Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 201 results by glorg44
Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot
While it is evident that display of BET/RETURN columns causes no error in balance calculations but yes this is not a conventional dice implementation which causes confusion to new users who come from a different dice site. Let me explain how it works:
And DD is not a conventional dice program?
Did some cunt
ask about features?- Avatars? I can pick from gallery, or facebook or use my gravatar
- Excellent chatting. Its like social media totally, like playing dice on Facebook
- Online list and an awesome one at that
- Meteror Shower
- Jackpot
- Ability to see actual stats of any ACCOUNT = transparency international! Something that every other dice site try to hide on purpose
- Friends List
- Proper Downlines List (never seen this proper on any other dice site)
- Complete transaction history! each and every record for: deposits / withdrawals / faucet / tips sent / tips received / and over all ledger book. Like never seen before on any other dice site!
- Milestones and levels
- Separate statistics site
- and top of all DD is not a shitty darky dicey crap like almost all others except PD and DD.
Edited:
I forgot to mention I love that TIC TAC TOE game on lock screen
Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot
Did you forget to mention "Caestro", "Yaestro", "Maestro" and several other "Cunt-estro" players on dean's lovely site. They are all dean's bots (Goddarrnint man, can't you even think of new names?) And yes all of these bots of his are playing dust money, what is the fucking point there when he doesn't even offer Faucet??? We love faussy at PD and at DD. We spit on dean's crap for casino.
Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot
You are not number 1 in features, you copied everything from all other sites and there isn't anything new on your site except problems like not showing players that they can actually be paid if they win, admitting that you will not pay if they win too much and exposing investors to greater risk than they were made aware of.
As for number of rolls, you are kidding right? That's how you determine growth?
The only stat that matters in determining a successful gambling site is amount wagered. You can check the leading dice sites here http://dicesites.com/
The expected profit on your 400 million satoshi bets is less than you pay out in faucet. That's your measure of success?
I don't like it either when you people play with innocent sentiments of this sweet little dean and his site
Dounn ya wahrry little
Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Well this thread is full of cunts OP being a total cunt lying about things just trying to recover losses, QuickSeller, bodgy and more of this "dirty dozen" being total cunts and throwing scam accusations here and there and finally a legendary "cunt" who has no idea that he is talking in a scam accusation thread where defendants reserve right to defend their name. 
OP being a total cunt lying about things just trying to recover losses, QuickSeller, bodgy and more of this "dirty dozen" being total cunts and throwing scam accusations here and there and finally a legendary "cunt" who has no idea that he is talking in a scam accusation thread where defendants reserve right to defend their name. Now angry ex-employee cunts
they should name this "cunt-thread" Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Not quite so funny bodgey mate. We are a startup company And had a total of two clients (one of which was involved in a car accident) We are currently on the lookout now for legitimate clients though. As I said I will keep this account active should I need to publicly broach the subject of our leaving DaDice
If you have a problem you could always create a thread of your own
I can smell some fun coming ahead Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
We also made it very clear, if any investor considers he is not aware of risks mentioned, we can divest him to the point before that specific roll. If this is not fair, then what is? And yes, with only exception of leen because of her not acting in good faith and associating lies with us.
What the hell is this supposed to mean? Leen made a valid point about her lost and about you are missleading information there. Leen supposed to be able to withdraw his btc , if you dont let him to withdraw it then you are a scammer. This will make your business goes down immediately
I think leen already withdrew 6 BTC and was paid even after this. And misleading information was removed from site long ago... wasn't this already made clear by dadice_dev. Why do you fail to read their end of story?
Oh right... yet another cunt!
Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Well this thread is full of cunts OP being a total cunt lying about things just trying to recover losses, QuickSeller, bodgy and more of this "dirty dozen" being total cunts and throwing scam accusations here and there and finally a legendary "cunt" who has no idea that he is talking in a scam accusation thread where defendants reserve right to defend their name.
OP being a total cunt lying about things just trying to recover losses, QuickSeller, bodgy and more of this "dirty dozen" being total cunts and throwing scam accusations here and there and finally a legendary "cunt" who has no idea that he is talking in a scam accusation thread where defendants reserve right to defend their name. Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
this whole dadice thing is pretty weird, no matter from which perspective you're looking at it, it's a fail. but for some reason the operators refuse to let it die already.
they failed as a scam, since no real whale or big investor will choose their site.
and they also failed as a "legit" business, since their reputation is burned and they're not making any profit while wasting money on their marketing.
so, what is this thing?
they failed as a scam, since no real whale or big investor will choose their site.
and they also failed as a "legit" business, since their reputation is burned and they're not making any profit while wasting money on their marketing.
so, what is this thing?
