He's obviously not a good follower of Muhammed. Muhammed would've waited until she was 9.

AIsha ftw mfs.

Is this a bitcoin address for ISIS? Looks appropriate.

1Vio1entPedophi1eProphet88228FSmd

I hope jihadists are using bitcoin. It'll make it allah funny when they realize the blockchain contains the truth about their violent pedophile "prophet" and the centuries of terror that followed in his wake.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1177520.0

https://blockchain.info/tx/8b3d8e580ecf6fbcf1b488f2f32eebdd437e3ff5691d12d2d6882fc299cee0dc

Try beheading the blockchain scumbag throwbacks.

It's another September 11. The first after the Charlie Hebdo killings in 2015. All Islamic violence has the same goal, the same goal since the battles led by Muhammed: Submission. In wake of the Charlie Hebdo killings it became clear the attack succeeded: there is an effective death penalty for criticism of Muhammed and Islam. The few voices willing to speak out have dwindled further and those remaining require an extreme level of security to prevent (or delay) becoming another victim.

Someone, however, took advantage of the censorship resistance to write some facts about Muhammed and Islam into the Bitcoin blockchain in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo killings. The truth about the violent pedophile prophet and his murderous legacy is encoded in the blockchain for all time, and will even live on in the set of unspent transactions on every full node. All Muslims using Bitcoin, and all of their appeasers, have helped to keep the message alive for almost 9 months. And there is nothing they can do to stop it. There is no one to behead. No one to throw from a building. No one to silence. No one to threaten into Submission. It will outlive them. It will outlive their barbaric faith.

https://blockchain.info/tx/8b3d8e580ecf6fbcf1b488f2f32eebdd437e3ff5691d12d2d6882fc299cee0dc

Here are the receiving addresses. Most of the amounts seem to represent dates.

1JeSuisChar1ie688369734557648Nmaet 0.00010715 BTC

Je Suis Charlie (January 7, 2015: the date the cartoonists were massacred by jihadists)

1TheoVonGogh92767858476884643GcLZ 0.00011204 BTC

Theo van Gogh (November 2, 2004: the date the filmmaker was decapitated by jihadists)

1StephaneCharbonnier26285564MCqGD 0.00010715 BTC

Stephane Charbonnier (January 7, 2015: the date the chief of Charlie Hebdo was murdered by jihadists)

1ManyMoreAndMoreToCome5645925Lcfbn 0.00012106 BTC

Many More And More To Come

1EducateYourse1fAbout1s1am4591LUXn 0.000063 BTC

Educate Yourself About Islam (630: occupation of Mecca by Muhammed and his followers, and the destruction of the pagan idols at the Kaaba)

1YouAreBeingLiedTo9389346685T6k9k 0.0001529 BTC

You Are Being Lied To (1529: Siege of Vienna by the Islamic Ottoman leader Suleiman)

1s1amDoesNotMeanPeace4469451rQu8h 0.0001683 BTC

Islam Does Not Mean Peace (1683: Battle of Vienna against the Ottoman Empire)

1s1amMeansSubmission44779957pjPdf 0.00007705 BTC
Islam Means Submission (July 7, 2005: jihadist bombings of British undergrounds and a bus)

1DoNotSubmitDoNotBe1ieveLies9MUahF 0.00031912 BTC

Do Not Submit; Do Not Believe Lies (March 19, 2012: A rabbi and his two children, along with the daughter of the school principal, are killed by a jihadi at a Jewish school
 in Toulouse, France.)

1ReadRobertSpencer8352634831132Sw 0.00031104 BTC

Read Robert Spencer (March 11, 2004: Madrid train bombings by jihadists)

1DearMus1ims87272932643664292hEwtn 0.00040814 BTC

Dear Muslims (April 8, 2014: The jihadi group Boko Haram bomb a Christian church on Easter in Nigeria.)

1NoMatterHowManyYouKi11644263YzZpu 0.0010108 BTC

No Matter How Many You Kill (October 1, 2008: A jihadi group sets off four bombs in India.)

1TheTruthAboutYour865236691yVxXXR 0.00010915 BTC

The Truth About Your (January 9, 2015: a jihadi attacks a Jewish supermarket in Paris)

1Vio1entPedophi1eProphet88228FSmd 0.0001012 BTC

Violent Pedophile Prophet (October 12, 2000: bombing of the U.S.S. Cole by jihadis)

1Wi11SomedayBeWide1yKnown636btr2s 0.00011509 BTC

Will Someday Be Widely Known (November 5, 2009: a jihadi in the U.S. Army goes on a shooting spree at Fort Hood)

1AndHistoryWi11RememberYou5717VXFf 0.00008798 BTC

And History Will Remember You (August 7, 1998: jihadis bomb U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, killing hundreds)

1TheWay1tRemembersNazis33663Sp6TQ 0.0000911 BTC

The Way It Remembers Nazis (September 11, 2001: almost 3000 innocent people are murdered by jihadi hijackers)

To the many victims of Islamic violence throughout the centuries, may you find peace.

To Open-Minded Muslim Bitcoiners: Please learn about the dangerous faith to which you belong and leave it.

To Other Muslim Bitcoiners: I hope you reflect on your active participation in this blasphemy against your prophet and do the honourable thing by cutting your own head off. And please videotape it.

Study the life of Muhammed. The Charlie Hebdo killers were following his example. No conspiracy theory is necessary to understand this.

