Search content
Sort by
Showing 18 of 18 results by jakakxl
I'm not exactly sure what you meant by that, but you are indeed right in the point you make at Nvidia sucking at crunching numbers. I'm running a brand new MSI GTX 560, OC to 1003 core, and I'm getting ~100 mhash, lol.
Maybe if enough people from a certain place I will not mention get a clue as to how ATI cards are making great headway into the bitcoin project, possibly there would be less "hurr no drivers" arguments. In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy my housefires and flaming 1.7 wood screws. I made my bed and I'll sleep soundly enough in it.
Maybe if enough people from a certain place I will not mention get a clue as to how ATI cards are making great headway into the bitcoin project, possibly there would be less "hurr no drivers" arguments. In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy my housefires and flaming 1.7 wood screws. I made my bed and I'll sleep soundly enough in it.
Told one of my friends about bitcoin, and the sheer difference between ATI and Nvidia and the main thing they market their products with.
ATI: Eyeinfinity, Number crunching, OC, Hardware OC modifications, Cheaper
Nvidia: Nvidia 3D, Stabler , "Quality", Better drivers, More OC with hacked drivers
Tried to convience him to buy ATI and start number crunching. He said, no.
Your comparision is flawed.
ATI has 3D too, ATI is not always cheaper, Nvidida is DEFINITIVELY not stabler nor does it has ANY nor more "quality" than ATI at all, "better drivers" is not truie anymore, ATI's drivers are very good now, ATi has unlocked shaders etc with hacked BIOS for 6950 which completely beats the ":More OC with hacked drivers" you give Nvidia, Nvidia actually Overclocks better than ATI
actually your comparison is VERY flawed
- ATI is not always cheaper
What? In terms of price/performance, it is. Unless you twist it and say "LOL THE 6970 IS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE 460" (lol). The 5970 doesn't count as it is not manufactured anymore.
- ATI's drivers are very good now
SC2 cursor problem.
- ATi has unlocked shaders etc with hacked BIOS for 6950 which completely beats the ":More OC with hacked drivers" you give Nvidia
What? You're comparing apples to oranges here...
1. ATI is not always cheaper... notable are the GTX 460 and GTX 560. Pretty cheap and beat ATI price/performance a lot of times. We are talking about gaming here not crunching. Reme,ber before the 6XXX came out? How the GTX 460 as a better buy especially in SLI?
2. If you are talking about the frozen mouse thing, all you gotta do is set windows font size to default.Else idk what the problem is as I don't have any problems with starcraft II
3. Well then how about the BIOS editor for ATI that can also help for the OCing... one way or another, these don't make much of a difference and shouldn't change your mind on either going NV or ATI
1. GTX 460: Yes, that's another exception. But remember, it was a mid-end card. GTX 560: see 6950. Overall, ATi still holds the "cheaper" world view.
2. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&biw=972&bih=1595&q=corrupted+starcraft+ati&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=
3.
I don't quite understand what you're saying here.3.
i7-950 - no OC. 2x 5970 with heavy OC. the rest is minimal. probably only wc pump matters - 18W.
1000W is the minimum you can get, and YOU NEED A QUALITY ONE. a 5970 Heavy OCed = 450~460W (normal POC is 400W) or so. CPU at full load is 130W or wtv... Right there is over 1000W, than include HDD, DVD-RW, pump etc, it is WAY over 1000W. Even at 10% CPU usage, you are basically maxing your PSU 24/7
I'd go with 1200W if you want to OC your 5970s. At stock,you have to expect at least 350W full load each 5970... You can pull it off with normal OCs, but heavy OCs are pushing it
Crossfires do not scale like that -- "A second card requires you to add another 294 Watts."
I'm not exactly sure what you meant by that, but you are indeed right in the point you make at Nvidia sucking at crunching numbers. I'm running a brand new MSI GTX 560, OC to 1003 core, and I'm getting ~100 mhash, lol.
Maybe if enough people from a certain place I will not mention get a clue as to how ATI cards are making great headway into the bitcoin project, possibly there would be less "hurr no drivers" arguments. In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy my housefires and flaming 1.7 wood screws. I made my bed and I'll sleep soundly enough in it.
Maybe if enough people from a certain place I will not mention get a clue as to how ATI cards are making great headway into the bitcoin project, possibly there would be less "hurr no drivers" arguments. In the meantime, I'm going to enjoy my housefires and flaming 1.7 wood screws. I made my bed and I'll sleep soundly enough in it.
Told one of my friends about bitcoin, and the sheer difference between ATI and Nvidia and the main thing they market their products with.
ATI: Eyeinfinity, Number crunching, OC, Hardware OC modifications, Cheaper
Nvidia: Nvidia 3D, Stabler , "Quality", Better drivers, More OC with hacked drivers
Tried to convience him to buy ATI and start number crunching. He said, no.
Your comparision is flawed.
