Hi, can you provide pictures that include the piece of paper with your forum name on it?

Where are you shipping from, how much do you want for it?

Good speculation but i can believe only in 400 to 1k value but in 4k value its impossible to see it this price even in past 4 years.. its impossible that the price will hit in that price this is just my own speculation..

That kind of growth just isn't realistic, though it definitely is simplistic.   Or maybe it will happen and it can be sustained and I'm totally wrong.   I would very much like that.

Any idea on ETH ??

I am trying to mix Wyckoff analysis and EW analysis but getting stuck with the same issue, are we on a re-accumulation phase (which looks like a symmetrical triangle correction) or a distribution phase (which looks like the ending diagonal wave). As an example, here below I made a chart in the hypothesis that we are witnessing the creation of a ending wave/distribution phase (but I could have made a symmetrical triangle correction as easily). Is this correct ?? what do you think ? maybe it is just to early to decide?

I just had a look now at ETH/BTC and in fact it looks like we are far from completing the next leg of both hypothetical symmetrical triangle correction or ending diagonal waves ... which make me even more confuse 

WTF, Bitcoin is programmable money and the code can be changed on a dime, if need be. You will get quick consensus on issues with higher importance.. So developers will make these changes and

people will accept these changes, if it threatens Bitcoin's survival. At this stage, it's only a big issue for Gavinista's and Big block supporters will ulterior motives.  If I had a Bitcoin for every time

Bitcoin were declared dead.. I would have been VERY rich. 

 "Hey guys, [insert circular comments somewhat pertaining to topic], blah blah blah, don't mind me I'm just here for my signature post count, blah blah blah, the end.

>throughput is still ~3tps
>core still didn't release SegWit it promised would be done the month before last
By "on a dime" you mean "In Two Weeks^TM," right?

>throughput is still ~3tps
>core still didn't release SegWit it promised would be done the month before last
By "on a dime" you mean "In Two Weeks^TM," right?

I may not understand what Nash equilibrium means, but you perhaps don't understand what money is.

It is not hard to see why little bits of shiny attractive, and rare metals might have become used as 'money', because little pieces of these metal were desirable to own, just for the sake of having them. Even in the modern era of more sophisticated forms of entertainment, I myself still enjoy owning the little bits of gold and silver that I have in my possession, and it will be kind of sad when the day comes to cash them in. But even gold and silver don't really become money, until some authority states that little metal pieces with a kings head stamped upon them, are indeed money, and that the populace better start offering up goods and services in exchange for these little pieces of metal, because the king expects taxes to be paid by every subject, using these very same coins, which his treasury has minted, and will exchange for goods and services.

Money has always required some kind of authority behind it. If that 'authority' is some Indian chief with a penchant for giant rare kinds of feathers to put in his headdress, then large fine eagle feathers are money. If some Pharoah has a hard-on for gold and silver, with which he can adourn his palace, then gold and silver is money. Money is whatever unit of exchange, a ruling authority will accept as tribute from it's subjects. In the modern day, that ultimate unit of exchange is the US Dollar. Bitcoins value, is entirely derived from it's rate of convertibility into either the USD, or any number of other fiat currencies which are ultimately backed by the US dollar. If the USD value of BTC is going up, everyone wants to be holding BTC, if it is going down, nobody wants to be holding BTC. I understand that there is value in Bitcoin in terms of the potential ease with which value (in USD) can be transferred around the world, without the need for any of the conventional banking system, and/or clearing houses, but without that convertibility into USD, Bitcoin is worthless.

