Of course, this was to be expected, because nothing surpasses Bitcoin.

Hello, I have been participating in the project for more than 2 years. Question from the Hashtrust.io Decentralized Cloud Mining administration: Will the coin go public? Will there be a listing? What time? Is there an update to the Hashtrust.io Decentralized Cloud Mining Roadmap? Sincerely.

Can you show the project that applies?

1.Proof of registration post link:   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1896850
2.Telegram username:  @kotik85
Week 7 (30.12 - 05.01)         
Twitter Profile Link:       https://twitter.com/KonstantinBass2
Twitter Retweet links:         
1   https://twitter.com/AirdropDet/status/1212720286510067713   
2   https://twitter.com/AirdropDet/status/1212720286510067713     
3   https://twitter.com/1stTrade1/status/1197471033630109696
Facebook Profile Link: https://web.facebook.com/konstantin.basalaev.14/
https://web.facebook.com/konstantin.basalaev.14/posts/632004920941794

Нет, не исчезнут альты из списка, которые сегодня состоят на СМС. Некоторые альты, совсем недавно появились, и куда им исчезать. Есть, которые состоят на нодах и им тоже, деваться некуда. Я думаю, что альткоины никуда не исчезнут.

Моё мнение, что стоимость Эфириума, сегодня должна быть более чем в 500 долларов. После обновления сети Эфириум, я думаю, произойдёт памр монеты.

Система рангов делает всё автоматически и это очень замечательно, и не нужно задавать вопросов. Спасибо за разъяснения.

So I lost my tokens? Something is not entirely clear to me, I sent it in vain.

Hello, help me, please. I did not exchange BTK coins. Old coins sent here is the link: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf000e14b3da174a4ba5126e6f67ef6e36a7e1b0a244eba911a070e0efb90a81e
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x41018664cf0bd8b9aac145e291b993589fa527353d5cf592e19445002848471c

Help, I didn’t do the exchange, I just sent you the coins back, but the exchange did not take place until the end. What should I do? So I sent you coins just like that?

I want to receive an exchange reward. Translated from two of my addresses: 0x1Ecf48D38179a35071c37aA4BA8796432b6Bd290
0x834157D053cb5203Ff12A296Bf86774f55A96aB8
But no refund. Help me make a swap.

Sorry, I'm a little hard to get used to. Corrected.

At first, you didn’t even need a pickax. The earliest prospectors of the California gold rush ventured into the Sierra foothills as solo travelers, sloshing through streams in search of nuggets dislodged by the current. That, at least, is the prevailing image: The individual renegade who headed west to strike it rich by his own initiative. But soon there were too many prospectors and too little easy gold. The task became more resource-intensive, requiring water to blast away the hills. That meant size and scale, to build pipes and aqueducts—out of reach to all but a few.

I thought of that history while reporting, earlier this month, on an alleged pyramid scheme involving the digital gold rush of the 2010s, in which people were sold on the idea that mining bitcoin was a path to self-won bounty. Early in this decade, had I possessed the foresight, I might have set up my home computer as a bitcoin miner and reaped healthy rewards. The key was openness. Bitcoin wasn’t worth all that much then, but anyone could do it. The underlying technology, blockchain, seemed to make sure of that, by eliminating the need for intermediaries. The platform would maintain our independence, our state of decentralization.

Then bitcoin went the way of gold. Why? Because it started making people rich.

With more miners competing, mining got more expensive. Higher demand for electricity meant you needed more efficient servers to yield a profit and, soon, economies of scale. Corporations took an interest. Today mining farms are a massive, government-subsidized business. Bitcoin, in turn, became a financial instrument. The banks invested, along with the pension funds. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission declared it a commodity, just like gold. How do you get bitcoin these days? When I bought a tiny fraction of one bitcoin the other day, after years of stubborn resistance, I did it through a popular investing app that sells my data to hedge funds who use it to better inform their bets. Governments can trace bitcoin transactions with ease, so you can’t even use it for crime or political dissent.

LEARN MORE

But still the myth endures. The message is that bitcoin, by virtue of its technical underpinnings, is something that sits outside of our world—a tool for people left out of the system. That, at least, was the pitch of the pyramid scheme scammers, who preyed on vulnerable people with the message that shares in a fraudulent bitcoin mining operation would save them when the traditional financial system could not. Many were taken in by that promise.

So Bitcoin has strayed a bit from its cypherpunk origins. But not blockchain, right? The underlying platform offers a Platonic form of decentralization, the cryptographic guarantee of trusting no one, of shrugging off central authority. It looked like the perfect antidote to the centralized internet, a weapon of war against Big Tech.

