Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 90 results by gnipnuhz
Just imagine selling your $259,900 house for 43BTC and 2 Months in street.
and after just 2 months sell 43BTC for $498198.
Again buying the previous also you will be in profit of $472298.
would you try this technique.
and after just 2 months sell 43BTC for $498198.
Again buying the previous also you will be in profit of $472298.
would you try this technique.
always bad to put eggs in one basket
Hey guys, I've decided to ask you - what whould you do in this problemmatic situation?
Suppose you have some bitcoins (let's say 22) and you bought them / got them a few years ago very cheap, and now you see it's price and.... what to do?!! Will you take the profit and go away, or sit and hold further? Suppose you're not going to buy more. But when to sell?
Suppose you have some bitcoins (let's say 22) and you bought them / got them a few years ago very cheap, and now you see it's price and.... what to do?!! Will you take the profit and go away, or sit and hold further? Suppose you're not going to buy more. But when to sell?
i suppose u already cashed our your initial investment. now i suggest u to keep 1/3, transfer 1/3 into eth, and do whatever u want with the remaining 1/3.
John McAfee在接受访问的时候说，比特币不是骗局，美元才是，政府和传统银行都很害怕加密货币，因为他们将取代并且改革当前的财富分配状况。他认为大型金融机构故意利用有影响力的舆论制造者，通过他们的观点来打击加密货币市场。并且还补充到，未来5年内，比特币价格将大幅上涨，随后的一年可能下跌2-3倍。。。
长线的韭菜们，别怂的，抄底就是了
长线的韭菜们，别怂的，抄底就是了
我觉得mcafee是个老顽童，说话很不负责，不能全信
比特币等的理想很丰满
但现实。。。
kyc等等都还没解决
在这种前提下说美元是骗局完全是哗众取宠
我觉得深洋葱并没有那么厉害
因为想法听上去没有什么创意
tor这个东西satoshi在09年就讨论过： https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7.msg30#msg30
洋葱只是自动连tor，可以算一个用户体验的升级
但并无任何技术突破
关于 deepsend, deepvault，我也没细看，不知道到底有什么特殊的，
现在匿名主要靠两个技术，网络层的靠tor，以及一些密码的算法
tor谁会用，而算法匿名已经被 zcash,monero等等做了很多遍了
因此我认为洋葱在想法和技术上没有突破
接下来说团队、认真、营销等等
做得好却是可以火
但这些在币圈都不是王道
以太，比特币，以及monero等等初期的时候
都是非常简单明了的想法
懂得人一听都很激动
洋葱没有给我这样的感觉
因为想法听上去没有什么创意
tor这个东西satoshi在09年就讨论过： https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7.msg30#msg30
洋葱只是自动连tor，可以算一个用户体验的升级
但并无任何技术突破
关于 deepsend, deepvault，我也没细看，不知道到底有什么特殊的，
现在匿名主要靠两个技术，网络层的靠tor，以及一些密码的算法
tor谁会用，而算法匿名已经被 zcash,monero等等做了很多遍了
因此我认为洋葱在想法和技术上没有突破
接下来说团队、认真、营销等等
做得好却是可以火
但这些在币圈都不是王道
以太，比特币，以及monero等等初期的时候
都是非常简单明了的想法
懂得人一听都很激动
洋葱没有给我这样的感觉
感觉很难玩啊
买了洋葱，然后一直跌。后来卖了就不跌了，现在比卖的价格还高
买了洋葱，然后一直跌。后来卖了就不跌了，现在比卖的价格还高
你犯了两个错误：
1. 听别人的推荐，要不你也不会买洋葱
2. 只买了一种币