Arguably, if Bitcoin grows and becomes stable enough in value, it may be passed around as a substitute for USD, and business may gladly hold any BTC they may receive (as opposed to converting it immediately to USD b4 they even recognise payment). But consider the 'Money as Debt' allegory of the goldsmith who issued claim cheques on gold stored in his vaults, only to find the towns people were making payments to each other with the claim cheques as though they were the gold itself. Under those circumstances, the goldsmith's claim cheques, were as good as gold. They were money. However, should it become known that the goldsmith's vaults are empty cos he handed it all to a foreign trader in exchange for luxurious goods, then these claim cheques become worthless. In Bitcoin's case, it won't be a lack of gold in the goldsmiths cellar, but a loss of confidence in the Fiat currencies which give Bitcoin it's value to begin with. As sick as it may sound, collapsing currencies will prove fucking great for Bitcoin, but only so long as the USD stands. Should the USD go down (and I am not that sure that it will anytime soon, but who knows), then the goldsmith's vault is truly empty, and the good townsfolk are going to have to ask themselves the question, "what really is wealth?" Could anyone expect the poultry farmer to exchange his eggs in return for some claim cheques on wealth that is no longer in the vault? Under a USD collapse scenario, is some large oil company going to deliver oil to a customer in exchange for a number of digital tokens with no tangible value, and with no powerful entity enforcing their use? No fucking way! Only chance Bitcoin has of becoming 'money' is if turns out some entity who control a sufficient volume of raw materials, production capacity, and military might, turn around and say, "ok, don't panic! We have the bread, we have the fuel, and we have the guns, and we will see you all alright, providing you pay us with these digital tokens, which we also own 90% off, and can set the value off, and decide how many Satoshi's to give your sorry arse for your hours of daily toil".....

But whilst it is all well n good reminding myself of Bitcoin's glaring limitations that all you Bitcoin Nutters don't want to acknowledge, that don't mean that Bitcoin aint gonna pump, and dump, and then pump again, to who really knows what limits. I suspect that the upper limits of this pump will ultimately be somewhere between $850-$1000. Has Bitcoin broken out it's range, is it now once again, a trending bull? For sure! But will it come back down to flush out all the weak hands and the too late to the party leveraged longs? I sure fkn hope so, otherwise the train has left the station, and I aint on it.

Any pizza shop can accept ETH easily, for example, by installing a mobile wallet for Ethereum: https://www.jaxx.io/

Looks like a triangle is shaping up before we resume the uptrend to find a C wave top of the B wave of the full correction since the $1163 high. However, if we break the ~$380 level, BTC will likely resume the downtrend straightaway.

It did.

look at the dates of those posts.

Looks like the Bearish Divergence wins this time around.

Does the steadily increasing bearish divergence on 1hr and 4hr charts not concern you?

https://www.tradingview.com/x/a8zjxHmI/

If Bitcoin is going to get to $400 on this move, then it is going to require a shit ton of retail investors stupid enough to gobble up $380+ sell walls, only to run into a barrage of selling pressure around $400 mark.

Please elaborate on (bold)

And watch them drop to $230. But at what cost? And risk? P&D is getting expensive in Bitcoinland.

At BTCWisdom is very well broken and we are still below - in fact we only touched it with a spike....

 
  
There are 7 billion pirates (sorry, I meant n pirates) who all are using silver coins with different Gods drawn on them to transact with.  Pirate #1 wants all n-pirates to adopt new and improved gold coins with no Gods drawn on them.  Luckily, he is an idealist and isn't necessarily looking for maximum profitability in this game; his only goal is to convert as many of the pirates as possible to the magical gold coin standard.  Right.... I forgot to mention that these are magic gold coins which can be instantly teleported to anyone on the planet, and no one has to know about it.  Despite the advantages though, this might be an uphill battle.  Most pirates are deeply religious and deeply value their silver with Gods drawn on it.  These new magical gold coins might be superior, but they also use witchcraft (which is untrusted and considered dangerous by many).  
  
Overnight millions of magical golden coins begin to appear in Pirate #1's lair.  This is because he is the first believer, and after all: they have to go somewhere.  The power of these coins is such that anyone who makes a statement of faith: "I believe in the power of the magical gold coin." will also be able to share in the miraculous appearance of gold coins in their lair (although the total amount that appears will slowly decrease over time to a minimum).  To compound the problem, it is possible to compete for a greater share of the magical gold coins by building ornate altars in your lair, the materials of which can only initially be bought with the holy-stamped silver (because no one accepts the magical gold as money yet).  
  
Assuming that Pirate #1 has the ability to immediately contact up to 1% of the pirates (of varying dispositions towards the witchcraft that these coins use, and who also have varying connections to eventually contact the other 99% of pirates), and his goal is to convince as many as possible to value the magical golden coins over the holy silver coins, what is his ideal strategy?  Historical precedent?