ATI has 3D too, ATI is not always cheaper, Nvidida is DEFINITIVELY not stabler nor does it has ANY nor more "quality" than ATI at all, "better drivers" is not truie anymore, ATI's drivers are very good now, ATi has unlocked shaders etc with hacked BIOS for 6950 which completely beats the ":More OC with hacked drivers" you give Nvidia, Nvidia actually Overclocks better than ATI
actually your comparison is VERY flawed
- ATI is not always cheaper
What? In terms of price/performance, it is. Unless you twist it and say "LOL THE 6970 IS MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE 460" (lol). The 5970 doesn't count as it is not manufactured anymore.
- ATI's drivers are very good now
SC2 cursor problem.
- ATi has unlocked shaders etc with hacked BIOS for 6950 which completely beats the ":More OC with hacked drivers" you give Nvidia
What? You're comparing apples to oranges here...
># Value of a BTC will always be related to the cost of power to produce it, since that's directly related to difficulty, which in turn is related to Bitcoin's popularity
that is a very wrong assumption; just take a look at your numbers
that is a very wrong assumption; just take a look at your numbers
[20:04:36] His stats
[20:04:42] how do you know
[20:04:48] Don't make no sense
[20:04:52] Mango-chan: >I think
[20:05:00] mmarker: neither does what you just said
[20:05:00] so where is he
[20:05:03] We're on block 109051
[20:05:15] block 109050 was just found
[20:05:37] and 109051 was just found as well
[20:05:44] * malfy (~malfy@unaffiliated/malfy) has joined #bitcoin-dev
[20:05:51] at 3:49:28 UTC
[20:04:42] how do you know
[20:04:48] Don't make no sense
[20:04:52] Mango-chan: >I think
[20:05:00] mmarker: neither does what you just said
[20:05:00] so where is he
[20:05:03] We're on block 109051
[20:05:15] block 109050 was just found
[20:05:37] and 109051 was just found as well
[20:05:44] * malfy (~malfy@unaffiliated/malfy) has joined #bitcoin-dev
[20:05:51] at 3:49:28 UTC
Yeah, I guess I'll go unlock it soon.
Hello, I currently have 2x6950 in crossfire, i7 2600k, 11.1a drivers, ATi Stream 2.3.
When I try to run it with the following parems:
poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=y --host=http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d 0
Hi,When I try to run it with the following parems:
poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=y --host=http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d 0
- Cayman [1] Cayman
[2] Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
It gives me this error:
InvalidURL: nonnumeric port: ''
Unexpected error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyc", line 171, in mine
File "BitcoinMiner.pyc", line 157, in getwork
File "jsonrpc\proxy.pyc", line 42, in __call__
File "urllib.pyc", line 89, in urlopen
File "urllib.pyc", line 208, in open
File "urllib.pyc", line 334, in open_http
File "httplib.pyc", line 1008, in __init__
File "httplib.pyc", line 656, in __init__
File "httplib.pyc", line 673, in _set_hostport
Any help? Thanks!
get rid of "http://:8332" from the host line, and put the port number after the "--port=" switch.
Thank you so much!
Anyone got 6950/6970 w/ any recommended settings? Any results?
Hello, I currently have 2x6950 in crossfire, i7 2600k, 11.1a drivers, ATi Stream 2.3.
When I try to run it with the following parems:
poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=y --host=http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d 0
Hi,When I try to run it with the following parems:
poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=y --host=http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d 0
- Cayman [1] Cayman
[2] Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
It gives me this error:
InvalidURL: nonnumeric port: ''
Unexpected error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyc", line 171, in mine
File "BitcoinMiner.pyc", line 157, in getwork
File "jsonrpc\proxy.pyc", line 42, in __call__
File "urllib.pyc", line 89, in urlopen
File "urllib.pyc", line 208, in open
File "urllib.pyc", line 334, in open_http
File "httplib.pyc", line 1008, in __init__
File "httplib.pyc", line 656, in __init__
File "httplib.pyc", line 673, in _set_hostport
Any help? Thanks!
get rid of "http://:8332" from the host line, and put the port number after the "--port=" switch.
Thank you, it works!
Hello, I currently have 2x6950 in crossfire, i7 2600k, 11.1a drivers, ATi Stream 2.3.
When I try to run it with the following parems:
poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=y --host=http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d 0
When I try to run it with the following parems:
poclbm.exe --user=x --pass=y --host=http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 -d 0
- Cayman [1] Cayman
[2] Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz
It gives me this error:
InvalidURL: nonnumeric port: ''
Unexpected error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BitcoinMiner.pyc", line 171, in mine
File "BitcoinMiner.pyc", line 157, in getwork
File "jsonrpc\proxy.pyc", line 42, in __call__
File "urllib.pyc", line 89, in urlopen
File "urllib.pyc", line 208, in open
File "urllib.pyc", line 334, in open_http
File "httplib.pyc", line 1008, in __init__
File "httplib.pyc", line 656, in __init__
File "httplib.pyc", line 673, in _set_hostport
Any help? Thanks!