Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 235 results by hobbymd
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Two hacks and two approaches - is Bitcoin is looking better than Ethereum?
by
hobbymd
on 08/08/2016, 15:53:37 UTC
Bitcoin  has shown  they will help exchanges steal money.
Wrong. Bitcoin is showing that it stands behind the values that it was created for.



Wrong, Bitcoin is showing that it's open for business to scammers, hackers and criminals without any worries .

Whose gonna use a tech that is a cesspool of criminals and scammers?!? easily stolen with no way of recovering ever back . Plus bitcoin is way way more centralized than other altcoins, the mining sphere in bitcoin is owned by the Chinese and in effect the block chain is owned and controlled by them as well ( top 3 Chinese pools can easily do 51% attack if they wish ) . Just because you might be running a node  that doesn't mean bitcoin network is decentralized .
Post
Topic
Board Mining speculation
Re: May 31st to June 14th diff adjustment thread with promo picks NOW OPEN!
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 16:11:55 UTC
It's my first time, picking a number so I go for +3.1 to +3.5 . 

Also there is big spike today in the network hash rate, wondering if it's just a variance or some farms just come online  Roll Eyes

okay  you get 3.01 to 3.25

that would work as well

cheerz  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 16:07:09 UTC
So go ahead and demonstrate what you have done that actually *matters* in the last ten years. Smiley

(yes - I have a post to show what I have done but I am going to wait for you to show me first as I somehow doubt you have done anything of any significance at all apart from trolling on forums)


 Grin  you see unlike some people I don't have time to keep posting to raise my status to legendary because in real life I actually don't have much free time to keep arguing about nonsense plus I've got much better stuff to do with my free time than trolling . Go thru my post history and please show me  one instance that I was trolling a thread?!?   

It seems you've come short and are relying on " I'm a troll argument" well good for you hopes that makes you happy.

I am lazy to look through your post history atm but by looking posts in *this* thread, it seems like you have some problem in reading or interpreting posts and thus it *looks like* you are trolling.


tbh I'm quite done with this thread as is going nowhere but down in mud throwing between each poster, and quite frankly I'm gonna enjoy my Sunday before the beginning of work week because if bitcoin dies tomorrow it won't affect me at all but some mega-farms are stand to loose boat load of money so they would do everything they can to skew the general opinion toward their position.

But one thing is sure if the block size increases to 8mb as the Chinese want it to be then that's no way is a consensus because theoretically they say my way or the highway

Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 15:47:02 UTC
So go ahead and demonstrate what you have done that actually *matters* in the last ten years. Smiley

(yes - I have a post to show what I have done but I am going to wait for you to show me first as I somehow doubt you have done anything of any significance at all apart from trolling on forums)


 Grin  you see unlike some people I don't have time to keep posting to raise my status to legendary because in real life I actually don't have much free time to keep arguing about nonsense plus I've got much better stuff to do with my free time than trolling . Go thru my post history and please show me  one instance that I was trolling a thread?!?    

It seems you've come short and are relying on " I'm a troll argument" well good for you hopes that makes you happy.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 15:26:54 UTC
well if you're not bitcoin enthusiastic then why the heck you spending your time here in BCT ??!!! Huh  what are your motives for being here?

Seriously - you don't know the first thing about me but presume to actually know all my motives?

So either you are some kind of "genius mind-reader" or just a "retarded bitcointalk.org poster".

Hmm.. my bet is on the latter. Cheesy




 Grin  you want to get to see who has a higher education here...  I have no problem with that I show my MD degree and you show me yours?  ok?  let's see who is more educated?  

It's not my usual standard to get low to your level or try to show off but at this instance I feel like teach you a lesson so you don't randomly challenge people's education  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Mining speculation
Re: May 31st to June 14th diff adjustment thread with promo picks NOW OPEN!
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 15:12:14 UTC
It's my first time, picking a number so I go for +3.1 to +3.5 . 

