Ahh. I'm pretty sure they meant bgodl.

Sorry if this was mentioned already. I'm too lazy to check.

It seems bitcoin was the subject at the presidential briefing yesterday. Sarah Sanders sez the president (and some advisors she named) were 'monitoring' it.

@15:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzskJmAHyck

Not sure if this is before or after the bitcoin Big Bang Theory episode.

I think it would be extremely interesting to see what proudhon really values his bitcoin at.
I'll make a bid (above $0) for that 0.1 BTC ok? I won't even insist on the requirement that it goes over the ath to trigger the transaction.
$100.

I wuz gonna tell you to look it up and you'd find the ticker is actually bitconnect.
But I'd feel guilty.

BCC=BCH=ABC are the various ticker symbols and software project names for the new bcash coin.
They stupidly chose BCC even tho it was already in use (BitConnect), so everyone else changed it to BCH.
ABC was the open source project which was actually launched later as bitcoin cash (BCH) - which most people now call bcash.

Simple, innit? /s

edit: got the quotes all wrong.

Jeez you been living under a rock?
It's BCC, of course. 

A couple years ago I made a ThailandBitcoin subreddit. In the middle of a thread on bitcoin exchanges and the 'banning' of bitcoin in thailand, goat said:
"Yes I bought a Lambo with XBT but I recently sold it and bought more XBT. It was a pro XBT PR stunt that also helped me acquire more XBT"
(https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinThailand/comments/2ysqmh/exchanges/)

The thread mostly consisted of him and a thai exchange owner slinging crap at each other ... worth a read.

Dark matter by definition is stuff which does not interact (or does so extremely weakly) with normal matter (our standard model stuff) except via gravitation.
This stuff they've found is normal matter.
It's hot ferkrissakes - radiating photons. Obviously dark matter doesn't do that.

I believe this is just a report that 2 groups have found some of the normal matter that we knew was there but had not detected.

Dark matter unaffected.

Jeez. People get so fkd up these days by the political correctness.

Follow this story:
There's a thing called human dna. It gets continually randomized. Humans spread out into all kinds of ecological niches.
Some mutations are handy in some niches; others are bad (and tend to die off).
So each niche creates a cluster of certain dna strings with higher/lower probability than other niches.
These clusters can grow to be so different that speciation occurs where interbreeding no longer works.
The ones you're talking about ('races' by definition) have enough differences to be noticeable, measureable, significant depending on people's definition of race. The differences include obvious stuff like skin color (yes, it's in the dna) as well as IQ and many other differences not so obvious.

Not so hard is it?

Saying there are no races just means you have a new definition of the word 'race'.
That kind of language change marks the politically correct.

'Tis incredible to think that half a bitcoin - something we would barely have noticed a few years ago - is now like $2500usd.

100 pizzas or so!

Confirmed: https://blockchain.info/address/1EpzWUZvWc4vDt6yyWMg6shPihizzfYefs

The first confirmation happened less than a minute from the broadcast tx.
Looks like bitcoin is working as intended once again - glad we've discarded the dead weight and pushed them off to their own chain(s).

I gave a different address to you before, but i'd like to keep non-bch addresses separate, so here's a better one:
1EpzWUZvWc4vDt6yyWMg6shPihizzfYefs

Thx for your generosity holding these lotteries.

Woot!
I NEVER win lotteries - this is a nice first.

I'm up atm. Thought I'd missed out but just now we had a $50 rip.
I'm back in the race I think. Another couple like that will do it.

Go bitcoin!
We (well I) need an ath in the next 17 hours.  

I find myself suddenly interested in the minutia of this lottery. 
Is the ath on bitstamp?
Is the day measured from 0000UTC?

NOOOOOO!!!!! I need another couple days dammit.
Would be good to see us break $5k in a day tho. Lol.

I'm confused again.  

So one could use the address given + redeem script on the input side of a splitting transaction?
Does that work if there isn't even one satoshi in the address?

quoted for posterity.

Not sure how I didn't already do this, but here's my info:
name: harrymmmm
btc address: 1harryJLHBcivP4sFQjTMDPfYHXBUT7ED

please quote.

Not that I disagree, but your reply seems unrelated to my thesis.

My point was that the whole thing can be framed as in the OP. Then ethically and morally there's no reason to follow through with the agreement you've signed under duress.
Even politically (to maintain your reputation as someone who keeps his word, for example), there's a face-saving way out by pointing to the duress.

I doubt these companies saw themselves as being blackmailed, but they actually were (in an arguably extreme definition of the word). Once they point to the duress, they need not feel obliged to keep their agreement.

To their credit

I guess I could have made 'Everyone signed an agreement to that effect.' clearer.
edited OP to change 'everyone' to 'both sides'