!
Been holding and staking since 2014, masternodes at some point. Out of the 40+ wallets I run it's one of the most unstable, if you even get past the automatic trojan removal. Gets stuck with fresh blockchain download required frequently, with that requiring multiple attempts in itself.
Thanks for the update Smooth, that is most excellent news indeed. I am looking forward to the fork and will try to have a few CPUs ready to mine when it the time comes around.
After hard syncing night looks like ver. 2.1.0 works good, i have done a test transactions without troubles. Block time issue solved. Reward normalised. Awaiting breaking of 100k
But as nodes have right client they never accept that. Actually it's known attack but he need 51% of all network for success. Unreal. Second thing orphans. I think that a lot of orphans because another new coin use same ports. 7117,7118 I post about that, see post #664 Block timeshift can be corrected too. It's not a big deal. I hope developers will fix that soon. In my opinion even not needs to do hardfork. About exchanges. I think no needs to disable deposits and withdrawals because market will go down soon. Nobody need coin that can't buy or sale. Tell me if I'm wrong.
you dont need 51% to do an attack on pos.
deposits and withdraws are most likely suspended due to the fork as a safety percaution, no harm done in that.
What does this have to do with FUD? He just wants some anwsers. Blocking such a wallet is not helping at all. You should check your code for bugs that could have been exploited. Why should the hacker stop using his exploit just because you block the wallet? He will be able to get some free coins of this wallet before you can block it. If he automates this action he can make a shitload of coins, reducing the value of the "real" coins. Stop blocking people just because their questions doesn't suit you! Provide some evidence for the actions you take and investigate the root of this problem. That's all you have to do to keep people quiet and not complaining.
I can only thank Rocket for pointing at such suspicious actions on the blockchain and I hope he won't stop until this is fixed!
Again, you my friend are missing the point we made. Where did we say that we "blocked" the wallet? We developers have found many-a-sung wallets and already have made advancements towards disbursing towards the community. We blocked "Rocket" because of activities like desperately trying to PM ppl out of the blue and saying we are doing a scammy network. We can present many screenshots where he has done the deed.
Being informed and trying to shove an ideology down your throat is completely different. That's why he was banned. We don't ban people out of the blue. We have a rules section by the community which he very well has repeatedly offended. Not for asking a question. See for yourself what he has communicated to us.
As for 'fix', please be informed yourself on what's occurring!
Fix ee? too late ee do you think i recently found out this bug? am the one who send this address to discord remember hehe? why do you think would i do that? youre wallet suck im telling you im been doing this for 2months now it only get better when your shit block time decrease then my reward become unstopable my reward become x6 hehe i will drop the boom soon you will see and when the top 100 become full of address like this.. my address reach top 31 in richest wallet in 4days only hehe http://explorer.deviantcoin.io/address/D7Dx3gjajN3GaQTihun4kpfz1dUPZip2Xc
Fix this ASAP dev.
OMG HOW?
there are a couple ways this can be done on pos coins. it depends on how the coin is designed...are there any devs active on this thread?
Due to the huge staking pools everybody nowerdays joins there are huge numbers of orphran blocks generated by people with fewer staking power ..
so does this imply that people staking solo using qt-wallets have huge disadvantages and been kicked out by pools while staking their solo generated reward?
Yeah this is the problem as far as I know. I don't know why DEV uses this kind of POS. They should use POS 3.0 were the amount of coins is not that important than now .. or am I wrong here? Please correct me if I am.
hmm, does this huge orphan disadvantage only rely on POS itself or is it the same for MNs?
MNs should be immune to that. This is a completly different system. But I think DEV has some problems right now with the blocks and the rewards payed. In discord it sounds like the blockchain is giving away too many rewards. Fix will be there "soon" as far as Discord says.
You missed point that we crossed block 200k and rewards changed! there isnt problem my friend. masternode -14, pos -6, so if you have masternode you getting even more but if staking then even less so go for full masternode (require 5kdev)
i think most of those comments were before block 200k, if it wasnt for all the orphans we still could be under 200k lol oh well it is what it is. its still pretty decent to stake from wallet tho
Due to the huge staking pools everybody nowerdays joins there are huge numbers of orphran blocks generated by people with fewer staking power ..
staking pools or not i dont think that is related to the orphan block problem. im thinking maybe blocktime or confirmations need adjusted, regardless i havent noticed it being bad enough to affect the network or nodes.
Due to the huge staking pools everybody nowerdays joins there are huge numbers of orphran blocks generated by people with fewer staking power ..
so does this imply that people staking solo using qt-wallets have huge disadvantages and been kicked out by pools while staking their solo generated reward?
Yeah this is the problem as far as I know. I don't know why DEV uses this kind of POS. They should use POS 3.0 were the amount of coins is not that important than now .. or am I wrong here? Please correct me if I am.
when staking solo v.s. pool you will get same amount of coins just not as frequent payouts, so on a pool you might get rewarded everyday or every few hours compared to every other day or what not.