Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 26 results by jxz
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 129 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 25/11/2015, 22:37:55 UTC
See, with NH;  they are trying to solve a block with your transaction;  so a different hash all together.  Theres no way for a renter to withhold blocks like that...   you can see the live submissions/hashrate coming through the solo pool.  I don't see that being faked at all.... unless the hash renter feeds garbage data to the pool (I would assume the pool would invalidate bad work?)
...
Incorrect.

Withholding is done by the miner - they simply don't return the particular share that is a block, they just return (some or) all other shares.
Even if they do this, the person renting out their hardware gets paid and so does the renting service.
You can't know in advance which work contains a block, you only know when you find a particular share that is better than network difficulty.

It has nothing to do with where you get your hashes from except the obvious that: if it was your own miner and you were solo mining you'd be throwing away your own block

Theoretically - would it be possible for a pool to send a miner the most recently solved blocks template immediately before the block change notification?  In this situation the miner should send back the solved block, then the pool could then discard it and continue sending valid work.  This could be a proof to see if blocks truly are being withheld.

I realize in this scenario some hash time would be wasted on an old block.
No for multiple reasons:

1) block change times on a pool are the #1 priority - slowing that down (by delaying work changes) is how you lose blocks and get orphans

2) the work base for each miner is different, so you can't send a miner the work base of the other miner that found the block
 If the work bases weren't different, then miners would be wasting time mining the same work and getting the same results

3) there's no guarantee that 2 miners will find the same block with the same work since their speed and mining code may increment the extranonce differently or to a different level (due to speed)


Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 129 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 25/11/2015, 21:22:40 UTC
See, with NH;  they are trying to solve a block with your transaction;  so a different hash all together.  Theres no way for a renter to withhold blocks like that...   you can see the live submissions/hashrate coming through the solo pool.  I don't see that being faked at all.... unless the hash renter feeds garbage data to the pool (I would assume the pool would invalidate bad work?)
...
Incorrect.

Withholding is done by the miner - they simply don't return the particular share that is a block, they just return (some or) all other shares.
Even if they do this, the person renting out their hardware gets paid and so does the renting service.
You can't know in advance which work contains a block, you only know when you find a particular share that is better than network difficulty.

It has nothing to do with where you get your hashes from except the obvious that: if it was your own miner and you were solo mining you'd be throwing away your own block

Theoretically - would it be possible for a pool to send a miner the most recently solved blocks template immediately before the block change notification?  In this situation the miner should send back the solved block, then the pool could then discard it and continue sending valid work.  This could be a proof to see if blocks truly are being withheld.

I realize in this scenario some hash time would be wasted on an old block.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 129 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 25/11/2015, 21:15:56 UTC
See, with NH;  they are trying to solve a block with your transaction;  so a different hash all together.  Theres no way for a renter to withhold blocks like that...   you can see the live submissions/hashrate coming through the solo pool.  I don't see that being faked at all.... unless the hash renter feeds garbage data to the pool (I would assume the pool would invalidate bad work?)

This is 100% incorrect.  A miner can easily submit all found shares except shares that are greater than the network diff.


My one recommendation to people going for rented hash:

Its smarter and more statistically probable if you rent as much hash as possible and run it at once.

More workers working on the same block == greater chance of solving _your_ block in a given amount of time.

If you just space out the hash in smaller amounts over time;  you have less hash to find that block in a given time and it is somewhat wasteful.

In the same sense that pointing two antminers at two different BTC payout addresses, will both have the same probability of finding a block;  whereas if they are both mining to the same address, they stand twice the chance as find a block as when they are working independent.

I hope people grasp this idea.....

The more hash you cram in that "10 min" gives you a higher actual probability of finding a block.

This is also wrong.  See ck posts above.  The only time working faster matters is to beat a difficulty change.  There is the same probability in finding a valid block with 1000TH for 1 hour as there is with 100TH for 10 hours.



Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 129 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 25/11/2015, 20:18:10 UTC
To some of the regular posters here, I'm curious about reaction to this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441465.msg13062153#msg13062153

If you don't want to follow the link, apparently 6 * Difficulty shares have been pointed at Eligius from Nicehash and not one block solve yet. Relevant here I think because many of us use Nice/Westhash to gamble.


That is interesting.  I think Kano has mentioned there is a big risk in block withholding from rental sites in the past.


ck - Do you have any way to review stats on the amount of blocks solved / shares submitted from nicehash?



Plenty of people have found blocks here using NH/WH and MRR.  I'm not sure what's going on over at Eligius...

Just because some blocks are withheld doesn't mean all have to be.   If this was occurring, I would assume that the individual miners would be withholding as opposed to nh/wh.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: new ckpool club run by philipma1957 with a nod to Member ziploc
by
jxz
on 15/11/2015, 01:37:02 UTC
philipma1957 - thanks for doing this, and I'm ok with however you choose to manage the order.


