Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 21 results by fkjnfndjn
In the meantime, we will make frequent updates to keep you informed
Where are these "frequent" updates?
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Regulater,
I appreciate your passion for this topic, but you might consider working on your anger management.
Sounds like you've taken appropriate personal action to avoid the effects of the RVN community not heeding your warnings, so I'm not sure why a guy who is as smart as you seem to think you are is wasting so much time trying to convince the ignorant through verbose ranting responses, but I'll assume you just enjoy it as sport.
Good luck to you.
I appreciate your passion for this topic, but you might consider working on your anger management.
Sounds like you've taken appropriate personal action to avoid the effects of the RVN community not heeding your warnings, so I'm not sure why a guy who is as smart as you seem to think you are is wasting so much time trying to convince the ignorant through verbose ranting responses, but I'll assume you just enjoy it as sport.
Good luck to you.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Maybe i need a tinfoil hat on to continue this argument.
You don't have to argue at all, on here or discord.
Just write the code that changes RVN to counter whatever you think the threat is, and submit it as a pull request.
You can even put comments in the code explaining your position.
Then the community will agree with you by running your code .... or not.
The method you are currently using - repeatedly referring to discussions in Chinese chat rooms and web posts with FPGA hashrates - and then replying to folks who don't share your level of concern with "LOLs" and astonishment that they can't see what you clearly see, doesn't seem to be working for you, so you might want to give the suggestion above a try. Or alternatively, sell your RVN and move on to another coin and community.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Do you have factual information or are you just guesstimating.
This is a pretty ironic statement from you considering this discussion involves a claim by you for which you have provided no factual information.
Provides no factual information? Primary sources are actually listed as factual information. If someone was at the beach and said it, that makes them a source, not a picture of it. Those are all Primary sources, but maybe you missed that in elementary school. Ironic how 5th grade education can destroy your post.
It has been stated in multiple chinese chats so that would be primary and secondary sources, and GPUHoarder knows about X16R ASICs is a primary person source.
The company that has them or people using them will not state information about them as Tron has stated he will take ASICs offline.
The difference is in the level of proof that different folks in the community require to reach the level of concern (apologies if that's not the right word) you seem to be at. It appears that "Chinese chats" and a post about hashrates for bitstreams that are not available to be downloaded are enough for you to be concerned ..... for others it is not.
Not sure why you felt the need to descend into personal attacks, but that does seem to be your discussion method with people who do not agree with you from what I've seen on here and discord. So be it.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Do you have factual information or are you just guesstimating.
This is a pretty ironic statement from you considering this discussion involves a claim by you for which you have provided no factual information.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
X16R has been on whattomine top for a long time, and will continue for a while.
It seems this fact, which is definitely true, would run counter to the idea that "secret" ASICs are on the RVN network, as every single algo that eventually got ASICs saw their coins sink on WTM GPU profitability rankings well before the ASICs were made public.
As long as RVN is one of the most profitable to mine on a 1080ti, it seems that ASICs are either an insignificant factor, or in fact do not exist at all.
That is not true at all. Simply looking at previous coins that were privately mined before public ASICs were released. Monero even spiked after the announcement of the X3 release, and they had usual dips with the rest of the market.
I'm not talking about price fluctuation, I'm referring to reduced profitability based on difficulty increase. Every coin with "secret" ASICs sunk on WTM rankings (for GPUs) prior to the ASICs becoming public because their network hash rate increased at a rate decoupled from their market price relative to other coins on WTM. RVN has not done that.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
X16R has been on whattomine top for a long time, and will continue for a while.
It seems this fact, which is definitely true, would run counter to the idea that "secret" ASICs are on the RVN network, as every single algo that eventually got ASICs saw their coins sink on WTM GPU profitability rankings well before the ASICs were made public.
As long as RVN is one of the most profitable to mine on a 1080ti, it seems that ASICs are either an insignificant factor, or in fact do not exist at all.
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
Not so hard to get it. I have it for a long time...
ccminer-KlausT-8.21-r7.
gtx1070
https://ibb.co/QNjmnC0
ccminer-KlausT-8.21-r7.
gtx1070
https://ibb.co/QNjmnC0
thanks for the link, ibut its just a pic of the miner, i see no download.
This coin is pumping like mad, no idea why.
What exchange do you see it "pumping like mad" on?
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Is there a date for when we will receive the airdrop?
I know it's meant to be Q4, just wondering if anything new has been announced.
I know it's meant to be Q4, just wondering if anything new has been announced.
You have this confused with some shitcoin. RVN has no airdrop.
A new generation of GPU is coming + clever devs want to use more of the CPU / GPU advantages to make them much more relevant against FPGAs and ASICs. I think the relevant CN coins will follow Monero then adapt the changes to their algo (CN FAST, HEAVY, LITE, SABER...).
FPGA devs will have to adapt.
FPGA devs will have to adapt.
If new algos are going to be as unpredictable/difficult to optimize as X16R is, I do not see any long term revival. It is not about how viable a coin is - it is about mining it in a predictable manner. Most people do not handle uncertainty well.
