Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 31 results by hotrock
Re: [BOT] NiceHashBot - FREE bot for auto. order and profit management on NiceHash
I cannot get it to load any of my current orders.
I have entered the correct API ID and API key but nothing shows up in the orders section. It does show the correct wallet balance so I do know that it is connecting.
My order is a Decred order.
I have entered the correct API ID and API key but nothing shows up in the orders section. It does show the correct wallet balance so I do know that it is connecting.
My order is a Decred order.
Getting an account with a post history and karma is gonna cost you.
My account has 542 link and 7,314 comment karma and is 3 years old.
http://i.imgur.com/NkYnr6x.png
I'm asking 0.2 btc.
I have only been banned from /r/pyongyang.
I also have this one
http://i.imgur.com/ToS7uQh.png
which hasn't been banned anywhere.
Asking 0.02 btc.
My account has 542 link and 7,314 comment karma and is 3 years old.
http://i.imgur.com/NkYnr6x.png
I'm asking 0.2 btc.
I have only been banned from /r/pyongyang.
I also have this one
http://i.imgur.com/ToS7uQh.png
which hasn't been banned anywhere.
Asking 0.02 btc.
so what is the reason you sell the GHS in cloudminr? I think there is no reason that the most plausible unless there is a problem on the site
I ended up with some overages on my cellphone bill and will be selling the BTC on localbitcoins. Although this won't cover all of my bill it sure would help.
I'm more than happy to admit that there is negative feedback about the site but I'm pretty sure I can find negative feedback about any cloudmining site.
I did not have problem with their support the one time I thought there was an issue. Turned out to be my bad memory.
I did not have problem with their support the one time I thought there was an issue. Turned out to be my bad memory.
I'm selling off the 232GH I have at a 0.00082/GH rate. You can either buy all 232GH for 0.19024BTC or you can buy half (116GH) for 0.09512BTC.
If you want to buy just post below and I'll request the voucher from the support. If the account earns enough to reinvest another couple GH I'll throw those in without changing the asking price.
Questions? Please ask!
If you want to buy just post below and I'll request the voucher from the support. If the account earns enough to reinvest another couple GH I'll throw those in without changing the asking price.
Questions? Please ask!
Re: [ANN] CLOUDMINR.IO Mining Contracts || 50k users || As low as 0.0011 BTC / GH/s
Edit: payment was sent ~1 hour later than the first payment transaction and 45 minutes after they said all payments had been issued.
Looks like 77 of the 280 btc made it out in payments. They still have 205 btc left in the wallet.
Is it possible they were relying on the 10 min average per block and btc didn't make it into the wallet soon enough to pay out the remaining transactions because of the block that took 43 minutes to solve?
i look forward their transaction id in Blockchain but there are no
BC.info reply
Sorry we could not find any blocks or transactions matching this hash
thia is their tx id
93b7703d4829a4e95aad21e8dd2b26768a477808fde9536f80f9068553d548ca
BC.info reply
Sorry we could not find any blocks or transactions matching this hash
thia is their tx id
93b7703d4829a4e95aad21e8dd2b26768a477808fde9536f80f9068553d548ca
Looks like 77 of the 280 btc made it out in payments. They still have 205 btc left in the wallet.
Is it possible they were relying on the 10 min average per block and btc didn't make it into the wallet soon enough to pay out the remaining transactions because of the block that took 43 minutes to solve?
Re: [ANN] NiceHash.com - innovative professional cryptocurrency cloud mining service
Well I have a 500mhs X11 farm and I messaged the owner to white list my IP but he says its gonna take a week for the new feature for big farms to be ready. So untill then, I have to connect all my rigs 1 by 1 (big pain in the ass) and then after a while they all get kicked off. Have to stop miners on every rig, and turn them on one by one. not very practical.
I agree that it isn't practical nor fun for you but their actions are in no way a "fuck you big farmer." If anything the fact that they got back to you and told you that the new system for you isn't going to be available because they don't think it is ready shows that they care about you. If they didn't care or wanted to say "fuck you farmboy" they wouldn't be implementing a solution for your problem.
If it is that big of a problem you can always send me some of your machines and I'll take care of them
Edit: Just wondering if you know what is going on with the jump in price per gh/day, did I miss something?
Re: [ANN] NiceHash.com - innovative professional cryptocurrency cloud mining service
I guess this is just a big screw you guys with farms. Not nice at all.
This makes no sense, why would they not like big farms. Big farms mean there is lots of hash power available and can thus go through orders faster which means more profit for them. Orders that sit uncompleted make them a little bit of money (one order fee) but then those buyers never place new orders (additional order fees.) Right now I wish there was more big farms because that would mean my order would get completed and I would happily refill or set up a new one but unfortunately there isn't enough hash power to reach my order while we also have massive buyers at the top.
Re: [ANN] NiceHash.com - innovative professional cryptocurrency cloud mining service
I'm not sure what causes the "the remote pool has terminated your connection" message but it usually clears itself up within a few minutes whenever it shows up on my orders (rarely.)
I would like to know what causes it so I can try to prevent it but it isn't a huge deal for me. (Especially with the current x11 jump to 1.6 BTC/GH/DAY wtf?)
