Like I said,  get some help man.  You're more paranoid than a San Francisco meth head.  You seem to think everyone is "out to get you" with the way you talk lol.

Oh I see,  so now people are to be ridiculed for stating the same or similar type of common sense facts.  An anonymous casino (which it appears you're now stating FBC is NOT even though it's marketed as such) being used as a mixer is not a "unique" idea by ANY stretch.  Do some research,  I suggest starting with the BTC ledger which is quite the valuable tool when searching for truths.

As for your other dribble,  LOL  you are just flailing like a blind a fish out of water.  Get some help man,  you're mental health doesnt appear to be very healthy.

Actually the more likely scenario as that of mixing stolen BTC.  It's a pretty well known fact (provable with the BTC ledger) that FBC is used as sort of a mixer for those that like to play with other people's BTC.  They dont care if they win or lose so long as they get back mixed BTC.  Anonymous casinos are just one of a plethora of options for mixing BTC,  its mostly just personal preference on which options a hacker will use.  Some use multiple options, others dont.  The end result is still the same.  Mixed BTC.  Note that it's MIXED and not "cleaned" BTC.  There is no such thing as "cleaned" BTC since it's not a privacy coin like Monero.  The idea is to mix BTC so much with "clean" BTC that by the time someone tries to block or blacklist it (if its consolidated into a single or only a few addresses),  it's to late and would affect others who had nothing to do with the theft to begin with (including themselves).

Doing math isnt called "schoolboy" anything.  It's just facts.  You cant dispute math.  Besides,  thinking about it any other way is just fantasy and THAT would be the schoolboy error.  I've seen your replies in here and you ALWAYS push the "could have been lucky" excuse every time,  as if you're a huge FBC shill or something,  trying to get people to believe things that are just unrealistic.  I dont do things that way,  I live in reality where I DONT plan on winning lotteries, I dont plan on winning in gambling, and I certainly dont tell others to expect to win either.  Those that are faced with reality,  usually resort to the "variance" excuse,  which is just that,  it's an excuse.  "Variance" exists in EVERYTHING.  For example,  if time lasts long enough,  it's possible that a fully functional Lambo, complete with logo and a nice paint job would just fall together all by itself.  That is "variance".  So trying to base things off "Variance" is completely absurd.  It exists,  but is it practical or realistic?  No.

One could guestimate the following based on known factors.
200mil / 50K == 4000 BTC wagered (roughly)

Since we know that 25x is about the MAX one could wager at the point where you lose EVERYTHING (based on 5% house edge),  we'll use 25x to guestimate the deposit (or deposit total in the case of multiple deposits).

4000 / 25x == 160 BTC.

So,  160 is about the SMALLEST we could guestimate his deposit was and we could also assume that they lost it ALL since 25x is just to high (otherwise 25x wouldnt be FBC's "bonus account" bet against you).

If you go with a CONSERVATIVE guess in a scenerio where they could have actually WON (as the owner insinuated),  we would use something reasonable like 5x

4000 / 5x == 800BTC

Now check the known FBC addresses and see if you can find deposits that are around these amounts..  If you cant find them,  then you'd have to question if this was even a real account at all.  If you do find them,  well,  then you now have the exact amounts

So my guess would be between 160 and 800.

400x on a 5% house edge casino,  WTF are you smoking?  Even at it's MOST conservative odds (94.6% for 5% house edge), you're going to LOSE by the 10-20th or so roll.  400?  HAHAHAHAHA you are a freakin nutjob.  But not as much as the pleb who thinks they can do it 4000x hahaha,  thats like saying it's chicken feed to RUN around the earth (including running on water) 5x no sweat.  It's fantasy world type stuff.  Never happen.

Tell you what,  if you can reach 25x,  I'll give you a nod that you got MAJORLY lucky (25x is also the SAME risk and bet that FBC takes with it's "bonus account").  If you can manage 400x,  I'll give you the Lambo in BTC myself.  No one is going to wager 400x their deposit without losing.  Thinking otherwise is just absurd.

IDK about the idiot part.  The fact that the site closed without notification is pretty damning evidence that the site was not legit from the get go.  Any legit site is going to know ahead of time that it's going to close and will give users ample notice.  It's the non-legit sites that just come and go mysteriously without warning and without reason.  And since it's now a KNOWN FACT that this was a non-legit site,  theft of coins is not a stretch.  It's VERY possible and actually VERY LIKELY that the site did steal from this user.  ESPECIALLY if they were having solvency problems.  Steal from one to pay the many........

Looks like no worries now.  The site has been down for over 3 days straight.  Good-riddens lol.

I am going to post some accusations against Changelly that are UNDENIABLE,  so in reality,  they arent actually "accusations",  they are FACTS proven by both BTC and Firo ledgers as well as their OWN centralized DB ledger.  I dont know if this rises to the level of needed a "SCAM" thread or not, so I'm using their own service thread instead.

