It appears to be not needed indeed. But distributed is not equal to descentralized, would not be possible to independently tokenize your info without blockchain, in other words, it would not be possible for the identity owner to have power over it without a fourth party, in that case the designers of the system.

I am an early supporter of Storm. I bought coins in ico and never sold them from my trezor wallet. I had been promised that i would be sent airdrops if i dont sell my cash fro my authorized Eth address where I store my storm tokens. I havent received any tokens yet! Please upgrade me on that

I don't believe that changing used api merely to show bigger marketcap will probably be worth to do. And after 3months we changes again because various other api will show bigger price? And if dev spend some time and can use other api then other folks will ask why nanowallet is counting zero fees exchanges if cmc don't

So, at any point in time, the Zilliqa network will only store the 10 most recent blocks, while, older obstructs can be outsourced to Bluzelle/Genaro’s network. The decentralization offered by these networks  will help eliminate centralization that may appear with archival nodes.

i am reading about the ERC-20 standard and my question is if the platform to send WPRs has some type of  "emergency token removal" function. I am not necessarily involved with it but I'd like to ask why the ERC-20 standard for WPR? Will there be any newer criteria for this to be achieved

I'm still surprised by the underperformance of SXUT to SXDT even taking into consideration the general market conditions. Any benefits will be a useful incentive for individuals to buy SXUT. CAN I ask when you begins buying SXUT to market to users who subscribe through CASET or is this private?

It appears to be not needed indeed. But distributed is not equal to descentralized, would not be possible to independently tokenize your info without blockchain, in other words, it would not be possible for the identity owner to have power over it without a fourth party, in that case the designers of the system.

Once this becomes a fully functioning product, it'll be huge. Visualize the best parts of Tor and the best elements of VPN combined in to one, more secure product that is free or even pays you. Plus the value of Cryptopay and how Justin has described SUB token acting similar to how BNB functions on Binance.

I am an early supporter of Storm. I bought coins in ico and never sold them from my trezor wallet. I had been promised that i would be sent airdrops if i dont sell my cash fro my authorized Eth address where I store my storm tokens. I havent received any tokens yet! Please upgrade me on that

Reducing block rewards will harm GPU miners the most creating threat of increased mining centralization. In the event that you reduce the prevent reward and kick ASICs from the network with a PoW change, it is possible to improve decentralization, protect GPU mining bonuses, and reduce inflation, The developers are currently talking about what EIPs relating to the forthcoming Constantinople hard fork.

I don't believe that changing used api merely to show bigger marketcap will probably be worth to do. And after 3months we changes again because various other api will show bigger price? And if dev spend some time and can use other api then other folks will ask why nanowallet is counting zero fees exchanges if cmc don't

I still believe that, at least if you want to make the most NIM in a short period of time, while the GHR is still low, renting cheap dedicated servers for like a month is your best option, or get free Azure/GCP credits and mine on those, but it will take multiple accounts to get a decent amount of NIM

So, at any point in time, the Zilliqa network will only store the 10 most recent blocks, while, older obstructs can be outsourced to Bluzelle/Genaro’s network. The decentralization offered by these networks  will help eliminate centralization that may appear with archival nodes.

i am reading about the ERC-20 standard and my question is if the platform to send WPRs has some type of  "emergency token removal" function. I am not necessarily involved with it but I'd like to ask why the ERC-20 standard for WPR? Will there be any newer criteria for this to be achieved

I'm still surprised by the underperformance of SXUT to SXDT even taking into consideration the general market conditions. Any benefits will be a useful incentive for individuals to buy SXUT. CAN I ask when you begins buying SXUT to market to users who subscribe through CASET or is this private?

I'm endeavoring to swap my ERC20 ICX coins over on the app and I keep getting to the final display and try to hit the 'complete' button but nothing happens. I also transfer 0.003 ETH to swap the cash over and it continues appearing and then disppearing when i refresh the budget page.

So harvesting opportunities are “given” to individuals who hold huge amounts of NEM, right? Will that change people faraway from attempting to be harvesters? If there’s a great deal of other coin online games in town- and there are- why would a person choose to harvest NEM when they might not be chosen for most harvests?

If anything this entire craze they began should be embraced. Strong smart agreements are essential to the Ethereum ecosystem, and also you make sure they are strong by pressing boundaries and keeping multimillion buck bounties to them. Regardless how you are feeling about these online games, Team Just does some complicated and impressive things on solidity.

I still have any doubt, I preserved my seed for the pocket where I've byteballs locked in smart agreement for one 12 months. If something happens with my telephone, Will I have the ability to recover that byteball locked with this seed? or any other option to recuperate if something will go wrong

Early adopters and innovators don't treatment if something is tough around the sides. However the early majority and late vast majority won't touch nearly all unrefined products. Also, more cement release dates for the real products and not simply the card preorder with info "later in July", however the atomic swap that hasn't eliminated onto mainnet