Search content
Sort by

Showing 10 of 10 results by i8aPie
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ANDS][PoW][MN] Anodos Coin Community Takeover & Rebirth
by
i8aPie
on 14/09/2018, 02:49:41 UTC
Congrats team on getting Masternodes Online up and running.

https://masternodes.online/currencies/ANDS/
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: CoinTracking - Profit/Loss Portfolio and Tax Reporting for Digital Currencies
by
i8aPie
on 31/03/2018, 13:26:47 UTC

I wanted to report an issue.

I have been using the Yobit API and having you pull in data.

I know it's a 7 day max, BUT you seem to be missing recent trades.

It appears that you are skipping trades that happen all at the same time.  Like I do a sell of 50 and it gets split in 3 trades 30, 15, 5 all with the same timestamp.  You appear to only pull one of the trades.

That's a pretty big issue.  Can you correct?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [$PAC] [X11] Community Governed | Masternodes | Actively Trading
by
i8aPie
on 07/03/2018, 13:44:34 UTC
They are just those butt-hurt FUD's who know nothing about blockchain and bought PAC's at 1-3 SAT  Cheesy Cheesy

These little guys make me so happy about myself, I am buying more $PAC's while its low, gonna be a masternode soon!

$PAC is a state of art coin, I have never seen transactions so fast and whitepaper that convincing!! Pactopia, Coinfly, you guys kidding me, this will be in top 10 coins soon!!

kel-alt - I took .3 BTC profit from the PAC run-up and bought more $PAC.
Just wanted you to know there is someone else that agrees investor/traders
just have to live and learn. As someone else said, no one forced anyone to
not do any research and buy PAC for BTC. I heard someone else say FUD is
good, it means the coin is being noticed, and maybe scared competition is
posting. No investor wins every bet, so time will tell. I know they are busy with
the redemption, but I would like to see new posts on website in addition to
social media, it would help confidence. I just looked at MN VPS set-up instructions
and they looked too complicated! What is VPS? Do you know if this/are these legit? -
http://altcoin-guide.com/paccoin-vps-masternode-guide/
 Go $PAC!
I have 5.4m $pac on my 1 wallet. What is procedure for 10 masternodes.

I would recommend you contact breakcrypto.

You could host 10 nodes for $400 per month. This way you keep all your coins locked safely in your wallet on your own comp and the nodes are hosted by Break.

He will have your contact details and if a node ever goes down he will contact you and all you need to do is click restart on your wallet (or his new mobile pacvault) to get it going again.

The safest way to handle it and a professional service from Break.

You can go with one of the services that offer hosting, like:

Full Master Nodes
https://www.masternodes.work/ ....... BreakCrypto Developer (Part of the Paccoin Team) 
-- Prob can DM him on Discord or PM him here


Or try to set them up and maintain them on your own:

Setup Your Own Master Node
http://altcoin-guide.com/paccoin-vps-masternode-guide/


Either way, with 5.4 M (almost 11 Masternodes, you should get them up). 

The payout calculations are approximately (576 / # ACTIVE MASTERNODES) x 6210 per day...

576 is blocks per day | 6210 is block reward

You can see how many are active at http://monitor.masternodes.work

Currently about 1700 active..
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [$PAC] [X11] Community Governed | Masternodes | Actively Trading
by
i8aPie
on 05/03/2018, 02:20:04 UTC
Here's my problem with all the "scam" comments, beside simply being untrue, it makes no sense logically. I wasn't on the team at the time but a scam in crypto is when a team simply walks away; the entire $PAC team from before I joined and after, is still here. They're still active on git, discord, etc. No one has disappeared with whatever alleged gains everyone keeps accusing them of making. No coins are missing, nothing is gone, no one took money and did a runner.

Everyone in $PAC is still responding, still working long nights to keep $PAC as strong as it has been for months. I, personally, haven't taken a night off since joining the team. I talk to most of the team members on a daily basis and most of them are on even more than I am. These are people with families who have sacrificed their time to try and make $PAC everything it should be.

What good would hurting the price do for someone like me? Nothing. I understand people are frustrated at the price drop but claiming it's a scam and blaming the people working long, long, long hours to make $PAC succeed is doing nothing useful for anyone except: people trying to buy it cheaply from people buying the FUD, and stressing everyone out.

