Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 125 results by joms123
Post
Topic
Board Services
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: A simple bitcoin Q/A. Learn new and interesting stuff about bitcoin.
by
joms123
on 25/04/2018, 14:37:49 UTC
⭐ Merited by pugman (1)
Since the lightning network is becoming more popular now,a lot of people are really confused on what actually it is.  So here's a question about it:

Question: What is lightning network? What's its role and what does it do?

I am looking for a simple answer or basically in layman's terms,so that people can actually understand.

I am eagerly waiting for the next question.
Oh crap,I almost forgot..
Don't post just because you have to earn a merit. I am seeing a lot of one/two liners just being rephrased from third party websites. Please understand what you're writing. Or just don't do anything rather.

Lightning Network

This terms explains everything in a clever way, so I’ll simply reiterate for the laziest who don’t feel like clicking a link:

You and I sign a contract.

As long as we both respect it, no one else needs to know we have this contract. But if I try to screw you, you want to be sure there’s someone who can force me to desist.

That’s Lightning Network: the contract is a smart contract, the enforcer is the blockchain. As long as no one breaks the law, millions of smart contracts can be stipulated simultaneously off chain, thus reducing greatly the amount of congestion on chain, but as soon as there’s a contentious, the smart contract can be broadcasted on the network (classic BTC transaction) and the power of blockchain will fix the issue. As simple as that. It’s just the translation of common practices into crypto-space.
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: 14 merit bonus for quality users [Jr to Sr. Member]
by
joms123
on 25/04/2018, 14:33:12 UTC
If you believe that you have quality posts for all 20 of your most recent posts then I will review them and if I agree I will give you 14 merit.
Sr. Members and below only.

However. if I heavily disagree I will add a neutral feedback to your account indicating that you are a spammer.
Game on. This is for those that complain about not being rewarded for quality content.

Disclaimer: I will only review the twenty posts that occur before your message.

*arbitrary amount is because of the sMerit I have left.

Please, don't send me merit. If you have merit to spare then give it to those that need it. Or save it, and in the likely case that there are more people here that deserve merit than I have available, you can send them the merit instead.
If you don't mind spend a few minutes and investigate my record. I trust I can went through your strict standards, if not I will attempt progressively and return later.

A debt of gratitude is in order for your opportunity Sir.
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: sMerit Post-Review
by
joms123
on 25/04/2018, 14:25:33 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: vlad230's post review service - Jr. Member and up [OPEN]
by
joms123
on 25/04/2018, 14:21:43 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Can Bitcoin solve the worlds problem?
by
joms123
on 25/04/2018, 13:20:32 UTC
⭐ Merited by STT (1)
Hello everyone!


Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency and worldwide payment system. It is the first decentralized digital currency, as the system works without a central bank or single administrator. The network is peer-to-peer and transactions take place between users directly, without an intermediary. These transactions are verified by network nodes through the use of cryptography and recorded in a public distributed ledger called a blockchain. Bitcoin was invented by an unknown person or group of people under the name Satoshi Nakamoto and released as open-source software in 2009.

This invention of Satoshi Nakamoto incredibly stunning us, Bitcoin known as a revolutionary invention.

Can Bitcoin solve the worlds problem?



Absolute yes for me , why?

The problem that governments created by monopolising the issuance of currency and thrusting fiat systems of finance and currency upon the world.

