Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 09/09/2025, 22:53:30 UTC
someone please tell me how the winner can rent thousands of GPUs at once when this is out of the service provider's control, where did they rent, this is a joke
Post
Topic
BoardMarketplace
Re: Don't buy "wallet.dat" files with lost passwords; EXCHANGE THEM.
The problem with puzzles is that no one gives their opinion, proposes, or experiments with anything new. I recommend you at least try it. As Carl Sagan said: “Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known”
Don't believe the pathetic people who say things are impossible. Humans have always found ways to improve everything. Many things that seemed unbreakable 30 years ago are now obsolete.
there is no other way but to invest in hardware, so give up
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 25/07/2025, 23:03:25 UTC
We should make a list of scanned prefixes and upload them to the web daily, for example to google doc.
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Do anyone here believe the whole puzzle use the same seed ? Is there posibility that that same seed lead to some similar statistical behaviour among them ? Just asking , mybe somone deeply observe it ? 😅🙏
So they generated private keys using a simple k = k + 1 scheme.
You don't understand how key derivation in BIP32 works and your foolish assumptions that puzzle keys have any dependency from one to another is deeply flawed.
Even though key derivation in deterministic wallets is deterministic, it doesn't mean that you can calculate a sequential key solely from knowledge of its predecessor or successor (or any other key).
In a deterministic wallet all keys appear as if they're random. Period! There is no exploitable relation between individual keys. Masking them down to a certain bitlength doesn't introduce any new relation.
But you can happily continue to read tea leaves...
I dont say any direct connection or dependency between them. I mean some kind of statistical prefix frequency similiarity among huge keyspace around them maybe 😅. I just persue to look it deeper. As i scan lots of statistical bias in several prefix count / frequency in dissected private key keyspace result
Do anyone here believe the whole puzzle use the same seed ? Is there posibility that that same seed lead to some similar statistical behaviour among them ? Just asking , mybe somone deeply observe it ? 😅🙏
So they generated private keys using a simple k = k + 1 scheme.
You don't understand how key derivation in BIP32 works and your foolish assumptions that puzzle keys have any dependency from one to another is deeply flawed.
Even though key derivation in deterministic wallets is deterministic, it doesn't mean that you can calculate a sequential key solely from knowledge of its predecessor or successor (or any other key).
In a deterministic wallet all keys appear as if they're random. Period! There is no exploitable relation between individual keys. Masking them down to a certain bitlength doesn't introduce any new relation.
But you can happily continue to read tea leaves...
I dont say any direct connection or dependency between them. I mean some kind of statistical prefix frequency similiarity among huge keyspace around them maybe 😅. I just persue to look it deeper. As i scan lots of statistical bias in several prefix count / frequency in dissected private key keyspace result
Click on the link to see the photo
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Do anyone here believe the whole puzzle use the same seed ? Is there posibility that that same seed lead to some similar statistical behaviour among them ? Just asking , mybe somone deeply observe it ? 😅🙏
Why is it that every 5 puzzles from puzzle 135 onwards, one puzzle has its public key revealed, while the surrounding puzzles do not?
because there were transactions with them, whoever created the puzzle specifically revealed their public key.
everyone knows that there must be a spending transaction to reveal the public key but from question 135 onwards all the questions are difficult and reveal the public key for the puzzles where the prefix starts with 4 and ends with 7, why don't they reveal the public key for puzzles of equal difficulty
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 14/07/2025, 17:30:37 UTC
Why is it that every 5 puzzles from puzzle 135 onwards, one puzzle has its public key revealed, while the surrounding puzzles do not?
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 14/07/2025, 16:37:53 UTC
wake up and go to work pls, none of us are good enough to solve this puzzle
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 12/07/2025, 16:26:53 UTC
Honestly, I don't believe people who say they invested hundreds or thousands of GPUs to solve this puzzle and why from puzzle135 onwards, one in every 5 puzzles reveals the public key and the others don't.
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 20/06/2025, 17:52:37 UTC
give up and wait for quantum technology
Post
Topic
BoardDevelopment & Technical Discussion
Re: Solving ECDLP with Kangaroos: Part 1 + 2 + RCKangaroo
by
hoanghuy2912
on 16/06/2025, 17:21:02 UTC
Hello, I want to ask about RCKangaroo, how should I adjust the parameters to be standard for puzzle number 135 (I use 4060 mobile card, 16 gb ram but 8 gb is occupied by the operating system), thanks in advance
Post
Topic
BoardBitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
hoanghuy2912
on 15/06/2025, 17:23:42 UTC
I think we should give up because of the lack of reality.