Then those that cannot handle uncertainty well will be left behind, and those that can will reap the rewards. Thats not just mining, thats life.
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
To both of you: Are you from this planet? Do you know how many shit-coins exist? How many are listed on exchanges? How many exchanges? And yes how many CPU only? Do you know what means Masternode, what are the consequences and why it does not exist for Bitcoin?
There is not such thing as floating. It's going up or sink.
Anyway I have some masternodes, so I get about 1-2% of Wavi masternode rewards. But no exchange means a dead coin. Everything is stable as MN are just online. Nobody can sell them, but there is no reason to stop them
If you believe that's "stable", then your finances are going to be "stable". After 3 years we can get our money back, but it does not worth the efforts to follow wavi for so long. And alternative costs are very high. So many missed alternatives, means for sure it wasn't the best choice.Anyway for me it was a test amount. Something to experiment with. I mean for me wining 200% was not a goal at all. I had that opportunity and I knew it + the risks to continue. But now I'm sorry for 1000 EUR lost, as I didn't get back my efforts.
And please stop writing nonsense. There are no more idiot investors that believe such stupid posts.
From your post history, it seems that you were once quite excited about WAVI ... and from this latest post, it appears you put 1000 EUR into buying WAVI (my apologies if I'm misreading that).
If that's the case, I can understand your frustration and loss of heart over WAVI. Hope things work out for you, either in WAVI or in another coin ... or perhaps you can find peace in another place.
Good luck.
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
What's going on with the coin? The project is alive? I've been watching the coin for a while, I liked the project. This is the problem with all coins on yescrypt - not enough buyers.
problem is, all cpu minable only coins also get run over by botnets. mining is not feasible for a person with 2-3 cpus vs botnet owners.
This isn't true for WAVI at all so far.
With my 3 CPUs I've created enough WAVI in 2 months to make 2 master nodes, and am well on my way to a 3rd.
That says nothing about the fact that cpu coins tend to be mined heavily by botnets. This coin is young and the difficulty is still low. Think about 2 years in the future: those 3 cpus you have will still be proportionately small compared to even a small botnet's hashrate.
It's probably the number 1 problem cpu-only coins face.
Well, by then my CPUs will have mined enough for 20 or so master nodes ... and then all those bots will be mining me some sweet sweet master node payouts from every block they find. Sounds good to me.
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
What's going on with the coin? The project is alive? I've been watching the coin for a while, I liked the project. This is the problem with all coins on yescrypt - not enough buyers.
problem is, all cpu minable only coins also get run over by botnets. mining is not feasible for a person with 2-3 cpus vs botnet owners.
This isn't true for WAVI at all so far.
With my 3 CPUs I've created enough WAVI in 2 months to make 2 master nodes, and am well on my way to a 3rd.
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
Can the developer try to make a listing on tradeogre exchange? If the fee is not large, we can try to collect donations for this?
I filled out an application for Wavi at tradeogre.
I'd suggest others do as well:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScolXS8WMCDG7j8dIAbmutrQR6BWD5BrOCcRKJLCFfgPTBwoQ/viewform
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
Examining the Wavi code further .... this is obviously a fork of Dash.
The same code I note above .... right down to the comments ... is in the Dash code.
The only change the Wavi developer seems to have made is to the max block reward (reduced from 500 to 50).
It curious that a coin designed to be long term CPU-only so quickly exits what is referred to as the "CPU mining era".
It would be interesting to hear from the dev regarding this design decision.
The same code I note above .... right down to the comments ... is in the Dash code.
The only change the Wavi developer seems to have made is to the max block reward (reduced from 500 to 50).
It curious that a coin designed to be long term CPU-only so quickly exits what is referred to as the "CPU mining era".
It would be interesting to hear from the dev regarding this design decision.
Re: [ANN] [CPU mining] WAVI [YescryptR32] [NO Pre-mine] [Masternode]
Here's the part of the code that governs the amount of the block reward:
CAmount GetBlockSubsidy(int nPrevBits, int nPrevHeight, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fSuperblockPartOnly)
{
double dDiff;
CAmount nSubsidyBase;
// if (nPrevHeight <= 4500 && Params().NetworkIDString() == CBaseChainParams::MAIN) {
/* a bug which caused diff to not be correctly calculated */
// dDiff = (double)0x0000ffff / (double)(nPrevBits & 0x00ffffff);
// } else {
dDiff = ConvertBitsToDouble(nPrevBits);
// }
if (nPrevHeight < 5465) {
// Early ages...
