Around 7% of supply is still in Cryptopia. Situation is artificially bullish for the markets at coin exchange.io assuming portion of that would be on the sell side

Devs nor anyone else didn't respond to this btc.ee case...and same time price is skyrocketing. Is the conversation about this coin somewhere else?

My case would be:
1) e-residency
2) set up company to Estonia and get bank account
3) trade my bitcoins to company b/a as EUR via mothership
4) invest and do stuff at Tallinn

Anyone any idea how much the tax would be for the sold bitcoins profits in Estonia if it's done officially via mothership as part of those footsteps I described.? Tax-free? :O

What if (my) coins are staying in Cryptopia? They support the swap? Cannot expect everyone reacting this quickly..

That's a nice return. Only very few catch the bottom, but for many investors these has been a nice ride so far. Can you count how much Market Cap multiply during that same span to recover my point of the emission?

Just have to remember there's about 215 000 new ZEC/ZCL/ZEN every month and to maintain the current prices markets have to eat quite a lot of new coins. Monthly volume is no where near in those levels it could absorb current emission so I believe there's a big hoarding going on from miners. Market cap rises fast just because of the emission. If the prices spike more from now we could see a big correlation once miners stop hoarding and cash out against fat buy support. Which sounds very crypto-like.

Good question. I am in AntShares because of that. And to Burst because of PoSpace / PoStorage. Is there some others coming, PoElapseTime I've heard as well... Makes sense to hedge against PoW & PoS systems with some amount.

There was automated maintenance going on for 15 hours (as shown in your screenshot). During maintenance price showed different in my wallet and when looking chart, I was wondering it. Then maintenance finished and market opened and there was some strange trades at first with high price. But combined volume is very small in those high trades. So it definitely doesn't reflect what total asks were up to that price in markets. Someone who had sell orders between 30k-60k can confirm their orders not filled?

For technical trading point of view it gives false signal that this is ATH and it should be fixed by BitTrex with explanation what happened. So we don't give thoughts this was orchestrated fomo by insiders or anything similar.

Anyone knows why did market cap jump from 2.7M to 3.7M on April 11 even price was stagnant according to coinmarketcap ?(http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/zclassic/). They corrected the amount in circulation or what?

This is very good question. Current difference in ZCash vs ZenCash technology is those 2 major things. What is the strategy after 23May? Time after time do same incremental changes than ZCash but with own "Zen flavour"? Or take completely different path aiming where? Is there any concrete example we can chew on what can we expect from Zen?

New site coming in 1-2 months... maybe has something to do with this.

I got this from Bittrex :
"Apr 11, 07:46 PDT

Hi,

We are looking into our options with zcl/zen but do not have any concrete decision yet. The new site is coming in a month or two.

Thank you,

Ryan @ Bittrex"

Little off topic: I originally asked why they removed "TOP 50 wallet distribution chart" section from their site as I found it extremely useful to monitor what bigger wallets were doing when trading smaller coins sometimes only listed at Bittrex. I was also worried that there had happened something and they are now in need of hiding wallet distributions. But apparently this was done ahead of new site launch which should be in following months without further explanation.

Any idea when we have answer if BitTrex is going to support fork and create automatically ZEN accounts for ZClassic holders? This would work much easier for many including me. Let's say BitTrex will do it, what are the risks then involved?

What is exactly happening in 11 days? (Followed icocountdown link and noticed Agoras countdown...)

30 BTC real volume? If I own 2.7M SYS (Sell worth of 30BTC) and want to sell those now at Polo price goes down to 0.8k sats. TOP2 balances even in Bitrrex own totally 13.5M SYS. Without real buy support and vol the real interest is not there.

The problem I'm seeing is the same as with some other smaller cryptos...there's no real buy support or vol. Price might have been getting higher over the last 4 days but once the rise stops you can expect someone dumping/cashing out and then the price is back in 1k sats..

Someone dumped possession. Someone got cheap coins.

School books taught that letting fundamental flaw get into product in early stages of development is highly costly to fix later after launch. Ethereum is having these kind of problems and backlashing now.

So I am happy to see this project having a leader who has the balls to stop the train now and halt to fix this issue when it's still low-cost. We should look a big picture indeed and be patient.

I see one with bigger stack got cold feet because turn of events with devs and decided to split. I'm fine with that.

Hats off for Doken doing all this research about Tau. Don't mind negative comments you did a heck of a job! If someone else does this much research and comes out with points I am definitely listening and giving value. Cheers!

And I agree that something isn't the best way it could be when it comes to economic/marketing aspect. But I haven't decided is it a good or bad thing for my personal slice I want to put on this project

What makes people who trade code asking Agoras in return of their services? Same applies for the other suggested markets, what obliges people to start using Agoras? They could ask, accept and take e.g. BTC, fiat or some other “app currency” instead?

Is there strong enough incentive for early adaptors and early coders to start asking compensations and stick in Agoras and what is that incentive? How sure it is that Agoras will be accepted as “the money” over tau? If not so and there’s no trading volume after IPO, price starts going down and coders easily abandon the Agoras ship…

This looks like a strong idea even though I don't understand much of the white paper details. Is Tau-Chain purely valued through this Agoras? If later someone wants to use Tau-Chain to solve some problem they buy Agoras (from market?) and pay for the usage of Tau-Chain network (how pricing the usage?). I understood inside Tau-Chain own rules can be set for that so can they make a rule to let someone use lot of computing power without charging anything? Or maybe I don't understand the logic where the value of Agoras might come..

If one Agoras is around 0.0006 and market cap is 7M USD or 30000 BTC (where to see the market cap?), then little over 50M Agoras is owned by people? And there is 147B Agoras to be shared. So 0.034% of the total amount is shared at the moment? Are my conclusion/numbers correct?