Search content
Sort by
Showing 16 of 16 results by goldenarmZ
Re: [ANN][MOON] Mooncoin: You know where it's headed! WE HAVE LIFTOFF!
Obviously MOON has a lot more potential to triple than their stupid BTC. That has maxed out and no one should hold on to BTC.
Thats... an interesting appraisal.
Just deleted chain data and only have the main seed in conf, just going to see what happens on sync an il post the results in case it can help
Just tried that. It syncs with the superseed to a point, then drops it and starts syncing from one the forks.
I think it needs to be hardcoded so the clients will ONLY sync from the superseed at the moment. The full network functionality can be restored later once we have a single solid chain. I don't know if that can even work... I haven't looked at the code. It's the only idea I've got though.
new version with superseed added to the code.
Remember:
70002 is not working anymore.
You must be on the 70003 protocol version.
Remember:
70002 is not working anymore.
You must be on the 70003 protocol version.
Rebuilding now, but I think I've always been on the same chain as you anyway. No issues here at all.
64920
Are you connected to the original node? 192.99.4.55:9508
./nutcoind getinfo
{
"version" : 80601,
"protocolversion" : 70003,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : some,
"blocks" : 55098,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00093260,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1388751341,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
./nutcoind getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 55098,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00093260,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 410824,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
./nutcoind getpeerinfo
[
{
"addr" : "192.99.4.55:9508",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1388753044,
"lastrecv" : 1388752811,
"bytessent" : 58361,
"bytesrecv" : 47753,
"blocksrequested" : 145,
"conntime" : 1388750305,
"version" : 70003,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 54810,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
...more peers...
]
many forking
such rofl
wow
{
"version" : 80601,
"protocolversion" : 70003,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : some,
"blocks" : 55098,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.00093260,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1388751341,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"errors" : ""
}
./nutcoind getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 55098,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00093260,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 410824,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
./nutcoind getpeerinfo
[
{
"addr" : "192.99.4.55:9508",
"services" : "00000003",
"lastsend" : 1388753044,
"lastrecv" : 1388752811,
"bytessent" : 58361,
"bytesrecv" : 47753,
"blocksrequested" : 145,
"conntime" : 1388750305,
"version" : 70003,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 54810,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
...more peers...
]
many forking
such rofl
wow
I think at this point, maybe I've just been outhashed. 
Seems like most people are on the 49xxx chain now, so I'll just leave it running and see what happens.
Seems like most people are on the 49xxx chain now, so I'll just leave it running and see what happens.
Whats your hashrate?
A pathetic 340k.
I'm at 49261 and everything seems to be orphaned now. Houston, we have a problem.
I am still pulling in blocks.
I think at this point, maybe I've just been outhashed.
Seems like most people are on the 49xxx chain now, so I'll just leave it running and see what happens.
Re: [SHS] Shares [Second Generation Crypto Currency] [Project Announcement]
This sounds great if it's real, but it's a big ask to blindly send BTC without anything to show for it.
I'm definitely interested in buying in once I can see something solid.
I'm definitely interested in buying in once I can see something solid.
Re: Lottocoin redesign - Up to 1BTC on offer or 2,000,000 LOT
To better convey what we are after, please check out the new Netcoin logo. That has pretty much all of the qualities we are after in the new Lottocoin logo.
thanks
thanks
This one?
http://jan.imghost.us/yTKO.jpg
Or the 3d one?
http://netcoin.pw/netcoin.jpg
Re: Lottocoin redesign - Up to 1BTC on offer or 2,000,000 LOT
I've been stuck in the newbie forum all day waiting to post in here! 
How about something like this? I'm happy to take suggestions for edits if required.
http://jan.imghost.us/ySiY.jpg
If chosen I'll provide high-res PNG with transparency and the photoshop PSD file for your use.
How about something like this? I'm happy to take suggestions for edits if required.
http://jan.imghost.us/ySiY.jpg
If chosen I'll provide high-res PNG with transparency and the photoshop PSD file for your use.
Can you see the picture i put above? It says "invalid picture" in my phone.
No, it doesn't show up.
I did. It ran without any problems at about 20k per card.
That probably suggests some issues with your overclocking settings imo. Try adding back things like shader number and thread concurrency but the leave the overclocking/fan/power control out for now.
I've been lurking for ages but never actually had a reason to post. 
Have you tried just running a very basic cgminer command with none of the gpu settings? It's best to eliminate all variables when testing a problem then bring them back one at a time.
I would remove all config files and just run cgminer with nothing but -o -u and -p specified. Then once you have it stable, try configuring from there.
I would remove all config files and just run cgminer with nothing but -o -u and -p specified. Then once you have it stable, try configuring from there.