看到币圈的人都很壕，少则几十倍的利润，多则几百倍都不在话下。涨了这么多被都是纸上的财富，正所谓的落袋为安，这么多的价值最后是如何变现？银行不是有超过一定的额度就会被问话吗？
其实变现不容易是ico比较热的一个原因
因为比特币量大了以后除了投ico没有任何实际用处
但是骗子说的新币是不是都是空气币呢，还是都发一些只是推广效果做得好的币而已
那当然要自己鉴别了
骗子看上的币一般来说还是有人气的
总归算多一个信息来源吧
看来真的，出了新的升级规则后确实有价值的帖子多了很多
不过我还是看不懂，笑哭
不过我还是看不懂，笑哭
lol，帖子价值高了
但发帖热情少了
深洋葱在最新一期周报里透漏，又招了一名技术牛人，待遇基本谈成，更多细节会以后公布。
大家拭目以待
哎，你咋挂着semux大家拭目以待
拥抱HUG币
晚上给简单翻译了一下：
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2512690.0
这个币就是让你挂钱包，运行节点，保持在线！ 是比特币核心代码，和流量矿石不同~~~
而且作者说项目已经获得投资，但是没有透露更多内容，主题帖也很简单~~~不知道作者具体是要干嘛，或者项目怎么发展！
刚好电脑常年不关机，挂一个玩玩，搞了500个币！
晚上给简单翻译了一下：
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2512690.0
这个币就是让你挂钱包，运行节点，保持在线！ 是比特币核心代码，和流量矿石不同~~~
而且作者说项目已经获得投资，但是没有透露更多内容，主题帖也很简单~~~不知道作者具体是要干嘛，或者项目怎么发展！
刚好电脑常年不关机，挂一个玩玩，搞了500个币！
我们这个论坛也应该发一个币
闪电网络进入公测
众所周知，区块链现在最大的问题就是拥塞，这导致交易费高昂，交易缓慢，不仅让主干币(bitcoin,eth)奇慢无比，除了作为投资和运行别的币的工具没什么别的用处，也催生了无数号称能解决这个问题的代币。闪电网络是接下来在区块链真正会发生的事，号称可以把小额转款做到非常快和便宜。（其原理和 PoS 有点像，就是说双方各抵押 0.5 BTC，然后双方就可以快速地进行 0.5 BTC 信用额度之内的转款，一旦发现作弊就没收作弊者的押金。）这个技术也没有特别牛逼，但它如果成功带来的商业应用是非常可观的，可以完全改变现在区块链的辐射范围。高频低耗小额转款技术成熟之后，区块链剑指 Visa/Mastercard 等信用机构就只是时间问题了。现在闪电网络总算进入公测，尽管还有很多不完善的地方，但是希望还是很明显的。
和币圈的很多别的事情比起来，我觉得解决流量是即本质又可行的一个点，所以也是当前区块链的最强音。
欢迎讨论。
（关于闪电网络我看的是 https://lightning.network/，应该也有中文的文档，欢迎交流～）
币圈的其他一些我觉得还比较有意思的事情：
- 怎么解决kyc和身份认证，这个问题和流量一样重要，但目前看来没有一条清晰的路，而且从技术的角度来看太凌乱
- 国际政治经济与区块链的互动，从加拿大/俄罗斯吸引挖矿，到委内瑞拉发行石油币，可以看出区块链的国际地位上升。是否会有小国一夜暴富？国际规则向来混乱而微妙。区块链尽管是一种去中心化的技术，但背后承诺的却是更加融合的国际秩序。像一张网一样把一堆心不甘情不愿的国家兜在一起，一切宏观经济的基石，从税收到贸易壁垒，都收到一定程度的动摇。不管有没有区块链，等待人类的不是人类大同就是第三次世界大战，区块链在里面起的作用令人唏嘘。回看今天各国的姿态，从故意装作没看见的，到唯恐天下不乱的，惟妙惟肖。
众所周知，区块链现在最大的问题就是拥塞，这导致交易费高昂，交易缓慢，不仅让主干币(bitcoin,eth)奇慢无比，除了作为投资和运行别的币的工具没什么别的用处，也催生了无数号称能解决这个问题的代币。闪电网络是接下来在区块链真正会发生的事，号称可以把小额转款做到非常快和便宜。（其原理和 PoS 有点像，就是说双方各抵押 0.5 BTC，然后双方就可以快速地进行 0.5 BTC 信用额度之内的转款，一旦发现作弊就没收作弊者的押金。）这个技术也没有特别牛逼，但它如果成功带来的商业应用是非常可观的，可以完全改变现在区块链的辐射范围。高频低耗小额转款技术成熟之后，区块链剑指 Visa/Mastercard 等信用机构就只是时间问题了。现在闪电网络总算进入公测，尽管还有很多不完善的地方，但是希望还是很明显的。
和币圈的很多别的事情比起来，我觉得解决流量是即本质又可行的一个点，所以也是当前区块链的最强音。
欢迎讨论。
（关于闪电网络我看的是 https://lightning.network/，应该也有中文的文档，欢迎交流～）
币圈的其他一些我觉得还比较有意思的事情：
- 怎么解决kyc和身份认证，这个问题和流量一样重要，但目前看来没有一条清晰的路，而且从技术的角度来看太凌乱
- 国际政治经济与区块链的互动，从加拿大/俄罗斯吸引挖矿，到委内瑞拉发行石油币，可以看出区块链的国际地位上升。是否会有小国一夜暴富？国际规则向来混乱而微妙。区块链尽管是一种去中心化的技术，但背后承诺的却是更加融合的国际秩序。像一张网一样把一堆心不甘情不愿的国家兜在一起，一切宏观经济的基石，从税收到贸易壁垒，都收到一定程度的动摇。不管有没有区块链，等待人类的不是人类大同就是第三次世界大战，区块链在里面起的作用令人唏嘘。回看今天各国的姿态，从故意装作没看见的，到唯恐天下不乱的，惟妙惟肖。
Possible improvement for the merit system: make it more like PageRank?
