Does anybody that picked UPS shipping have a shipping confirmation yet?  It seems DHL and Fedex have starting shipping but I've yet to see a single UPS.  My order was payed within 15 minutes after they activated on the first night, yet I've got no confirmations at all.

Nice, just added my new address to Fedex.  No notifcation yet . . . hopefully soon then since I ordered within 10 minutes of it going live.

You need to go back to high school and learn some math; you're not doing it right.

Also, if you are paying 35% taxes in the US, you are either a millionaire with no write offs, deductions or expenses or someone in desperate need of a tax professional.  I'm thinking the latter, since you can't be a millionaire and not understand basic math and tax law.

I second that if possible . . . I have two coming I can pledge to it.

Darn, just tried to get a second . . . they thought ahead and had a quota of 1 per account.

Yes its similar, but can be used at the command line to set core and mem clocks as well as power. 

Heres a sample of my batch for nvidiaInspector:

SET GPU0=-forcePState:0,0 -setPowerTarget:0,75 -setTempTarget:0,1,70 -setFanSpeed:0,40 -setMemoryClockOffset:0,0,300 -setBaseClockOffset:0,0,50
SET GPU1=-forcePState:1,0 -setPowerTarget:1,75 -setTempTarget:1,1,70 -setFanSpeed:1,40 -setMemoryClockOffset:1,0,300 -setBaseClockOffset:1,0,50
SET GPU2=-forcePState:2,0 -setPowerTarget:2,75 -setTempTarget:2,1,70 -setFanSpeed:2,40 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,300 -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,50
SET GPU3=-forcePState:3,0 -setPowerTarget:3,75 -setTempTarget:3,1,70 -setFanSpeed:3,40 -setMemoryClockOffset:3,0,300 -setBaseClockOffset:3,0,50
SET GPU4=-forcePState:4,0 -setPowerTarget:4,75 -setTempTarget:4,1,70 -setFanSpeed:4,40 -setMemoryClockOffset:4,0,300 -setBaseClockOffset:4,0,50
SET GPU5=-forcePState:5,0 -setPowerTarget:5,75 -setTempTarget:5,1,70 -setFanSpeed:5,40 -setMemoryClockOffset:5,0,300 -setBaseClockOffset:5,0,50

.\Bin\nvidiaInspector\nvidiaInspector.exe %GPU0% %GPU1% %GPU2% %GPU3% %GPU4% %GPU5%

I use nvidia-smi.exe to see the graphics card stats, but its a command line utility as well.  You can find it here:

C:\Program Files\NVIDIA Corporation\NVSMI\nvidia-smi.exe

Just run it from an command prompt and it will show all the stats in one snapshot.  It can make an xml file which I parse with powershell to pull that stats I want, but just running the exe will give you the basics.

I run those exact components (minus the ti, mine are regular 1070s, but Asus ROG).  I cable two GPU per PCI-e cable,  then two risers per sata cable.  I've had two rigs running like this for over a year.  I was hesitant at first and checked the cables for heat frequently, and have never had an issue.  I do power limit each card to 125 watts with nvidiaInspector.

Not everyone uses only a single miner like that.  I mine based on profitability of the coins and use the API and other factors to determine what to mine automatically, then it generates the run command based on the API data.  I see the API reporting the best port to use as a more elegant solution, since the server would know better.  It would also eliminate the miner needing to sit idle waiting for a timeout before switching.

I had a thought (you may have had it already too), does the API change the port it publishes if the first port is full?  For the coins that get overloaded and you have a second port setup, it would be cool, for those that use the API to determine what to mine, to have it flip to the second port when the first hits a certain number of connections.

I'm not sure how many use the API like this but it might encourage its use more to balance the ports.

Just an idea!

Thanks.

UPDATE:  Seems to be working now.

Any issues with Luxcoin?  Both of my miners are not starting for some reason.  