That being said, don't concentrate too much on the +/- speed that nicehash shows.  Only the speed paying really matters.  The +/- percentages result from the estimations based on the different diff levels between miners<->nicehash and nicehash<->solo.ck.

The difference between the two numbers should approach zero as time goes on.

Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: new ckpool club run by philipma1957 with a nod to Member ziploc
by
jxz
on 14/11/2015, 16:21:06 UTC
Guys I have a point to discus , But plz philip dont understand me wrong , Its just a point

If we pay a fee to you to manage this rental, and you only create an fixed order then you go . anyone can do that

I think your main work is to rent @ best cheap price like 0.0071 or 0.0072 and monitor this order to ensure that it alive .

But you just create fixed order @ 0.0076 . we can save more and got about 2 extra hours if we rent @ 0.0072

My idea is to create fixed order @ 100 TH  AND create another standard order 600TH  @ 0.0071 and monitor it





His (very small) fee is justified by his reputation, not just the amount of work he puts in.  I'll gladly chip in 0.01 to know that if we hit I will get my reward.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: new ckpool club run by philipma1957 with a nod to Member ziploc
by
jxz
on 14/11/2015, 06:23:11 UTC


Good luck to us all.


Thanks again phillip1957 for running this.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: new ckpool club run by philipma1957 with a nod to Member ziploc
by
jxz
on 13/11/2015, 20:36:33 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 123 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 13/11/2015, 15:31:10 UTC
If you guys are looking for more participants in the group, I'll join up to 1BTC.

Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 108 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 16/10/2015, 14:29:37 UTC
Grin Congrats to    1LPWZ9AskyF8Ux384cXoYbvNRTKgLooGh3

Edit: @ck: Poolmessage is cool now!



That's me!  For anyone interested:

Over the last 15 days I've spent 8.5 BTC at nice hash to mine 2 blocks.  Renting 100-150TH/s for around 8-12 hours a day. Around .5-1 btc a day.


Since May I've spent about 19BTC total renting between MRR and nicehash at random speeds and intervals.

So as it stands today, I'm extremely pleased to be +30BTC while solo-renting.

Wow! Congratulations!

But man, you must have solid brass clankers to pull that off. You risked almost 28 BTC to get 50 back. Nice luck there.

Thanks, but not quite that much.  It was 19 total. 

10.5 until I found the first one over a 5 month span.
8.5 over the last 15 days to get the second.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining 108 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 15/10/2015, 16:44:18 UTC
Grin Congrats to    1LPWZ9AskyF8Ux384cXoYbvNRTKgLooGh3

Edit: @ck: Poolmessage is cool now!



That's me!  For anyone interested:

Over the last 15 days I've spent 8.5 BTC at nice hash to mine 2 blocks.  Renting 100-150TH/s for around 8-12 hours a day. Around .5-1 btc a day.


Since May I've spent about 19BTC total renting between MRR and nicehash at random speeds and intervals.

So as it stands today, I'm extremely pleased to be +30BTC while solo-renting.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 65 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 09/06/2015, 20:51:18 UTC
Is the pool still down?  My local hardware is connecting fine, but westhash is reporting the pool to be dead.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 0.5% fee anonymous solo bitcoin mining! 46 blocks solved!
by
jxz
on 13/05/2015, 22:33:40 UTC
Question regarding the Bestshare.
The bestshare shown by my miner is totally different than when I view it through the weblink of the pool.

Is that normal?

It is possible your miner shows a larger best share because solo.ckpool resets the best share anytime a block is found on the entire pool.   So if your miner found the best share before the last reset, your miner would have a higher value.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
by
jxz
on 24/01/2014, 11:26:28 UTC
By default it will mine on eligius at the burn in address associated with your account. The account will already contain any coins the unit might have mined during the HF burn in testing. In my case around 70 mBTC. It is running @ 422 GH/s

Quote
For factory testing an initial Bitcoin wallet was generated on this device in order to perform a live test of your product.  As a gift to you, we are providing you this wallet so you can claim any mining proceeds from the mining pool (Eligius) that may have accrued, but we do not imply that any have accured, or that the mining pool, which is beyond our control, will release any proceeds.


And you guys keep referring to HashFast as a scam.  Look at how generous they are to their customers.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
by
jxz
on 23/12/2013, 19:01:19 UTC
I was just looking at the cgminer image posted by gateway a few days ago and the work utility value on that screen seems really high for 422GH/s.

I would expect 422GH/s to show WU at about 6K, not the ~11K that is shown.  From the other stats on the screen it appears that it had been hashing for at least 10 minutes, so that should have been enough time for WU to stabilize.


Am I missing something?


Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com
by
jxz
on 05/12/2013, 19:29:27 UTC
We've got a 106xx order and we still don't have a tracking code.  Does anyone know the latest order number to have shipped today?
Well someone with 101xx got their shipping details last night, so hopefully we are at 102xx or 103xx tonight.
103XX.   Have tracking number but it is NOT moving.   just says the label was made, not picked up yet.

