Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 158 results by kizlod
Trump predicted this.
He knew that these crooks were going to sell the confiscated coins and that’s why he said “Never sell your bitcoin” in Nashville during the bitcoin conference.
Why would they move these coins to an exchange otherwise?
Kabamala is full of shit and everybody sees through her. She is anti-crypto.
He knew that these crooks were going to sell the confiscated coins and that’s why he said “Never sell your bitcoin” in Nashville during the bitcoin conference.
Why would they move these coins to an exchange otherwise?
Kabamala is full of shit and everybody sees through her. She is anti-crypto.
Don't they have to sell confiscated coins at some point?
XRP for me. I feel so many hate it for no reason and I am going against the herd and buying in the hope it will finally wake up in the bull run peak over the next 6-12 months now that the law suit that has been holding it back for many years is coming to an end.
I plan to sell some in this bull run peak next year but also hold a few thousand until 2030 when the price will likely be a lot more.
I plan to sell some in this bull run peak next year but also hold a few thousand until 2030 when the price will likely be a lot more.
For no reason? First of all, its charts during the years don't look good. People were calling for the big pumps all the time, but it did almost nothing. And it's fully centralized and controlled by the bank, lol.
It’s had a law suit over its head for over 5 years so that’s the reason it didn’t do well last bull run.
Once the law suit is fully over it will be free, there will be no fear over it.
Let’s see what happens, but it will definitely do better than Bitcoin from today for the rest of this bull run.
Yeah, I heard it so many times. Can't agree with you, but we'll see.
Hello,friends
For general development and communication,i would like to hear stories from users of this fine forum about owning bitcoin
How much,how long,when did you first buy bitcoin?
I would like to hear stories from both current big hodlers and former hodlers
Interested to know why you sold and if you regret it?
Thank you all
-Regards
For general development and communication,i would like to hear stories from users of this fine forum about owning bitcoin
How much,how long,when did you first buy bitcoin?
I would like to hear stories from both current big hodlers and former hodlers
Interested to know why you sold and if you regret it?
Thank you all
-Regards
I bought my first BTC 5 years ago, and I still haven't sold it. I wouldn't say how much I have, but I'm still far from having a full coin.
Is it possible that some meme coin might challenge bitcoin in future ? Why or why not ? I personally feel that though we may see some mem coin making it really big but it will never be at the level to challenge bitcoin.
I can't imagine that memecoin will challenge bitcoin. Memecoins are temporary coins i think. They are today but not tomorrow. Memecoins first show 10x, 50x or 100x hype. Seeing this, we can think that they will challenge bitcoin. But after one or two years the real situation is understood. No coin has been able to challenge Bitcoin so far and will not be able to in the future.Exactly. Tons of coins have more utility, existed for a longer time, and not one of them got close to BTC. Thinking that memecoin can beat Bitcoin is truly ridiculous.
People want easy money and they see memecoins as the way. And people also like memes. That's easy, but the risk is high and memecoins don't provide anything besides a chance of getting money, that depends on the hype of a coin. So I'd rather buy something else.
Re: Is bitcoin a type of social media or a type of social network? Is it neither?
"No, it's a p2p digital currency.".
Yes, but from a technical standpoint bitcoin displays traits associated with social networking. It's definitely not a easy-to-use social network (for most people), that's for sure. The only difference is, any identifying features of the user are usually replaced with random strings of numbers and letters.
-connection between two users
-communication between two users
-sharing of information between two users
-forming of relationships between two users
On the other hand, definitions of social media usually describe a service that enables the ability for a user to create and share content, or to participate in the act of social networking.
From what I understand, bitcoin doesn't support or really have a use for user generated content sharing and uploading. It's currency after all, not Instagram.
But it's currency that let's you talk to another person with the only requirement being they are using the same software.
Yes, but from a technical standpoint bitcoin displays traits associated with social networking. It's definitely not a easy-to-use social network (for most people), that's for sure. The only difference is, any identifying features of the user are usually replaced with random strings of numbers and letters.
-connection between two users
-communication between two users
-sharing of information between two users
-forming of relationships between two users
On the other hand, definitions of social media usually describe a service that enables the ability for a user to create and share content, or to participate in the act of social networking.
From what I understand, bitcoin doesn't support or really have a use for user generated content sharing and uploading. It's currency after all, not Instagram.
But it's currency that let's you talk to another person with the only requirement being they are using the same software.
_____________________________________________________________
Of the three options, I think bitcoin is a social network.
What do you think?It can't be a social network, you can't connect through Bitcoin, only use it as a currency or an asset. Or a social network, all that stuff is built around BTC, like this forum, but you can't call BTC that.
Re: Is bitcoin a type of social media or a type of social network? Is it neither?
"No, it's a p2p digital currency.".
Yes, but from a technical standpoint bitcoin displays traits associated with social networking. It's definitely not a easy-to-use social network (for most people), that's for sure. The only difference is, any identifying features of the user are usually replaced with random strings of numbers and letters.
-connection between two users
-communication between two users
-sharing of information between two users
-forming of relationships between two users
On the other hand, definitions of social media usually describe a service that enables the ability for a user to create and share content, or to participate in the act of social networking.
From what I understand, bitcoin doesn't support or really have a use for user generated content sharing and uploading. It's currency after all, not Instagram.
But it's currency that let's you talk to another person with the only requirement being they are using the same software.
It can't be a social network, you can't connect through Bitcoin, only use it as a currency or an asset. Or a social network, all that stuff is built around BTC, like this forum, but you can't call BTC that.
