Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 82 results by i_rape_bitcoins
Re: Coblee shows intent to promote Litecoin centralization
Quote
[1:42] i wish i could prune the blockchain of all the transaction spam though
We can see here Coblee is promoting centralization by wanting to remove the block chain spam in Litecoin.
The fate of Litecoin is self-explanatory. Perhaps Coblee is losing fate his "Liecoin" can meet up to the challenge.
Just because I WISH I WAS A TEAPOT....it doesn't mean that I AM one.
Pull your head out of your ass and wake up.
Don't you have some coding on MicroSCAM to complete ? May Launch ? ....like, May 2015 ?
Actually no, I'm heading to sleep. But I will pray for your "internet detective" business success.
Coblee shows intent to promote Litecoin centralization
Quote
[1:42] i wish i could prune the blockchain of all the transaction spam though
We can see here Coblee is promoting centralization by wanting to remove the block chain spam in Litecoin.
The fate of Litecoin is self-explanatory. Perhaps Coblee is losing fate his "Liecoin" can meet up to the challenge.
As we all know with the recent plausible evidence of Zhou Tong being the Bitcoinica hacker, we should recall the generosity of this theft compared to MyBitcoin.
Zhou Tong offered a 5,000 BTC refund of the 100,000+ BTC stolen. If we use 100,000 as optimistic estimate of the stolen coins, 5,000 easily amounts to 5%.
Looking back on MyBitcoin, they offered 49% of the total 154,406 stolen.
Whats the verdict? MyBitcoin was more generous than Zhou Tong.
Zhou Tong offered a 5,000 BTC refund of the 100,000+ BTC stolen. If we use 100,000 as optimistic estimate of the stolen coins, 5,000 easily amounts to 5%.
Looking back on MyBitcoin, they offered 49% of the total 154,406 stolen.
Whats the verdict? MyBitcoin was more generous than Zhou Tong.
BitcoinEXpress is wrong yet again trying to find Simran's location.
Hey retard BitcoinEXpress, he lives in Pharr, Texas. Looks like you need your vision fixed from all the Litecoin bashing you've taken!
In other words, he's a phony.
Hey retard BitcoinEXpress, he lives in Pharr, Texas. Looks like you need your vision fixed from all the Litecoin bashing you've taken!
In other words, he's a phony.
If someone were to buy a significant amount of them what would happen?
The person who does it would take the risk of BTCX's attack going through. On the other hand... The hashrate would go through the roof making it more and more unlikely to go through.
I don't have the BTC to do it, but if anybody who has would risk it this would be an amazing opportunity.
The person who does it would take the risk of BTCX's attack going through. On the other hand... The hashrate would go through the roof making it more and more unlikely to go through.
I don't have the BTC to do it, but if anybody who has would risk it this would be an amazing opportunity.
Hey retard, there are 954592.35366225.
Luke is obviously butt hurt the developer of BBQCoin does not follow christian values. Because of this, he has decided to attack BBQCoin.
The 51% attack mines blocks with no transactions, and rejects those who do.
The 51% attack mines blocks with no transactions, and rejects those who do.
Re: [BREAKING NEWS] RS asking for BTC donations to finish MicroCash
I bet you dollars to donuts that Daniel Parnell (aka RealSolid) is on social assistance while he works "full time capacity" on the microcash code. He doesn't work - his wife doesn't work - how are they supporting their family?
Is there anyone in Australia that would want to make a little phone call and let them know that Daniel is committing fraud by running his own business while being on welfare?
Is there anyone in Australia that would want to make a little phone call and let them know that Daniel is committing fraud by running his own business while being on welfare?
Hey retard,
Ever heard of running a business that gives you passive income? Not everyone is employed from 9 to 5. Unfortunately those who are (like you) are delusional to the point where they think its the only way to make money.
We can see here BitcoinEXpress is clearly trying to find excuses for his DDoS incompetence.
Quote
Pinging microcash.org [106.187.94.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56
@Coinhunter
Seriously nobody cares about Solidcoin any longer...
Nice try and thanks for playing.
We all know you can't DDoS shit from your previous replies. Face it, no one is going to believe you anymore.
Your excuses and attempt to circumnavigate any claims of your incompetence is just digging you deeper into the hole.
Have fun 51% BitcoinEXpressCoin.
You clearly don't understand how p2pool works.
It's a genuine p2p network there are not "major nodes"
It's a genuine p2p network there are not "major nodes"
Most people are too lazy to setup P2Pool for themselves, instead they go mine at an P2Pool that's already setup.
My channel logger was in #microcash when I decided to check in and saw some gems posted by Ahimoth.
Ahimoth claims microcash.org has proper DDoS protection in place and that it cannot be taken down by BitcoinEXpress.