In a separate post on a related thread today I explored what should be the fate of those who make excuses for Islam or falsely try to divert blame from Muslims.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1065500.msg11429133#msg11429133

I admire the people who have spoken out openly and honestly in spite of the danger. Those at Charlie Hebdo did, and were executed to avenge the "prophet." I hope the one surviving artist has a safe long (well-deserved) retirement, but you're right that he'll be a target the rest of his life. Ayaan Hirsi Ali has spoken out openly and honestly and she is on a hit list as well. Who is standing by her? I'm reminded of Brandeis University who "disinvited" her to speak. Don't the people at Brandeis University who made that decision deserve to be on the Hebdonymous List? Do there names deserve some kind of respect? Many others have spoken out, including Geert Wilders, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, etc. Their lives are in danger from jihadists and their names are cursed as "racist Islamophobes" by the collaborators, the traitors, the people who well deserve their names being added to the Hebdonymous List.

In a free society where people are free to speak their minds, different beliefs can be debated. False statements can be identified because they are subject to criticism. True statements are left standing (in addition to being made clearer) after being subjected to criticism. This kind of open debate is the vital lifeblood of a free society. We did not choose to live in a world in which criticizing Islam leads one huge group of people will label you a "racist Islamophobe hate speaker" and another huge group of people to kill you. But this is the society that has been forced on us. I read a news story that the British police collected the names of the people who bought the first Charlie Hebdo issue after the massacre. We are not safe.

In this environment it's not surprising that world leaders regularly tell the nothing-to-do-with-Islam lie and that Islam is a religion of peace. It's the only politically correct position to hold on Islam.

Suppose Hebdonymous were successful and that some of these liars and apologists had their name associated with anti-Islamic speech online. Then imagine your next conversation with that coworker or in-law or Facebook friend of a friend, you know the one: the Islam-is-peace and the real problem comes from those crazy Islamophobes. You could tell the son-of-a-bitch: If I ever hear you say this bullshit again, you may find your name nominated to be on the Hebdonymous List.

In an optimal world, both those who are pro-Islam and those who are anti-Islam could express their views openly. The current world in which only the pro-Islam view can be safely expressed is extremely dangerous. We are marching into a new dark ages of blasphemy laws with horrific punishments. If both sides cannot express their views openly without danger, it is preferable to me that neither side can express their views openly without danger. Those making excuses for Islam need to know: you can become the target of jihadis too -- and we'll make goddamn sure of it.

Is this dishonest? Yes, it is. That's a legitimate criticism of the strategy. But it's also dishonest when Obama goes before the U.N. and calls "Innocence of Muslims" a "slander against the prophet of Islam." That short youtube video was based on facts about the life of Muhammed, as anyone who's studied this history of Islam knows. It wasn't slander. It was true. That's why they demonized the filmmaker. The last thing people like Obama (and almost all other world leaders) want is for ordinary people to learn the truth about Islam and Muhammed. So, the Western Islamophiles are already using a dishonest strategy. In addition, Muslims lie, lie and lie about their religion. Just look at the post history of Muhammed Zakir on this forum. Now, many people on this forum have done a good job of exposing his lies, but this forum also has the advantage of a certain level of anonymity. I would not encourage anyone to point out the lies of Muslims without this protection. You'll be needlessly risking your life.

I'm open to suggestion about how to do something like Hebdonymous, but there's one thing I want to make clear:

Hebdo is not fini.

I hope to see the day that Muslims and their "multi-kulti" allies in the West will curse the attacks on Charlie Hebdo. I want it to give birth to something that hurts them far worse than a little harmless mocking of Muhammed. Muslims may have avenged their prophet for one day, but they fucked up. Big time.

Freedom of speech is currently dead. The Charlie Hebdo massacre clearly demonstrates that there is an effective death penalty for criticism of Islam. If we cannot freely discuss Islam, there is no free society. We are not living in a free society. To make things worse, many people in the "mainstream" will blame those who are killed for their deaths. They feel more comfortable insulting the dead than insulting their murderers.

I've struggled for months thinking about an appropriate strategy for counteracting this. Obviously we can't deal with the main problem (jihadists who have no concept of freedom in general or freedom of speech in particular) until we deal with their protectors. Their protectors include many people who blamed Benghazi on that youtube video, people who blame Charlie Hebdo, people who are afraid to even show the cartoons not to mention defend the cartoonists. Some examples of these people are Will Saletan, the AP reporters who blamed Pamela Geller for the attack in Texas, the news readers at networks who refuse to even show the cartoons. These cowards, these co-conspirators, these must be our real targets if we are ever to reclaim the freedom required to have a modern civilized liberal society.

A good strategy would lead to these co-conspirators having the same fear of defending jihadis as the obvious fear they have of defending freedom of speech. The problem, obviously, is that we are reasonable people. We are not going to go around randomly killing journalists, and to be very clear: I'm not advocating that.

But we should keep in mind that we do have access to a very powerful weapon: the ignorance of jihadis.

We need a movement of people willing to draw Mohammed cartoons and criticize Islam. But instead of doing it under our own names, we should have a list of "targets." These would be the people who have proven they do not value freedom of speech, those like Will Saletan (/archives/332844.php]ace.m[Suspicious link removed]/archives/332844.php) who refused to stand with the maker of the youtube video Innocence of Muslims, those who condemn Pamela Geller and Geert Wilders for what they say instead of the jihadis for trying to kill them. We should use the names of those "protectors" when we draw Muhammed, when we point out the inherent violence in Islam, in the Quran and in the life of Muhammed.

We should make our targets their targets. This would at least muddy the waters.

I propose "Hebdonymous" as the name for this movement.

It would be very important that the identities of the people actually creating the artwork or writing the prose remain hidden. The best guide I ever read for remaining anonymous on the internet was the "Jolly Roger's Security Guide for Beginners." With Tor, bittorrent, and bitcoin (or altcoins) we could strike back against those protecting Islam in a very effective manner. We would need a method of identifying and distrubting the names of those who make excuses for jihadis and a way of distributing the content we create using their names.

Comments?