Is been responsible with gambling all it takes to be a professional gambler or someone needs to win in the process many times already to be considered a professional gambler?

I have always win less, no reason to lie but I get curious when I see gambling related posts online about people pointing to some gamblers calling them professional and the only vital point of this all is because they won many times in their own way.

What is a been qualified as a professional gambler in your own world? The winning part or the responsible part of trying to avoid addiction is all.

The best way to secure it is in a physical way and preferably in different places at ones - on metal plates or something that wouldn't be destroyed by time, fire, and so on, imo..

Seriously, it is not easy to hold Bitcoin for a long period of time, as different things will always cross our minds especially when the price of Bitcoin has increased well and someone has made some profit from it. As a volatile asset bitcoin is,sometimes makes us think that if we don't sell now, the price may drop soon Or we might think we should sell at that particular and buy back later when the price drops. But before we know it, we start spending the money.

However, I will say the reason why many of us always want to sell even before the time we planned to sell our bitcoin is because for a lack of trust that many people have for Bitcoin, despite their investment in it. Another point again is that when we use money we may want to use in near future and invest it in Bitcoin, we always want to sell once we see small profits from our Bitcoin investment.But with a good mindset, we can hold our Bitcoin investment for a long period especially when we invest from our discretionary funds.

When did ethereum's fee not become abnormal? Doesn't it always happen that its fee is abnormal every time there is a rally in its price. And even if for example its price value is falling,
its Ethereum gas fee is also decreasing, I can still say that the charge is high.

Just a few weeks ago before the ETH price rally, Ethereum's fee seemed to be around 8$, it is probably higher now for sure its gas fee I'm sure of that, it might have potential
but the gas fee is really the only concern issue.

Actually, being rich has a very broad meaning, perhaps some people think that wealth is identical to money, but true wealth is freedom from all things, including health. As long as you don't have debts with other people or parties, you are already in the wealthy class, so what you currently own, such as a motorbike, a simple house, a motorbike, and a small amount of Bitcoin assets, is your wealth.

Health is also wealth that cannot be valued by anything, what's the point of someone having a large amount of wealth if they spend their time just sleeping in the hospital. So having more time will make it easier for you to manage it, such as working, resting and exercising to maintain health so you can continue to enjoy life without feeling anxious.

Wealth is the abundance of valuable financial assets or physical possessions which can be converted into a form that can be used for transactions.

In popular usage, wealth can be described as an abundance of items of economic value, or the state of controlling or possessing such items, usually in the form of money, real estate and personal property.

Well-being is what is ultimately good for a person. Also called "welfare" and "quality of life", it is a measure of how well life is going for someone. It is a central goal of many individual and societal endeavors.

The positive speculation on how big this bull run will be is a topic we should talk about a bit more because the nature of the projects getting tokenized these days suggests much greater sustainability.

Take ZKWASM for instance, an open-source infrastructure that integrates ZK proofs with WebAssembly to enable scalable, privacy-preserving on-chain computation.

This innovation by Delphinus Lab has been live for over two years and even has backing from Binance Labs and OKX Ventures.

And now their ZKWASM token is going live centralized exchanges like Binance, Bitget, and OKX and it's hard for me to imagine its performance being perceived negatively.

My main point here is that we are getting more tokenization from projects with real utilities and this might be the spark that lights a very long bull run.

I mostly go with the higher odds with the bets that I make. And that is a combination of thinking that I might be lucky to win those matches and as well as I am taking chances. I'm not just betting blindly without doing some little bit of analysis. So, for me the measure that I do are both but if there is only one choice to make. I am taking my chances. What if the chance that I am lucky with those high odds that I am about to bet will win? 
People might get confused to that and say that there is not that much difference for both of them. But as a gambler, we know that at most times we just take chances.

A lot of these guys copy the same methods whitepaper, roadmap, etc. The only problem I see is the altcoins all did that the first time around and most failed and cut bait and ran.

That's because most ETH competitors are new and widely-unproven. Investors prefer the stability and reliability of the Ethereum blockchain, even if gas fees go all the way to the moon. Just like it's the case with Bitcoin these days. So no matter how fast or cheap the competition is, they'll never be able to beat the "King". ETH enjoys first-mover advantage on the market, anyways.

For those seeking the "best of both worlds", there's the option of using an L2 network built on top of the ETH blockchain. Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, etc. allows anyone to keep using ETH at a cheaper cost. I hope more people discovers this for the ecosystem's one benefit. With cross-chain bridges and atomic swaps becoming a reality, L2 networks will have a better user experience. We'll see if gas fees on the main ETH blockchain will remain low forever. Only time will tell...

Valid take — and I’ve heard the same frustration from many teams, especially after watching project after project burn through hype cycles with no underlying product or system.

You're absolutely right: not every game needs a token, and in some cases, tokenizing too early (or for the wrong reasons) does more harm than good. If there’s no gameplay utility, no economic loops to sustain it, and no governance role – it’s just another vehicle to extract value and disappear.

