Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 51 results by hjdt4fd1
I don't know any piratcoin faucet, but you should buy the coins if you like them ...
already bought, but I want more
Apparently I made the list, although I've said the coin probably serves no purpose right now, never actually recommended the coin to anyone, and think most nation coins are silly. You have also repeatedly said I was Chinese (even though I'm not). You'll do best if you just stick with sane posts.
I agreed with you last night when you found the Bittrex thing. I don't agree that means we know who is using the fake account, but good catch finding it.
Your contributions and enthusiasm in HKC ANN thread seems contradict to what you said here.
The following is what you have said in HKC ANN thread:
Any idea with this coin will be listed on coinmarketcap?
BTW, can you think of any other places you would like to see this coin listed?
Some people are still sleeping on HKC and they need to be aware it's out there.
Poloniex would seem like the next logical step for the coin. It's still a small exchange, but not as small as Bittrex. A lot of nation coins seem to 'graduate' to there before then moving to larger exchanges.
Agreed... Scammers never admitted what they did ... HAHA
Zerocoin offers anonymity is what we need, I feel more secure.
Indeed it is safe, and there is no marketing, no hype, just a steady development.You can also avoid converting bitcoin to USD through exchanges that needs your passport (more risk) to avoid all the taxes as they'll have no way to associate that bitcoin address with you.
You're right, there is no way the IRS will bitcoin address with your link.Bitcoin will go down some more... but it will go back up and then some.
You're right, bitcoin it will go back up and then some.Re: I think I can build a more secure web wallet than any other so far.
If you really after a web wallet, then watch out myTREZOR.
It will be as easy to use as any web application with no sign-up. Your keys will be in your hand, literally, in a high security special purpose device, safe from any hacks.
http://www.bitcointrezor.com/news/2014-02-10-mytrezor-bop-bitcoin-server
Here you have its first public demo in Berlin:
http://vimeo.com/90026733
It will be as easy to use as any web application with no sign-up. Your keys will be in your hand, literally, in a high security special purpose device, safe from any hacks.
http://www.bitcointrezor.com/news/2014-02-10-mytrezor-bop-bitcoin-server
Here you have its first public demo in Berlin:
http://vimeo.com/90026733
Agreed. TREZOR and other hardware wallets are strong security made simple, they're what's needed for bitcoin to go mainstream
I am really looking forward to the Trezor (I ordered 2 last year) but I think it will not be for everyone. The retail price for this thing is yet TBA and I doubt that it will be anything below $100! Not much for total security if you are a "whale" and have lots of bitcoins in your wallet, but too much for the bitcoin starter.
So there is still room for another "middle security" wallet solution, easy to use for the average joe but still secure enough so that it is not easily hacked.
Who's got the [links]? I want to know [about] multisig [addresses].
A multi-signature address is an address that is associated with more than one ECDSA private key. The simplest type is an m-of-n address - it is associated with n private keys, and sending bitcoins from this address requires signatures from at least m keys. A multi-signature transaction is one that sends funds from a multi-signature address.
The primary use case is to greatly increase the difficulty of stealing the coins. With a 2-of-2 address, you can keep the two keys on separate machines, and then theft will require compromising both, which is very difficult - especially if the machines are as different as possible (e.g., one pc and one dedicated device, or two hosted machines with a different host and OS).
It can also be used for redundancy to protect against loss - with a 2-of-3 address, not only does theft require obtaining 2 different keys, but you can still use the coins if you forget any single key. This allows for more flexible options than just backups.
It can also be used for more advanced scenarios such as an address shared by multiple people, where a majority vote is required to use the funds.
Multi-signature transactions are often conflated with BIP 16 and 17. In fact they are not directly related. Multi-signature transactions have been supported by the protocol for a long time; but implementing them would require a special output script.
What BIP 16/17 do is offer a standard way to encapsulate a script within an address; this makes it easier to use advanced scripts, with the most prominent example being multi-signature transactions.
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/3718/what-are-multi-signature-transactionsThe primary use case is to greatly increase the difficulty of stealing the coins. With a 2-of-2 address, you can keep the two keys on separate machines, and then theft will require compromising both, which is very difficult - especially if the machines are as different as possible (e.g., one pc and one dedicated device, or two hosted machines with a different host and OS).
It can also be used for redundancy to protect against loss - with a 2-of-3 address, not only does theft require obtaining 2 different keys, but you can still use the coins if you forget any single key. This allows for more flexible options than just backups.
It can also be used for more advanced scenarios such as an address shared by multiple people, where a majority vote is required to use the funds.
Multi-signature transactions are often conflated with BIP 16 and 17. In fact they are not directly related. Multi-signature transactions have been supported by the protocol for a long time; but implementing them would require a special output script.
What BIP 16/17 do is offer a standard way to encapsulate a script within an address; this makes it easier to use advanced scripts, with the most prominent example being multi-signature transactions.