When the situation occurred,  I recognized it IMMEDIATELY and I began the 'support' process as early as I could since I knew that that possibility of the TX ID disappearing was extremely high which would result in my losing everything if I didnt get it documented early while the TX still existed.  However,  this situation does NOT excuse their actions at this point.  They could have been MUCH more forthcoming with truthful information and they chose to be deceitful and give run-around answers instead.  Decisions have consequences and they are going to learn this today.

So on Jan 20th 2021 I exchanged 0.00302680 BTC for 18.71027775 Firo via Changelly using a "Fixed" rate as seen in their TX SS below (https://prnt.sc/10lnupi).  That same day Firo had a MASSIVE 51% attack that re-orged an ENTIRE day's worth of TXs which included their TX of Firo from their Firo address (which in the end turned out to be a BINANCE address) to my Firo address.  I then tried to send that Firo to another address and it kept failing and I couldnt figure out why.  My wallet (Coinomi) reported that it was in my balance, but it kept aborting with an error everytime I tried to send it.  So I checked the TX id and it had changed from "Confirmed" to "Unconfirmed".  I have only seen that happen in 51% attack situations.  So I checked the Firo discord and noticed others were complaining about the same thing.  Then an hr later the dev for Firo confirmed that it was being attacked with a discord announcement.  After that announcement,  I quickly emailed Exchangelly to tell them about the situations and that they would have to re-send the TX as it was reversed.  I did NOT expect them to do this right away so I was very lenient on them and gave them PLENTY of time to rectify the situation.  But once Firo returned the attackers funds to all exchanges and I STILL wasnt refunded,  my patience with the situation ENDED.  I still have not received ANY kind of refund be it BTC or Firo.  They have BOTH.  Both the BTC ledger AND The Firo ledger confirms it.  Since Feb 2nd there has been NO EXCUSED for their continued reluctance to refund me in SOME manor.  So,  I'm here to share the story with others with the intent to HURT their reputation based SOLELY on decisions they made.  Had the attackers funds NOT been refunded,  I would be happy to take the loss and would have given them a pass (even if I was almost certain they didnt lose anything because I couldnt be 100% certain,  however that isnt the case here).

Here is a timeline of events:

Jan 20th 8:30am:  I make an exchange for BTC to Firo via Changelly
Jan 20th 1:14pm:  Firo confirmation TX comes in of completed Changelly TX
Jan 20th ~3pm: I try to transfer Firo to another address and it fails
Jan 20th ~6pm:  Reuben confirms 51% attack
Jan 20th 9pm:  First email to them.  They were courteous as was I.  I told them about 51% attack and what to expect in the coming days/weeks.  They reply with vague "technician" is looking into it.  (What they are "looking into", who knows,  theres nothing to investigate since its all in the ledgers)
Jan 20th: Attack is halted
Jan 21st:  I ping them for an update.  They return with the same "Technician is investigating" claim again.  Ok,  whatever.  It's still early.
Jan 21st:  Attacker comes back with a vengeance because Reuben was able to LOCK their funds in the address they consolidated it to and FAIL.
Jan 22nd:  Reuben starts a thread on Firo forums asking community what to do with the funds he locked up from the attacker.  I voted to release them to the attacker because I believe in decentralization,  not centralization even if it means I'm going to lose because of it.
Jan 24th:  Surprisingly out of the blue without me asking them they reply to me with "We have investigated the case with the exchange partner, so it looks like your transaction is being resent now.  Once it receives enough confirmations, the amount will reach your wallet."  This seems to coincide with Reuben's post, so I think it could be truthful (At this point I didnt know they did this knowing it wasnt truthful),  so I was still patient with them.
Jan 24th: I confirm that NO such TX was ever made to my original Firo address so I give it a few days just in case.
Jan 29th:  I email them to tell them no such TX was ever made. I also ask them what exchange they are having to work with.  BTW,  I already knew who it was, but wanted to see what they would say because I was slightly suspicious that NO TX was ever attempted and I knew that the attack was over long ago.  They work with BINANCE,  I got this info from Binance themselves when I made a support ticket about the situation.  This is an important fact because it's Binance that was the target of the attack and to which the Firo would be returned (along with a couple other smaller exchanges).
Jan 30th:  They reply that they dont give out the exchange info.  But they NEVER address the fact that their own claim that the funds were returned was indeed factual.  They ignored it.
Feb 2nd 5:02am:  Firo releases version of Firo that REFUNDS the attackers funds to the exchanges
Feb 2nd 5:16pm:  I again remind them I have not been reimbursed yet.  I tell them I would be satisfied with refund in either BTC or Firo (At this point I am STILL patient with them but that soon ends after the next email).
Feb 2nd 7:18pm:  They are back again with the "Technician is investigating".  Investigating what?  That you've lied about a TX twice now?  They are just giving me the run-around at this point and it's EXTREMELY obvious since there is nothing to "Investigate".  You cant "Investigate" a blockchain ledger.  Either it IS or it ISNT.  There is no "maybe".  Companies who are trying to use 1920s "run-around answers" with 21st century blockchain ledgers are NOT going to fare very will in the 21st century.  Blockchains sole purpose is to ELIMINATED those types of situations,  not continue to make them viable excuses.
Feb 5th:  Block 343312  clears out hackers funds to be redistributed to exchanges from which they came originally.  After this date,  there is NO EXCUSE AT ALL that I should not be refunded.  This is the date where I lost ALL PATIENCE with them and it's clear in my next few interactions with them.
Feb 22nd:  I email them telling them I have STILL not received ANY kind of refund or Firo from them.  I am CLEARLY not happy in this email to them.  I also warn them about making this a public issue if the problem is not rectified soon.
Feb 22nd:  This is their reply:  We are sorry for this delay. Unfortunately, our team is highly overloaded right now, however, we'll send an urgent query to our tech team regarding your case. Once the issue is resolved, you'll be immediately informed.   (needless to say, I've NEVER been contacted ever since.)
Feb 23rd:  I reply to them that if I'm not refunded at the end of the day,  that the next time they hear from me will be to provide them with a link to a public SHAMING of this experience.  And that is the end.  You're now reading this because I have STILL NOT RECEIVED ANYTHING FROM CHANGELLY.
Feb 23rd:  They actually replied with:  "We are still processing this case. We appreciate you patience."  to which I promptly ignored because it's CLEAR what their intentions are at this point,  which is to do NOTHING.
Feb 14th:  It's been almost a month,  I have received NOTHING from them,  not even an email,  so it's time to put this out in the public as I promised and give them the link.