This could be your own personal opinion. I don't understand from which angle you're looking at it, I may recommend an eye sight checkup
OP clearly lied about being censored, lied about not knowing max. payouts, lied about their skype conversation, in fact manipulated it as said in post by dev. will dooglus leave negative trust to leen93 for lying to him?
as he used false information fed by leen to ask if "we will not pay" statement is official policy of Da Dice. Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Do they not teach math in your country. If you use 1% of bankroll as max bet you get an exponential decay in bankroll that never reaches 0.
To teach you this its easier in a chart form. The bankroll is on the Y-axis and the winning bets in a row is on the X-axis. You can see that it never reaches 0, although it does reach close enough to 0 at some point.
This means you can always payout the full winnings of the user regardless how lucky they are, the worst case scenario is that the user cashes out the entire bankroll and you have nothing left. You will always be able to pay what is owed if you use this method.
To teach you this its easier in a chart form. The bankroll is on the Y-axis and the winning bets in a row is on the X-axis. You can see that it never reaches 0, although it does reach close enough to 0 at some point.
This means you can always payout the full winnings of the user regardless how lucky they are, the worst case scenario is that the user cashes out the entire bankroll and you have nothing left. You will always be able to pay what is owed if you use this method.
The reason is "commercial" not "technical". We have started with 20 BTC max. payout for a "reason", and commercially we are doing good. This issue has been discussed before:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg11441671#msg11441671 so there is no need for us to answer it again and repeat same things over and over again.
as admitted, the manual was taken from dean's site but links were later link was removed from our interface.
Actually, as a player wins more, your Kelly goes up exponentially until there is no money left to pay out the player.
Isn't what dadice said that kelly is fine, manual was wrong and accordance to PRC? where did you get link to it I also don't see it on site. And PRC admin made post here that it was word to word copy something but I dont know why he deleted that post.
Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Do they not teach math in your country. If you use 1% of bankroll as max bet you get an exponential decay in bankroll that never reaches 0.
To teach you this its easier in a chart form. The bankroll is on the Y-axis and the winning bets in a row is on the X-axis. You can see that it never reaches 0, although it does reach close enough to 0 at some point.
This means you can always payout the full winnings of the user regardless how lucky they are, the worst case scenario is that the user cashes out the entire bankroll and you have nothing left. You will always be able to pay what is owed if you use this method.
To teach you this its easier in a chart form. The bankroll is on the Y-axis and the winning bets in a row is on the X-axis. You can see that it never reaches 0, although it does reach close enough to 0 at some point.
This means you can always payout the full winnings of the user regardless how lucky they are, the worst case scenario is that the user cashes out the entire bankroll and you have nothing left. You will always be able to pay what is owed if you use this method.
The reason is "commercial" not "technical". We have started with 20 BTC max. payout for a "reason", and commercially we are doing good. This issue has been discussed before:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg11441671#msg11441671 so there is no need for us to answer it again and repeat same things over and over again.
as admitted, the manual was taken from dean's site but links were later link was removed from our interface.
Isn't 10 kelly actually 10 times of your investment? how much did you invest? If you invest 5, you were contributing and risking 50 BTC to bankroll. am I wrong?
Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Well its clear now that page was taken from PRC but you knew it about all already. You only cry because you lose, you didn't cry when you win. Hahahah not bad for a kid who just lost his pocket money.
but you knew it about all already. You only cry because you lose, you didn't cry when you win. Hahahah not bad for a kid who just lost his pocket money.Re: DADICE : exposing investors to more risk than their kelly, misleading informatio
Now since @dadice_dev has introduced working relations of leen93 with dadice, as well as exposed her lies she made number of times (no need to mention her constant rude attitude towards everyone).
First things first, we do not believe in censorship and that is why our thread is not self-moderated. We welcome criticism with open heart and justify the situations, where we are right and correct ourselves where we are wrong. If today we are not accepting public investments, is only because of this community and we consider ourselves as part of this community as well.
We did NOT mute leen93 in our chat, although it came to our attention this morning that after we have left, she created a scene in the chat (which is not new) and one of mods muted her for SPAM reasons. It is also to be noted that she created this thread right after the Skype conversation, and she had full knowledge that we are going offline for the night. She wanted to divest her investments and withdraw 6.19 BTC, those transactions require manual approval, so we also completed her transaction, told her that we are going to bed for the night and we can discuss anything with her in morning.
Since she had already created the thread here, and knew that staff will no longer be available in chat to answer her, she had no reason to make scene of any sort in chat, that is the reason she got muted.
In this justification, I want to put these facts in glance: (1) We never changed a single thing in our investments program and game play experience which could cause what people here referring to as "bug". (2) The maximum payout at dadice has always been 20 BTC from the very first day. Dooglus himself acknowledged this and even made his fair criticism on it:
Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg11441671#msg11441671
We believe there is no bug in this system, instead the entire issue is combination of a bit peculiar and bit silly. Kelly criterion calculations are accurate and I welcome dooglus to invest in our private bankroll and make all the tests he might want to confirm this. But again, the max. payout is and was a well known fact. I would like to ask leen how she came by that link? We removed the link after rightful objection by dean that one of our freelance writers copied major part of it from dean's site. (Well, dooglus also claims dean copied stuff from his site) but since it was wrong, we had removed the link from our interface. And link is NOT visible to both public and private investors.
Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg11364583#msg11364583
The purpose of the manual was to make people understand how Kelly system really works, in simpler terms, if you place 1 BTC investment on 10x Kelly, Your investments will increase site's bankroll by 10 BTC. Which means you are risking 10 times of what you could have been risking on Kelly 1 but you also gain profit accordingly.
So the manual's main purpose was to help people understand how Kelly system work. The effective max. payout at dadice is and has always been 20 BTC as mentioned in our FAQ (which is credible resource since its still linked in interface).
We have now removed the manual link for the time being, until we find another writer who can get this job done. Rest assured, leen knew everything about this system and was beneficiary of this as well. So we totally and utterly reject this accusation from her and deny any incentive. I would also like to request leen to make voluntary request to our support to have her account permanently closed down.
We have rewarded bug incentives to many users, we have had very severe issues (who hadn't?), but we feel its in our own interest to be part of this community and we respect every user on BitcoinTalk. So I would like to welcome dooglus to check the investments system, give me his username on dadice and I will have this option enabled for him. The entire accusation is based on a misleading manual which is not even linked on our interface, I wonder how did leen came by of that link. Perhaps some user gave her the link, but we have now removed that document for time being.
If any of our investors want to leave dadice, they are welcome to post here and we will divest their investment to the value it was prior to mentioned particular roll. With exception of leen alone because of many reasons, one of which is, again, she is not acting in good faith and was aware of max. payouts since the start (she made her first investment on 26-Mar-2015) and knew how our investment program works, and was one of beneficiaries of it as well.
I believe we have answered all relevant questions in this and our previous posts. We will no longer discuss cold storage, max. payout and other issues which have been buried already.
Thank you for your interest in dadice!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterionFirst things first, we do not believe in censorship and that is why our thread is not self-moderated. We welcome criticism with open heart and justify the situations, where we are right and correct ourselves where we are wrong. If today we are not accepting public investments, is only because of this community and we consider ourselves as part of this community as well.
We did NOT mute leen93 in our chat, although it came to our attention this morning that after we have left, she created a scene in the chat (which is not new) and one of mods muted her for SPAM reasons. It is also to be noted that she created this thread right after the Skype conversation, and she had full knowledge that we are going offline for the night. She wanted to divest her investments and withdraw 6.19 BTC, those transactions require manual approval, so we also completed her transaction, told her that we are going to bed for the night and we can discuss anything with her in morning.
Since she had already created the thread here, and knew that staff will no longer be available in chat to answer her, she had no reason to make scene of any sort in chat, that is the reason she got muted.
In this justification, I want to put these facts in glance: (1) We never changed a single thing in our investments program and game play experience which could cause what people here referring to as "bug". (2) The maximum payout at dadice has always been 20 BTC from the very first day. Dooglus himself acknowledged this and even made his fair criticism on it:
Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg11441671#msg11441671
We believe there is no bug in this system, instead the entire issue is combination of a bit peculiar and bit silly. Kelly criterion calculations are accurate and I welcome dooglus to invest in our private bankroll and make all the tests he might want to confirm this. But again, the max. payout is and was a well known fact. I would like to ask leen how she came by that link? We removed the link after rightful objection by dean that one of our freelance writers copied major part of it from dean's site. (Well, dooglus also claims dean copied stuff from his site) but since it was wrong, we had removed the link from our interface. And link is NOT visible to both public and private investors.
Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg11364583#msg11364583
The purpose of the manual was to make people understand how Kelly system really works, in simpler terms, if you place 1 BTC investment on 10x Kelly, Your investments will increase site's bankroll by 10 BTC. Which means you are risking 10 times of what you could have been risking on Kelly 1 but you also gain profit accordingly.
So the manual's main purpose was to help people understand how Kelly system work. The effective max. payout at dadice is and has always been 20 BTC as mentioned in our FAQ (which is credible resource since its still linked in interface).
We have now removed the manual link for the time being, until we find another writer who can get this job done. Rest assured, leen knew everything about this system and was beneficiary of this as well. So we totally and utterly reject this accusation from her and deny any incentive. I would also like to request leen to make voluntary request to our support to have her account permanently closed down.
We have rewarded bug incentives to many users, we have had very severe issues (who hadn't?), but we feel its in our own interest to be part of this community and we respect every user on BitcoinTalk. So I would like to welcome dooglus to check the investments system, give me his username on dadice and I will have this option enabled for him. The entire accusation is based on a misleading manual which is not even linked on our interface, I wonder how did leen came by of that link. Perhaps some user gave her the link, but we have now removed that document for time being.
