I'm not going to change the subject, the unanswered question is simple: Why are you doubling the tokens Founders and Team receive while halving the value of preICO investor's tokens?

Originally the allocation for pre-ICO contributors was of 6.3%, of which you sold about 92%, that means pre-ICO contributors accounts for a 5.8% of the total, but then you decreased that to a 1.4%

That's great, but why are you doubling the tokens Founders and Team receive? Meanwhile, not only you are not doubling the tokens preICO investers receive, but you are halving their value. With this action you are breaking an agreement ... not the right way to start a project which tries to solve the lack of trust in the niche.

Is it truth that you are doubling the marketcap and amount of tokens team and founders receive while halving the value of the tokens pre-ICO investors got??? 

How could anyone believe in your project if the first thing you do when you have an opportunity is to break your very first agreement? 

I'm having the same error (using 1.7.1), even after I changed the hub, any idea?

I used the key Azzazel sent me with a new clean installation of Windows 10 Home N and it worked perfectly.

I would recommend Azzazel to anyone who needs a serial key for Windows or any other M$ product. 

If you offer Windows 10 Home N, I would take a vouch one

Hola @jtimon, viendo que BU tiene ahora mas hashrate que SW (parece que antpool ha pasado a soportar BU con varios de sus servidores), si BU termina obteniendo el 75% o mas del hashrate, aceptarias que esa es la opcion elegida y pasarias a desarrollar soportando y colaborando con BU? Al fin y al cabo fueron core quienes decidieron que eran los mineros los que debian votar y elegir.

You probably haven't seen the specs, price will come down.


1.808.640 new coins per day ... over 660M coins in a year, inflation is huge on this one (and no halving).

Very smooth presale. I'll keep an eye on this, it's an interesting platform/project, hopefully you will bring it to reality.

The coin has a marketcap of just 4BTC, it would make sense to any major investor to pay some money to a capable coder and turn this into a nice project moving the marketcap to something north of 1000BTC, and at that point, with a handsome return, it would be very easy for that major investor to keep paying that and some other devs.

Does this mean that after the ICO the rest of the 1528000DSLK will be available at least at $1? If that's so, you should be considering burning them, the distribution leaves already too many coins on dev's hands, 944k + 584k + 944k + about 1.2M not sold from the ICO, and only about 300k in the hands of investors. This is probably the main reason why you might end up with 100-150BTC instead of the 700BTC that you were hoping for.

Also, if the monthly emission is around 65971DSLK (((1+0.382)*1350*30) + 10000), being 10000DSLK of those for the budget, it means a bit more than a 15% of the monthly emission for the proposal budget, don't you think that's a bit too much? Specially compared to DASH's 10%

Also, one question, the "944000DSLK as collateral for Weaver operations, running Stormnodes as a service"... who gets the reward of those Stormnodes?

Dev accumulating while working in silence, in a few days/weeks dev will come back very active with a lot of work done and price will pump x100 easily ... classic 

How can I access to my coins from the ICO? http://tao.network/crowdsale.html seems to be down

Thanks minerjones for accepting my spot, good luck to everyone and happy halving!

I'd like to take #e8 if available (#c6 or random otherwise)

You could also argue the only reason why it felt in first place was that selling wall artificially creating selling pressure.

Email account included? Price?

This is a natural step and I'm so glad this got finally proposed, I have been struggling recently with the security every time I had to restart a masternode, always fearing a keylogger + malware could steal my coins.

Now, if you don't mind me asking, for those of you using trezor with DASH already, is it possible to use the same trezor to store both BTC and DASH or do I need one trezor to store each coin? a.k.a.  do I need to buy another trezor?

Not really. I would say they intentionally didn't add Monero, because ETH is not a bitcoin clone and they added it anyway, they just probably didn't see any reason to add Monero.

But why the amount of BTC decreases? If this morning there were at least 129BTC invested, how is it possible that now it shows 123BTC?