This year, Big Tech made its move into blockchain, in what may ultimately look like a hostile takeover. It was convenient, just as our national conversation moved, threateningly, to antitrust and privacy. Earlier this month, Twitter announced it was (maybe) “decentralizing” with (maybe) blockchain, despite long ignoring the cries of people asking it to do just that (with readily available, non-blockchain technology). Critics noted that more private tweeting would help it dodge concerns about content moderation. Facebook has developed a cryptocurrency, Libra, that it claims it doesn’t control, but which will certainly entrench its power. That move helped spark China to accelerate its own push into digital currency, which would become a handy surveillance tool. It’s unclear what role blockchain will play in that effort, but in any case, Xi Jinping is trumpeting public investment in the technology for other purposes.

The co-opting of blockchain—its inevitable centralization—should not have come as a surprise. It’s a lesson we’ve learned again and again: We bestow our social values upon technology, not the other way around. We‘ve been through this before. Take the internet. First came the promise that it would unlock knowledge and make us all free—until a dictator cuts the cord and companies track and manipulate our behavior. For blockchain, using words like “decentralization” and “self-sovereignty” doesn’t simply make it so. That takes work: protections for privacy and safety, assurances that networks operate as intended. Like the internet, that doesn’t mean the initial hope and promises were untrue; we were just blind, at first, to alternate interpretations—to manipulations of certain ideals.

Source: https://refind.com/link/50174488

This spring, a mysterious figure calling themselves the Quantum Bullshit Detector strolled onto the Twitter scene. Posting anonymously, they began to comment on purported breakthroughs in quantum computing—claims that the technology will speed up artificial intelligence algorithms, manage financial risk in banks, and break all encryption. The account preferred to express its opinions in a single word: “Bullshit.”

The provocations perplexed experts in the field. Because of the detector’s familiarity with jargon and the online personalities it chose to follow, the person or persons behind the account seemed to belong to the quantum community. Researchers were unaccustomed to such brazen trolling from someone in their own ranks. “So far it looks pretty well-calibrated, but [...] vigilante justice is a high-risk affair,” wrote physicist Scott Aaronson on his blog a month after the detector’s debut. People discussed online whether to take the account’s opinions seriously.

“There is some confusion. Quantum Bullshit Detector cannot debate you. It can only detect quantum bullshit. This is why we are Quantum Bullshit Detector!” the account tweeted in response.

In the subsequent months, the account has called bullshit on statements in academic journals such as Nature and journalism publications such as Scientific American, Quanta, and yes, an article written by me in WIRED. Google’s so-called quantum supremacy demonstration? Bullshit. Andrew Yang’s tweet about Google’s quantum supremacy demonstration? Bullshit. Quantum computing pioneer Seth Lloyd accepting money from Jeffrey Epstein? Bullshit.

People now tag the detector, @BullshitQuantum, to request its take on specific articles, which the account obliges with an uncomplicated “Bullshit” or “Not bullshit.” Not everyone celebrates the detector, with one physicist calling the detector “ignorant” and condemning its “lack of talent and bad taste” in response to a negative verdict on his own work. But some find that the account provides a public service in an emerging industry prone to hyperbole. “I think it does a good job of highlighting articles that are not well-written,” says physicist Juani Bermejo-Vega of the University of Granada in Spain.

LEARN MORE

The anonymous account is a response to growing anxiety in the quantum community, as investment accelerates and hype balloons inflate. Governments in the US, UK, EU, and China have each promised more than a billion dollars of investment in quantum computing and related technologies. Each country is hoping to become the first to harness the technology’s potential—to use the computers to design better batteries or to break an adversary’s encryption system. But these ambitions will likely take decades of work, and researchers like Bermejo-Vega worry whether they can deliver on inflated expectations—or worse, that the technology might accidentally make the world a worse place. “With more money comes more promises, and more pressure to fulfill those promises, which leads to more exaggerated claims,” says Bermejo-Vega.

It’s not clear that quantum computing will end up benefiting society, says Emma McKay, a graduate student at York University in Canada who studies the societal impacts of the technology. If quantum computers are to be broadly available to users, the computers will need a lot of environmentally-unfriendly infrastructure for storing data, says McKay. According to physicist Sabine Hossenfelder, writing in The Guardian, a future quantum computer capable of simulating new chemicals would produce 10 terabytes of data per second and “require a supporting cast of conventional computers and other devices to program, operate and monitor them.”

“I have yet to see evidence that any quantum technology is worth the amount of resources we are putting into it,” says McKay.

Most quantum researchers take a softer public stance than McKay, but they too have begun to voice their anxieties, in response to a specific hyped announcement: Google’s quantum supremacy demonstration, in which the company’s researchers performed a largely useless mathematical problem on a quantum computer faster than a supercomputer. Since reports of this demonstration first leaked in September, many researchers have expressed concern that the word “supremacy” suggests quantum computers are now better than conventional ones, which is patently false. While Bermejo-Vega thinks Google’s demonstration does provide scientific value of the technology’s viability, she emphasizes their success was “narrow.” In addition, all quantum computers, including Google’s, perform inconsistently because they are prone to errors that researchers don’t know how to correct. “Google’s computer is mostly still a useless quantum computer for practical purposes,” she says.