Also there is big spike today in the network hash rate, wondering if it's just a variance or some farms just come online  Roll Eyes
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 15:00:30 UTC
Bitcoin will *never* scale up to Visa or Mastercard and anyone who thinks so is really "kidding themselves".

In the world of "remittance" Bitcoin can be king but in the world of general transactions it is never going to get there.

When will you guys realise that "normal people" actually *want* reversible transactions and the safety of their banks. They are *never* going to want to lose their money to scammers who want to take advantage of irreversible payments.

It is so funny that Bitcoin fanatics just seem to forget all about "customers" (probably because most of them are scammers trying to steal their customers money).


I see you're coming from the camp of " it can't never scale up " but I want the Bitcoin somehow magically becomes main stream so I can keep profit from mining on it  Grin  good luck with that  Roll Eyes  

well if you're not bitcoin enthusiastic then why the heck you spending your time here in BCT ??!!! Huh  what are your motives for being here?
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 14:57:53 UTC
Simply they either need to relocated to somewhere else or slowly die while dragging the rest of community with them.

When they have indicated that a more modest increase in max. block size (such as the 8MB that Gavin has stated he would accept) would be acceptable then why do you keep trying to turn this "storm in a teacup" into some sort of  Others vs. China battle?

If China ends up abandoning Bitcoin then I really don't see how that would be any sort of victory for Bitcoin at all.

China is not the only country in the world with bandwidth issues so I guess next you want to get rid of any developing countries as well and after a while pretty much Bitcoin will just be USA coin. To that I say - no thanks.


No but it's one of the few countries in the world with restricted internet access (GFW) . Now name me how many other countries are in that category? 

No it won't be a USA coin, as a matter of fact everybody can access the Blockchain and send/received transactions even in China or Africa or even moon but mining of it becomes more difficult because it's not like before anymore where all you needed was cheap hardware along with cheap power equals to profit.

Lets get this straight,  being able to accessing the network is not the same as being able to mine on it. You keep bundling these two together to benefit your flawed argument.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 14:37:45 UTC



I know. The size of the blocks earlier were not big like now and still a limit was put to prevent spam and DOS attacks. In fact, number of transactions were much lesser than it is today. You think this has changed now? NO! We should not only consider about scaling[ but stability and decentralization too.

The current way of proposing by Gavin actually says about him asking miners and companies to adopt new fork which is essentially hurting decentralization.

You're contradicting yourself  Cool  , bitcoin mining as is right now is CENTRALIZED in China that is a fact that you can't ignore. Again raising block size limit won't make bitcoin inaccessible in China or Africa , it would make only MINING harder due to connection restriction, which is nobody's fault. The network has grown over past several years, you can't keep using the same old tricks and praying that everything would be fine.

Also you can't just keep setting up shacks in remote locations with cheap power and poor internet connection just because you want to mine bitcoin and dump it to profit from it. As a matter of fact those mega-farms couldn't careless about mining being centralized in a single location . All they care is ROI and profit.

It amazes me people keep defending these mega-farms and at the same time they bring up decentralization , it's oxymoron . There's saying that goes as " you can't patch stupid " it fits perfectly here.

If Bitcoin does't scale up  it would just collapse, then who cares about stability and decentralization when it's already collapsed because of not being able to scale up. Get your priority  straight .

 
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 03:34:49 UTC
I believe in the end the Chinese mega-farms are either way doomed if they can't get access to some sorta fiber optic connection or relocating their operation to somewhere else, because once we reach the transactions limit something needs to be done otherwise the whole Bitcoin will collapse

It has nothing to do with connection equipment and everything to do with the Great Chinese Firewall and a smaller increase in block size was seen as been acceptable by both the exchanges in question so it actually seems to me that an 8MB block size limit will satisfy all parties (as Gavin has already said he'd be okay with 8MB).

Cutting out the Chinese would not actually be a very good idea for something that is designed to be a world-wide revolution in person to person payments and a non-inflationary store of value.

Actually that would be a good idea since in China the government can take over the farms if they wish to without any recourse, just make bitcoin mining illegal and confiscate the hardware and perform a 51% attack on the rest of the network.  having all this hashing power centralized in china is a liability for the rest of the network.

