Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 292 results by korm
Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.7.2 - native algo switching
777000000000000022AA1C00315A5436A0550F15B68C1506004082007C041420CA8980A9020004C 01712262B612B3715
Its Elpida timings good for micron ??
Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.7.2 - native algo switching
hi guys, please give good timings for micron,
777000000000000022AA1C0073626C41B0551016BA0D260B0060060004061420EA8940AA0300000 01914292EB22E3B16-on these timings max 950 on heavy algo rx578....
777000000000000022AA1C00315A5436A0550F15B68C1506004082007C041420CA8980A9020004C 01712262B612B3715777000000000000022AA1C0073626C41B0551016BA0D260B0060060004061420EA8940AA0300000 01914292EB22E3B16-on these timings max 950 on heavy algo rx578....
I explicitly benched my miner against Claymore 9.7, and i also explicitly said i couldn't beat it, by an order of magnitude. It can push my HD7850 1G to 450, i cannot go above 370 
but yes, i'm still second, other miners are still worse. But i found jce a lot more stable than Claymore 11.3 and faster on cards with 2G+ memory.
On RX550 and RX560 jce should be the best if configured properly, which include waiting for 5-10 minutes after each start to let it warm up.
On RX460 2G use multi-hash 416, 432, 448 or 464, worksize 8, alpha 4 or 8, beta 64. On 4G, use same and multi_hash 464.
Otherwise try the 0.31e, the most stable so far, it takes ages to compile its opencl but may mine a bit faster than 0.32 in some cases.
but yes, i'm still second, other miners are still worse. But i found jce a lot more stable than Claymore 11.3 and faster on cards with 2G+ memory.On RX550 and RX560 jce should be the best if configured properly, which include waiting for 5-10 minutes after each start to let it warm up.
On RX460 2G use multi-hash 416, 432, 448 or 464, worksize 8, alpha 4 or 8, beta 64. On 4G, use same and multi_hash 464.
Otherwise try the 0.31e, the most stable so far, it takes ages to compile its opencl but may mine a bit faster than 0.32 in some cases.
It's true. Clay 9.7 knows the secret but no longer works on new algorithms. So now JCE it's the number one miner for old GPU (HD6870 on Clay - 290Hs, JCE - 260Hs (effectiv 240).
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":368 },
On RX 460 4G new SRB1.6.6 after 5-10m give 463Hs on each GPU. JCE stuck on 420-440 depending on the card (like old srb 1.30)
I also had that the cards gave out only half of the maximum speed. Noticed once
3*RX460
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":464 },
After switching to a new algo, all the miners began to work badly on old HD6870. This one is the closest to Clay9.7 
But with RX460, it works worse than the srb. I do not know why
But with RX460, it works worse than the srb. I do not know why
what parameters to set for RX460/560? this one? its not the faster then SRB
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
what drivers you recomend for RX460/560?
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":464 },
what drivers you recomend for RX460/560?
Re: [ANN] [ARO] | Arionum | CPU | PHP Based | Decentralized Revolution
LG V10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 1.44Ghz = 7 hash/s
what wrong ?
what wrong ?
the battery will die
Re: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW
Do not use the official pool. They are not competent. Can not stop the pool after fork. Zero the balance for ALL days. Fu***ng idiots.
An adequate pool with a normal admin is intense.hashvault.pro
An adequate pool with a normal admin is intense.hashvault.pro
Is this the best pool man, lot of the pools fucked up during falk and did not upgrade properly.
And from the comments some of them seems stealing coins?
Yeah, the BEST
https://www.hashvault.pro/
+ they have discord where You can ask for help from admin https://discordapp.com/invite/HW3bSA
the only + of the official is the ability to setup a not a high statdiff (1000). I have two processors left on it. But now I withdraw every 5 coins
Re: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW
Is it possible to connect to a remote node in the wallet? What are the addresses of the node?
intense-wallet-cli.exe --daemon-host node.intense.hashvault.pro:48782Re: [ANN] DERO FIRST SSL BLOCKCHAIN: CryptoNote Privacy + Smart Contracts
strange that they have already posted information about this FPGA . means that their development fee will bring more then the rig.
64KH/s with Cryptonight-V7
greedy bastards
they will finally bring down the price
Re: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW
well im using the new xmrstak and its not working with this pool
in the pool.txt"currency" : "stellite",
Work, bt not so good as SRBminer
Re: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW
does anybody mine on intense.hashvault.pro
Yes. The Best pool everAnd after the balance was stolen on the official pool ... only HV
On the HV is an adequate admin. And when there were problems with payments on the sumo pool (about 14,000 sumo was lost due to the bug in the new algorithm), the administrator did not reset the balance of users. In difference from these *****.
Re: [ANN] DERO FIRST SSL BLOCKCHAIN: CryptoNote Privacy + Smart Contracts
I think with the Atlantis release Dero will provide the world with a new Cryptonight protocol, might not even be called Cryptonight any more. Not some existing variant of Cryptonight for sure. But the devs keep their cards close to their chest so I am just guessing like every one else of you on here....
If the algorithm is unique then this is very good. There will be no ASIC and no NHIt's like a good detective. Nothing is known in advance