And how it can affect the security of the network, in my opinion it is a little about something else. This protects the network from various network errors and forks, no?
That's right, exactly, and this in turn directly affects the security and integrity of the entire system. This

What about translations? After all, there can be an interesting article about some technology in Italian and it would be interesting for many English-speaking users, does the platform contain translations of articles?

But if we are talking about text content, in what language will it exist within the framework of this platform? Are there any restrictions?

Of course, this is true, but no one is protected from a hacker and various intruders who can hack the system and steal funds.

As far as I understand, the discussion here is all about texts, it is in this form that the content will exist on the platform. These can be articles, reviews, etc. I'm right?

Yes, I am absolutely sure that the speed of transactions and anonymity play a large role in the modern world, but you also should not forget about security.

Naturally, moderators also participate in the monetization of content and receive 5% of each article approved by them, so it is beneficial for them to be responsible in their work.

Masternodes is, in fact, a decentralized network of computers serving the PowerSwitch network. Masternodes perform important network functions and receive a portion of the rewards for the unit.

I also think that this is quite logical and correct. If a person has earned a certain reputation, then he can be considered as one who is well versed in the matter.

Here people ask what is the profit from investing in this project, I can answer that undoubtedly these are master nodes that can be profitable.

But how can I know that these people are really competent in this matter? Who will these moderators be and what is their motivation?

You are not quite right, the most significant people are the authors, the project team emphasizes this. Moderators only make their assessment of new content.

They will be reputable experts in the field to which this kontent belongs. If the content is moderated by the moderators not very well, the author will be offered the opportunity to recycle the material.

Why is it early, I would like to know the details of this, if they write about it in their white paper, I should roughly understand how this will work.