My friend got 0.004 to 0.8 on www.satoshimines.com, check it out, the withdrawals are apparently ass though
some more info?
check out my post i made about it, he lost it though, but he did try withdrawing and it didnt go through, so he decided to keep on going it was my 0.004 he lost :/
he couldn't withdraw?? uhm... this not sound good to me!
Ya ikr, im going to get him to do it again anyways though
My friend got 0.004 to 0.8 on www.satoshimines.com, check it out, the withdrawals are apparently ass though
some more info?
check out my post i made about it, he lost it though, but he did try withdrawing and it didnt go through, so he decided to keep on going it was my 0.004 he lost :/
Post
Topic
BoardGames and rounds
Re: Gambling Question
by
kennethru
on 16/12/2014, 06:28:27 UTC
My friend got 0.004 to 0.8 on www.satoshimines.com, check it out, the withdrawals are apparently ass though
Post
Topic
BoardService Discussion
Re: fuck this
by
kennethru
on 15/12/2014, 05:28:40 UTC
Im going to get him to do it again but ya i noticed that primedice withdraws in minutes, satoshimines takes ages.
Post
Topic
BoardService Discussion
Re: fuck this
by
kennethru
on 15/12/2014, 03:08:38 UTC
He did get basically 2$ to 300 though
Post
Topic
BoardService Discussion
Re: fuck this
by
kennethru
on 14/12/2014, 20:55:51 UTC
Hes says he waited for an hour for the withdrawal then nothing happened to he kept going, we wouldve had atleast 300$
I agree with both of you that each roll of the dice is independent in and of itself from a mathematical standpoint. That the odds of rolling a 6th roll <10 out of 100 after 5 consecutive <10 Rolls (given youre playing a bet where you are wagering the dice will roll >10 out of a possible 100) is 10% in terms of chance, where the previous 5 rolls have no effect on the 6th roll at all.
But mathematically one can assume that certain patterns are unlikely to happen, such as the Monte Carlo Roulette Incident of 1913, where there were 26 rolls of consecutive black, and people lost millions betting red was bound to roll next.
But then again I dont believe an incident like that has happened since. While each roll of the wheel has roughly (factoring out greens or 0s) a 50/50 chance of rolling a red or black, 26 black has the same odds as any other pattern of 26 if pre-determined and bet on, 26 black in a row is astronomically unlikely.
But yes I agree, each roll is independent with no relation to the last roll of the dice. I would wager however you are statistically speaking more likely to see gains FIRST by betting on a 90% win wager using simple a basic Martingale strategy, than an immediate wipe out bust of say 10 consecutive 10% chance losses in a row.
CD
So at the end have you become rich ? anyone form the community have bought at least one copy of your amazing guide ? You're really amazing scammer.
Ps: I think you are scared from @dooglus or am I wrong ?
Read the post, Hes not even selling it and hes pretty chill even though theres a bunch of dickheads like you
If he didn't sell anymore this guide , why this thread is till open ? I think he should close it (at least for save his dignity).
"If he didn't sell anymore this guide" Your dumb as fuck, jesus please help this retard
I agree with both of you that each roll of the dice is independent in and of itself from a mathematical standpoint. That the odds of rolling a 6th roll <10 out of 100 after 5 consecutive <10 Rolls (given youre playing a bet where you are wagering the dice will roll >10 out of a possible 100) is 10% in terms of chance, where the previous 5 rolls have no effect on the 6th roll at all.
But mathematically one can assume that certain patterns are unlikely to happen, such as the Monte Carlo Roulette Incident of 1913, where there were 26 rolls of consecutive black, and people lost millions betting red was bound to roll next.
But then again I dont believe an incident like that has happened since. While each roll of the wheel has roughly (factoring out greens or 0s) a 50/50 chance of rolling a red or black, 26 black has the same odds as any other pattern of 26 if pre-determined and bet on, 26 black in a row is astronomically unlikely.
But yes I agree, each roll is independent with no relation to the last roll of the dice. I would wager however you are statistically speaking more likely to see gains FIRST by betting on a 90% win wager using simple a basic Martingale strategy, than an immediate wipe out bust of say 10 consecutive 10% chance losses in a row.
CD
So at the end have you become rich ? anyone form the community have bought at least one copy of your amazing guide ? You're really amazing scammer.
Ps: I think you are scared from @dooglus or am I wrong ?
Read the post, Hes not even selling it and hes pretty chill even though theres a bunch of dickheads like you
Post
Topic
BoardService Discussion
Topic OP
Is Primedice legit?
by
kennethru
on 21/11/2014, 21:13:35 UTC
Friend just showed me it, i don't get how it works. In my opinion i would its rigged but I dont anything about it.