Also without the Chinese miner, the network is still world wide and available in china only that mining is not possible because their own government policy of censorship and restriction.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 07/06/2015, 03:26:32 UTC
Adapt or die.

You do understand that >50% of the hashing rate comes from Bitcoin mining farms located in China?

If they decide to not adopt a change then put simply *no change will occur* (as they will still be creating over 50% of the blocks making any 90% consensus simply impossible to reach) so chest beating is hardly going to help here.

This is not about politics but about finding a practical solution that will let Bitcoin grow without causing a collapse in the hashing strength or confidence in the Bitcoin blockchain.


So what if they can't get access to better connection is not other people's fault, instead you expect everybody else bend over to their wishes? how long you plan on bending over and take it just for the sake of it?  Roll Eyes  plus having more than 50% of hashing power centralized in one location is not good either and is not called " hashing strength "  it's rather a weakness where the government can take over it if they wish especially in China. I see rather as liability for the network rather than strenght

Simply they either need to relocated to somewhere else or slowly die while dragging the rest of community with them.
 


Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 20:34:12 UTC
Can't believe people are still wondering if they'll get their money back. Grow some experience in forex and you'll make your asicminer losses in like a couple months, whatever the amount. rofl

Is forex trading easier than bitcoin trading? Does forex trader value technical analysis more so that resistance and support are of higher value than on bitcoin trading?

Only wondering?


TA (along with macroeconomics) is way way more reliable in FX than in bitcoin, simply because the sheer volume of orders (liquidity) in Fx comparing to bitcoin hence S/R ( support/resistance) along with pivot points are more reliable and respected.

You need couple of billions in order to be able to manipulate the prices in FX whereas in bitcoin a couple of millions would do it  Wink plus if you get caught doing it in FX there are fines/jail time whereas in bitcoin is just another day in wild west or shall i say another day in paradise   Roll Eyes
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 18:44:53 UTC

Quote
That works for me. It would be kind of cool if they refused to upgrade, the difficulty drops massively and westerners are able to mine again for a reasonable profit. lol


that would be truly awesome, also that would cause less selling pressure since small miners don't sell everything they mine unlike mega-farms. again another win win strategy  Cheesy   it seems the rest of the community is better off without the Chinese and their bickering   Cool

Please think it over again: If Chinese decided to work further on the original blockchain, let's call it bitcoin legacy, then what will they do with their coins on the new blockchain bitcoin XT? They will dump them all, that will be millions of coins dumped on western exchanges, sending bitcoin's value to single digits, maybe cents, thus the whole XT coin ecosystem will collapse. Similarly XT people will dump all their coins on the bitcoin legacy chain, causing their coins to become worthless, both coins dead



well i thought the whole point of this discussion is about Chinese miner not being able to mine bigger blocks because of their poor internet connection ( stale/orphan blocks ) hence rejecting the whole idea of increase block size because they stand to loose money to those with better internet connection.

Also dumping prices to singles digits is a guarantee death sentence for the mega-farms since they won't be able to sustain their operation cost. They stand to loose millions of dollars if that happens  Grin . Maybe the price goes into singles digits for a few months and once the mega-farms are all bankrupt we can start again but this time any Chinese mega-farm investor will think twice before setting up a shop in some remote location in china just because they have access to cheap power!!


The whole point here is the Chinese mega-farms are holding a choke point on further progress of Bitcoin/Blockchain as a whole . to them profiting/ROI  is more important than survival/Scaling  of bitcoin itself . As is now, the whole mining is centralized mainly in China, a country with restricted internet access and censorship.