Find below all the links and images supporting this experience.

Link to Firo Forums post about 51% attack refund idea
https://forum.firo.org/t/firo-51-attack-post-mortem-and-vote-on-attackers-funds/1084

Link to Firo update that CONFIRMS stolen funds were returned to exchange wallets (I voted AGAINST this btw even though it meant I could lose the BTC I sent to Changelly as I dont believe in centralized decisions).  But since it happened,  I might as well fight tooth and nail to get it back (which I did and failed at,  well, up to this point anyway).
https://github.com/firoorg/firo/releases/tag/v0.14.5.2

Link to Firo TX that began process of Binance and other exchange refunds:
https://explorer.zcoin.io/tx/3ecea345c7b174271bbdcde8cad6097d9a3dc420259743d52cc9cf1945aaba03  (This TX ID is found here:  https://github.com/firoorg/firo/pull/984 for update 14.5.2)

Previous unconfirmed TX of ORIGINAL BTC -> Firo exchange that is no longer "unconfirmed", the Firo was removed from the mempool returned to the Exchange's wallet.  You can see from the emails that they confirmed this TX did exist at one time.
https://explorer.firo.org/tx/abea4dd04bdb22c71f7ef35c73226a2459652c9ab45aa6c00aa680e459e87083

The TX id from their own DB that confirms the above firo TX did exist at one point.  It also confirms that the TX is still "failed" (duuuuuuh)
https://changelly.com/track/ozxuqnm4ata1xyr7   (https://web.archive.org/web/20210314205600/https://changelly.com/track/ozxuqnm4ata1xyr7 and https://prnt.sc/10lnupi in case they try to change their own DB)

My Firo address that is STILL empty and is found in the above https://changelly.com/track/ozxuqnm4ata1xyr7 link
https://explorer.zcoin.io/address/aBgVNoPKScfV5KF8XpmWU21WDshLg9z9mB

The BTC TX from my wallet to their wallet (as confirmed in the above TX id of their own site)
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/61c9c0af78354ef218963f4d3e4e7ca882f95d26a46310b3b5a05aee5c50645f

6 Email screenshots of me/changelly.  I took SS's of just my replies to them to keep the number of images to a minimum.
https://prnt.sc/10ln05t
https://prnt.sc/10ln2qc
https://prnt.sc/10lngpx
https://prnt.sc/10lnhk2
https://prnt.sc/10lniab
https://prnt.sc/10lnj11
https://prnt.sc/10lnn06

SS Of my own wallet using the changelly service logs
https://prnt.sc/10lnupi

So the only one that lost out in this TX was ME.  Not Changelly.  You will be next if you continue to use Changelly,  it's just a matter of time before they get you.  They will use any excuse in the book to either not send you anything at all OR send you LESS than what you were supposed to get in the first place.  You have been warned.

I have to agree,  Gigabet is not really helping itself in the "legit" area and I'll explain why below.