✦ 100% voluntary and non-coerced or forced upon people

✦ Users/owners are free to do with it what they will and use it in whatever way they like

✦ Fraud/counterfeiting (which are standard practice in banking/government finance systems) are completely impossible

✦ No central entity means no single point of failure and a distributed mining/accounting system means an incredibly resilient and powerful network (The Bitcoin network outperforms the top 500 supercomputers combined | ExtremeTech)

✦ Inflation (creation of money) happens at a stable rate and halves every four years, creating a limited supply of 21 Million Units - this solves a problem that central banks and governments have created

✦ Free transfer and free to hold - this solves the problem that banks created
Post
Topic
Board Bounties (Altcoins)
Re: [AIRDROP] ALTTEX.IO- 🔥💰90 ALTX tokens (0.14 ETH) 💰🔥 to each participan!!
by
joms123
on 25/04/2018, 00:43:34 UTC

#Proof of ownership
Username telegram:@imjeybi08
Username twitter:@imjeybi08
Link to profile twitter: https://twitter.com/imjeybi08
Username Facebook: Jomel Basco
Link to Profile Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/imjeybi08
Post
Topic
Board Bounties (Altcoins)
Re: [BOUNTY]Modern Finance Chain - MERCHANT PAYMENTS + REWARD SYSTEM
by
joms123
on 24/04/2018, 11:19:19 UTC
BCT Name: Joms123
Your Twitter account Link: http://twitter.com/imjeybi08
 
Links to the RTs&likes:
1 - https://twitter.com/ModernChain/status/988910126366167040
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -


25/04 - 01/05"   "Week 4
02/045- 08/05"   "Week 5
09/05- 15/05"   "Week 6
16/05- 22/05"   "Week 7
23/05- 29/05"   "Week 7
30/05- 05/08"
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Why is bitcoin better than stocks, real-estate?
by
joms123
on 24/04/2018, 11:03:29 UTC
In the traditional investment systems  there are areas like stock exchange, real estates, commodity market, forex market. Then there are hedge funds, mutual funds, equity, debentures. Next in line are precious metals like Gold, silver, diamond. Years after year and decades after decades when mainstream economics was convincing people that how one of above is better than other as it is giving returns in the range of 8% to 9% at max 10-13% a new revolution named bitcoin is rising and spreading across the world. Bitcoin has defied all conventional knowledge about return on interest. Surviving each negative publicity and doubts, incidents like mt. gox and still growing better than ever.

What do you think why bitcoin is the best investment than stocks, real-estate, gold or any other conventional investment?

This is a difficult one, as I am not invested in bitcoin and heavily invested in real estate. Real Estate has some significant advantages. One, it is tangible. You can touch it, paint it, plant trees in it, this makes one less nervous on valuation volitility. Two, people will always need a place to live, Amazon, Google, Apple will not make an alternative to a roof over your head and a place to keep your stuff. Three, you can borrow most of the acquisition. Four, you can depreciate it and chew up some of the earnings. Four, you can cash out refi without cap gains or dilluting your ownership percentage. Five, you can make improvements and raise the rent to force cap appreciation. Six, you can live in it in a pinch.

Downside, and this is why it is a difficult case, you are tied to a local that can have economic trouble, natural disasters, or massive regulatory shifts that can blow you up. Bitcoin seems protected from that.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Is the US Dollar Too Volatile?
by
joms123
on 24/04/2018, 01:30:16 UTC
Today, it seems everywhere you look there are negative things being said about bitcoin volatility.

To break up the monotony of borish media sources endlessly discussing btc volatility as if they have nothing better to do than beat dead horses 24/7/365, let's change the subject to a more neglected topic, that of: fiat volatility.  Smiley

Behold exhibit A.



Image link: https://i.imgur.com/km3TFeR.jpg

This chart would appear to contradict what many say about the US dollar representing a stable value. The buying power of the US dollar appears to be declining significantly over time.

Example of the purchasing power of the US dollar declining: a 2 liter bottle of soda used to cost $1.00 in the united states, not long ago. Today it costs $2.00. If the paradigm shift from $1 to $2 occurs over a 10 year period, we might say that inflation is occurring @ a rate of 10% per year or the dollar is losing 10% of its value per year in contrast to purchasing food items like 2 liter bottles of soda. This precedent of diminishing fiat buying power could apply over our global economy.

So it is possible the purchasing power of the US dollar and other fiat currencies are diminishing significantly over time.