I think the current debates ultimately boils down to one thing: managing a growing and vibrant community like BTT is hard. There are now more economic incentives to level up for signature campaigns and the system allowed it to be gamed by posting shit-posts. To close this loophole the merit system was introduced, which may or may not work; the forum is waiting to see what happens next.
From my point of view, the challenge is to effectively promoting quality content / members without discouraging the "spirit of freedom". We have a good lesson to learn from the early internet which underwent the exactly phase. There were a lot of garbage content online and it was hard to find useful things. The problem was later well solved by Google's PageRank algorithm -- pretty much a decentralized "merit-system". The more merit a webpage has, the more merit it adds to those webpages it links to.
What's different between PageRank and the current merit system is that PageRank is decentralized while the current merit system is centralized. PageRank is decentralized in that there are no webpage that is considered "source of merit". Every webpage can contribute merits to its downstream links no matter how little merit it can contribute. I think this is what people are complains about. Right now if 10000 newbie members likes a post, the poster won't get merit. The poster only get merit if a senior member likes it. This might be an exaggerated example but it reveals where the system might be improved.
A natural thought is to implement something like a like or +1 system where a like from A to B's post is considered a link from A to B; a PageRank algorithm can then be ran to figure out everyone's merit. However, even if this is the case, it'd take a long time for the forum to accumulate likes to obtain meaningful results. But still I think this is the right direction and I'd love to have a like button to click when I like a post. Over time, the forum might got enough likes data to evaluate this option.
With that said, there is difference between webpage score and BTT merit/levels -- webpage score fluctuates while BTT merit/levels monotonically increase. So when we ran the PageRank algorithm, we can lower cap everyone's merit with their existing merits. I think this is still an improvement, because I only needs to focus on likes while the system figures out the merit outcome for me. I also think it is good to give all newbies a non-zero merit to start with.
Last but not least, even with PageRank there are SEO algorithms that can game the system. But that still would be much harder comparing to having no merit control at all.
Thoughts?
From my point of view, the challenge is to effectively promoting quality content / members without discouraging the "spirit of freedom". We have a good lesson to learn from the early internet which underwent the exactly phase. There were a lot of garbage content online and it was hard to find useful things. The problem was later well solved by Google's PageRank algorithm -- pretty much a decentralized "merit-system". The more merit a webpage has, the more merit it adds to those webpages it links to.
What's different between PageRank and the current merit system is that PageRank is decentralized while the current merit system is centralized. PageRank is decentralized in that there are no webpage that is considered "source of merit". Every webpage can contribute merits to its downstream links no matter how little merit it can contribute. I think this is what people are complains about. Right now if 10000 newbie members likes a post, the poster won't get merit. The poster only get merit if a senior member likes it. This might be an exaggerated example but it reveals where the system might be improved.
A natural thought is to implement something like a like or +1 system where a like from A to B's post is considered a link from A to B; a PageRank algorithm can then be ran to figure out everyone's merit. However, even if this is the case, it'd take a long time for the forum to accumulate likes to obtain meaningful results. But still I think this is the right direction and I'd love to have a like button to click when I like a post. Over time, the forum might got enough likes data to evaluate this option.
With that said, there is difference between webpage score and BTT merit/levels -- webpage score fluctuates while BTT merit/levels monotonically increase. So when we ran the PageRank algorithm, we can lower cap everyone's merit with their existing merits. I think this is still an improvement, because I only needs to focus on likes while the system figures out the merit outcome for me. I also think it is good to give all newbies a non-zero merit to start with.
Last but not least, even with PageRank there are SEO algorithms that can game the system. But that still would be much harder comparing to having no merit control at all.
Thoughts?