So in this post I am going to outline why I believe gigabet.com is a NON-Provably fair casino despite their claims to be such an entity.  As far as I'm aware,  there are very few posts about it here on Bitcointalk and none of them have any replies from the site admins themselves as far as I can tell.  So I guess this type of a post shouldnt come as a surprise since many new casinos are indeed scams anyway.  Before I can begin, I have to outline sites which ARE provably fair and that implement it in a couple different ways so that we have a baseline to work with.

Freebitco.in:
This site implements a provably fair system that is identical to that of gigabet.com (to be expected anyway) in every way EXCEPT in how it's implemented.  Freebitco.in provides the user the Hashed server seed, nonce, client seed, AND the actual server seed itself after EVERY roll on it's site and every site has a NEW server hash.  Whether it's for a gambling roll or their faucet rolls.  The nonce is the bet ID for your specific account and has nothing to do with the server seed at all.  IMO This is the best implementation that a casino can have as there is nothing being hidden anywhere,  it's LIGHTING fast to verify a roll with 1 single click right in the site's own roll results page UI.  A bot can do it as the rolls happen without making any extra API calls to the server.  Their provably fair system is second to none.  It's simply the best there is.

Primedice:
This site implements a provably fair system that is identical to that of gigabet.com in every way EXCEPT in how it's implemented.  Primedice will only reveal a server hash if you generate a new server hash.  Doing so is not as intuitive as it should be via the UI,  but via a bot its very simple.  You just make a call to generate a new hash, then immediately send the server the game's ID and you'll be able to retrieve the server hash for the roll/game/spin/whatever that had just happened.  Also note that the nonce at primedice is tied to the server hash since a single server hash can be re-used (why anyone would want to do that.... no idea,  seems fishy and/or insecure to me).  So nonce is the bet ID for that server seed.  The key here is that there is no time limit on when you can make a "new server seed" request which makes it a viable option for provably fairness.

Stake:
This site implements a provably fair system that is identical to that of gigabet.com in every way EXCEPT in how it's implemented.  Primedice will only reveal a server hash if you generate a new server hash.  Doing so is not as intuitive as it should be via the UI,  but via a bot its very simple.  You just make a call to generate a new hash, then immediately send the server the game's ID and you'll be able to retrieve the server hash for the roll/game/spin/whatever that had just happened.  Also note that the nonce at stake is tied to the server hash since a single server hash can be re-used (why anyone would want to do that.... no idea,  seems fishy and/or insecure to me).  So nonce is the bet ID for that server seed.  The key here is that there is no time limit on when you can make a "new server seed" request which makes it a viable option for provably fairness.

Now lets compare to Gigabet

Gigabet implements the SAME provably fair system as the sites above with a few differences that are IMO very very suspect.  It's almost like they want to purposely make it impossible to actually verify rolls,  even by way to automated means which is EXTREMELY suspect IMO.

1.  There is NO WAY to view a roll's "server seed" in the Roll result's UI.  None.  It simply doesnt exist.  It literally has no field,  whether you have generated a new server seed or not.  The only data it has in the UI is the "Nonce", hashed version of the server seed, and the client seed.  There isnt even a LINK to where you can find the server seed.  Anywhere.  There isnt one in their FAQs, there isnt one in the roll result page,  it's NO WHERE to be found.   Instead,  they have silently buried the actual server seed in a separate page that is well hidden in their menu system.  Once you find it,  all if will have is the server seed and the number of rolls that used that server seed (AKA nonce in this case).  It's up to you to figure out which roll went with which server seed and nonce.
2.  The roll results in their own UI only shows the last 20 rolls.  Thats it.  Thats all you get.  There is no history,  no archive,  no anything for past rolls.  Once a roll has scrolled off the page,  your are SOL if you havent logged it's ID in a local DB somewhere.
3.  The server seed changing mechanism is behind a time wall.  You cant regenerate a new server (nor client) seed whenever you want.  You have to wait at least 1 min between requests.  This 1 item ALONE is enough for me to suspect something is going on that shouldnt be.

My conclusive opinion:

The biggest problem is #3,  the time limit.  The others can be dealt with by using a bot at the time a roll happens.  IMO There is absolutely no reason for putting a prohibitive time limit (more than once every 2 seconds IMO is prohibitive since it would lower the BPS of a bot that verifies every roll) on when someone can generate a new server/client seed pair.  The only reason I can think of is to purposely try deter people from even bothering to try to verify rolls.  And once you cross that line,  it's open season on your reputation because why would any casino want to purposely deter someone from verifying their roll results.  There is only 1 reason for that.  Because things are NOT as they should be and they are adding in every hoop they can think of to try to hide it while still trying to claim things are "provably fair".

I would like to hear other's opinions on the tactics Gigabet has employed to hide it's server seeds from it's users through the way the UI works all the way down to the time wall.