That said, tokens can work – but only when they’re tied deeply into the systems layer. Not just a currency, but part of how players interact, compete, trade, and progress. We’ve worked with teams that approached it more like designing an in-game resource economy – with emissions, sinks, sinks that evolve, and even hybrid monetization that doesn’t rely on token sales.

Equity and traditional funding absolutely still make sense, especially when the token has no real utility yet. But if a team is going the Web3 route, they need to treat the token not as a shortcut, but as a system design challenge – no less serious than progression or matchmaking logic.

Appreciate the candid view – conversations like this help push the space toward more mature and grounded thinking.

— Dmitriy | dimtiks.com

I mostly go with the higher odds with the bets that I make. And that is a combination of thinking that I might be lucky to win those matches and as well as I am taking chances. I'm not just betting blindly without doing some little bit of analysis. So, for me the measure that I do are both but if there is only one choice to make. I am taking my chances. What if the chance that I am lucky with those high odds that I am about to bet will win? 
People might get confused to that and say that there is not that much difference for both of them. But as a gambler, we know that at most times we just take chances.

Well, I think there might be laws in place on what the government must or must not do with assets that have been seized from criminals. I doubt they can willy nilly decide to simply hodl in hopes of speculation gains. Personally, I am ok with this. The Bitcoin goes back to the people and the price will go down, which means cheaper Bitcoin available to buy. Although considering the amount being sold off, I doubt it will have any kind of significant price impact.

Having big salary?
I think that was never something to consider being rich in today’s economy.

Everything in this era has totally change because of how the whole world have change even the meaning of being rich, high rent, high rate of taxes, inflation and lot more are the factors that determines being rich in today’s world.
In today’s world being rich means you own a house, being able to pay taxes without affecting ur wellbeing budget, and having freedom.
Having alot of money doesn’t matter in today’s world,  if u don’t have freedom and if you can’t make the money work for you.

Different gambling activities have different chances attached to them and when I mean chances I am referring to the probability you have for actually win the bet or hit the jackpot in games like crash and slots. This is basically because sometimes unrealistic bets can sometimes play out as a win and some other times bets that have a high winning chance can eventually become the losing bet.

I believe people who gamble on sports may understand this better since sometimes in sports betting some gambler's prefer to go for the smaller odds that usually have a higher winning chance and sometimes they can still end up a losing game however some prefer to go for the big game with big odds and smaller winning chances.

What's usually your pick as a gambler since sometimes some persons are luckier than others?

I see no foolishness here, and we should weigh the situation carefully before passing judgment. It mustn't be Bitcoin all the time before countries can be progressive, and they have gained enough holding this stash for this long. Something must pay for the budget and government obligations, especially this time that the UK is now preparing for unplanned self-militarisation. This is actually free money. Besides, the UK still has investments all over, so what?

As long as projects owners stands to make profit from the meme coins projects they are developing, they will continue to develop more memes because they already know how much they are going to get inside. It's not all of them that has a good intention towards their investors, it's only experts who knows their tricks that will make profit because they know how to enter and exit. Always have an exit plan if you are investing in memes because the developers and the whale investors also have their exit plans.

Never gonna trust staking where they put my money into the custody of their contract, who knows if there's zero day exploit.
I'm sure even centralized exchange staking is a lot more safer than decentralized staking since the centralized exchange staking are bound with regulation relating to the custody.

I will only stake in a DEX if the annual return is more than 100% so it's worth the risk.

Yes, Everyone has their own strategy and comfort zone - focusing on BTC and ETH as core assets is definitely a solid and proven approach. I’m exploring other options like SOL just to better understand the market dynamics and potential use cases, but it’s true that timing and long-term vision matter most

I don't understand. Was it the card company that rejected you and didn't let your transaction go through, or the company providing the domain that didn't accept it and refused to provide services to you? If it were the latter case, I don't see any relevance to Bitcoin and it giving equal importance to eveyone, because it was the company that refused to provide their services to you probably because of the region you come from, and they must have regional restrictions or may have had bad experiences from other people from your regionn in the past.

Discrimination is something done by will, and it's mostly done by humans, Bitcoin is a decentralized payment system, so it would obviously not care who is the person behind the transaction because its job is only to get the transaction confirmed as long as it meets the criterian required. The miners don't have the right to reject specific transactions within a block as long as it contains enough fees and everything required for it to go through. That's the beauty of Bitcoin, it's truly decentralized.

Investors’ greed has no break as long as there is demand in the market; the memes will continue to get hype. What makes memes in demand is that there is a market, promoters, and exchanges willing to support them; they don’t care about usability.

As long as there is an attractive narrative, promoters will hype it, whales will support it, and investors will sustain it. Memes are risky investments, but we have more types of investors who are willing to take the risks.

He didn't give detailed explanations on the process he took trying to buy the domain and the kind of card he used or which provider he was dealing with, but we get the message he was trying to pass. Bitcoin extended the opportunity of doing business across international boarders without interference from government or requesting any layer of verification causing limitations. For any cross country deal with Bitcoin payment option, it is considered the best selective option.