Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 23 results by ironmaik
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 12/03/2018, 08:39:59 UTC
Coinmarketcap is a MUST also in my opinion ;-)
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 05/03/2018, 15:25:10 UTC
coinspool still on 1.1.3, any plans when to upgrade Huh

cheers
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 19/02/2018, 15:31:58 UTC
Hi,

does the new wallet 1.1.4 needs a "reindex" ?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 09/01/2018, 17:33:13 UTC
When I see "-xxx ROI" marked red in the block explorer this is
the amount I put into deposit, correct ?

The amount "minus" vs "deposit" nearly correlate, so this
assumption jumps into mind - and what's logged in debug.log
for that hash points into same direction.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.
by
ironmaik
on 09/01/2018, 17:29:55 UTC
wrong channel - sorry - forget it.......
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.
by
ironmaik
on 09/01/2018, 17:26:26 UTC
If I see "-xxx ROI" marked red in the block explorer this is
the amount I put into deposit, correct Huh

The amount "minus" vs "deposit" nearly correlate, so this
assumption jumps into mind.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 07/01/2018, 17:46:00 UTC
I also would like to see some comment from the mintpond admin
if it's really all healthy - after 6 days with no luck I doubt.
We had temporarily > 3 GHs, of course after 6 days without block
most miners moved away which is not good. As well as others
I see mintpond clear and unspectacluar - which is meant positive!
And if we wanna have some steps to be more decentralized we
should have reliable alternatives to MPH.

So please give at least a status that from your point of view
all seems to be ok -- OR -- check and then give an update ;-)

Thx - hope to speak for others as well
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 06/01/2018, 09:32:20 UTC
360 == conform to coinspool, so wait and see for another 100 rounds....

for the ones interested in - the new binary runs on debian strech (version 9) as well
without any modification

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 06/01/2018, 07:45:47 UTC
@ghobson - "you did it" :-)

got 1 block throughout the night solo with new binary on ubuntu 16.04.
I did expect 2 blocks but right now hashrate increases so it might be ok.

How long this will show up "immature" in the wallet?
The block is there since 8 hours now - I know for the coinspool it
takes 360 rounds to be balanced.

For windows I'm out - but others verified it to be ok already.

I can also conform about 20% higher hashrate.

Great stuff - thx to you ghobson :-)
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 05/01/2018, 13:37:37 UTC
So ..... found some time to test now

- brand new binary from ghobson (the haswell one)

./hodlminer-avx2-ubuntu14-haswell --version
hodlminer 2.4.4
 built on Jan  5 2018
 features: x86_64 PHE SSE2 AVX AVX2 XOP
libcurl/7.47.0 OpenSSL/1.0.2g zlib/1.2.8 libidn/1.32 librtmp/2.3
libjansson 2.5

- ubuntu 16.04

at least it is running right now with an even better hashrate than the version I used before :-)
I did NOT restart ROIcoind since I did this before with -reindex and -rescan -zapwallettxs respective.

Keep you informed when (or if) I got the first block solo mining, will take some hours


Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 04/01/2018, 19:08:04 UTC
@ghobson: I can confirm cpuminer - same problems as junktroep reported
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 04/01/2018, 14:07:19 UTC
I experience exactly the same behaviour as junktroep described.
The "bad block" ghobson wrote is also OK!

Totally lost - even done a -reindex from scratch -> with new errors:

2018-01-04 13:44:15 ERROR: ConnectBlock(): coinbase pays too much (actual=12050000000 vs limit=12049999999)
2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000007f5a6cedac5892380640fd381aa889a46e91f8bd4d5da074ad6219c35b  height=33987  log2_work=39.166366  date=2018-01-03 00:51:57
2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound:  current best=0000004131844a477f77e92d9729e949c371dbb2e5a6db217f0d49d0b8958f17  height=33986  log2_work=39.166295  date=2018-01-03 00:45:46
2018-01-04 13:44:15 ERROR: ConnectTip(): ConnectBlock 0000007f5a6cedac5892380640fd381aa889a46e91f8bd4d5da074ad6219c35b failed
2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000007f5a6cedac5892380640fd381aa889a46e91f8bd4d5da074ad6219c35b  height=33987  log2_work=39.166366  date=2018-01-03 00:51:57
2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound:  current best=0000004131844a477f77e92d9729e949c371dbb2e5a6db217f0d49d0b8958f17  height=33986  log2_work=39.166295  date=2018-01-03 00:45:46

Will move to pool for now - hopefully this one is fixed now.

Frustrating thing at the mom.....

greez
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.
by
ironmaik
on 22/12/2017, 10:27:08 UTC
Moin,

do I have a local problem or is the block explorer http://www.fuzzbawls.pw/explore/HOdlcoin
still stuck at block 364940 ?

Thx
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 02/11/2017, 15:00:27 UTC
ok - solved for me.

cannot change label on zerocoin window - ok
can change label in travnsactions - incoming only

makes sense :->
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 02/11/2017, 12:30:56 UTC
Moin,


cannot edit "label" in zerocoin window (here no pulldown)
nor in transaction window (here I have the pulldown with
possible actions). Even unlocked the wallet.

Debian 9, wallet 0.13.3

any idea?

Thx
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 30/10/2017, 14:43:29 UTC
Moin,

is anything wrong with
      - https://zcoin.io/language/en/get-zcoin/
at the moment? I cannot connect to download new wallet 0.13.3.
Either with opera and firefox

thx
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 07/10/2017, 15:50:26 UTC
fsck.... diff 9725 increasing ....

Can MTP help to get this down again - fighting bots and asics?
When can we expect the new algo and will djm's ccminer  support it
right from the beginning?

Thx
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 07/10/2017, 15:42:26 UTC
Moin,

anyone a clue if GTX980 supports nvidia coolbits?

Only found "some cards will support, some not".....

GTX960 works well with coolbits12,
GTX980 does not seem to accept

Thx
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 05/10/2017, 19:20:12 UTC
tested - for me its the same result as I already built against cuda8
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Zcoin (XZC) - Implementing Zerocoin technology for financial privacy
by
ironmaik
on 05/10/2017, 18:26:18 UTC
Hi,

regarding new nvidia ccminer by djm.

If I already compiled source against cuda8 and compute_52 ONLY (GTX9XX series) - do I gain some hashrate on top?
(since github says (more or less) gain came from compiling against compute_52 for cuda8)

Any parts rewritten or only compilation optimization?

Thx