seriously man. this whole forum is a bunch of little fucking kids yelling at each other about who's right.
This guy hit the nail on the head. So much FUD, opinions based on nothing, racism, name calling, bitching.......this place is horrible these days. No sort of overall community, anyone can just post whatever they want with no moderation lol.
Now with easy to release tokens, wallet builders and no real set of rules stopping hundreds of useless coins being created and posted. People wonder why they get scammed? Because this place makes it easy for the scammers lol
Why re-invent the wheel, once an algo has been picked there wouldn't be much different between the coins anyway? Nothing wrong with fixing a broken wheel. Again, where is your proof that they can't dev? FUD FUD FUD
You are, again, trying to reframe the issue. Many different cryptocurrencies share mining algorithms and that is not a problem. The problem here is that Credits is simply a total clone of Dynamic with just a few minor tweaks.
And you only registered today to troll this thread/slack or created a new account to hide your real ID lol
As I said above, I registered because I felt that the points I raised were important and because I was banned from the Slack after raising them. Everyone is free to read the Slack conversation:
Why aren't you posting in every other coin that is just a clone then, many also have hidden pre-mines.
A newly modded member of the slack got ban happy, the dev didnt want you banned and was against it. That's why the ban was lifted. The dev is all up for discussion. But your not discussing. Your accusing them of not being a dev based on nothing really which is FUD. You keep saying ITS JUST A CLONE!!!! Well go post in every other thread here because most of them are just clones.
fl0d3v changed only what anyone with basic programming skills and an hour of time could have. Like I said in the chat, he changed some text strings, the parameters for the network itself (to create a new network, obviously), some colors, etc. Whether Credits has the '-lite' suffix or not, it is essentially a 1:1 clone of another project--Dynamic (DYN).
Why re-invent the wheel, once an algo has been picked there wouldn't be much different between the coins anyway? Nothing wrong with fixing a broken wheel. Again, where is your proof that they can't dev? FUD FUD FUD
And you only registered today to troll this thread/slack or created a new account to hide your real ID lol
Is it a straight up clone and re-name like so many coins that get put on here (and still get traded for some reason, how many "lite" versions of coins do we really need)?
Yes, that's exactly what it is. Look at the github and look at his commits. Even the markdown on the main github page is almost identical, including grammatical errors, with only a few minor changes and instances of the text "Dynamic" replaced with "Credits". You are attempting to reframe the issue by asking me why a developer shouldn't receive a payout. The issue is that he is not a developer in this context--copy-pasting does not make you a developer. At most, he is a marketer.
The dev has already explained what has been done (and why, non working functions etc). No this is not an exact clone of a coin, Pascal-Lite is a 1:1 clone of a coin with the word lite on the end.
I'm guessing you have lots of proof that they aren't a "real" dev?
Everything is all out in the open. No-one has claimed it's a brand new algo etc.
Your still posting FUD.
--Edit-- Why re-invent the wheel, once an algo has been picked there wouldn't be much different between the coins anyway? Nothing wrong with fixing a broken wheel.
I usually lurk and never post, but I felt that this was important. I raised what I feel are important points in the credits-community Slack and instead of addressing them, they removed me. Here is our conversation up until I was removed:
The developer of this project has simply cloned Dynamic (DYN) and changed a few numbers. That does not necessarily mean that this project is a scam, but it does mean that the "developer" could receive a huge payout from his relatively large pre-mine for what amounts to maybe an hour or less of real work.
Why shouldn't the developer recieve a payout? Has anything been hidden? Is it a straight up clone and re-name like so many coins that get put on here (and still get traded for some reason, how many "lite" versions of coins do we really need)? Nope, he/she has at least done some work, has a roadmap, invested his/her own money to get it started and commited to developing the coin for at least 2 years.
So, your actual point is what exactly? FUD?
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [MCL] MiracleCoin | No ICO | Proof of Faucet distribution | Traders Coin
by
jmixup
on 22/10/2014, 23:00:40 UTC
Tweeted!
Shocked its not been added already
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [MCL] MiracleCoin | No ICO | Proof of Faucet distribution | Traders Coin
Kudos to you from America. You have a terrific coin with a great future.
As with Guldencoin you are adding merchants daily and developing a customer friendly cryptocurrency. Say, I noticed that Guldencoin is accepted at Subway sandwich shops in the Netherlands. Maybe Subway would accept Sterlingcon in the UK and British Isles. I would't mind buying a chicken sandwich with Sterlingcoin here the states too!
Best regards to you.
Nooooooooooo! I'll spend all my Sterling on food if that was the case haha