Well that was quicker than expected, and it seems I was wrong.
And it also seems your hash algorithm can be power-efficient (if not GPU/ASIC proof...).

Please accept my apology.
Your project seems to be going well, I hope it will have great success.

Just look at the explorer  : I get 5 blocks in a row random just now , here are the miner info :
0.14.1/0.2.5
0.14.1/0.2.1-GPU-0.7/2409081814
0.14.1/0.2.5
0.14.1/0.2.1-GPU-0.7/2409081814
0.14.1/0.2.1-GPU-0.7/2409081814

4 hours ago Only the GPU one was showing.

And you were saying in your Discord:
"We are really happy with our CPU launch".
Denial is not my definition of talking an issue, but whatever

Is there any way to get the network hashrate history (block or time vs. Hashrate) to check from the beginning of the launch?
(I did not find this information but I may lack the competence...)

GPU miner wins majority of blocks on the explorer's faith :
0.14.1/0.2.1-GPU-0.7/2409081814
astrix:qrnm7xutzpsp6nqazpm9wk3t4vx55cfua4h4k99zw60m4vwspryscj0h8ckaz

No signs from the devs giving a s^@t about it on the discord, no announcement...
Stay away from this "project".

Hi.

I've a rig with 7 different GPUs.
I want to dual-mine ETC/ZIL+ALEPHIUM on 6 of them (they are AMDs), with different intensities between etchash & blake3
I'm a bit confused about how to declare that :


doesn't work, all gpus have the same intensities : 23;7.
Is it possible to tune that?