If any of our investors want to leave dadice, they are welcome to post here and we will divest their investment to the value it was prior to mentioned particular roll. With exception of leen alone because of many reasons, one of which is, again, she is not acting in good faith and was aware of max. payouts since the start (she made her first investment on 26-Mar-2015) and knew how our investment program works, and was one of beneficiaries of it as well.
I believe we have answered all relevant questions in this and our previous posts. We will no longer discuss cold storage, max. payout and other issues which have been buried already.
Thank you for your interest in dadice!
please inform yourself a little bit with the kelly criterion. Even wikipedia is fine
LOL. looks like you got BURNT
You should be proving they have bug in system but they proved you're a liar well this was fun.edit:
I saw post from PRC admin, why he deleted that?
Re: Primedice.com | Most Popular & Trusted Bitcoin Game | Huge Community | Free BTC
Hi. Two questions:
1) Is there any leveling requirements table?
2) What are the rules of using faucet? I mean, how often are you allowed to claim (times/24h)? I really like this feature, but definitely don't want to be accused of exploit etc.
1) Is there any leveling requirements table?
2) What are the rules of using faucet? I mean, how often are you allowed to claim (times/24h)? I really like this feature, but definitely don't want to be accused of exploit etc.
You faucet will increase after 1 BTC wagered. I don't think there is any table for that. And faucet is to test sites not claim all day long, You should risk your own money if you want to gamble and claim winnings.
Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot
It is quite amusing how conveniently they manage to resurrect all these buried topics. I don't think if cold storage and solvency is a sore point for dadice any longer since the investment option is only available privately.
Kudos to Da Dice for managing everything so beautifully!
Kudos to Da Dice for managing everything so beautifully!
gambling can never fix your life but can wreck it 
also can have no effect play wisely if you are addicted
also can have no effect play wisely if you are addicted Gambling is fixing someones life's; just look casino's owners
if they had the money to open a casino in the first place, I dont think their life needed any fixing in the first place
hhahah... well said buddy!
Re: Hufflepuff Making 2k BTC On PrimeDice Nov 2014. March 2015 Update: He Cheated
MICRO get this number from the wagered amount x 1 % house edge because there is no data about PrimeDice's profit since it is privately funded. Currently PrimeDice has 1M BTC wagered so roughly that is around 10k BTC in profit . 50k BTC is 5 % of the wagered amount which is quite impossible I'd say even for PrimeDice
for references http://dicesites.com/primedice
for references http://dicesites.com/primedice
Is that 1M btc wagered stats for PD 3 only or is it for the whole time since PD started operation in 2013?
I am pretty sure its the overall accumulated amount.
Re: Primedice.com | Most Popular & Trusted Bitcoin Game | Huge Community | Free BTC
you say its pretty common to have 20 rolls rolling above 49.50 on a 100 provability chance?
Indeed it is, this is not the first time someone posted here about 20 + loss streak and as a matter of fact alot of people has posted the same things over and over again so for me it is pretty common here ( you can check few posts back ). There is nothing wrong with it and you are just not "lucky" with your rolls . You will need to learn about provably fair ( I gave you the link above ) and you can always check wether your rolls are rigged or not . Simply follow the steps on the website to verify your rolls
Here another link for you http://dicesites.com/tools and from the sites you can check that the probability to get 20x loss streak is about 0.00011637% . The number is close to zero but it is not impossible so with that being said, conclusion is that you are unlucky to have 20 + loss streak
I have had 25 or 26 reds streak on 2x at primedice. Its a bit rare but sadly happens
Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot
Why dadice does not run on my chrome. The errors message says mismatch. I run it on firefox but is very slow compared to primedice and coinichiwa.
I just check it and I have no problem on Chrome.
Are you using the latest version of Chrome, and where do you see that error message?
I'm using the latest chrome but I'm using windows xp. The site won't load on chrome.
You could try to delete cache and cookies to see if it helps.
I am not using XP so I can't check your problem. But I would be very surprised to see Chrome not working well on XP, since Chrome promised to keep providing support to XP users to the end of this year.
I faced no difficulty accessing Da Dice using chrome, although I am not using XP. people still use XP?
Gambling destroyed my life.I lost control over how much time and money I used to spend gambling.When I was in the nascent stage of being a gamster I had mixed feeling about it.Thats why I never stopped!
I took loans so that I can never stip rolling. I still have to repay a loan worth 5 BTC!
I took loans so that I can never stip rolling. I still have to repay a loan worth 5 BTC!
Well in this case you should find some resource to get hold of this.
get some help buddy!In my very honest opinion, gambling neither fixes your life nor wrecks it... as far as its taken lightly, and solely for fun. I know some people who try make a living out of it???