What are everyones thoughts on this?   Huh

This question deserves a detailed explanation so stay with me. The canadian dollar and the US Dollar are both affected by oil prices but DIFFERENTLY!

Oil Prices and Oil Exchange

In 2014 when OPEC (Organization of Petrol Exporters) decided that they would maintain the supply of oil despite it’s plummeting prices this had detrimental impact on the Canadian economy, because Canada is one of the largest exporters of oil to the US this meant that it became more difficult for their oil prices to remain competitive. It became more difficult for Canada to sell oil at profitable prices, this sent the Canadian economy down the drain. However the US Economy flourished because of how easy it was and still is to get oil.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Bitcoin Price heads to $9,000 While Total Crypto Market Climbs to Nearly $400B
by
joms123
on 23/04/2018, 11:28:28 UTC



Crypto market continues with its positive show with Bitcoin Cash being the show-stopper. Analysts remain bullish on the future. Crypto markets continue its positive momentum as the Bitcoin prices are now just short of $9,000 levels with the total cryptocurrency market cap approaching the $400 billion mark. Last week proved to very good for crypto enthusiasts as the bulls were seen taking charge of the markets. The crypto surge added $80 billion to the overall market valuations as per the global charts on CoinMarketCap, and this price-rally has been majorly contributed by Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple besides other altcoins.

At the press time, Bitcoin is trading at $8,927.27 while the overall crypto market valuations are at $399 billion, according to the data on CoinMarketCap.

As the U.S tax deadline passed away last week, analysts believe that the Bitcoin price rally to the $20000 mark is just to kick-in. Fundstart analyst and Bitcoin proponent, Tom Lee said: “We believe the ‘winter’ is ending for Bitcoin, as the crypto to fiat pressures from tax day subside, and as headline risks seem to be fading.”

Considering the CoinsharesCrypto ETF, which is a major indicator of BTC price movements, he said: “We believe large institutional investors globally use this ETF as a way to quickly gain exposure to Bitcoin. Hence when shares rise, big money is buying bitcoin.”

Bitcoin Cash is seen once again leading the pack today posting a nearly 20% gain while trading just short of $1400 levels. It looks like as the Bitcoin Cash hard fork is approaching closer, more and more traders are lining up to grab this Bitcoin derivative at the earliest. The new Bitcoin Cash hard fork scheduled next month in May is expected to bring new features to the network along with simplified smart contracts that is driving the craze further.

Moreover, there has been a renewed positive in the market towards Bitcoin as the SegWit usage continues to grow since the beginning of the year. As per the latest data, Segwit transactions now amount to 32% of the total transactions while occupying 27% of the total block space in the Bitcoin network. Most of the crypto exchanges and wallets have now adopted the change and the use of SegWit is now giving a further push to the most awaited Lightning Network development.

Last month, Lightning Labs released the first Bitcoin mainnet-ready Lightning Network after reaching 1000 active nodes. The Lightning Network is basically a second layer protocol developed atop the Bitcoin’s blockchain network, which takes transactions off the chain, thereby reducing congestion on the main network while expanding the blockchain’s operational abilities by manifold times. Later, it will add the record of all these transactions to the BTC’s blockchain network.

Former JPMorgan banker, Daniel Masters is quite bullish on the future of digital currencies saying that they are fuelling a financial revolution. Masters currently heads the digital investment bank Coinshares and is the chief investment officer at Global Advisors.

Masters remains bullish on the crypto growth story and says that the future looks to be promising with the crypto markets being much bigger than they are today.


WHATS YOUR OPINION ABOUT THIS?

Read more at: https://beat.10ztalk.com/2018/04/23/bitcoin-price-is-heading-to-9000-while-total-crypto-market-climbs-to-nearly-400-billion-coinspeaker/
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Will the bitcoin be outdated by another currency?
by
joms123
on 23/04/2018, 00:08:44 UTC
My answer to the principle is: NO

Bitcoin is money, the value of money is built on confidence, tradition and security, attributes that Bitcoin offers easily. The analogy between Bitcoin and social networks is completely incorrect, people think that Bitcoin is an myspace that will be replaced by facebook. It turns out that Bitcoin is money and not a social network, so this comparison is completely wrong.

