Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 36 results by kelkel112
Re: [ANN] BtcEX - Built for Security, Transparency and Liquidity
What does this mean unique token utility of BXC what can not be found on other exchanges ? If this was highlighted then was good to have shed more light on the unique use cases of the token in the same paragraph to make it easy and interesting for the reader to reach at the conclusion. Exchanges are rising fast but it is something much more serious and bigger than issuing a simple token.
From whitepaper
Re: [ANN] BtcEX - Built for Security, Transparency and Liquidity
From which country does this token come from?
It is registered in EstoniaRe: Why its still worth mining ETH (or other coins) for me - Updated Dec 7 - 2018
just keep mining if you just have a small loss and if you don't have a need to sell them every month to pay off the bills...
One day they will rise back!
One day they will rise back!
What do you mean did you read my post at #1?
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
I perfectly understand about what we are talking about. I just want to say that your account will not be dealt with. Since you violated the rules of the forum (paragraph 33 - plagiarism).
Quote
Also what you mentioned its not copying, I was quoting it as a reference and I have made my own comment. Please look carefully.
Why didn't you highlight someone else's text and provide a link to the source? Is it possible to discern in your post that the content is not original? No.
33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e]
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
IMO as long as you can relatively easily discern the fact that the content in question is not original, it should be fine.
"Up to 400 MH/s
In this run we've been able to upgrade the Batch Two "Mini" Titan to 200 MH/s, and the "standard" Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. We've also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether.
It seems that no one said batch one Titan is 400Mh/s too."
I answer someone's question, "Up to 400MH/s"
And then I provide a reference to support my point.
After that I made my own comments again "It seems that no one said batch one Titan is 400Mh/s too."
Anyone with a brain would understand the text "In this run we've been able to upgrade the Batch Two "Mini" Titan to 200 MH/s, and the "standard" Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. We've also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether." is a reference. Because you can see the wordings "we".
I agree with you. If reading this thread it is quite obvious to anyone this is not plagiarism. Anyone reading that thread in 2014 saying this is plagiarism needs help.
Come on guys be sensible about this. Plagiarists who are just bots or spammers copy and pasting to boost their sigs fair enough get rid. This example back in 2014 obviously not claiming he is releasing titans at 400MHs is certainly not the same thing. It seems insane to believe he was trying to pass this as his original work.
@Xal0lex
Yes I could easily discern that it was not his original work. I would expect 99.9 percent of those on that thread could too.
Still waiting my account to get unlocked... It was a fault that bitcointalk leaked the password hashes, it was not my fault
I don't understand why I have waited for MONTHS to get it unlocked and I still haven't received any reply from an official.
⭐ Merited by cryptohunter (1)
What do you mean did you read my post at #1?
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
I perfectly understand about what we are talking about. I just want to say that your account will not be dealt with. Since you violated the rules of the forum (paragraph 33 - plagiarism).
Quote
Also what you mentioned its not copying, I was quoting it as a reference and I have made my own comment. Please look carefully.
Why didn't you highlight someone else's text and provide a link to the source? Is it possible to discern in your post that the content is not original? No.
33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e]
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
IMO as long as you can relatively easily discern the fact that the content in question is not original, it should be fine.
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
Obviously I am not using the external sources and pass it as my own
Re: Locked coz password hashes were leaked, please unlock it now! Proved ownership!!
that's right, the notification is for a locked account due db hack in 2015
however Xal0lex pointed out that your post contains copied text from coindesk
I may be wrong... it seems genuinely copy-pasting as reference without quote tags, but let theymos be the judge
unless there are more of your posts found as copied contents
then don't bother asking/waiting for unlock
I am sure theymos is smart enough to understand that is a reference however Xal0lex pointed out that your post contains copied text from coindesk
I may be wrong... it seems genuinely copy-pasting as reference without quote tags, but let theymos be the judge
unless there are more of your posts found as copied contents
then don't bother asking/waiting for unlock 
What do you mean did you read my post at #1?
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
I perfectly understand about what we are talking about. I just want to say that your account will not be dealt with. Since you violated the rules of the forum (paragraph 33 - plagiarism).
Quote
Also what you mentioned its not copying, I was quoting it as a reference and I have made my own comment. Please look carefully.
Why didn't you highlight someone else's text and provide a link to the source? Is it possible to discern in your post that the content is not original? No.
33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e]
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
IMO as long as you can relatively easily discern the fact that the content in question is not original, it should be fine.
"Up to 400 MH/s
In this run we've been able to upgrade the Batch Two "Mini" Titan to 200 MH/s, and the "standard" Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. We've also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether.
It seems that no one said batch one Titan is 400Mh/s too."
I answer someone's question, "Up to 400MH/s"
And then I provide a reference to support my point.
After that I made my own comments again "It seems that no one said batch one Titan is 400Mh/s too."
Anyone with a brain would understand the text "In this run we've been able to upgrade the Batch Two "Mini" Titan to 200 MH/s, and the "standard" Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. We've also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether." is a reference. Because you can see the wordings "we".
Copy:
Original:
What do you mean did you read my post at #1?Up to 400 MH/s
In this run we've been able to upgrade the Batch Two "Mini" Titan to 200 MH/s, and the "standard" Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. We've also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether.
It seems that no one said batch one Titan is 400Mh/s too.
In this run we've been able to upgrade the Batch Two "Mini" Titan to 200 MH/s, and the "standard" Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. We've also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether.
It seems that no one said batch one Titan is 400Mh/s too.
Original:
In this run, weve been able to upgrade the Batch Two Mini Titan to 200 MH/s, and the standard Titan to 400 MH/s, while still keeping power consumption and thermal disturbance as low as possible. Weve also made great strides in noise reduction and packaging, aiming for a sturdier product altogether.
"Your account is locked because it sat inactive for years after the password hashes were leaked in 2015, and was therefore at high risk of being hacked."
Also what you mentioned its not copying, I was quoting it as a reference and I have made my own comment. Please look carefully.
Re: [ANN][Crowdfunding]🌏MULECHAIN | sharing economy platform | CEO with John McAfee
I have done it 
...
The email address can also be found from some of the posts that I have posted in 2014. I guess its the proof that it's remained unchanged.
I found thisThe email address can also be found from some of the posts that I have posted in 2014. I guess its the proof that it's remained unchanged.
http://archive.is/TbFFP#selection-1651.0-1651.25
... kelvin@cleanwatercoin.org ...
http://archive.is/dtdd5#selection-641.0-641.25...
I don't own the bitcoin address anymore but I own the email address that listed on the locked account!
I hope it helps?
I don't own the bitcoin address anymore but I own the email address that listed on the locked account!
I hope it helps?
Maybe you can use PGP Signed Message to prove that's your email
...
If you want us to recover a hacked/lost account, you need to prove that you own it. Typically, the only acceptable method of proving ownership is by signing a message (including current date and desired new email address) using a Bitcoin address or PGP key associated with the account. A Bitcoin address or PGP key is associated with the account only if the account posted the key/address, sent it in a PM, or if it is still listed in the account's profile.
...
If you want us to recover a hacked/lost account, you need to prove that you own it. Typically, the only acceptable method of proving ownership is by signing a message (including current date and desired new email address) using a Bitcoin address or PGP key associated with the account. A Bitcoin address or PGP key is associated with the account only if the account posted the key/address, sent it in a PM, or if it is still listed in the account's profile.
...
[Eng: Tutorial] PGP Signature - Encrypt/Decrypt message - Fingerprint