Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 43 results by kunac
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
To me it seems like something is very wrong when a coin based on openness and p2p anyway has around 88% of all the generated coins collected in only one single account. Account number 86646-64 holds right now 6,051,085 PascalCoins.
Cheers!
Cheers!
That's account from biggest mining pool - Suprnova.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1799665.msg17950428#msg17950428
....When I discussed this in the Byteball thread, the Byteball author Anthony realized there is a problem and started to talk about avoidance of needing to replace witnesses and how to have a community wide vote and other mechanisms for overcoming the inherent flaw (which means really he will end up needing whales same as for DPoS to avoid chaos so then you are right back to centralization and the failure of Bitshares and Steem again).....@tonych
....When I discussed this in the Byteball thread, the Byteball author Anthony realized there is a problem and started to talk about avoidance of needing to replace witnesses and how to have a community wide vote and other mechanisms for overcoming the inherent flaw (which means really he will end up needing whales same as for DPoS to avoid chaos so then you are right back to centralization and the failure of Bitshares and Steem again).....@tonych
Failure of Bitshares is based on broken promise by lead dev Dan, Bytemaster, now Dantheman. He left Bitshares. After that he start Steem with 80% premined coins.
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
3GhhbooCWRR5iwmZceRFDbnZeCF4fXiWWjqcDwutLcZuTPEwfHzqtB6oh98SUxQv49tcbdZSLHEroJM 76U5AEs7DWReJxtRXEcio1P
I would like to create account for my coins. Thank you.
I would like to create account for my coins. Thank you.
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
Re: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS
For those upset about the core network, or forks taking away its potential, I have this to say. Crypti can't be shut down or turned off if you don't let it. If you believe in the network, your investment, and the potential that it has, then fight for it.
Thank you for all your hard work.
Do you believe in the Crypti network, will you fight for it? If members of core team or Foundation don't care who will? At these point Crypti looks like dead coin. With 80% of coins in LISK and no support from "Foundation" Crypti is finished.
Re: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS
I think that Boris and Foundation need to act quick, before Max release coins from LISK ICO. He can kill Crypti twice; first with fork and second with all his coins. Any opinions? Boris?
Re: [ANN][LISK] Lisk | ICO | Decentralized Application & Sidechain Platform
Let's start from the beginning.
Before Lisk there was/is Crypti. Crypti stayed at a marketcap of 500k and even lower for years, because nobody gave a shit about it. All of a sudden two guys from Crypti announced that they will stop developing for it and, unhappy with the way it was advancing, forked out Crypti and renamed their project to Lisk.
For a few days both parties were unhappy about it and the main developer Boris (who's still not responding much) swore that he would stay and continue the development for Crypti, telling us that Lisk has nothing to do with it.
Anyways, just like i suspected a few weeks ago, the scammer Boris and his crew kept this confusion going for a long time (avoiding answers), while they were buying Lisk like crazy, even though they were dismissing it at the beginning. The temptation of gaining fast bitcoins through a second ICO (lol) was too big for our friend Boris and, after he lost all his morals, he made the announcement that he will stop developing for Crypti and switch to Lisk.
What you see now in Lisk is in fact the same TEAM from Crypti ROFL, just that somehow they've managed to fool enough idiots so that the project could rise 6x in a few weeks, taking Crypti from 500k to now 3M for Lisk.
These guys never added anything on top of the fork. It is exactly the same project. Only promises and that's about it. Who knows what other shady things these guys did. They've probably even faked the ICO numbers on their website just to create more hype.
Good luck
Before Lisk there was/is Crypti. Crypti stayed at a marketcap of 500k and even lower for years, because nobody gave a shit about it. All of a sudden two guys from Crypti announced that they will stop developing for it and, unhappy with the way it was advancing, forked out Crypti and renamed their project to Lisk.
For a few days both parties were unhappy about it and the main developer Boris (who's still not responding much) swore that he would stay and continue the development for Crypti, telling us that Lisk has nothing to do with it.
