BitShares 2.0 testnet clocked 1000 tps within 3sec block time average https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,18727.msg240918.html#msg240918.

Far from 100,000 tps with 1 sec block time of theoretical possible.

Still, good enough to be used by OpenLeger by CCEDK - https://bitscan.com/articles/openledger-the-most-powerful-crypto-financial-platform-in-the-world - the most powerful crypto-financial trading platform.

Nano card is already on offer.

With no major glitches,  looks like BitShares is set to explode - the referral system integrated into the blockchain should help.

Запуск OpenLedger планируется на 13 октября когдя запускается BitShares 2.0 (graphene).

I recall the number of blocks mined before the difficulty adjustment is 500. So, have to wait less than 500 hours. Check out http://explore.siacoin.com/ to see miners come and go.

Current sia hashing rate (according to http://explore.siacoin.com/) is 1.407528 TH/s.

The highest I've seen.

Edit: Now it dropped to more familiar 642.957488 GH/s. Strange.

Sia blockchain explorer web site is back online.

 http://explore.siacoin.com/

My local blockchain is 16448 blocks.
From my experience, syncing the blockchain slows down as it gets higher. 

Failing to save local blockchain database properly should only mean your local machine/wallet has inconsistent state (for example, no transactions seen, or no  coins received).

The blockchain should be resynced (the old/corrupted blockchain databased should be removed) and the new/consistent blockchain state should reflect the changes made to your wallet/coins.

It is better to unlock your wallet only after the blockchain was synced.

Also, mind, one confirmation (one block mined) can take very long time. This would continue until the difficulty is recalculated for the current hashing power. And this should happen after some number of blocks (500 minus whatever # found so far) were mined.

Seems like some time ago, a lot of hashing power joined the network, mined a lot of coins, dumped some. The mining difficulty was raised, that hashing power left the network. The current hashing power is not enough to keep finding block every 10min. This should change when the difficulty is recalculated. That is just one unfortunate/ugly side effect of POW (proof of work) algorithm of securing the blockchain. Mining pools should scale  this problem down.

The following is relevant to linux. 'cmd' tool in windows may enable similar results.
'siac' is a file name in linux, 'stop' is the command for 'siac'. This (and similar commands) need to be run
from the directory this file resides in.

Stopping the 'siad' this way should save the blockchain database in a few minutes. Unfortunately there is no 'progress indication' of either saving the database was completed or not. The following command can be used to see if 'siad' processes terminated. No output should mean the 'siad' process stopped and the database was saved.

Disclaimer: The 'ps aux | grep siad' was not tested.

Как событие прошло?

Есть коментарии?

это результат "stress test".

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37rwph/stress_test_for_the_next_few_hours_ill_be/

This post is about BitShares:

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/

New DPOS (Delegated Proof of Stake) system of securing the blockchain - http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/DPOS
decentralized exchange - http://bitshares.org/
with market tools http://www.amazon.com/BitShares-101-Generation-Currencies-Decentralized-ebook/dp/B00QUIWHR0 - 99cents

Platform for Decentralized Autonomous Companies (as in https://letstalkbitcoin.com/bitcoin-and-the-three-laws-of-robotics/):
http://playshare.io/
http://www.bitsharesmusicfoundation.org/

Market pegged assets BitUSD, BitCNY, BitEUR, BitGOLD, BitSILVER - pegged by the Delegate feeds http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/BitShares/bitAssets

Here is "the origins of BitShares" https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=14019.0

Again https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/milestones
Also, a delegate (of DPOS) voted by the stake holders into the top 101, can withhold 100% of his/her rewards and
finance their efforts in developing and maintaining the project. As the BitShares market cap grows, the BitShares
blockchain could compete for top talents in the industry.

Market pegged assets, BitUSD, BitCNY, BitEUR etc are the easiest ways for payments adoption: no need to change pricing
habits or adjust for value fluctuation.

BitShares BTS BitUSD BitCNY BitEUR BitBTC BitGOLD BitSILVER

https://wallet.bitshares.org/

BitShares introduced

DAC (Decentralized/distributed autonomous company) and the platform for running DACs are
quite strongly associated with BitShares. https://letstalkbitcoin.com/bitcoin-and-the-three-laws-of-robotics/
Although may blockchain projects qualify as DAC, the economy of running it has influenced the BitShares system.
It is yet to gain some presence and understanding (including my own) but some DAC projects are already there
in the BitShares blockchain (like PLAY of http://playshare.io/).

DPOS (Delegated proof of stake). http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/DPOS
There are currently top 101 delegates  (voted in by stakeholders) who produce blocks.
They may choose to burn (part of) the reward for producing a block thus stopping dilution and preserving the value.
Or they may keep the reward and add value to BitShares in some other way (developing, marketing etc).
The block production under 10sec is quite handy for an inbuilt decentralized exchange.

TITAN (Transfer Invisible To Any Name) http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/TITAN
It generated a new key pair (deterministically from the owner key) for each new transaction.
Useful for some cases but complicates things in others (like having same wallet/account on two machines). 

I'm bias,

but BitShares DPOS (delegated proof of stake) economy of securing a blockchain was what determined its current design.

http://wiki.bitshares.org/index.php/DPOS_or_Delegated_Proof_of_Stake

edit:
Here's the discussion on the economy of DPOS (but the images has gone somewhere).
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5564.0

I'm not sure if that is the case, but:

If each market pegged BitAsset (BitUSD, BitCNY, BitEUR, BitGOLD, BitSILVER, BitBTC)
locks 300% of bitshares value as collateral (at the moment of creation),

isn't if fair to consider locked bitshares when talking about BitAssets?

I find this application of DPOS amazing.

Could be BitShares - BTS.

Why?

Among other reasons:

Market pegged assets: BitUSD, BitCNY, BitEURO, BitGOLD, BitSILVER, BitBTC. Avoid volatility, pay, accept familiar value assets.
Bullish with BTS? You can 'create' BitUSD and short it.

Under 10 sec confirmation time: Good start for a decentralized exchange with trading on the blockchain.

Developing efforts are closing on 1.0 client release (currently 0.6.2) which would see a
smooth user experience client and the supporting ecosystem (gateways, bridges etc).

Used their services and paid with bitcoin last year.

Positive experience. Will use Namecheap again and pay with bitcoin (or other crypto if they enable, or via shapeshift browser pluging).