WTF?  102XX and nothing.  I guess they are just shipping them out at random?

101xx and still only status "paid" (Payment date 11/06). Got the same standard answer from support like posted here before, to contact them again on friday.

I'm order 106xx paid on Nov 10 and I recieved a shipping notice today.   The KNC site still reads in progress.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
by
jxz
on 05/12/2013, 15:56:28 UTC

You might want to hold onto that email.

Though you can bet they are going to move heaven and earth to get shipping labels in the system for every batch 1 order by midnight honolulu time.

I believe the TOS says DELIVERED by Dec 31. 
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com
by
jxz
on 30/11/2013, 21:35:36 UTC
i really wish KNC would answer their phones once in a awhile....

that boat has sailed..it is like they just waved the white flag and bailed on voice support...I just get an answering machine in Swedish....all it does is make me doubly annoyed in that no longer can you call them voice...and I suddenly want to have a Swedish girlfriend ....
I tried during the account fiasco... and didn't get thru for the first time in half a dozen calls over the past few months...   but others did... Cypher got thu.. and others...  just when the answering machine is on, the line is either busy, or they are closed...  You gotta know by now there are hundreds of people calling every hour trying to talk to KNC...   and during a incident like that...thousands...
It's like trying to be caller #9 on Santana Tickets... lol

During an incident like this, a simple news post to the home page could have stopped a large majority of those calls.

I truly don't understand why it is so hard for any ASIC manufacturer to offer the simplest of communications to their customers.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s
by
jxz
on 30/11/2013, 04:58:58 UTC
We'd like to take a moment to address sharpspoon's concerns:
 
Firstly - we would like to apologize to sharpspoon for any miscommunication or lack of communication on CoinTerra’s part. We’ve already reached out to him directly this evening via a Private Message and a senior member of the management team will look into his specific situation and resolve it as quickly as possible.

Secondly - and this is not a "the dog ate my homework" excuse - but we've done some investigation and we *think* we know why sharpspoon's issue wasn't responded to when it was supposedly escalated to senior management. I was reluctant to go into the details but in the interest of transparency here goes:  When our Tier 2 (escalated) customer service expert cc'd (it's a blind cc, only viewable internally) a member of the management team asking him to personally look into the issue, he left the ticket 'open' (as opposed to 'resolved', which is what we do when we close a ticket). It appears that in our Customer Support software, when you do that, the ticket stays in ‘open’ limbo and doesn't forward the cc until the ticket is finally closed (resolved) - which only happens when the issue has been fixed satisfactorily for the customer. We are going to look into this and find a solution, if it is indeed what I suspect the problem is.

Thirdly - yes it is true that we have been inundated with inquiries over the past two weeks, due to the massive surge in world-wide interest in the Bitcoin ecosystem as the BTC price has skyrocketed, and that has directed a huge amount of traffic to CoinTerra: This has been very much a double-edged sword!

As soon as we saw the surge in inquiries we took action to add significantly to our Customer Service team, both on phone support and web/email tickets.  However, it does take a little time to train new staff up to be able to respond to issues, and the fact that the more senior customer service team members needed to spend time training the new members meant that they weren't able to be as effective as they normally are at responding to issues.

In response to that situation we had more senior staff roll up their sleeves to help to clear the backlog. Those of you with open tickets may well have noticed our responses through the Thanksgiving holiday, and we have now caught up to the point where there are no "unassigned" tickets up to Wednesday evening when we officially closed for the holidays.  There are still a number of escalated tickets where additional steps are required to resolve the matter (e.g. if someone made a mistake on their wire transfer such as a misspelling or wrong address, which requires investigation.)  We shall endeavor to be fully caught-up on these as quickly as possible when the offices re-open on Monday.

Finally, we'd like to thank sharpspoon for pointing out that we did not, in fact, delete any of his posts on our forum. We will occasionally move a post if it is in the wrong sub-forum (or should be in a more appropriate sub-forum), and we will, of course, remove any spam that gets through or any content that is illegal/profane/highly offensive - normal forum moderation stuff. But we do not have a policy of censoring free speech.

We hope this goes some way to explain the situation. Of course, actions speak louder than words, so we would hope that sharpspoon will let the community know when he's been in contact with our senior management, and when his issue has been resolved.
 
Have a happy Rest-Of-Thanksgiving weekend!
 
 == The CoinTerra Support Team ==



Since you are online, this should be a good time to ask.

When are the first units going to ship?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s
by
jxz
on 26/11/2013, 02:47:05 UTC
What I found really interesting is they removed the line about the exchange rate for late payments that went in their favor and added the USD only refund when it's in the customers favor.

The old version is still in google cache if anyone wants to save it.