So, think before you speak harsh words. I'm here, I'm working hard to make $PAC a strong crypto contender, and if you believe otherwise, then please divest yourself and move on to another currency. You're welcome to ask anyone on Discord I've interacted with if they have faith in my efforts since joining the team. If you don't, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it, but I've taken nothing from you and only tried to make something worthwhile for you by giving up my free time for you.

I've scammed no one and never would. I'm not aware of anyone who has scammed anyone on the $PAC team and if I was, I'd leave immediately. I joined the team because the community was, and still is amazing, the people who work so hard as volunteers (including myself) just because they see the potential. Even non-developers pitch in by helping others setup masternodes, etc. People even write songs just to keep spirits high.

I've only been on the team for a few weeks and it's wonderful. I've met so many amazing people and, I won't lie, it's tough to hear people call the hundreds of hours of time put in "a scam." Think before you speak, why would anything that anyone has claimed benefit the $PAC team? The only thing that benefits the $PAC team is the coin performing the way it deserves based on the community we have.

I feel for the people who bought at 1 sat; I do. But I had nothing to do with that. That 1 sat spike is what brought me to the team because I saw PAC was reborn. I wouldn't be here if it hadn't happened. But claiming $PAC is a scam will never get the price to 1000 sats. Hard work will get us there and that's exactly what the $PAC team is putting in. If you disagree, like I've said before, there are other currencies to move on to. I hope you believe in the team, but if you don't you're entitled to your opinions and I respect that.

I, personally, believe.

best,
break.


This needed to be said. I'm tired of all the whining in the thread.  

Lets move along and get to the next phase.  

Sadly, I get the anger at Cryptopia.  Locking up the wallet and closing the DOGE markets all about the same time was crappy.  But why all these guys keep thinking any coin team would have ANY say as to what Cryptopia does is just dumbfounding.  I highly doubt Cryptopia can't make their own decisions about their own exchange.

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [$PAC] [X11] Community Governed | Masternodes | Actively Trading
by
i8aPie
on 04/03/2018, 22:06:59 UTC
Question is it still possible to stake coins in the old wallet and swap them in a later stage into $pac ? ? ? ?

Course I read this from a Senior Member in the old dread of PAC:
------------------------------------------------------------
From Disaster Faster, Senior Member:

You have no idea how disappointed I am!

Let this be a warning to everyone.

I had been running the old PAC wallet for a very long time and it staked once per month and never failed once.

I was told to download the PAC redemption wallet and I did and that was a HUGE mistake!!!

The PAC redemption wallet refuses to stake and every single stake is rejected. This is costing me a huge amount of coins and is a scam in my opinion.

This new dev team you just lost every bit of my respect on this and brace yourself because I am going to dump billions of this coin now and I could care less how far I drive the price down.

I will also not be swapping to your new coin whatsoever because of what you have already done is not honorable IMHO.

Warning to all: if you are running the old PAC wallet KEEP RUNNING IT so you can stake coins. DO NOT switch to the redemption wallet or you will get burned and stake nothing.



Go ahead and dump it...  Don't redeem..  That's your prerogative..  

Why tell everyone what you are going to do, just do it..   No one cares..  It'll just be cheap coins for those who want it..
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [$PAC] [X11] Community Governed | Masternodes | Actively Trading
by
i8aPie
on 04/03/2018, 19:42:35 UTC

Did anyone used them? How is the payout just a ballpark figure will be fine say for 1000 $PAC. Thanks

There are currently 1546 according to:
http://monitor.masternodes.work/

So, the calc currently would be 576/1546 * 6210 = 2,313 $PAC daily on average

https://www.masternodes.work has hosting but doesn't do shared nodes..


Forgot to include the discord link (it's on the front page of the thread to if you want to use it from there)
https://discord.gg/jYhzkPW ($PAC Discord)

They should be able to give you advice on who's good.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [$PAC] [X11] Community Governed | Masternodes | Actively Trading
by
i8aPie
on 04/03/2018, 18:15:52 UTC

Did anyone used them? How is the payout just a ballpark figure will be fine say for 1000 $PAC. Thanks

Can't tell you much about that shared node group.  You should ask in Discord.

Masternode payouts daily average are approximately 576 (daily block avg) divided by Number of MasterNodes times 6210 block reward..

