How to I get the GPU model to show next to each card under GPU settings.  Some of my miners seem to have it working by default:



And others are completely blank:



I have defined a number of GPU profiles and have them associated with GPU's on various mining hosts.  I have a total of 12 Managed Miners at this point, and they all share the following path and credentials:



Despite that, after a restart, neither Afterburner nor Afterburner Remote Server appears to be running.  So I have to RDP into each miner and manually start those to apps, before I'm able to access GPU settings from my host running AM.  The AM Remote Agent is of course also installed on all the miners, and it starts the mining program(s) just fine and I can reboot the remote computers just fine.  But, like I said, neither Afterburner nor Afterburner Remote Server appears in the system tray.  The GPU's do start mining with the correct clock and power values that are defined in Afterburner on each rig, but the tray icon is not there, so I can't make adjustments from AM without first going to each rig.

Each managed miner is running latest Win 10 Pro and the only login account that exists on each computer, is my Microsoft Account, so that is the Remote Windows account I specify under Options/MSI Afterburner as per the above screen shot.  And all the miners are set to automatically login with my MS Account credentials.

Love the program, but these little annoyances are driving me nuts!

Are you saying that your whole rig crashes because a misconfigured mining software?  That's a bad situation.  There's a couple of things you can do.  Disable the rule that initiates the reboot sequence with the smart plugs until you can troubleshoot the problem.  When done, turn the rule back on.  Another thing you can do is hover your mouse over the stop button and as soon as AM kicks on the mining software click stop immediately... to keep the mining software from progressing to the point where it crashes the whole rig.  You can also disable the autostart miner from the managed miner or profit miner.

Hi,

If this is for the auto start of a miner after reboot, there is actually a setting in the Options dialog, Advanced section, that I added quite recently for this. "Delay auto start of miner after reboot".

Yes, it's built in.



You don't need to set it up.  AM will set the command line correctly.  You just need to define a pool, a miner, and then tell the miner to use EWBF on that pool.  AM does all the work from there.



Not especially, no.  I run it on a simple virtual machine on one of my low-end vmware nodes.  The node has a low-end Athlon 5350 CPU.  I gave the VM two cores and 4GB of RAM.  It runs fine... runs an average of 15% CPU on that piddly VM with the resources given to it.

Better run your own tests... Lots of smart words put in one sentence but have no meaning all together.

No need to hurry when making 300k a month.

I actually advocated EWBF earlyer, but sticking with DSTM now Test ended with average 3049 EWBF vs 3099 DSTM. 50 free hashes? Sounds good for me... --fee 0 didn't helped EWBF. And at least in my case i still see 2% less shares then reported by miner. And even some say they see 1% reduce it still does not save EFBW.

And this is GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EFBW.

P.S. I am not related to DSTM or EFBW in any way, long time used both but recent discussion in DSTM thread pushed me to do a test myself. Believe me or not, this was exactly same machiene of 6x1080 (non ti) not tweaked in any way for one or another miner, and it was not even restarted during test period.

So for us miners it is actually bad, DSTM does not have competition and would get out even with 3% fee....

DSTM stated that he will look into GDDR5X optimisation, and someone advocated EFBW to be better on GDDR5X cards here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2021765.msg28416751#msg28416751

Windows version is not?

Finally no more flaming

Charging 2% here from all profits is just ridiculous , this guy is making millions monthly yet he hides behind anonymity and brilliant "customer service" (yes, you are paying him).

Here its a working program for fee remove

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2800586.0

Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner??? 

Then you and the fecker guy should stop complaining about the fee. Take it or leave it, bitching about it won't change it as dtsm stated he won't change it.

As devs are making hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars per month, how about donating a portion of that to good causes like what https://pineapplefund.org/ is doing? That's what I would do if I were in their position. Atleast something to consider.

what would be cool is if DEV for EWBF picked back up see how many stay here .. sorry i have issues with ass holes who are greedy...If i Understand it right dstm was gonna raise the fee sigh .... .... i guess 13 k a day wasn't enough they need more ...So that said and to make others think they won which they didn't I'm not using DSTM any more and going back to EWBF ...... I don't feel like I'm being fucked using EWBF or Using CM for that matter ... GL  DSTM i hope your Greed does you in .....

I've had better luck with higher clocks (sometimes drastic) with dstm.  Course every Rig, PC and Software is different with each configuration slightly.  Just to see if there was a major difference again, I tried the EWBF with the --fee 0 option on one of my 1060's.  I was getting 305-308 sols average.  DSTM same settings 322 sols average.  So with a 6.5 dev fee I'm getting 8-11 more sols during mining.  Not much but quicker but still in the positive column to the tune of a few extra bucks a month (given the markets current drop in price).

2% fee is normal, no mining program would be lost, no profit, I do not understand why it's still being solved, work has to pay