Been doing DD on ICO's for almost a year and it is now my full time job. Created an app to better manage ICO reviewing then the traditional spreadsheet. Now open to the public.
Currently 87 ICO reviews of upcoming ICO's.
Scoring is based on:
* idea: how original and groundbreaking is the idea
* team: do they know how to work together? do they have grit? domain experience?
* market: addressable size of market, competitive landscape, positioning
* traction: do they have an MVP or prototype? What about users?
* advisors: this also includes major investors such as YC, Sequoia, and big partnerships. Essentially how quickly will they be lifted into market.
* tokenomics: weighted decision based on ico market cap, ico price, organic growth vs shilling investors
* type: bonus points goes to infrastructure, currency, or new blockchain projects.
The scores lead to the following rank system similar to university ranks
High Distinction >=85
Distinction >= 75
Credit >= 65
Pass >= 50
Would be very interested on thoughts and if you like it.
https://icohotsheet.com/