Awesome work!

Checking in consider me in (#42) thanks.

Wasn't trying to FUD - had real questions:

OgNasty stated that the account had been comprised (#44 and #41), then later talked about having the coins in hand (#59).  I'm sure you can understand my confusion.

Had the link explaining that names were carried over to the new coin was posted in the first place - everything would have cleared up quickly.  Instead, I see (how many posts) suggesting that I'm trying to FUD?...  I've been in the community for some time, the projects that I've been a part of and am still, speak for themselves.  Regardless:

1)  Great - can't wait and looking forward to my coin's sister :-)

2)  I only wish, as a community, we act with a bit more civility.  Granted, a ton of non-verbal information is lost - so we need to make a greater effort.  I do think this frightens off folks that would otherwise make for a stronger overall group. 

I realize that I too probably read too much into the earlier posts, and felts a bit slighted - only now as I'm writing this, I'm perhaps feeling that others weren't trying to jump me as I initially thought.  I apologize if my tone is improper as well. 

We are all here because we love the idea of crypto and also because we love physical tokens representing this grand new experiment.   

Again, reading through this thread, you don't see how there seemingly is conflicting information?  I think it is not unreasonable to request that the matter be cleared up to ensure complete confidence.  Suggesting that I can move on, that feels like a deflection (perhaps it was not intended to be). 

The reason that I suggest that there's something weird going on, it is because that I haven't log'ed into this account in over a year (you can check perhaps).  I did so to show my wife the collectibles marketplace - only to see a name that I hold dear... NaTTy's.  When I saw this (on page two of the forum) I clicked to see the new coin...Only to see that I'm on the list. 

If this is true, WONDERFUL - I love the work (I'm in like flynn).  However, you don't see how this really makes me wonder if perhaps this is not 'real'.  Plus I see a number of respected posts suggesting the same?...  I would like a clear explanation and one that can point to other channels explicitly for further confidence.  I like many here have been around the block and know that things in this space are not always what they seem.  I'd like to know.

Updates to this. And by updates, verifiable cross channel proof/news.   I’d like to better understand what’s happening with this.  I think that this is not actually happening/real.  Please be careful people. 

Signing / Verify an address to claim my clams.

I have some old paperwallets that are still in use, so I'd rather not expose any information outside of a signed message, using an offline computer running brainwallet software.

However, I open the software, change the network to CLAM, and then sign a very basic message - it is during the verification process on my QT client that I get a verification failure error.

I have even performed this in 'reverse'.  Basically signing a message on the QT client, just to be sure that the data elements that I'm using are in fact correct.  Any ideas greatly appreciated.

Running The CLAM Client v.1.4.17 (aka QT client).

Got the coin - looks awesome.  Thanks so much!

Awesome!

I'll take 'D' - txid incoming.

Looks awesome - Thank you again.

The COA reminded me of a Tarot Card... (might be interesting - but a loooong term idea ;-) )

This sounds great. 

Just wondering about the addresses and all - can we submit vanity addresses for engraving? (If so, any preferred means of communicating this or just DM)  Thanks again for making this coin.

Might I suggest a Blockchain based solution... There's a few out there,

https://stamp.io/

etc

I'd really love to see it on Litecoin's Blockchain too....

#42 - Thanks

Sorry if re-post, the system glitched and ...

Anyway:

1)  Discount Code?  Pretty please...

2)  No shipping to the USA, really...

I hate to be a 'me too' - and not have anything to really contrib to.  But - me too :-(

I'm running Mac OS 10.10.5 Openbazaar 1.1.4 for the mac.  Some of the programs I've got open/running::  Bitcore Core, and Ethereum-Wallet (no problems on either of these.)

I don't have my IP ports open for this particular computer, is this an issue?

For what's it is worth a screenshot of as far as I can go::

http://i.imgur.com/Z9kUXW5.png
(Basically the same as the other...)

What am I forgetting or overlooking.  Do I need any ports open on my computer/router?  I just want to 'see' other shops and was under the impression this SW would be the interface.  Hell, I thought that I needed bitcoin running - ala Lighthouse...

Awesome!    Great way to start a weekend. 

Thank you, I really appreciate all the work that went into making this raffle a reality; and I'm also excited at this example that demonstrates the power and potential of this technology at facilitating help - regardless of physical location.  This is only possible through hard work, and a great community of peers.  This is why I love the crypto space, the people are amazing.

I also will get some more later today 

Also, how will the raffle actually be performed?  Will tickets be assigned a random number and then a random number picked, traced back to the TXID and then the user?

Just wondering.

2.5 for no.3

1.4 for #3

I bid 0.85 BTC