Search content
Sort by

Showing 7 of 7 results by kommando98
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [ARO] | Arionum | CPU | PHP Based | Decentralized Revolution
by
kommando98
on 19/02/2018, 22:14:20 UTC
The Windows LightArionum wallet is pretty slick, actually makes it super easy to mine if you aren't interested in configuring a standalone miner.

1. Download and install the wallet, which will set you up with an address
2. Click the "miner" tab
3. Click "start mining"
4. Now you are mining to the wallet address that was created when you installed the wallet.

Very slick and very easy!  This should make an easy transition into mining for some new folks on hardware they already have and increase adoption and support of the coin. Very promising!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [Mining OS] SimpleMining.net - Easy to use GPU MINING Operating System
by
kommando98
on 16/01/2018, 20:05:16 UTC
I am having some issues messing with the OC settings on my smOS 8x1060 rig.  It seems when I try to change the clock or memory settings either with a single setting for all cards or individually, that it doesn't update as its not reflected in the Core/Mem column after I do it.  The only way I can modify the output of the cards is to increase the power to the cards.  Currently I'm running at 100W to each card just to get up to 2300sol/s for Equihash.  I'd like to be able to OC each card's settings accordingly on a lower power setting if possible, or leave the power setting as is and increase the output with the OC.

For example, here is the Core/Mem Column before adjustment:
1860 1860 1860 1847 1860 1860 1885 1936 (100)
3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802

Then in the OC tab I added 1100 (I've tried lower numbers as well) to the Mem settings and it didn't look like anything changed:
1847 1873 1860 1860 1873 1898 1898 1936 (100)
3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802

Also, that's 7 ASUS 1060 cards and 1 Gigabyte 1060 (all 3GB), but looks like the Gigabyte has much higher clock speed (and its temp is always ~10C less than the others).  I'm sure I could bump up the output on that card with some OC.

I saw someone say if the OC tab isn't working that you might need to delete then re-install rig.  This makes me a little nervous, do I just delete it from the dashboard and it will automatically pop back up in the dashboard again when I restart it?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.7 (Linux / Windows)
by
kommando98
on 30/12/2017, 18:00:40 UTC
Yeah, you must have better cards and I must have the Hynix memory not Samsung.  I tried all of them up at 110W and your settings and my core and memory numbers never got that high.  The cards topped out at ~300Sol/s on that setting.  This is the best mine get at the 150/1100/110 settings:

> GPU2 65C Sol/s: 295.2 Sol/W: 2.75 Avg: 295.5 I/s: 156.6 Sh: 0.00 . .
> GPU0 65C Sol/s: 294.7 Sol/W: 2.76 Avg: 296.9 I/s: 156.7 Sh: 0.00 . .
> GPU1 65C Sol/s: 288.4 Sol/W: 2.70 Avg: 294.8 I/s: 157.4 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU3 69C Sol/s: 292.3 Sol/W: 2.79 Avg: 293.0 I/s: 155.0 Sh: 1.50 1.00 109
GPU4 66C Sol/s: 295.5 Sol/W: 2.90 Avg: 295.5 I/s: 155.7 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU5 61C Sol/s: 291.7 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 291.0 I/s: 157.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU6 61C Sol/s: 301.0 Sol/W: 2.80 Avg: 299.7 I/s: 157.5 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU7 56C Sol/s: 295.8 Sol/W: 2.87 Avg: 296.1 I/s: 158.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
========== Sol/s: 2354.7 Sol/W: 2.79 Avg: 2362.6 I/s: 1255.5 Sh: 1.50 1.00 109
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.7 (Linux / Windows)
by
kommando98
on 30/12/2017, 17:36:54 UTC
GPU0 64C Sol/s: 279.7 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 277.9 I/s: 146.8 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU1 63C Sol/s: 280.4 Sol/W: 3.50 Avg: 280.0 I/s: 147.7 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU2 64C Sol/s: 272.3 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 274.2 I/s: 147.6 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU3 69C Sol/s: 274.8 Sol/W: 3.40 Avg: 271.6 I/s: 145.9 Sh: 0.99 1.00 104
GPU4 66C Sol/s: 282.2 Sol/W: 3.49 Avg: 276.2 I/s: 147.4 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU5 60C Sol/s: 281.9 Sol/W: 3.51 Avg: 279.6 I/s: 148.9 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU6 67C Sol/s: 298.0 Sol/W: 2.71 Avg: 293.5 I/s: 156.9 Sh: 0.00 . .
> GPU7 65C Sol/s: 297.4 Sol/W: 2.72 Avg: 294.7 I/s: 158.4 Sh: 1.98 1.00 114
========== Sol/s: 2266.9 Sol/W: 3.28 Avg: 2247.8 I/s: 1199.5 Sh: 2.97 1.00 109