Most of mankind's wealth resides in vaults for hundreds of years, so the circulating medium is derisory close to it. Why are we going to need fast, no-fee coins if we can use paper money and banks? Bitcoin's purpose is to be a safe asset, scarce and superior to gold. What is behind Bitcoin is the fact that no politician can steal you through taxes or inflation, there is nothing safer than Blockchain and Bitcoin. So far no technologically superior currency has emerged to Bitcoin to the point of provoking an abyss between technologies and will hardly emerge.

BUY BITCOIN TODAY AND ALWAYS.

Bitcoin is King Kong

Do not mistake this. Bitcoin (BTC) is still standard of measurement against ALL other altcoins in the crypto world. And when BTC runs or when BTC dips, alts bleed. This is because BTC still rules them all.

And while I have answered questions regarding other coins in the past, I have only focused on altcoins with solid dev teams behind the coin and have the markings of a solid project. However, I never mistake those coins as better than BTC or long term holds.

For example, Ripple (XRP) has a solid run. Many people began buying into it as it started to run and at the all time high (ATH). Those who bought ATH, for example, learned a hard lesson. It took a hard dip and correction and many people were hurt (or in the crypto world, the term is they got “wrecked). However, if you were like me, I sold my XRP when it hit the ATH and put it into USDT, then jumped in on a BTC dip three days ago when BTC went from $15,000 to $17,400 (it jumped $2,400) and I pulled back to USDT.

While others who bought into Ripple, currently at $2.73 as of writing this, are waiting for the next price jump (to $3.00?), I made 20x as much buying into BTC while they wait for their profits

…because BTC is still the king.
Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Re: Advice from computer savvy folks about best Anti-malware software
by
joms123
on 22/04/2018, 02:33:06 UTC
Recently bought myself both Malwarebytes and Bitdefender on a single recommendation. But i am fairly uncertain how these really compare to the many others out there. Wanted to get some recommendations from people in the know.

In the last year i've got increasingly into Bitcoin and crypto so obviously, this issue has become more important to me.

Finally have heard the view that all anti-malware software is modern day snake oil, and all one needs is updated current windows - Any truth to this?

Comodo provides free Anti-Malware software automatically detects and destroys the many different types of malware.

Even if you're the most careful PC user out there, malware can find a way to download itself onto the computer. A seemingly innocent email from a friend could in fact be a stealth method of exploiting security features. What appears to be a favorite website could in fact be an imposter, foisting its own malware on unsuspecting visitors. There are literally hundreds of ways in which personal information and entire operating system can be hijacked.
Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Merits 4 from 3 users
Re: Is Bitcoin Destroying the Planet?
by
joms123
on 21/04/2018, 02:51:01 UTC
⭐ Merited by DdmrDdmr (2) ,Flying Hellfish (1) ,AverageGlabella (1)
With the price of the Bitcoin rising, fears are mounting that the mining centers are consuming too much electricity (to the extent that some call it an environmental disaster).
Smari McCarthy of Iceland's Pirate Party says"We are spending tens or maybe hundreds of megawatts on producing something that has no tangible existence and no real use for humans outside the realm of financial speculation"[1]
Although the main use of Bitcoin is not speculation, [for example, in some countries, bitcoin used to request medicine and food from outside of the country because of local currency problems] however, the consumption of this amount of electricity is not justified.

