Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 36 results by john_cm
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Topic OP
[ANN] [GPTС] GPTсash – AI-Powered Cryptocurrency | KawPow | No Pre-mine
by
john_cm
on 31/05/2025, 14:10:20 UTC






Welcome to GPTcash (GPTC) – a revolutionary decentralized cryptocurrency of the new generation, inspired by the power of artificial intelligence and built on the reliable and fair KawPow algorithm.

About the Coin

Coin Name: GPTcash
Ticker: GPTC
Algorithm: KawPow
Blockchain Type: Proof of Work (PoW)
Block Time: 60 seconds
Block Reward: 50 GPTC
Max Supply: 21,000,000 GPTC
Premine: None
Dev Fee: None
Fair Launch: Yes, a fully fair launch with no privileges

Project Goals

  • To create a fair and decentralized cryptocurrency for GPU miners
  • To stimulate the AI and blockchain development community
  • Integration with AI, machine learning, and data processing platforms
  • Transparency, openness, and community involvement in project development

Technical Details

  • KawPow – ASIC resistant, optimized for GPU mining
  • Blockchain: completely independent
  • API, RPC, and CLI available from day one

Links

Wallet: https://github.com/GPTcash-dev/GPTcash/releases/download/1.1.3/GPTcash-win64-1.1.2.zip

Roadmap

Q2 2025
Network launch
Code release on GitHub
Mining start (fair launch)
Basic infrastructure: block explorer, mining pools

Q3 2025
Listings on first exchanges
Mobile wallet launch
Begin promoting in AI/ML communities

Q4 2025
AI platform integration
Bonus programs for developers and miners
AMA sessions, contests, team interaction

Join GPTcash

We are building a community where everyone has a voice. Whether you're a miner, developer, investor, or simply an enthusiast – GPTcash welcomes you. Help us shape the future of fair PoW!
Contact


✉ For inquiries and proposals: dev@gptcash.com

GPTcash – The cryptocurrency of the new generation. No pre-mine. No centralized control. Only decentralization, community, and technology.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Most stablecoins are not censored-resistance and it sucks
by
john_cm
on 16/07/2020, 12:44:40 UTC
I read somewhere that Tether Freezes Millions of Dollars USDT in 40 Addresses Amid Regulatory Pressure, and it gets me really concerned about the future of crypto payment. Not just USDT, other stablecoins like PAX, BUSD, USDC are all centralized and have the powers to censor or blacklist an address just like banks do to a regular bank account.

The whole development sucks. Stablecoins are leading the future of payment, most people prefer to transact in it due to the stability and fast transaction. However, if it continues in this track, crypto will just be another petty tool used by the government to torment the lives of people. I think its time we start looking elsewhere away from all these shitty stablecoins and probably come up with reliable, decentralized crypto more suitable for the mainstream payment than the ones currently existing.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: What will it take for crypto payment to go mainstream?
by
john_cm
on 12/07/2020, 10:02:24 UTC
From careful observation, it's becoming clear that it may be hard for crypto to go mainstream without the involvement of the payment sector.
For now, the most reason why BTC is not good enough for common payment is yeah, the high transaction fee. However, Bitcoin is the most trusted crypto. If there should be a payment from crypto, many people will prefer to accept BTC because it is trusted and valuable enough compared to the other cryptocurrencies. Although in the crypto world, many people will not prefer to the BTC for payment because they know the fee. however, what's about the people or company out there? They probably only know BTC as the best crypto and most used crypto. Most of them only trust in the Bitcoin. And they only want to accept BTC. This can be a dilemma. However, the choice is on everybody's side.

That's right. a lot is going to change is Bitcoin fee is slashed to a few cents. But then, one would imagine what will be the fate of the mining network should mining become unprofitable and unsustainable due to low fees and continues halving. First, a lot needs to be done about mining costs. The system is totally messed up.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: What will it take for crypto payment to go mainstream?
by
john_cm
on 11/07/2020, 18:39:57 UTC
Businesses are considering the volatility of cryptomarket and maybe this is the reason why they still don’t want to adopt and we cannot blame bitcoin for that. Fees wise, cryptocurrency is a lot more cheaper and faster compare to the banks. So there’s still a chance for the main stream only if we can encourage more businesses to adopt and to search more about the benefits of cryptocurrency.

Crypto will go mainstream on different perspective, it might not be thru payment system but it can be into something that is more important, and that adoption will begin very soon.

it will be interesting to see what will drive crypto adoption in the coming years
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: What will it take for crypto payment to go mainstream?
by
john_cm
on 09/07/2020, 22:43:43 UTC
Total embracement I guess, people should start implementing crypto payment in their businesses across the globe and also to avoid volatility the merchants and business owners should swap tokens and coins to usd coins instantly, it should work this way

The whole adoption thing will happen with Time. maybe soon, but we will definitely get there
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: What will it take for crypto payment to go mainstream?
by
john_cm
on 08/07/2020, 19:05:27 UTC
In fact this is true, Bitcoin needs a long time to confirm the transaction as it requires large fees and these are things that make a lot of people prefer to use altcoins like XRP, TRX, LTC, Dash because it is much faster and its fees are low compared to Bitcoin.
But I think this problem has been solved with the Bitcoin lighting network where fees have been reduced very significantly and the speed has become superior to altcoins as well but the Bitcoin lighting network has not been widely popularized yet.