Both just sit at this point:
[2018-01-06 18:08:19] Starting on stratum+tcp://yiimp.eu:8333
[2018-01-06 18:08:19] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-06 18:08:19] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-06 18:08:19] 6 miner threads started, using 'phi' algorithm.

Start params:  Bin\NVIDIA-TPruvot\ccminer-x64.exe -a phi -o stratum+tcp://yiimp.eu:8333 -u Ldf6BHXXeq4BMRoGY3QbhH96dgKQGhLQgb -p sm2

Thanks,

Jake

It's a merge mined coin, which means it is mined alongside other coins at no cost to you.  There are no exchanges for it therefore you receive no profit for it, but it didn't cost you any extra work.  You can safely ignore any that show auxPOW.

No you can't specify what coin you want to mine, just what coin you want to be paid in (if there are enough blocks being found to pay you out).  The whole point of a multipool is to always be mining the most profitable coin, so being able to choose one is pointless.

His twitter feed is on the front page and the top tweet states the issue.  Best of both.

Always research the company behind these things . . .

Obelisk is a subsidiary of Nebulous Inc, which is the company behind the SIA blockchain development.  Nebulous is a company based in the US and you can actually identify and name its owners and the people behind it.  If it goes south, their reputation is on the line as well as the US legal system being brought to bear on them. They have also been quite open about what they are doing and where their funding comes from.

A few links for your reading:
https://blog.sia.tech/

https://sia.tech/funding2016/

https://siawiki.tech/development/nebulous_inc

Its extruded aluminum.  Comes in various forms . . . 8020.net or Makerbeam is available on Amazon.

You can also get fully made cases for Spotswood.  http://spotswoodcomputercases.com/wp/

With the OP's hardware, eth mining hasn't been the best profit since mid to late last year; if you are switching now, you missed out on a whole lot of profit.  But hey, better late than never to up your profits.  Look at whattomine.com, plug in your numbers and that will give you a good baseline for the minimum you should be making with your rig.  From there look at zpool.ca and yiimp.ccminer.org for the best algo's to mine using ccminer variants as your miner software.  Ethash dual mining can still be profitable with 1070s as well so keep claymore around for those when they are good.

Do your research and run the numbers to find the best thing to mine each day.  And yes, you should be checking daily to make sure you are at top profit . . . or find and automated way to do it.  (MultiPoolMiner, MinerControl, Nicehash, etc).

Exactly.  My rigs are always on the most profitable algo and I switch my payouts based on my long and short term goals.  When SIGT came a long I did switch to dedicated mining for the first couple days though since it was a bit unique.  Glad I did, then zpool picked it up so I switched back to multi-algo mining and skunk has been at the top of the list most of the time since then; but plenty of other float up day to day.  You also have to keep up on your mining software as well, skunk has been getting regular new release from multiple sources.  

Its all about the effort you put in to keep it moving forward.

If you are only looking at the front page of whattomine (and even the coins page), you are missing a significant part of the mining market; and also some of the most profitable.  They don't list skein, skunk, tribus, nist5, hmq125, x17 and others; each with coins that can be more profitable day to day than those listed on the front page.  Hell, skunk (SIGT) has been above it for days if not weeks and 1080ti's kill it with that coin.

You should use whattomine as the baseline to show the MINIMUM you should be making with your rigs, with MINIMUM effort.  Then if you want to put in the effort, you can make more, but you need to keep an eye on the forums and markets so you are maximizing your profits.  You also need to consider the rise in value of new coins . . . lots of people have made a lot of money on SIGT because they got in early.  If I count the gains on that alone, its $100+ a day for my rigs.  But that takes work and paying attention to the market and community.

Make a new Topaz address and switch to that one.  It should show up as Topaz pretty quick.  I just did that with my SIGT address and its identifying it correctly now.

The site can mis-identitfy a wallet address sometimes.  Eventually it will clear it self up, especially once the payout occurs.  I am currently specifying c=SIGT on mine, with a SIGT address, but the statistic page says its BitToken.  I'm waiting for the next payout to see if it corrects itself, but usually it does.