If electricity consumption is the problem, why miners do not focus on renewables?[for example, In Iceland, electricity supplies from renewable sources are so abundant that they can be distributed free of charge][2].But if the use of bitcoin mining from renewable sources increases, does that threaten the future of energy? "We will not have enough energy for future generations"

Source:
#1 https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/02/in-iceland-bitcoin-mining-will-soon-use-more-energy-than-its-residents/
#2 https://www.ecowatch.com/iceland-worlds-largest-clean-energy-producer-per-capita-1882105880.html

No, it will need to change or regulators will make it illegal to mine / transact Bitcoin, here are a few problems with Bitcoin…



The BIG Problem With Bitcoin

Many people believe that Bitcoin is the future currency of our world, others argue that it is a store of value. Whilst both could be true, there are fundamental issues with Bitcoin that need to be changed in order for it to scale to mass adoption.

In this article I will be listing the top 3 issues that Bitcoin faces in terms of scalability.

1. Energy consumption

A study from Digiconomist found that each transaction on the Bitcoin blockchain uses 236 KWh worth of electricity, this amount is enough to power 8 U.S households for an entire day.

Now to put things into perspective, there are over 300,000 transactions per day. At this rate, Bitcoin uses more electricity per year than the whole of Nigeria and this is only increasing.

Read more here: Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index - Digiconomist

Proof of work is vastly uneconomic and damages the environment at an alarming rate.

2. Scalability issues

Energy consumption will hinder the scalability issues of Bitcoin, however the other issue that arises with POW mining is that with the increase in cost associated with mining BTC it is less economical to mine Bitcoin. This would limit the distributed nodes (miners) globally and allow a larger percentage of control to the dominant mining pools / farms.

This would lead to a more centralised blockchain, where they can change the rules of BTC as they please.

The supply of Bitcoin is finite, capped at 21 million. Eventually (currently predicted for 2140) Bitcoin's supply will run out. Once this happens, miners will no longer receive rewards for completing blocks but instead will be given fees. The fees will be drastically high in relative terms, and people will stop using the blockchain.

Also, if miners decide that this is uneconomical for them to process the transactions and use their computing power elsewhere the speed of transactions for Bitcoin will drastically slow down, rendering one of the fundamental values of a Bitcoin (speed) useless.

3. The unknown future

Bitcoin is not a superior blockchain, there are hundreds of projects that are faster, cheaper and more valuable than Bitcoin. Bitcoin has market dominance because it is one of the first and most topical cryptocurrency (did you know that the price of BTC has a direct correlation to the amount of google searches). Here are a few things that could really end Bitcoin’s dominant era:

I) Blue chip company coming into the markets

This is more so for all cryptocurrencies, but Bitcoin in particular. It’s not a matter of if but a matter of when a blue-chip company such as Facebook, Amazon or Google decides to implement their own cryptocurrency, they will dominate the market.

The consumer's trust is already with these big companies, and they have the power and capital to influence the entire market.

Another possibility is a potential ‘world coin’ which global governments will all agree on using, this may seem unrealistic but it is definitely not impossible and many benefits would arise from having such a currency.

II) Quantum computing

Bitcoin is said to be Quantum resistant, on the whitepaper it mentions that:

‘To compensate for increasing hardware speed and varying interest in running nodes over time, the proof-of-work difficulty is determined by a moving average targeting an average number of blocks per hour. If they're generated too fast, the difficulty increases.’

This may seem quantum resistant but it is important to understand that the difficulty is changed every 10 minutes and this is more than enough time for QC to mine all of Bitcoin’s remaining coins.

The other issued that QC represents is that there is a possibility of QC calculating people’s private keys for their BTC wallet. I do not know the technical details of how this is done, but from what I have read this is possible.

III) Bitcoin bubble

My last point for this section is that Bitcoin is not being bought as a store of value or a currency by most people, for most people Bitcoin is a speculative investment hoping to make a fortune on something they really don’t know much about.

Once the bubble reaches its peak, and people start panic selling, Bitcoin will inevitably crash with that. After all, Bitcoin’s price is determined by demand vs supply.

In the light of a fair argument, I would like to point out that Bitcoin can change to tackle these issues and substantially increase its long-term survival. Bitcoin has a massive passionate community behind it and this reason why Bitcoin has grown to where it is today.

