What's wrong with you guys, the man asked for advice on what ICOs to invest in and people start to question his sincerity or trash-talking ICOs altogether.
That is not what the guy asked for, he asked for ICOs to invest in, not questions about how he got his money or what major coins you are currently hodling and want to see go up.

To provide some actual relevant content, I have high hopes for Quantum1Net. The guy have a real damn solid team on LinkedIn with heavy players in their respective field as well as being featured in major news outlets such as Bloomberg.
You can get on may ICO papers and podcast by paying but getting on Bloomberg Markets is not something you can buy for ETH.
I've bought some of their tokens, these guys are definitely people to keep your eyes on.
https://quantum1net.com/

Quantum1Net's a real dark horse IMO.
They have yet to even close their ICO and they have already been in major real world media like Bloomberg and Yahoo Finance. How many ICOs can boast that?
https://quantum1net.com/

Before you buy, look at the team. If the team is hidden or a bunch of unknowns with no history, avoid like the plauge.
That others has invested is no guarantee that it is a good project, there are millions of suckers out there.
Personally, I've bought Quantum1Net, their team is impressive enough to land them mentions on Bloomberg and Yahoo Finance.

You can check the website and the roadmap there.
https://quantum1net.com/#moreinfo

Hemp as an industrial material for cloth, ropes and such is already in use and has been for a long time. Mind you that you would need to smoke a blunt the size of a utility post to get high of industrial hemp.

Have you visited their Telegram? They are far more active there and they have addressed the issues you keep regurgitating over and over.

Also, why are you so bloody obsessed with Quantum1Net? You have been yapping at their heels on twitter for months and ALL your posts on this forum is in this very thread.
Are you so upset that they forced you to follow the law?

As far as I know, there are only three countries with regulations, Estonia, Switzerland and Belarus. Estonia seems to have the most success of these three so I suspect we'll see regulations modeled to look like theirs.

I hope that the community pulls itself together to impose some self regulation. Given the antipathy governments and banks show towards blockchain, they will certainly use regulations to curb it as much as possible. 

The best solution would be some kind of industry organisation, a foundation by of the different blockchain teams, large and successful ICO companies and academics from the universities.
Government regulation is often ham-fisted in execution and biased by ideological beliefs as well as different between countries when the blochchain technology is global and decentralized.
If the blockchain world could organize some kind effort to sanitize itself it would be for the best.

Blockchains, cryptocurrency and weed, this start up will cause some governments to have a collective aneurysm 
I like!

This case makes me wish that Tarring and Feathering is brought back as a punishment.
I really hope the judge throws the book at the lot of them

I saw you mention that in your Telegram, it gives me absolute confidence that this will succeed.
Very bullish project this.  

Do you even have the slightest idea on how an ICO actually works? That last part about the bounty program leads me to believe that you don't. Bounties are paid in TOKENS, not fiat. It is beyond me how someone with a PhD can be so misinformed and bad at checking up facts.

I agree, this product has something more than just cryptos. The tangibility and ability to reach a really wide market makes me believe this will go gar and get big.

A project I'm involved with has acquired UAHPAYs services. UAHPAY has been most helpful in our dealings with him. His approach is professional and his lists are of a good quality 

Yep, it's good to be in on this rocket early. When the FOMO sets in, I'll be set 

With cannabis actually being legalized in places and a definite cultural shift towards allowing it, this project is really interesting.
I'll be watching this closely   

Says the guy who decided it was more important to cry  for attention on Twitter than to try to actually get to the bottom of things. Do we need to remind you that you rejected a legit NDA, broke the law by calling them all kinds of nasty stuff on twitter and now milk your precious C&D for all its moneys worth rather than actually trying to do something constructive?

Have you checked the linkedin of the team? The CEO has 20 years of successful computer network business behind him, the CTO has years of work as principal scientist in a quantum research project, their security lead is the founder of a large IT security company and the founder of one of the largest IT security conferences in Sweden.
These are guys who know how to deliver.

They have a linkedin, you can check the members there.
https://www.linkedin.com/company/quantum1net

You actually called me out on your twitter and made fun of me in a most childish way. Shouldn't an actual PhD have a bit more dignity and professionalism?
Besides, Quantum1Net appears to have responded to you, your allegations that they refused to comment on your claims are false. How can you claim that their idea is fraudulent if you refuse to even look at their work?