// 1111/((x+1)^2)
nSubsidyBase = (1111.0 / (pow((dDiff+1.0),2.0)));
if(nSubsidyBase > 50) nSubsidyBase = 50;
else if(nSubsidyBase < 1) nSubsidyBase = 1;
} else if (nPrevHeight < 17000 || (dDiff <= 75 && nPrevHeight < 24000)) {
// CPU mining era
// 11111/(((x+51)/6)^2)
nSubsidyBase = (11111.0 / (pow((dDiff+51.0)/6.0,2.0)));
if(nSubsidyBase > 50) nSubsidyBase = 50;
else if(nSubsidyBase < 25) nSubsidyBase = 25;
} else {
// GPU/ASIC mining era
// 2222222/(((x+2600)/9)^2)
nSubsidyBase = (2222222.0 / (pow((dDiff+2600.0)/9.0,2.0)));
if(nSubsidyBase > 25) nSubsidyBase = 25;
else if(nSubsidyBase < 5) nSubsidyBase = 5;
}
// LogPrintf("height %u diff %4.2f reward %d\n", nPrevHeight, dDiff, nSubsidyBase);
CAmount nSubsidy = nSubsidyBase * COIN;
// yearly decline of production by ~7.1% per year, projected ~18M coins max by year 2050+.
for (int i = consensusParams.nSubsidyHalvingInterval; i <= nPrevHeight; i += consensusParams.nSubsidyHalvingInterval) {
nSubsidy -= nSubsidy/14;
}
// Hard fork to reduce the block reward by 10 extra percent (allowing budget/superblocks)
CAmount nSuperblockPart = (nPrevHeight > consensusParams.nBudgetPaymentsStartBlock) ? nSubsidy/10 : 0;
return fSuperblockPartOnly ? nSuperblockPart : nSubsidy - nSuperblockPart;
}
We appear to be in what the developer labeled in comments as the "GPU/ASIC mining era".
The exact amount is governed by current difficulty level, but at the current block height it cannot be more than 25, and can go as low as 5.
Code:
CAmount GetBlockSubsidy(int nPrevBits, int nPrevHeight, const Consensus::Params& consensusParams, bool fSuperblockPartOnly)
{
double dDiff;
CAmount nSubsidyBase;
// if (nPrevHeight <= 4500 && Params().NetworkIDString() == CBaseChainParams::MAIN) {
/* a bug which caused diff to not be correctly calculated */
// dDiff = (double)0x0000ffff / (double)(nPrevBits & 0x00ffffff);
// } else {
dDiff = ConvertBitsToDouble(nPrevBits);
// }
if (nPrevHeight < 5465) {
// Early ages...
// 1111/((x+1)^2)
nSubsidyBase = (1111.0 / (pow((dDiff+1.0),2.0)));
if(nSubsidyBase > 50) nSubsidyBase = 50;
else if(nSubsidyBase < 1) nSubsidyBase = 1;
} else if (nPrevHeight < 17000 || (dDiff <= 75 && nPrevHeight < 24000)) {
// CPU mining era
// 11111/(((x+51)/6)^2)
nSubsidyBase = (11111.0 / (pow((dDiff+51.0)/6.0,2.0)));
if(nSubsidyBase > 50) nSubsidyBase = 50;
else if(nSubsidyBase < 25) nSubsidyBase = 25;
} else {
// GPU/ASIC mining era
// 2222222/(((x+2600)/9)^2)
nSubsidyBase = (2222222.0 / (pow((dDiff+2600.0)/9.0,2.0)));
if(nSubsidyBase > 25) nSubsidyBase = 25;
else if(nSubsidyBase < 5) nSubsidyBase = 5;
}
// LogPrintf("height %u diff %4.2f reward %d\n", nPrevHeight, dDiff, nSubsidyBase);
CAmount nSubsidy = nSubsidyBase * COIN;
// yearly decline of production by ~7.1% per year, projected ~18M coins max by year 2050+.
for (int i = consensusParams.nSubsidyHalvingInterval; i <= nPrevHeight; i += consensusParams.nSubsidyHalvingInterval) {
nSubsidy -= nSubsidy/14;
}
// Hard fork to reduce the block reward by 10 extra percent (allowing budget/superblocks)
CAmount nSuperblockPart = (nPrevHeight > consensusParams.nBudgetPaymentsStartBlock) ? nSubsidy/10 : 0;
return fSuperblockPartOnly ? nSuperblockPart : nSubsidy - nSuperblockPart;
}
We appear to be in what the developer labeled in comments as the "GPU/ASIC mining era".
The exact amount is governed by current difficulty level, but at the current block height it cannot be more than 25, and can go as low as 5.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
Why is official thread of Ravencoin still supporting SCAM POOL --> threeeyed.info ThreeEyed Ravencoin Pool
SCAM PROJECT THEFTS HAVE STOLEN MY COINS.
I WANT THEM BACK NOW.
SCAM PROJECT THEFTS HAVE STOLEN MY COINS.
I WANT THEM BACK NOW.
I think you need to consider that participation in a decentralized financial system may not be for you.
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
I see this as well, and have emailed contact@miningpoolhub.com about it.
Hello,
There is something wrong with ETN block rewards right now.
After Block # 172377, there was an Orphan block with some error and any subsequent blocks have no rewards being distributed. No ETN is now being distributed among miners (or atleast me) as i can't see anything credited in transactions menu anymore.
Can you please look into this?
There is something wrong with ETN block rewards right now.
After Block # 172377, there was an Orphan block with some error and any subsequent blocks have no rewards being distributed. No ETN is now being distributed among miners (or atleast me) as i can't see anything credited in transactions menu anymore.
Can you please look into this?