Thanks for reading,
Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Is happiness so ephemeral?
by
joms123
on 19/04/2018, 16:34:28 UTC
This video left me thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?=247&v=e9dZQelULDk

Why we care so much about getting the things we want if in a blink of the eye we just desire something else? Is this the human nature or is this an impulse created by the world we are living now, exactly the same that happens with flying insects at night who keep going around our lightbulbs until they burn?

I don't want to sound dramatic though, just sharing something interesting.

What are ephemeral things in life?
Life is a complex mixture of ephemeral and interminable things, and one needs to identify them clearly in order to have a happy life.

People : Very rare people exist in one’s life for long time, others are just temporary. For example, colleagues, travel buddies etc.

Orgasm : Indeed, this has the shortest life span. Though a human has more than enough chances.

Trust : One wrong move and it gets shattered forever!.
Crushes : Most crushes a person gets in his/her lifetime, are short lived. If it exceeds more than 4 months, it is love already.

Happiness : It is also an ephemeral entity, it can completely vanish with one wrong incident.

Sorrow/ Sadness : Similar to happiness, it is also short-lived. Be happy. Smiley

What is ephemeral and what’s not, just depends on our attitude towards life. If we are optimist, they the happiness will not end so soon and vice-versa.

Thank you.
Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Re: Legalization of drugs?
by
joms123
on 17/04/2018, 23:57:56 UTC
My vote is yes, for those over 18 years of age. I think all drugs should be available over the counter. Instead of creating black markets for drugs, why not have it open market and just propagandize the dangers?

---
Edit1:
Wow. That's a pretty even split in votes. We're at 2/2/2!  Shocked

Edit2: 20 / 14 / 17. Legalization of all drugs is winning. Noice.

I think legalization and regulation of all drugs is going to be inevitable in a few decades.

A lot of drugs are already legal, just go to your nearest pharmacy. You can buy a lot of drugs here, many of them quite deadly (swallowing 20 pills of tylenol is a very bad idea).

If you want something stronger, even larger amount of drugs are illegal to buy only until you happen to have a prescription from a doctor (and a lot of doctors are sponsored by drug manufacturers to give you that prescription). Such drugs include opiates, benzodiazepines or amphetamines, and are responsible for more direct deaths than any illegal drug.

Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Re: The United State Congress publicly supports cryptos
by
joms123
on 17/04/2018, 20:52:54 UTC
You can read the full original report here. https://www.congress.gov/115/crpt/hrpt596/CRPT-115hrpt596.pdf

Unless I have been fooled, this THE 2018 JOINT ECONOMIC REPORT, Chapter 9 is fully dedicated to Blockchain technology, page 201. It talks about using blockchain to make the technological infrastructure more resilient, about the use for medical records, the huge public demand for knowledge, taxes and all the hot topics.

Overall Recommendations from the Report:

  • Policymakers and the public should become more familiar with digital currencies and other uses of blockchain technology, which have a wide range of applications in the future.
  • Regulators should continue to coordinate among each other to guarantee coherent policy frameworks, definitions, and jurisdiction.
  • Policymakers, regulators, and entrepreneurs should continue to work together to ensure developers can deploy these new blockchain technologies quickly and in a manner that protects Americans from fraud, theft, and abuse, while ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.
  • Government agencies at all levels should consider and examine new uses for this technology that could make the government more efficient in performing its functions.







Most countries don’t see bitcoin as a competitor or a threat but take some security measures regarding how secure could be; for example, United States consider bitcoin not a coin but a commodity according to the IRS but in a report in recent years showed that only a small amount of people declare they have bitcoins and they treated as criminals.

The problem with these countries is that most of them have a monetary policy that guide them and they’re the only authority established by the State to create money.; that’s why the United States in a Congress Report suggested to consider them as a commodity (due the price fluctuation) and not a currency.