Yes, but from a technical standpoint bitcoin displays traits associated with social networking. It's definitely not a easy-to-use social network (for most people), that's for sure. The only difference is, any identifying features of the user are usually replaced with random strings of numbers and letters.
-connection between two users
-communication between two users
-sharing of information between two users
-forming of relationships between two users
On the other hand, definitions of social media usually describe a service that enables the ability for a user to create and share content, or to participate in the act of social networking.
From what I understand, bitcoin doesn't support or really have a use for user generated content sharing and uploading. It's currency after all, not Instagram.
But it's currency that let's you talk to another person with the only requirement being they are using the same software.
_____________________________________________________________
Of the three options, I think bitcoin is a social network.
What do you think?It can't be a social network, you can't connect through Bitcoin, only use it as a currency or an asset. Or a social network, all that stuff is built around BTC, like this forum, but you can't call BTC that.
For me, it is enough for Bitcoin to be legally accepted as a payment method. It doesn't have to be a legal tender to perform its function. If countries recognize Bitcoin as a currency, that would already be enough.
For Bitcoin to become a legal tender is a long shot, and could even just be considered as an extra mile. Bitcoin doesn't have to be a legal tender for businesses and customers to accept it as payment. I think it is enough catalyst for Bitcoin's adoption rate for a government to declare it as an acceptable currency.
I also think that Bitcoin don't have to be a legal tender of any country to achieve it's global currency aim, if it's accepted in any country as a payment option and it's business people will adopt it and accept it as a means of payment, then it'll still mentain it's function as a legally accepted payment method. I don't think that most governments will accept Bitcoin as a legal tender because they can't control it as a result of it being decentralized, the least they can do is regulate it. Bitcoin don't have to takeover fiat currencies, it can function perfectly well as an alternative digital currency, besides people are adopting it more as as an investment asset, because it's a store of value.For Bitcoin to become a legal tender is a long shot, and could even just be considered as an extra mile. Bitcoin doesn't have to be a legal tender for businesses and customers to accept it as payment. I think it is enough catalyst for Bitcoin's adoption rate for a government to declare it as an acceptable currency.
I never understood why a lot of people are trying to push the idea that BTC will replace fiat. It won't, and it doesn't need to. Perhaps it needs more adoption, but it truly a great alternative, it doesn't have to be the only available option.
The Big Question
Who Is Really At Fault?
The Big Answer is BOTH
there will be no Victim if there are no fraudster , but there will never be a fraudster if there is no victim.
remember that victim is the reason why there are existing fraudster.
so lets not blame one but instead help the victim find a way to not become one.
Well, it's the fault of both of them, but the fraudster is the one to blame. He's committing a crime, there is no grey morality about that. You don't question if a murderer committed something bad when it happens.
I think it is hear to stay and we will see a lot of technological advancements in metaverse. All big tech giants have already started or have come up with thier own version of the Metaverse. What I am excited about is how it progresses in the future. Imagine meeting new people globally, buying products and others.
Well, you could do all that without metaverse, it's just fancy. I don't really see the point of it.
They all might seem promising, but you've got to do deep research with all of that. And it still doesn't confirm that this coin will not be rug pulled or at least that it will perform well.
We need to understand one thing that we should never trust any politician they don't do things without their own benefit. As per the statement I don't think is any sort of acceptance but rather a pure manipulative statement and I think we shouldn't be quick in judging or trusting any politicians as it's all the vote politics and they can do anything for votes.
Majority of government and politicians don't like Bitcoin and crypto, you can understand that from the atrocious regulations laid by Indan government.
Majority of government and politicians don't like Bitcoin and crypto, you can understand that from the atrocious regulations laid by Indan government.
Exactly. I'm pretty sure that he's just saying that to get votes. But it also may bring some people into crypto I think. The ones who are not into it now, but believes Trump.
I think that early investors were almost purely for the idea. I'm investing in BTC because I'm sure that it will get to the $100K and even higher. I've been buying it at below $20,000 last year and now it's at $40,000+. Not a lot of assets are capable of that.
Is DOGE Coin's Rise a Sign of the Future of Cryptocurrencies, or a Fleeting Internet Meme Phenomenon?
In my personal opinion, Doge is still memecoin and just hype is not suitable for the long term. The future of cryptocurrencies is still held by Bitcoin in the long term because Bitcoin will attract people to invest in cryptocurrency.
In the future, we won't know whether Dogecoin can experience an increase until it reaches a new history, therefore there is no harm if we invest in several Altcoins including Dogecoin and don't just rely on one type of investment (Bitcoin), so that later when the most popular coin experiences an increase we can gain profits from several investments that we make in several Altcoins.
Doge Coin is a meme project and the only reason there is still hype about it is elon musk. We should be careful when we are thinking about investing in a project that is getting all the interest from the industry only because one man is interested in it. What if elon says he is going to develop his own project or he will not longer supporting doge and its development? This market will react negatively. So the advisable option is to invest in a project that is fundamentally strong and has a real use case.
Well I do agree with you there is hype because of Elon Musk. That is a big reason why we are still talking about this meme coin. But also we must remember it is the first meme coin that was created in 2013.
And first it was meant to be only a joke. But then when we can start to make money if we just hodl it this is why it is most popular meme coin. I do not think Elon Musk is going to develop his own project so I am not going to worry about this happening.
Elon even said at some point that he's not planning to make his own project. And DOGE was the only memecoins that was created as a pure joke, it feels like everything else was made just to make hype and grab money.