In addition, though, it would be nice if the "Top Miners" section could be looked at and fixed. Those numbers haven't updated for a very long time. I think without being able to have confidence in those numbers, it's hard to be confident that the other numbers in the header and stats page are accurate. For new miners considering joining and for users on the fence for leaving, I think confidence is very important.
Also, for that matter, the Forum tab points to something that doesn't exist and the Contact feature has another problem. Perhaps the forum link should just point here and the contact tab be fixed or removed.
Post
Topic
BoardPools
Re: [92 GH] MaxBTC.com Pool - Merged NMC, No Fee, DGM, LP, API, SSL, 2FA, Port 80
Seems this pool is being abandoned :/ That's too bad. I liked the way it presented all of the workers stats.
It's due to the current round, it's over 337 hours now, no payout. So people have left.
I had noticed in the last few rounds completion there is 1 big workhorse that contributes quite a bit of shares.. perhaps they are having hw problem or as u suggest have left.
Yeah, not sure what happened to our big miner but with the global hashrate where it is, it's going to be a long time before we solve a block without him. I think we'll need to add stratum support to grow the userbase/recover hashrate but at the moment, we're focused entirely on Kraken.
I agree with the stratum support. That will help.
In addition, though, it would be nice if the "Top Miners" section could be looked at and fixed. Those numbers haven't updated for a very long time. I think without being able to have confidence in those numbers, it's hard to be confident that the other numbers in the header and stats page are accurate. For new miners considering joining and for users on the fence for leaving, I think confidence is very important.