This is with 6&7 turned up to your settings 150/1100/110 as they seem to be the best cards, but still top out at ~300Sol/s.

What do the numbers in your rig list look like?  For some reason the memory clock numbers don't change even when I change them in overclock settings, maybe that's my issue:

This is what my Core/Mem column looks like:
1721 1733 1695 1733 1708 1733 1911 1961 (80,80,80,80,80,80,110,110)
3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802 3802

The Memory numbers on the last two should be higher, since that is how they are set in the OC settings, but you can see they don't change like the core numbers do.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.7 (Linux / Windows)
by
kommando98
on 30/12/2017, 17:16:24 UTC
Hmmm, I can't get close to those numbers.  Even at 150/1100/110 I'm barely cracking 300 across all the cards.

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.7 (Linux / Windows)
by
kommando98
on 30/12/2017, 15:43:40 UTC
Great performance with this miner on SimpleMining.
I was getting under 300 sols per 1060 3GB GPU (6 GPUs), now I'm getting as much as 333 sols per card!
Way better than EWBF.

Getting between 1917-1947 sols using 150/1100/110 settings in overclocking in simpleminer!

I'm going to have to try those overclock settings!  What is your Sol/W number with that setup?  I'm currently debating between max efficiency or max output!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.7 (Linux / Windows)
by
kommando98
on 30/12/2017, 15:11:49 UTC
I just set up my 8x1060 3GB rig through SMOS and I'm not seeing any plus signs on the right of the cards.  The other numbers seem to indicate they are earning shares, based on shares/min numbers, etc but the lack of "+" is concerning me!

GPU0 68C Sol/s: 272.7 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 274.2 I/s: 146.2 Sh: 1.49 1.00 98
GPU2 68C Sol/s: 276.4 Sol/W: 3.44 Avg: 275.6 I/s: 147.2 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU1 66C Sol/s: 270.9 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 273.4 I/s: 147.3 Sh: 1.49 1.00 101
GPU3 68C Sol/s: 267.6 Sol/W: 3.40 Avg: 269.8 I/s: 146.1 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU4 68C Sol/s: 271.6 Sol/W: 3.42 Avg: 271.8 I/s: 147.3 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU5 62C Sol/s: 274.9 Sol/W: 3.48 Avg: 279.1 I/s: 148.7 Sh: 0.00 . .
GPU6 65C Sol/s: 279.9 Sol/W: 3.50 Avg: 280.0 I/s: 148.2 Sh: 4.49 1.00 97
GPU7 56C Sol/s: 287.3 Sol/W: 3.62 Avg: 289.1 I/s: 151.4 Sh: 2.99 1.00 98
========== Sol/s: 2201.2 Sol/W: 3.47 Avg: 2212.9 I/s: 1182.4 Sh: 10.45 1.00 98

 If it matters, I'm using dwarfpool.  Maybe it is due to the RBPPS and the payouts don't take place until a block is found?  

Edit:  just spotted a "*", still waiting on a "+".  Haha!