Lots of people are using bitcoin in order to find some financial help to save their assets. For example, in Venezuela bitcoin’s demand is big because their currency is dead, it’s useless to save something with the Venezuelan bolivar and too difficult to find dollars (USD) so they use bitcoin in order to save the money and hope to gain some value. It’s affecting in a small scale to the economy and the State is prosecuting those who use bitcoin. No joke. They detained two engineers for mining.
Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Re: *The Rules of Financial Freedom*
by
joms123
on 17/04/2018, 12:49:17 UTC
*The Rules of Financial Freedom*

RULE NO 1. *There is a Price to Pay.*

RULE NO 2. *There is Time to Give.*

RULE NO 3. *There is Patience to Observe.*

RULE NO 4. *There is a Seed to Sow.*

RULE NO 5. *There is Education, Information or Training to Acquire.*

RULE NO 6. *There is Process to Follow.*

RULE NO 7. *There are Principles to Obey.*

RULE NO 8. *There is Cause for Alarm when you are Poor.*

RULE NO 9. *Nothing Ventured Nothing Gained*

RULE NO 10. *Quitters Never Win and Winners Never Quit.*

RULE NO 11. *The Road to Success is for Men with Faith.*

RULE NO 12. *Poverty is a Risk and Wealth is a Risk.*

RULE NO 13. *The More the  analyses the More the  paralyses (analysis paralysis).*

RULE NO 14. *Financial Freedom is not a Chance it's a Choice.*

RULE NO 15. *Your Destiny is in Your Hands.*

*Financial Freedom is Possible for YOU if Only YOU would play by the RULES!*

Technically speaking, financial freedom is when you have enough money to do whatever you want.

Depending on your "wants" this is easily possible.

The place to start is to calculate how much it costs (or would cost) to live your desired lifestyle.

Then you need to calculate how much of a lump sum you would need to produce this amount each year. The go-to school of throught is that through a properly diversified portfolio you can safely withdraw 4% of your initial sum each year and never run out of money.

So you just divide your cost of living by 4% and you get how much of a lump sum you need.

This provides you financial freedom.




Tips to get there fast:

1. Start investing early
2. Create a strict budget that allows you to save a lot of dough
3. Save (and invest) all you can
Post
Topic
Board Bounties (Altcoins)
Re: [BOUNTY] PHOTOCHAIN - 1 250 000 TOKENS TO REWARD! AIRDROP LIVE!!!
by
joms123
on 16/04/2018, 14:53:20 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Re: KYC Safe or Threat
by
joms123
on 16/04/2018, 11:14:00 UTC
KYC faced the real security issues. Someone can steal your data by hacking the platform and use it for criminal purpose. But in other hand, crypto world still finding the best ways how to protect crypto transaction form money laundery, human trafficking and drugs transaction.

I think, its a big responsibelity to keep KYC data safe. If not, crypto will had bad ending.

It’s as safe as providing your Kyc details to any private sector Banks. Digital Wallets are now regulated by the RBI. At the end it’s the consumer trust what matters. Until a data breach happens all public and private sector banks and companies are good so having faith , trust and confidence is all what you can do.
Post
Topic
Board Serious discussion
Merits 2 from 2 users
Re: What is your stance on capital punishment?
by
joms123
on 16/04/2018, 00:19:57 UTC
⭐ Merited by o_e_l_e_o (1) ,funsponge (1)
I've been studying this subject recently and have had some heated discussions in the past about it with friends and the like. Recently though I've been looking at some polls which have been conducted and it seems that the vast majority of people actually agree with the death penalty. I think it would be interesting to have a discussion with the Bitcoin community on this as I tend to find that they are much more logical and open minded to things than the normal targeted audience that these polls are presented too. 

Quotes may be shorter than they are in sources to cut down on filler content and pick out the most important aspects.

According to the guardian[1] "China, Iran, North Korea, Yemen and the US carried out the most executions in 2012. At least 1,722 people were sentenced to death in 58 countries in 2012."

