Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 12/03/2018, 08:39:59 UTC
Coinmarketcap is a MUST also in my opinion ;-)
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 05/03/2018, 15:25:10 UTC
coinspool still on 1.1.3, any plans when to upgrade
cheers
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 19/02/2018, 15:31:58 UTC
Hi,
does the new wallet 1.1.4 needs a "reindex" ?
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 09/01/2018, 17:33:13 UTC
When I see "-xxx ROI" marked red in the block explorer this is the amount I put into deposit, correct ?
The amount "minus" vs "deposit" nearly correlate, so this assumption jumps into mind - and what's logged in debug.log for that hash points into same direction.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.
by
ironmaik
on 09/01/2018, 17:29:55 UTC
wrong channel - sorry - forget it.......
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.
by
ironmaik
on 09/01/2018, 17:26:26 UTC
If I see "-xxx ROI" marked red in the block explorer this is the amount I put into deposit, correct
The amount "minus" vs "deposit" nearly correlate, so this assumption jumps into mind.
I also would like to see some comment from the mintpond admin if it's really all healthy - after 6 days with no luck I doubt. We had temporarily > 3 GHs, of course after 6 days without block most miners moved away which is not good. As well as others I see mintpond clear and unspectacluar - which is meant positive! And if we wanna have some steps to be more decentralized we should have reliable alternatives to MPH.
So please give at least a status that from your point of view all seems to be ok -- OR -- check and then give an update ;-)
Thx - hope to speak for others as well
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 06/01/2018, 09:32:20 UTC
360 == conform to coinspool, so wait and see for another 100 rounds....
for the ones interested in - the new binary runs on debian strech (version 9) as well without any modification
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 06/01/2018, 07:45:47 UTC
@ghobson - "you did it" :-)
got 1 block throughout the night solo with new binary on ubuntu 16.04. I did expect 2 blocks but right now hashrate increases so it might be ok.
How long this will show up "immature" in the wallet? The block is there since 8 hours now - I know for the coinspool it takes 360 rounds to be balanced.
For windows I'm out - but others verified it to be ok already.
I can also conform about 20% higher hashrate.
Great stuff - thx to you ghobson :-)
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 05/01/2018, 13:37:37 UTC
So ..... found some time to test now
- brand new binary from ghobson (the haswell one)
./hodlminer-avx2-ubuntu14-haswell --version hodlminer 2.4.4 built on Jan 5 2018 features: x86_64 PHE SSE2 AVX AVX2 XOP libcurl/7.47.0 OpenSSL/1.0.2g zlib/1.2.8 libidn/1.32 librtmp/2.3 libjansson 2.5
- ubuntu 16.04
at least it is running right now with an even better hashrate than the version I used before :-) I did NOT restart ROIcoind since I did this before with -reindex and -rescan -zapwallettxs respective.
Keep you informed when (or if) I got the first block solo mining, will take some hours
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 04/01/2018, 19:08:04 UTC
@ghobson: I can confirm cpuminer - same problems as junktroep reported
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining Hybrid | 15% POS | 593% Term Deposit
by
ironmaik
on 04/01/2018, 14:07:19 UTC
I experience exactly the same behaviour as junktroep described. The "bad block" ghobson wrote is also OK!
Totally lost - even done a -reindex from scratch -> with new errors:
2018-01-04 13:44:15 ERROR: ConnectBlock(): coinbase pays too much (actual=12050000000 vs limit=12049999999) 2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000007f5a6cedac5892380640fd381aa889a46e91f8bd4d5da074ad6219c35b height=33987 log2_work=39.166366 date=2018-01-03 00:51:57 2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound: current best=0000004131844a477f77e92d9729e949c371dbb2e5a6db217f0d49d0b8958f17 height=33986 log2_work=39.166295 date=2018-01-03 00:45:46 2018-01-04 13:44:15 ERROR: ConnectTip(): ConnectBlock 0000007f5a6cedac5892380640fd381aa889a46e91f8bd4d5da074ad6219c35b failed 2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=0000007f5a6cedac5892380640fd381aa889a46e91f8bd4d5da074ad6219c35b height=33987 log2_work=39.166366 date=2018-01-03 00:51:57 2018-01-04 13:44:15 InvalidChainFound: current best=0000004131844a477f77e92d9729e949c371dbb2e5a6db217f0d49d0b8958f17 height=33986 log2_work=39.166295 date=2018-01-03 00:45:46
Will move to pool for now - hopefully this one is fixed now.
Frustrating thing at the mom.....
greez
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Ħ [HODL] 5% Interest. No Staking Req. Term Deposits 10%. Solo Mining.
cannot edit "label" in zerocoin window (here no pulldown) nor in transaction window (here I have the pulldown with possible actions). Even unlocked the wallet.
is anything wrong with - https://zcoin.io/language/en/get-zcoin/ at the moment? I cannot connect to download new wallet 0.13.3. Either with opera and firefox
Can MTP help to get this down again - fighting bots and asics? When can we expect the new algo and will djm's ccminer support it right from the beginning?
If I already compiled source against cuda8 and compute_52 ONLY (GTX9XX series) - do I gain some hashrate on top? (since github says (more or less) gain came from compiling against compute_52 for cuda8)
Any parts rewritten or only compilation optimization?