Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 143 results by kaprosuchus
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 08/09/2017, 16:32:02 UTC
Does anybody have a recent list of paying cloud miner and their ROI as of current.
It seems genesis, hashflare, viabtc, minergate and eobot are the remaining legit options.

Genesis and Bitmain are the only two I would trust at all.

I haven't tested the Genesis Ethereum and Monero 2 year contracts but I'm going to guess you'll only make about 90% of your money back.

I bought a little ZCASH mining on Genesis and I've made about 80% of my money back after one year.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 07/09/2017, 15:28:21 UTC
FYI the AntL3 Bitmain/Hashnet mining is NOT currently profitable.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 17/11/2016, 15:13:55 UTC
your write is investment cloud mining in zeus
only one month, 29 day can get BEP, in there equal can gert profit over 3%/day
so zeus is real mining or only ponzy scheme, because return is over high

VGHSv1 30DAY is no longer available.  It has been marked as "SOLD OUT" since June 25 2015.   Wink
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 16/11/2016, 18:12:20 UTC
That seems to pay more than cloud mining. Which makes me ask, since cloud miners make so little money mining with S5s, why not mine a SHA256 altcoin instead and if so, which SHA256 alt is most profitable to mine?

The Ant-S9 based PACMiCv5 looks pretty nice (way better than 0.01% a year) and ZCASH looks like an ideal ALTCOIN.   Wink
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 16/11/2016, 14:46:54 UTC
Wells Fargo and Bank of America are currently paying 0.01% Annual Percentage Yield on savings accounts...   Wink
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 15/11/2016, 21:31:04 UTC
The Ant-S9 based PACMiCv5 might be worth looking into...    Wink
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 12/04/2016, 20:38:41 UTC
Final Profit -51.7185317326379%.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 08/04/2016, 13:50:02 UTC
AntS5 Numbers (day 121):
(UPDATED)



https://sites.google.com/site/freebitcoinsforall/
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 29/03/2016, 16:30:28 UTC
AntS5 Numbers (day 112):
(UPDATED)



https://sites.google.com/site/freebitcoinsforall/
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 17/03/2016, 21:53:26 UTC
AntS5 Numbers (day 100):
(UPDATED)



https://sites.google.com/site/freebitcoinsforall/
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 07/03/2016, 23:38:05 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 23/02/2016, 19:03:00 UTC
The image details exactly how my (AntS5) profit has declined over the past 70 days.

My starting daily payout was 0.7341805919% of my principal.

My current daily payout is 0.1171920740751260% of my principal.

My average daily payout declines -1.332518616% every day.

If this rate of decline remains stable, I will only make back 34.9358556% of my principal.

In other words, at this rate I will never make my money back and instead I will lose 65.0641444% of my investment.

The two key factors contributing to payout decline are difficulty increase and BTC/USD denominated fees.

If you would like further explanation, please let me know.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 16/02/2016, 18:38:40 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁
by
kaprosuchus
on 05/02/2016, 23:27:02 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 05/02/2016, 23:26:10 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: ▁ ▂ ▄ ▅ ▆ Cloudmining 101 (ponzi risk assessment) ▆ ▅ ▄ ▂ ▁
by
kaprosuchus
on 03/02/2016, 15:55:00 UTC
Even "legitimate" mining will probably lose money...

Case in point:

Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 01/02/2016, 18:42:19 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 19/01/2016, 22:15:33 UTC
Hm makes Pacmic v1 look pretty enticing. I just hate having bitcoin tied up where I can not sell it which is why I have always been investing recently in the S3s. The S5s and S4s are expensive for the value although the S5 is enticing due to the daily volume making it much easier to get out at a reasonable price.


Note: the S3 is currently underwater and the S4 fees are 97.05022905974230% of expected PPS earnings...
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 19/01/2016, 18:31:41 UTC
The image details exactly how my (AntS5) profit has declined over the past 41 days.

My starting daily payout was 0.7341805919% of my principal.

My current daily payout is 0.262949915062229% of my principal.

My average daily payout declines -1.968164087% every day.

If this rate of decline remains stable, I will only make back 33.36612811% of my principal.

In other words, at this rate I will never make my money back and instead I will lose 66.63387189% of my investment.

The two key factors contributing to payout decline are difficulty increase and BTC/USD denominated fees.

If you would like further explanation, please let me know.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Top Cloud Miners Compared by Profitability
by
kaprosuchus
on 18/01/2016, 14:12:01 UTC