So, 500,000 $PAC MN should net the following (currently anyway) assuming all things stay the same, which they obviously wont:


There are currently 1546 according to:
http://monitor.masternodes.work/

So, the calc currently would be 576/1546 * 6210 = 2,313 $PAC daily on average

https://www.masternodes.work has hosting but doesn't do shared nodes..
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [DYOR] Do Your Own Research [x11][PoW/PoS][Bounties][Random Block Rewards!]
by
i8aPie
on 31/01/2018, 03:43:51 UTC
any place i can buy this yet? or only able to mine and stake?




We are working on acquiring funds for exchange listing - until then, mining & staking Smiley

Really, the yobit price wasn't bad to get going.

At least setup a discord where people can do private trades and potentially you can trade some premine for funds to get listing?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] paccoin a new SHA256D coin is being introduced
by
i8aPie
on 15/01/2018, 17:08:33 UTC
Did someone steal my coins mined since yesterday?  Sad
They where confirmed in my wallet and then suddenly they where gone.
http://paccoinexplorer.com/address/AmxaG6CpFUQZVCSagZJjzhM83YRQA4Ekoc


Yeah, I think the chain reset over them.  It's what we were discussing:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=331394.msg28186144#msg28186144
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] paccoin a new SHA256D coin is being introduced
by
i8aPie
on 15/01/2018, 14:31:00 UTC
I totally posted badcode I just noticed, typing too fast, sorry:

Code:
if (pindexNew->bnChainTrust > bnBestChainTrust && pindexNew->nHeight > nBestHeight)

Wanted to fix before anyone tried to discredit for b/s reasons.

I'm not familiar with the crypto tech, does this mean that who has the highest pile of coins gets the staking power? IE., large holder gain pos coins and such coins over write those pos of smaller coins owners?

Very likely, a large holder will get the next 1-3 block rewards corresponding to the large chunks of ( and higher-weighted) coins assigned for the POS, immediately after he/she starts staking (minting), but once rewarded, the large portions of coins will no longer be eligible for staking until next time of days or weeks of holding periord for that portion of coins to be used again. There should be less input for staking as time passed, to the point that if you (" with the other wallet") just start staking at that point, you might have a higher staking weight to get the next block.

It is a matter of chance; therefore, your chance of getting rewards immediately starting staking is much, much lower, but even if both start at the same time, there might be a time say one hour later, the one having only, say 1/10 of total coin balance of the other wallet client, would have almost the same amount of coin weight to get the next reward which you are supposed to get anyway.

It might takes longer if there are many, many higher coin-weight wallet starting the staking during the time you are in.

As you can see, the one with extremely small amount of coin most not get a reward for quite a few months but by the time, you would have much higher amount of holding-time and staking power.  Cheesy

If I understand correctly, that people with big pile will have lower coins/wattage (which is fair per POS), but is the main concern like this?
1. Smaller miner starts at height 1000, he's digging away
2. Big miner finds the block at 1000 and 1001
3. Smaller miner is now mining 1001, which has been mined by the big miner
4. So the smaller miner is always doing catch up

My apologies for not being a smart person...

I think its worse than this.  I will start with I'm not a Dev, but what they are talking about appears to be visible in the explorer.

I think it appears that large Coin holders are overwriting MANY blocks.  Not allowing many mined/staked coins to count.  I once noticed my stake sometimes appears then disappears with a "generated but not accepted" flag.  I assume this may have been what was happening.

I think you can see it in the Explorer..
http://paccoinexplorer.com/

Just look at the blocks in order. At some point they get a posted block that is earlier than the previous. If the block with the older Block Number is Confirmed to the chain the chain loses ALL blocks that were after that block and already posted to the chain. 

Example, I just scrolled down the last 300 blocks..  Check these out..

2625860 came before 2625810.  Because the 2625810 was posted by a large coin holder it RESET the chain to that point.  Consequently dropping ALL blocks from the previous 2625810-2625860.

Here are the recorded blocks:

This one is the last of the orig 2625810-2625860 chain (and now block is not confirmed)
http://paccoinexplorer.com/block/000000000028c00c9e96d42aaaaad7396054f382ca29f2051fd912bc738e09be

Then 2625810 comes along and RESETS the chain back 50 BLOCKS... 
http://paccoinexplorer.com/block/e6122643109608381a8486d0fac2af9b0fbeb8212020f411dddd1a009bdedede

Seems those blocks are then lost..

Like I said, I'm no dev.  But this does appear to be a pretty big issue. 

A chain that changes isn't really a chain?