Why you contact them?
Yh, I felt very ups*t that #66 was very likely to have been snatched. I just think it is one's responsibility to ensure there are no risk of sorts so I reached out really just hoping they will tell me their secure processes which should be enough reassurance at least. I know my way with keys, the maths of ECC for BTC and most of the functionality but I am not very familiar with the indepth mining process because I never mined btc at all or joined any pool. So I wanted them to state with their mouth what you said here like the point that miners don't Just see decrypted rawtx immediately and so on rly.
If someday I ever found a key. 100% I am going to use the mara service without doubt, Obviously I am going to document it well, like publish the sha256 hash here on bitcoin talk and maybe some other tech stuff.
Members of a mining pool don't see all the RAW transactions, they only see Block header of 80 bytes, it is faster than update 1MB every second
I have heard of such a thing that the pool confirmations are more automated than manual and rawTX isn't just openly sited out there from someone but yh wanted to double check this by getting them to say it but they gave me a chilling response. I should have solicited experts here before asking them I guess. I don't know why they had to make it complex really by such response.
"this" what? Please be more clear with your question.
I meant how one can safeguard it if Mara wasn't gonna be reliable. I think with what u've confirmed I am a bit less worried about using it now.
[/quote]
Also what are the chances that filing multiple -rbf TXs with slightly higher fees on the Slipstream concurrently could help get a faster confirmation before the bot BSGS the key and run its own -rbf.