Search content
Sort by
Showing 8 of 8 results by i90ast5I
All of us are working for a solution. Stay tuned and do not troll....
Thank for you job.
Do you have idea what best miner program for 192_7 equi? (GPU)
in addition to my post, refrain from translations for this exchange!
OctaEx.com is a scam. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2596908.msg39394268#msg39394268
I wrote about it in first day, when litecoinz listed on octaex. But moderators delete my message.
Developers write that this coin is the future of Lightcoin. And did anyone really measure the speed of transactions? How much does the transfer cost?
Having a strong network is not only about the speed of a transaction, is also about the number of people that you can actually transact with. That is very strong for the real Litecoin and difficult for new coins to reach that scale.
Bitcoin Network can write about 7 transaction per second. Litecoin about 56 transaction per second. LTCZ about 112 transaction per second.
For example Ripple 1500 transaction per second. Nano 7000 transaction per second.
I think it will be nice, add to compare table "max transactions per second", "blockchain database size in the one year".
The transaction price is completely dependent on the network hashrate and inflation (mining). I.e. popularity.
It's nice to see an expert user using a "newbie" account 
LOL
LOLSorry if I offended you. I read you changes on the github, I decided that you spend too much time on your own scam project :-)
And I thought that it has not be the scam, I registred account and write to you :-)
Anyway LTZ (not LTCZ) is not a scam and I made many implementation on the core not only on frontend (check source code and compare it with other Z based coins)
What is common between ltc and ltcz, except for the name?
What plan for litecoinz? Why is best then bitcoinz, or zen, or hush, or komodo, or zcash, or zclassic, or bitcoin gold or any other on the equihash?
Zcash and many other currensies have fundamental problems:
* scalability, maybe you have play for liting network or analog?
* database size, maybe you have the garbage collector in the plan?
* the difficulty of confirming hidden transactions, any plan for it? (If all transactions on the network are hidden, confirmation will take forever)
I do not understand, LTCZ looks like scam, but have native GUI and have good fork (source code). Do you have plans for make changes
on core, or you want create only frontend?
Zcash and many other currensies have fundamental problems:
* scalability, maybe you have play for liting network or analog?
* database size, maybe you have the garbage collector in the plan?
* the difficulty of confirming hidden transactions, any plan for it? (If all transactions on the network are hidden, confirmation will take forever)
I do not understand, LTCZ looks like scam, but have native GUI and have good fork (source code). Do you have plans for make changes
on core, or you want create only frontend?
just interesting to read such conclusions, you could not explain why you think so .... 
Zcash network arrived about $1072298.88 per day. Hashrate 484030771.00.
One sol arived $0.002215352709466481
For all coins one sol arrived about the same amount of $, if arrived less the miners go mine other coin, if got more the miners go from
other coins to this coins.
LTCZ have 474683 hashrate, 28800.0 coin per day. If one sol arrived about $0.002215352709466481
LTCZ got $1051.59 per day, one coin is $0.036
If "no changes" on hashrate, price 1 LTCZ == $0.036
Then LTCZ was listing, we have three ways:
* All try sell, price down and hashrate too (nobody don't want mine without profit).
* All whant buy, (but LTCZ is not super project), maybe it will want to buy, price up and hashrate up too.
* No events