That's the problem, the lightning network hasn't been fully accepted even among giant crypto payment gateways. strange though!
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
What will it take for crypto payment to go mainstream
by
john_cm
on 08/07/2020, 10:24:47 UTC
From careful observation, it's becoming clear that it may be hard for crypto to go mainstream without the involvement of the payment sector. Whenever we talk about cryptocurrency payment, we quickly want to adopt Bitcoin. I think we are all getting it wrong here considering Bitcoin's high transaction fee and relatively longer confirmation time compared to other crypto stablecoins or other faster crypto assets.

My personal take, however, is that, for crypto to go mainstream and the impact felt, the focus needs to pivot a bit away from Bitcoin. Yes, it is the first crypto, but at its present state, it definitely cannot fit into every area. This is my opinion, if you have something contrary, I will definitely love to hear them.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Topic OP
How reliable is crypto payment?
by
john_cm
on 01/07/2020, 22:37:39 UTC
⭐ Merited by CryptopreneurBrainboss (1)
I thought about the use of cryptocurrency by merchants for day to day trade settlement. When combined with fiat, it gives customers a lot of options and flexibility to chose how they transact. On the flip side, I am also thinking that crypto volatility could poss a lot of dangers and issues when adopting crypto for payment.

What do you think about the future of cryptocurrency payment, will conventional altcoin (non-stablecoins) have a chance or the race will solely be won by stablecoins?
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Is the economy supposed to be a political tools?
by
john_cm
on 26/06/2020, 17:28:08 UTC
To the best of my knowledge the federal government does not draw up fiscal policies, they rather approve them when a bill is passed, the central bank of a Nation is responsible for making economic policies which they think would benefit the nation.

You should also note that the sector that makes the policies is different from where actual bills are printed. The idea of 'printing money out of thin air' should not be taken literally as this rarely happens. What the central banks does is they put measures in place to counter the effect of an economic issue;
During a recession, an expansive monetary policy would be passed and this would help to stimulate the economy and increase the cash flow without printing more actual bank notes. This can be done by;
• Making cheaper credits available for banks. This would increase the amounts local banks can borrow from the federal reserves, the bank in turn would make loans readily available for the populace at cheaper interest rates. This is done to stimulate SMEs by injecting more money into the market.
• They can also engage in quantitative easing: were the central banks would buy securities and bonds from member banks, and provide them with credits in those amounts, this increases the liquidity in Banks and increases the flow of money. This was done by the Federal reserve in America during the 2008 financial crisis

These measures are rarely taken proactively and are usually implemented after a recession has already hit, hence the outcomes are not usually very impressive, they are used to set an economy on the path to recovery. It could take several years after it's implementation for the economy to begin to expand.

I guess you have a decent economic background which is great. I also understand that the body making policies and those printing the bills are independent at least on paper. But I strongly feel that behind the scene of what we don't see, there are a lot of interconnected powers playing out, of which the government is always the mastermind.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Verifying that an ERC20 token can't be inflated
by
john_cm
on 26/06/2020, 09:02:00 UTC
Hi,
I have found an ERC20 token related to a business I think is interesting. The only issue left with me is how can I verify, within their open source code, that the creator of the token can't just create as much token as he wants at some point if the token becomes very valuable. Does anybody know? Thank you!

One thing you should be aware of is that any code that is not fully decentralized can be altered by the dev at any point in time even if it was originally programmed to be capped at a given number. But increasing the total supply seldom happens even with the most shitty project. What is most frequent however is the continuous release of tokens from the total supply into the circulating supply and massive dump from project team members, which is even more deterrent. 
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Compound (COMP) Gets Listed on KuCoin, Deposit Now and Share 4,067 USDT!
by
john_cm
on 26/06/2020, 08:53:30 UTC
Compound taking the DeFi world by storm is one thing that blows my mind. The number of exchanges that have declared support for the COMP token in barely a week time is mindblowing
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Topic OP
Is the economy supposed to be a political tools?
by
john_cm
on 26/06/2020, 08:49:10 UTC
I still find it hard to wrap my head over the fact that most economist analyst is aware that continuous printing of money is deterrent to the economy and quality of life in the long-run, but still, the government keeps issuing endless bills. It's not my desire to politicize my views but ideally, economists should run most of the economic policies but it seems the economist is only a remote control tool used by the government to achieve political interest.