Source: https://refind.com/link/49542232

You need to try to stack satoshi and keep Bitcoin to Halving. This will obviously happen and Bitcoin will approach the mark of $ 100,000 for Bitcoin.

It is certain that Bitcoin can withstand paper money today in all directions. In financial terms, this is very good. Let's see what to see from the banks, and things are progressing.

Most likely, scammers have deceived you and you need to know that before sending funds, check the identities to whom you send your funds. How to understand the address is not suitable for sending. This is their excuse.

Ого, статистика падает по количеству пользователей, за период времени. Это не очень хороший показатель, но есть свои плюсы.

Да, есть и такие, кто зашёл на форум, просто. Здесь я нахожу, немного больше полезной информации, чем на другом форуме. Это мне нравится. Два форума, bitcointalk и cryptotalk, гдя я стараюсь быть и нахожу друзей.

Дорога к блокчейн-революции не всегда была гладкой. Большинство технических экспертов сходятся во мнении, что потенциал для новых предприятий и приложений, основанных на распределенных регистрах, огромен, но мы все еще ждем того прорывного года, когда блокчейн перейдет от ориентированной на технологии фокусировки к широкому распространению .

2020 год - это новый год и начало нового десятилетия.

Я полагаю, что мы находимся на пороге блокбастерного года для разработки блокчейнов, и в 2020 году эта технология начнет предпринимать свои самые большие, самые меняющиеся шаги. По мере того, как инноваторы будут продолжать формировать конкурентную среду, мы увидим больше продуктов в производстве и начнем видеть решения на основе блокчейна.

Я связался с некоторыми творческими и влиятельными лидерами мысли в пространстве блокчейна для их прогнозов на предстоящий год. Их предсказания - вместе с несколькими моими - ниже.

ПРОДУКТЫ В ПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ
«Те, кто тихо строил в зимнее время года, начнут выпускать бета и производственные версии своих платформ. Есть много компаний, которые находятся на грани выпуска своей продукции для массового рынка. Те, кто поставляет продукты, которые лучше, чем их централизованные коллеги, увидят реальное принятие. Те, которые более сложны для внедрения традиционными пользователями, придут, но не увидят принятия , на которое надеются их сообщества ». - Бен Голуб, исполнительный председатель и временный генеральный директор Storj Labs

«2020 год будет годом, когда программные инструменты (например, Stripe, Plaid, Twilio), существующие в традиционном стеке разработки программного обеспечения, будут созданы и приняты в децентрализованном стеке разработки программного обеспечения ». - Бен Ламберт, руководитель Pelion Venture Partners

«Проекты с открытым исходным кодом, использующие фабрику Hyperledger , останутся в лидерах не потому, что в нее будут вложены ресурсы , а из-за большого количества пользователей и решения новых интеграций, которые используются в качестве доказательства концепции. В среде коммерческой цепочки блоков , которая не зависит от открытого источника , компании будут искать способы представить его в своей продуктовой линейке, одновременно уравновешивая разрешения и конфиденциальность по-настоящему децентрализованным способом ». - Луис Макиас, генеральный директор и основатель GrainChain

РЕГУЛИРОВАНИЕ
«Между Си Цзиньпином, недавно объявившим, что Китаю необходимо « воспользоваться возможностью технологии блокчейна » , и сохраняющейся неопределенностью регулирования в США, Китай расширит свое лидерство в блокчейне по отношению к США, пока SEC не выпустит более четкие руководящие принципы, связанные с криптовалюты и b lockchain, рынок США продолжит развиваться », - Бен Голуб

«Принудительное правоприменение SEC в отношении мошеннических ICO с 2017/2018 гг. Будет продолжаться в 2020 г., что приведет к дальнейшему снижению активности при торговле монетами и соблюдению существующих законов о ценных бумагах. Результат: законные токены секьюрити будут хорошим способом привлечения капитала для уникальных активов, так как регуляторный ландшафт догоняет технологию и более ликвидный рынок для результатов токенов безопасности », - Джонатан Джонсон

КОНФИДЕНЦИАЛЬНОСТЬ И БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ
«Конфиденциальность и безопасность станут ключевым фактором для облачных операторов. С момента получения данных в прошлом году и скандала с Cambridge Analytica Facebook стал более чувствительным к проблемам конфиденциальности и конфиденциальности своих пользователей. Конфиденциальность и безопасность в настоящее время становятся ключевым отличием для бизнеса, и это заставит компании во всем мире серьезно задуматься о своих стратегиях безопасности в 2020 году. Им потребуется гораздо больше времени, чтобы укрепиться и полностью развернуть свои стратегии, но 2020 год станет годом, когда разговор начнет меняться », - Бен Голуб.

ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ

Source: https://refind.com/link/50016737

Accept 71 DASH for payment?
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dash/

i need USA Apple Enterprise Developer

The true value of bitcoin is an upward correction in the price of bitcoin. It can be seen that on the chart, the scale rises and the price of bitcoin rises.