I think if we look at all the countries there the most surprising one would likely be the US. Iran which isn't on the greatest terms with American currently shares a common characteristic with America in terms of people getting sentenced to death. In fact according to this source between 2007-2012 America sentenced 504 people to death whilst Iran sentenced much less (156).

I'm not at all defending the approach that these countries take and aren't saying that 156 lives taken isn't worse/better than 504 as this is another debate and hard dilemma.  I personally feel that the death penalty should be abolished worldwide and I'll go on to list my counter arguments to common statements about why the death penalty should remain. Although I think it would be interesting if we could have an actual discussion about this and possibly my view point will change.

I feel that these are the major points people seem to come up with is either for revenge, justice, if the crime is severe enough or as a deterrent for future criminals.

First of all I don't understand why revenge is considered a good thing. In most major movies revenge is normally seen being done by the 'good' guys and is justified just because someone is the bad guy in the movie. Revenge doesn't gain you anything and the only thing you are actually doing is lowering yourself down to their level. In my opinion revenge should only be felt by those who are personally affected by the situation and shouldn't impact the public at all and therefore I feel this is a poor argument when it comes to an argument for pro death penalty.

A common argument that I see is that if the crime is severe enough such as murder then it's perfectly acceptable for ordering the death of someone. I fail to see the logic here and I would invite anyone that has this mindset to explain your reasoning. I think we can all agree that to take someones life is wrong and there's got to be something chemically wrong or what ever for you to carry out the act but this also applies to sentencing someone to death. You are literally supporting a system which will put yet another person to death. Let's not forget that basic human rights and that everyone has the right to live. You may not feel like this is the case in more severe crimes but let's not forget that the amount of news articles which have been released after someone has been sentenced to death where new evidence has been discovered or brought up which proves that the prisoner was in fact innocent. Is this justice? Is the jury, court and executor now murderers too?

Finally, the argument that it will act as a deterrent for future cases. Well I think it's a common opinion that people feel that the death sentence is the 'easy' way out and making someone live with what they have done is more appropriate. Although this brings up the point of the physiological affects on the person who committed the crime and how that may affect them. So it might not actually act as a deterrent if someone knows they are going to die shortly after anyway. It could also be argued that it doesn't severe as a deterrent anyway due to the amount of crimes which have been committed since the death penalty has been abolished elsewhere in the world. 






[1] https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/mar/29/death-penalty-countries-world

My opinion is Mixed.

I recognize that the state has the authority to administer the death penalty. I have no problem with this, “in principal”. However, it is poorly administered and does not perform it’s function well if at all.

It is also vastly expensive as presently conducted.

I recognize that there are seriously bad people who will remain a danger to society for all their lives. Incarcerating them in inhuman conditions (like the “Supermax” prison) for life seems far more inhumane than execution.

At the same time, I recognize that many of these really bad people are insane, and that this mitigates to some degree their level of responsibility. Unfortunately, we have no reliable way to treat such people at this time.

The death penalty is inequitably administered. Everyone knows this. If you are poor and/or a minority, you are vastly more likely to be given “death” than if you are wealthy/white.

That’s unacceptable.

Additionally, programs like “the innocence project” have proved that many people presently on death row were in fact innocent and had been improperly convicted, either by incompetent representation, faulty evidence, jury bias, or prosecutorial malfeasance. (withholding exculpatory evidence, not putting contrary witnesses on the stand…)

That’s horrifying.

Our state just executed a fellow who had been on death row for 30 years. 30 years… Waiting to be executed.

Finally, the stated purpose of the death penalty is deterrence. That the prospect of being exeted will deter people from committing serious crimes. It doesn’t. Death-penalty crimes are committed either in a state of rage, or under the influence of psychosis, or due to long-standing pschological or psychiatric conditions.

There has not been any evidence shown (to my knowledge) that the death penalty provides any such deterrance. Instead, what it provides is vengeance. “Closure” as we so euphemistically say these days.