I believe in the end the Chinese mega-farms are either way doomed if they can't get access to some sorta fiber optic connection or relocating their operation to somewhere else, because once we reach the transactions limit something needs to be done otherwise the whole Bitcoin will collapse
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 17:41:59 UTC

You're right. All mega farm owners are in it just for the fiat. That's not just a Chinese thing. In the Middle Ages alchemy was a study where people tried to convert base metals into gold. They wanted to figure out how to make money out of nothing. For farm operators, Bitcoin is modern day alchemy that actually works. They can take a bunch of electronic parts and manufacture money. I'm sure none of them said, "hey, I want the world to be a better place. I'm going to spend millions of dollars to mine Bitcoin to empower the people then donate all the mined Bitcoins to African relief, save the whales and feed the children." Mining farms are about profit. Profit doesn't come from holding Bitcoins. It happens when you sell them for fiat.


Exactly, this is not a China specific thing. Currently, I count 90% of the bitcoin utility is coming from speculation and long term investment, only very tiny amount of bitcoin were used as payment medium (and mostly were used in mining, drug dealing and money laundering). International remittance have the potential to grow, but that also requires bitcoiners to be extremely good on IT and have good exchanges on both end, not an easy task

Because speculation and investment is the major demand for bitcoin, it is very important not to bring in uncertainties in bitcoin, that will hurt speculators and investors' confidence and affect the demand negatively, even increase the difficulty in regulation front

that's true only if you live in China , outside of it you can actually use it now a days to buy stuff, pay bills, send money across the globe, etc etc
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 17:37:57 UTC


I'm thinking more along the lines of blocksize increase and their limited internet capability. We've been discussing Chinese farms fighting the increase. If the increase happened anyway they will be forced to take some kind of action. I do agree that it would be good for Bitcoin if they were out of the picture.

In a way the Chinese miners are hindering any further progress that could've taken place already.

They should've not set up mega-farms in a country with restricted internet to begin with but their greed of making money  didn't stop them from doing it and now the rest of community needs to suffer just because they can't access internet is their own fault and not anybody's else. I say if they can't keep up let them sink for good.

They can go on and make a Chinese version of it and trade it among themselves  and the rest of us can progress further without any limitation and a better decentralization.  it's a win win strategy  Wink


That works for me. It would be kind of cool if they refused to upgrade, the difficulty drops massively and westerners are able to mine again for a reasonable profit. lol


that would be truly awesome, also that would cause less selling pressure since small miners don't sell everything they mine unlike mega-farms. again another win win strategy  Cheesy   it seems the rest of the community is better off without the Chinese and their bickering   Cool
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 17:11:53 UTC


I'm thinking more along the lines of blocksize increase and their limited internet capability. We've been discussing Chinese farms fighting the increase. If the increase happened anyway they will be forced to take some kind of action. I do agree that it would be good for Bitcoin if they were out of the picture.

In a way the Chinese miners are hindering any further progress that could've taken place already.

They should've not set up mega-farms in a country with restricted internet to begin with but their greed of making money  didn't stop them from doing it and now the rest of community needs to suffer just because they can't access internet is their own fault and not anybody's else. I say if they can't keep up let them sink for good.

They can go on and make a Chinese version of it and trade it among themselves  and the rest of us can progress further without any limitation and a better decentralization.  it's a win win strategy  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 15:34:05 UTC
It doesn't matter if the china exchanges are against it or some other entitiy. it's all about nodes. if the people follow the fork, chinese exchanges have to follow.

What you don't get is that the major Chinese exchanges are very tightly tied to major Chinese mining operations and those nodes *matter* (as the majority or at least close to it of all Bitcoin hashpower is in China).



but but but majority of Chinese exchanges have fake volume, with organized pump and dump  Grin   . It's beyond me to understand how people can trust any of these " major"  Grin  Chinese exchanges .  All it takes for them to crumble/disappear overnight with your bitcoin  is a little bit of government crack down........  aaaaannnnnnnd its gone  Roll Eyes   then you would see people start crying and complaining about their stolen coins  Cheesy  
 
IMO all these " major" Chinese exchanges are operating in grey area of law in China hence very susceptible to shutdown at any moment law changes or a ban comes to effect

As for Chinese mega-farms miner, they're simply greedy and are init to purely profit from it by dumping their mined coins every day. All they're are after is fiat money, they don't really give a fuck about bitcoin since it has ZERO utility in China.  