It seems the world now runs policies for immediate gains while trashing policies that bring future gains. Maybe I am having a distorted view, but looking at most government policies around the world, even a non-economist can tell that this will be disastrous in the future.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Altcoins vs. Stablecoin: which is more suitable for merchant crypto payment?
by
john_cm
on 20/06/2020, 08:25:36 UTC
Depends on what you're looking for. Some people like to be paid in BTC or ETH because they like the speculative side of things and believe the crypto ecosystem will gain value over time. Similar to if someone asked you if they could pay for something in Apple stock, and it would be up to you to decide if you thought that was going to appreciate in the future.

I personally really dislike stablecoins because the issuing parties are either sketchy (like Tether) or not prepared to do support any real volume (like GUSD). If you're gonna accept crypto, I would just accept that it means you are intrinsically bullish and take BTC and ETH.

The extreme volatility of crypto stands on its way to mainstream adoption... For me personally, if my business involves high turnover rate and will require constant cash to service inventory, I might be a bit skeptical about accepting regular volatile crypto because it might dip thereby wiping my business profit.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Altcoins vs. Stablecoin: which is more suitable for merchant crypto payment?
by
john_cm
on 19/06/2020, 22:25:34 UTC
Paper currency is the most stable currency that does not know sharp fluctuations from time to time, but the cryptocurrency as we have all seen is more volatile since its inception. That is why I do not think that crypto will be a solution for merchants who accept payment in digital currency. You can only benefit from investing in digital currency.

in terms of stability, there is a thing line between paper currency and stablecoins cryptocurrency... my concerns, however, is on stablecoins vs non-crypto stablecoins
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Altcoins vs. Stablecoin: which is more suitable for merchant crypto payment?
by
john_cm
on 18/06/2020, 19:23:25 UTC
Stablecoins are usually tokens that are built on the Ethereum or Tron network. So they are dependent on the main coin and its blockchain - especially on the network security, scalability, fees, and transaction speeds. I just would like to say, that you simply can´t use stablecoins without the altcoin and its blockchain for now. There is no stablecoin that uses its own blockchain and probably that's good because it is much easier for the users, to hold them on one Ethereum wallet.

I am not concern about how they are built, I am however concerned about merchant choice and perception of the two cryptocurrencies
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
Altcoins vs. Stablecoin: which is more suitable for merchant crypto payment?
by
john_cm
on 18/06/2020, 09:15:25 UTC
One advantage of stablecoins is price stability. Merchants don't have to worry about price volatility when transacting in stablecoins. In the past and present, there have been a handful of projects proposing issuing altcoins (non-stablecoins) that will lead the future of crypto payment. What's the fate of such projects, will there ever be considered viable?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: If Bitcoin Is Old Tech But....
by
john_cm
on 18/06/2020, 08:28:25 UTC
You really cant put Bitcoin out of the map considering its legacy and popularity among the cryptocurrencies out there. Bitcoin is more convenient and popular so using an alternate coin would be like switching from a smartphone to a keypad phone. I hope you get my point.

Your statement still boils down to the philosophy that suggests that Bitcoin might only be enjoying the benefit that comes from its popularity of being the first cryptocurrency not necessarily that its better than other new generational cryptos.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: If Bitcoin Is Old Tech But....
by
john_cm
on 15/06/2020, 21:52:19 UTC
You are wrong...
Who complaints that the Bitcoin transaction is slow? Who says that Bitcoin technology is old already?
There is no other Bitcoin than this the Old one (as you say). Yeah, we can create a lot of altcoins but not another Bitcoin.

We don't need to be FUD in here if we don't believe and trust this technology. Bitcoin is just a 10-year-old baby and it already showing great and amazing results. We have the dumps and ups but people are still happy with this, don't you ever know that? I hope you don't mind this but to consider reconciliation rather than to think wild.

I am not FUDing mate, rather I am seeking for information or input from the community
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: If Bitcoin Is Old Tech But....
by
john_cm
on 13/06/2020, 20:33:16 UTC
Nobody is forcing you to use bitcoin, and I doubt the community is forced either. If you don't wanna use it then you can move one, and tried to compete with the bitcoin chain. Old or young doesn't matter in crypto, or if you want that to count, then factoring the security of the network must be included too.

Simply because something started earlier than everyone, doesn't mean it's no longer good.

 I am not saying Bitcoin isn't good, my argument however is that they seem to be other faster and more scalable blockchains in existence right now.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Does Currency Value Falls During Recession?
by
john_cm
on 13/06/2020, 20:23:58 UTC
I want to believe USA and her dollar are the only currency that can withstand the effect of the pandemic and the influx of fund, especially with response of the fund from the government as palliative, we may be disappointed. We may see a properly management fund in the economy, more so the drastic opening of the economy is strategically placed for swift recovery into normalcy.

It will be a total miracle for the economy to go through this global pandemic without sinking into a deep recession