I would like to know what causes it so I can try to prevent it but it isn't a huge deal for me. (Especially with the current x11 jump to 1.6 BTC/GH/DAY wtf?)
Ended up with large TX fee on small payment, what did I do wrong?
Edit-- nevermind, someone else explained that it was a change address that it was sent to and how to change that setting-- End Edit
Hi, I have a question about transaction fees in electrum. I punched in a transaction of 0.01 btc to send with a 0.0001 tx fee but blockchain shows me as having placed a 0.003785 btc fee. What did I do wrong? How can I prevent this from happening again?
Link to transaction here
https://blockchain.info/tx/67e9e45e8c7ca897701a2f6411febdd8c928b4e022a37f047d1686962f3c41fc
Hi, I have a question about transaction fees in electrum. I punched in a transaction of 0.01 btc to send with a 0.0001 tx fee but blockchain shows me as having placed a 0.003785 btc fee. What did I do wrong? How can I prevent this from happening again?
Link to transaction here
https://blockchain.info/tx/67e9e45e8c7ca897701a2f6411febdd8c928b4e022a37f047d1686962f3c41fc
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
Delete your old .bin and restart.
My conf for a 270 with 14.6rc2 driver
2.6Mh on x11
2.0Mh on x13
1.6Mh on x15
8.2Mh on nist5
Deleted .bin files, empty trash, reboot
C&P of your config (changed btc address XD sorry, and removed payment limits) give me per card:
2.0Mh on x11
1.6Mh on x13
0.8Mh on x15 (still crashed when trying to switch to another pool)
4.4Mh on nist5
What disto are you using? Are you using strictly cli or are you using gui?
I'm probably just gonna give in and leave things the way they are.
Edit: I appreciate your willingness to help, that is for sure!
I could do without the gui if I had a reliable way of getting to cli from outside of my house but I'm not sure how to do that. Right now I'm planning on using TeamViewer since I'm going to be on holiday for a month.
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
sure there is a difference, roughly 30% increase in hashrate. you have to update your drivers to 14.6 or ask someone to provide you with the kernel bin files compiled by sgminer on machine running 14.6 drivers. then you can use these kernel bins on mining rig with 13.12 drivers and get almost the same hashrate as with 14.6 drivers
I just did a fresh install with the 14.6 drivers and am still getting the same rates as before, even with a direct c&p your config.
I originally tried to just update but ran into problems hence the fresh install.
I even checked with
dmesg | grep fglrx | grep module
and it verified that I had fglrx 14.20.7 installed. (downloaded the 14.6beta driver right off of AMD's website)
Any ideas?
Edit: Additional details about my set up:
2 Sapphire 270x
Ubuntu 14.04 fresh install using unity desktop.
I'm focusing on x11 and x13 right now. x15 causes crashes no matter what I do. If this is all I can get nbd.
Re: [ANN] sgminer v5 - new unified multi-algorithm on-the-fly kernel switching miner
on nicehash with undervolted 270s (core/mem clock @ 1040/1250MHz) running linux with 14.6 beta drivers i'm getting
x11 = 2.5 mh/s
x13 = 2.0 mh/s
x15 = 1.75 mh/s
with this config
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X11_Auto",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "BTC_Address",
"pass" : "d=0.02;f0=0;f2=0;f3=5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0",
"profile" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X13_Auto",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "BTC_Address",
"pass" : "d=0.02;f0=0;f2=0;f3=5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0",
"profile" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X15_Auto",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "BTC_Address",
"pass" : "d=0.02;f0=0;f2=0;f3=5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0",
"profile" : "x15"
}
],
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "200",
"gpu-engine" : "1040-1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250-1250",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "128"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "200",
"gpu-engine" : "1040-1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250-1250",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"xintensity" : "200",
"gpu-engine" : "1040-1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250-1250",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64"
}
],
"default-profile" : "x11",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"shaders" : "1280",
"gpu-fan" : "0-90",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "80",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"scrypt" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "10",
"expiry" : "120",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"hamsi-short" : true
}
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X11_Auto",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "BTC_Address",
"pass" : "d=0.02;f0=0;f2=0;f3=5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0",
"profile" : "x11"
},
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X13_Auto",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "BTC_Address",
"pass" : "d=0.02;f0=0;f2=0;f3=5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0",
"profile" : "x13"
},
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X15_Auto",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://stratum.nicehash.com:4339",
"user" : "BTC_Address",
"pass" : "d=0.02;f0=0;f2=0;f3=5;f4=4;f5=0;f6=3.5;f7=0",
"profile" : "x15"
}
],
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "x11",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "200",
"gpu-engine" : "1040-1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250-1250",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "128"
},
{
"name" : "x13",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "200",
"gpu-engine" : "1040-1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250-1250",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64"
},
{
"name" : "x15",
"algorithm" : "bitblock",
"xintensity" : "200",
"gpu-engine" : "1040-1040",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250-1250",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64"
}
],
"default-profile" : "x11",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"shaders" : "1280",
"gpu-fan" : "0-90",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "80",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"scrypt" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "10",
"expiry" : "120",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1",
"hamsi-short" : true
}
Thanks!
I'm running 13.12 drivers, was there much of a difference between 13.12 and 14.6 beta or were you ever on 13.12?
I'll go ahead and give the config a try before I update drivers just to see.