Plus majority of mega-farm are located in very remote locations so obviously getting a proper internet connection would really hurt their profit margin hence if they could have their way, they would never want to upgrade at all. It's like asking a kid to give up it's candy voluntarily  Grin

You're right. All mega farm owners are in it just for the fiat. That's not just a Chinese thing. In the Middle Ages alchemy was a study where people tried to convert base metals into gold. They wanted to figure out how to make money out of nothing. For farm operators, Bitcoin is modern day alchemy that actually works. They can take a bunch of electronic parts and manufacture money. I'm sure none of them said, "hey, I want the world to be a better place. I'm going to spend millions of dollars to mine Bitcoin to empower the people then donate all the mined Bitcoins to African relief, save the whales and feed the children." Mining farms are about profit. Profit doesn't come from holding Bitcoins. It happens when you sell them for fiat.

If the Chinese think about it long enough, they might decide to separate their Bitcoin from the rest of the world and mine their own version. They have most of the economy right now anyway and could increase their profit by excluding all of the other miners around the world. The Bitcoin hashrate would immediately drop by +50%.


that's equal to shooting yourself in the foot. Lets say hypothetical they go for it, what they gonna use the Chinese version of bitcoin for (they already had QQ coin)? passing hot potato from one hand to another  Roll Eyes do more speculation?!?!  while the rest of the world uses the real bitcoin Grin with better features and increased transaction per seconds.

 As is stand today, bitcoin has no utility in China, expect for dumping and taking profit ( there is no real economy at all, it's all speculative) if they cut themselves from the rest of the world , then they have severely limited their market . Heck there might not be enough buyers alone in China to absorb the dumping from mega-farms  Grin hence price sinks and subsequently the mega-farms need to close down if they can't meet their operation cost. It would be their demise .

Also it might be better for the Blockchain as a whole since having majority of hashing power centralized in China is not a good thing at all. What if tomorrow their government starts to crack down on mega-farms?  i think that would actually be good for bitcoin since it would result in spread of hashrate  and take out their majority.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: chinese exchanges reject 20mb block size increase
by
hobbymd
on 06/06/2015, 14:03:25 UTC
It doesn't matter if the china exchanges are against it or some other entitiy. it's all about nodes. if the people follow the fork, chinese exchanges have to follow.

What you don't get is that the major Chinese exchanges are very tightly tied to major Chinese mining operations and those nodes *matter* (as the majority or at least close to it of all Bitcoin hashpower is in China).



but but but majority of Chinese exchanges have fake volume, with organized pump and dump  Grin   . It's beyond me to understand how people can trust any of these " major"  Grin  Chinese exchanges .  All it takes for them to crumble/disappear overnight with your bitcoin  is a little bit of government crack down........  aaaaannnnnnnd its gone  Roll Eyes   then you would see people start crying and complaining about their stolen coins  Cheesy  
 
IMO all these " major" Chinese exchanges are operating in grey area of law in China hence very susceptible to shutdown at any moment law changes or a ban comes to effect

As for Chinese mega-farms miner, they're simply greedy and are init to purely profit from it by dumping their mined coins every day. All they're are after is fiat money, they don't really give a fuck about bitcoin since it has ZERO utility in China.  

Plus majority of mega-farm are located in very remote locations so obviously getting a proper internet connection would really hurt their profit margin hence if they could have their way, they would never want to upgrade at all. It's like asking a kid to give up it's candy voluntarily  Grin
Post
Topic
Board Computer hardware
Re: [WTS] Bitmain Antminer S1 x4 - Canada - 15$ each -
by
hobbymd
on 19/02/2015, 16:56:28 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Computer hardware
Re: [WTS] Bitmain Antminer S1 x4 - Canada - 15$ each -
by
hobbymd
on 19/02/2015, 07:05:58 UTC
If you don't find a buyer, i would take all 4 controllers boards ;-)

 Wink  it might comes to that if I can't sell them as is  . sell the controller boards and use the fans for some other project  Roll Eyes