http://i.imgur.com/buFzEaW.png

Friday, January 27, 2017 4:28 AM UTC
Lisk, the decentralized blockchain application platform, has collaborated with Berlin-based blockchain consultancy, lightcurve GmbH, which will be contracted by the Lisk Foundation to support the development and promotion of the platform while also assisting with the management of the Lisk community.

The announcement follows the registration of the Lisk Foundation, a Swiss Stiftung, or not-for-profit, which took place in December 2016. According to the official release, the Lisk Foundation currently controls over $10,000,000 USD in cryptocurrency with their funds open to public inspection.

“Today, we are proud to announce our collaboration with lightcurve GmbH, an enterprise fully committed to serving the needs of the Lisk Foundation and the project overall. The lightcurve GmbH will support the Lisk Foundation in the development and promotion of the Lisk project,” said Max Kordek, President of the Lisk Foundation.....

http://www.econotimes.com/Lisk-collaborates-with-blockchain-consultancy-lightcurve-GmbH-for-platform-development-510116

I understand what you are saying, and I agree with that other poster actually says.  He's not saying that Shadow ever integrated Tor or I2P in their code or had any plans to, but rather that Eclipse Crypto took the Shadow source code and properly (as far as I can tell) implemented ring signatures and also implemented TOR.

He even points out the fact (by pointing out the relevant functions that are used in the source code) that XSPEC implements the same algorithm that Eclipse Crypto did for generating a Key Image, and it appears this algorithm was also subsequently used by XSPEC.  

All of this was done more than 10 months before XSPEC.

As such, you can't make the claim that you are the first.

If you would read and follow the links (bitcointalk thread which points to github) that were provided to you, you'd see that to be the case ...

Easy enough to dig through the details if you want.  

Instead, you re-assert the exact same statements that Y_0 is claiming not to be true; he even provides enough of the details for you to look into it yourself.  In fact, if you read that Eclipse Crypto thread that is linked, you'll see that the Eclipse Crypto account refers to Y_0 as one of their devs.  Why he made that post in this XSPEC thread that didn't indicate he is one of the Eclipse Crypto devs that is beyond me.  Modesty or maybe he didn't want to derail the conversation, except to simply point out the true historical events for people who are capable of doing some (basic) research (especially when it doesn't take too long).

Regardless, repeating a claim over and over again doesn't make it any more valid particularly when it's proven to be the case otherwise.

ARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!                     Madness !!