Anyways, just like i suspected a few weeks ago, the scammer Boris and his crew kept this confusion going for a long time (avoiding answers), while they were buying Lisk like crazy, even though they were dismissing it at the beginning. The temptation of gaining fast bitcoins through a second ICO (lol) was too big for our friend Boris and, after he lost all his morals, he made the announcement that he will stop developing for Crypti and switch to Lisk.
What you see now in Lisk is in fact the same TEAM from Crypti ROFL, just that somehow they've managed to fool enough idiots so that the project could rise 6x in a few weeks, taking Crypti from 500k to now 3M for Lisk.
These guys never added anything on top of the fork. It is exactly the same project. Only promises and that's about it. Who knows what other shady things these guys did. They've probably even faked the ICO numbers on their website just to create more hype.
Good luck
I'm only an advisor at Lisk and do not work there, but I wish the team good luck.
I'm focusing on my own blockchain 2.0 project, which we will announce soon
Boris, any good news for Crypti holders?
Re: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS
Max "stole" Crypti code to start LISK IPO. Those Crypti holders who accepted his offer are now happy with LISK. Crypti can live without Max and his shills.
At these stage Just-Dice on CLAM is pointless. Imagine if you win, you will lose too much money when you try to sell CLAMs on Polo, with little volume and lower and lower price every day.
For that reason you will still play and lose at the end. These is good for the house but still will end bad with lots of worthless CLAMs.
If you win 10.000 CLAMs you will need to sell them for half of the price. Over that amount is impossible to sell.
To put it simply; CLAM is copy-shit-coin and will ruin Just-Dice reputation.
For that reason you will still play and lose at the end. These is good for the house but still will end bad with lots of worthless CLAMs.
If you win 10.000 CLAMs you will need to sell them for half of the price. Over that amount is impossible to sell.
To put it simply; CLAM is copy-shit-coin and will ruin Just-Dice reputation.
Re: Qora | POS | Assets | Names | Polls | Automated Transactions | Social Network
The web wallet that have NXT or XEM would be much more attractive to new users like me. It is really incredible that the coin with a lot more features then closest competitors is more than 10x cheaper.
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
No really... without digging clams will lose ALOT of his charme. And i think it will go down pretty fast then too.
How can you say that after 2 years!? The only reason why CLAM is still alive and kicking is Just-Dice. You can't be that blind. I don't have a problem with digging but that award (4.6) need to be smaller with time. Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
If you own CLAM, you can express that opinion via CLAMour.
I notice you have been expressing it in trollboxes as well.
Yes I did. I'm also voted for stop digging.
Experiment with fair distribution is obviously failed after last digger. Why we need to wait for another one? What's the point anyway?
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
I think that Doog and friends bought far to much CLAMs on 0.0009 so we can't expect price increase. Beside that we have big inflation and constant threat of new digger. On the other fronts Just-Dice seems can't attract new users. CLAM is simple not attractive to them any more. You can lose twice on dice game and decreasing CLAMs with no volume.
Two years should be enough for everyone who wanted to sign up for CLAMs to do so. After that date new CLAMs rewards for every BTC, DOGE, LTC address should be drastically reduced or abolished.
Two years should be enough for everyone who wanted to sign up for CLAMs to do so. After that date new CLAMs rewards for every BTC, DOGE, LTC address should be drastically reduced or abolished.
Unfortunately I still holding some XMR. From the user perspective nothing has changed. One year is very long time in crypto world. Same wallet, same price. BTC will become anonymous before XMR gets decent wallet. There was a chance, maybe still is but all I can say now is; too little, too late.
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
If you guys don't like the way clam is working jump ship and move to another shitcoin don't try to manipulate the core rules to the coin just to please some bagholders
Without JD CLAM will be exactly these - just another shitcoin. Look at the chart. http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/clams/
Let's vote!
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
So would you prefer not to have the current holders be allowed to vote for what they want?
Please Let's Vote Now!
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
I don't care about CLAM. Im here because of Just-Dice. Right now Just-Dice bleeding because of that digger. Maybe Doog should separate those two communities with new coin. 874.338 invested coins is good start.