So, whats it going to be? Can BitcoinEXpress take microcash.org down? Your move BCX.
If he can't take it down, there's no doubt his LTC ramblings are pure FUD.
Quote
[16:53] * caish5 (~caish5@110-174-192-158.static.tpgi.com.au) has joined #microcash
[16:56] * jimmy__ has quit (Quit: Page closed)
[17:29] * r71 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
[17:42] * pho| has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[17:42] * pho| (~pho@unaffiliated/pho/x-6551342) has joined #microcash
[17:45] Even if bitcoinexpress goes on a ddos rampage, MicroCash's website has ddos protection in place.
[17:45] As well as several of our related sites.
[17:46] BCX is about 90% lies, and 10% truth, as shown by past performances.
[17:48] BCX can try all he/she wants, but won't be able to take down microcash.org
[16:56] * jimmy__ has quit (Quit: Page closed)
[17:29] * r71 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
[17:42] * pho| has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[17:42] * pho| (~pho@unaffiliated/pho/x-6551342) has joined #microcash
[17:45] Even if bitcoinexpress goes on a ddos rampage, MicroCash's website has ddos protection in place.
[17:45] As well as several of our related sites.
[17:46] BCX is about 90% lies, and 10% truth, as shown by past performances.
[17:48] BCX can try all he/she wants, but won't be able to take down microcash.org
Ahimoth claims microcash.org has proper DDoS protection in place and that it cannot be taken down by BitcoinEXpress.
So, whats it going to be? Can BitcoinEXpress take microcash.org down? Your move BCX.
If he can't take it down, there's no doubt his LTC ramblings are pure FUD.
Kind of hard to DDoS imagination. Microcash doesn't exist. never will.
We can see here BitcoinEXpress is clearly trying to find excuses for his DDoS incompetence.
Quote
Pinging microcash.org [106.187.94.147] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=216ms TTL=56
Reply from 106.187.94.147: bytes=32 time=221ms TTL=56
My channel logger was in #microcash when I decided to check in and saw some gems posted by Ahimoth.
Ahimoth claims microcash.org has proper DDoS protection in place and that it cannot be taken down by BitcoinEXpress.
So, whats it going to be? Can BitcoinEXpress take microcash.org down? Your move BCX.
If he can't take it down, there's no doubt his LTC ramblings are pure FUD.
Quote
[16:53] * caish5 (~caish5@110-174-192-158.static.tpgi.com.au) has joined #microcash
[16:56] * jimmy__ has quit (Quit: Page closed)
[17:29] * r71 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
[17:42] * pho| has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[17:42] * pho| (~pho@unaffiliated/pho/x-6551342) has joined #microcash
[17:45] Even if bitcoinexpress goes on a ddos rampage, MicroCash's website has ddos protection in place.
[17:45] As well as several of our related sites.
[17:46] BCX is about 90% lies, and 10% truth, as shown by past performances.
[17:48] BCX can try all he/she wants, but won't be able to take down microcash.org
[16:56] * jimmy__ has quit (Quit: Page closed)
[17:29] * r71 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
[17:42] * pho| has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
[17:42] * pho| (~pho@unaffiliated/pho/x-6551342) has joined #microcash
[17:45] Even if bitcoinexpress goes on a ddos rampage, MicroCash's website has ddos protection in place.
[17:45] As well as several of our related sites.
[17:46] BCX is about 90% lies, and 10% truth, as shown by past performances.
[17:48] BCX can try all he/she wants, but won't be able to take down microcash.org
Ahimoth claims microcash.org has proper DDoS protection in place and that it cannot be taken down by BitcoinEXpress.
So, whats it going to be? Can BitcoinEXpress take microcash.org down? Your move BCX.
If he can't take it down, there's no doubt his LTC ramblings are pure FUD.
Re: Change.org petition to get BitcoinEXpress arrested!
There is clearly a loophole in the system. Once you hit the required number of signatures, the FBI will appear at BitcoinEXpress's door immediately.
What people don't know is that you can change the number of required signatures to 1, and it'll do the job.
What people don't know is that you can change the number of required signatures to 1, and it'll do the job.
Re: Change.org petition to get BitcoinEXpress arrested!
Prepared to get doxed by BitcoinEXpress.
There's nothing you can do. He has not done anything yet.
Well, somebody with a big ltc investment might want to also buy a fuckton of EC2's and defend the blockchain. Just a thought
As stated in the AWS acceptable use policy of disallowed activities on their network:
Intentional Interference. Interfering with the proper functioning of any System, including any deliberate attempt to overload a system by mail bombing, news bombing, broadcast attacks, or flooding techniques.
Have fun tracking down one of BCX's instances. Also, this would be master debatable, clients following the longest block chain is by design, so I would argue his 51% attack would "[interfere] with the proper functioning of any System."