Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 121 results by kz3d8fc7
Re: EUROPECOIN [ERC] 🌟 FINANCECLOUD 🌟 CRYPTOCURRENY & FINANCE API + SMARTHUB 🌟
No luck
It connects to 1 peer for a few minutes and then disconnected.
Is there somewhere i can download a up to date blockchain??
I suspect I was linked to the mining pool? seeing that the pool is off and I am off? not sure?
any advice
It connects to 1 peer for a few minutes and then disconnected.
Is there somewhere i can download a up to date blockchain??
I suspect I was linked to the mining pool? seeing that the pool is off and I am off? not sure?
any advice
I am afraid CREX is off. Last block 474906 - 2021-03-29
Re: EUROPECOIN [ERC] 🌟 FINANCECLOUD 🌟 CRYPTOCURRENY & FINANCE API + SMARTHUB 🌟
Hi,
Does any one have any addnodes?
My wallet been showing "No block source" for 3 days now.
debug.log
2021-01-29 16:29:30 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:29:40 connect() to 167.114.249.196:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:29:55 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader: incorrect proof of work
2021-01-29 16:29:55 Misbehaving: 144.76.238.2:8881 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED
2021-01-29 16:29:55 ERROR: invalid header received
2021-01-29 16:29:55 ProcessMessages(headers, 164208 bytes) FAILED peer=1
2021-01-29 16:29:58 connect() to 85.214.68.75:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:30:39 connect() to 167.114.249.196:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:31:44 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:32:49 connect() to 85.214.68.75:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:32:53 connect() to 85.214.68.75:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:33:49 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:34:16 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
Thanks
Does any one have any addnodes?
My wallet been showing "No block source" for 3 days now.
debug.log
2021-01-29 16:29:30 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:29:40 connect() to 167.114.249.196:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:29:55 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader: incorrect proof of work
2021-01-29 16:29:55 Misbehaving: 144.76.238.2:8881 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED
2021-01-29 16:29:55 ERROR: invalid header received
2021-01-29 16:29:55 ProcessMessages(headers, 164208 bytes) FAILED peer=1
2021-01-29 16:29:58 connect() to 85.214.68.75:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:30:39 connect() to 167.114.249.196:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:31:44 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:32:49 connect() to 85.214.68.75:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:32:53 connect() to 85.214.68.75:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:33:49 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
2021-01-29 16:34:16 connect() to 95.104.192.198:8881 failed after select(): Connection refused (111)
Thanks
54.37.81.148:8881
What happened to hashnest trade page ?
I can not find Sell / Buy hash market page in new GUI.
This might be the reason:
https://support.hashnest.com/hc/en-us/articles/360035712132-Announcement-57-Temporary-Closure-of-Shop-and-Market-on-Hashnest
https://www.bitstamp.net/article/upcoming-changes-fee-schedule/
Were adding additional fee tiers that will allow our high-volume customers to operate with lower or zero fees. The new fee schedule will look like this:
< $10K: 0.5%
< $20K: 0.25%
< $100K: 0.24%
< $200K: 0.22%
< $400K: 0.20%
< $600K: 0.15%
< $1M: 0.14%
< $2M: 0.13%
< $4M: 0.12%
< $20M 0.11%
< $50M: 0.1%
< $100M: 0.07%
< $500M: 0.05%
< $2B: 0.03%
< $6B: 0.01%
< $10B: 0.005%
> $10B: 0%
The fee schedule will remain based on your total trading volume over the past 30 days.
1. Crypto withdrawals
The new crypto withdrawal fees will be as follows:
Bitcoin: 0.0005 BTC
Ethereum: 0.001 ETH
XRP: 0.02 XRP
Bitcoin Cash: 0.0001 BCH
Litecoin: 0.001 LTC
2. Fiat Withdrawals
For bank withdrawals the following fees will apply:
SEPA payments (Europe) 3 EUR flat fee
International wire transfer 0.1%, 25 USD/EUR minimum fee
Minimum Order Size
Lastly, we are also changing the minimum order size to 25 EUR/USD or 0.001 BTC (for BTC denominated trading pairs).
The changes we are introducing will allow us to keep providing a trading venue that meets the demands of the quickly evolving crypto markets. Were grateful for your support and will continue offering the most secure and reliable trading services possible.
As a reference, the current fees are:
All trading pairs (cumulative)
Fee %
30 days USD volume
0.25% < $20,000
0.24% < $100,000
0.22% < $200,000
0.20% < $400,000
0.15% < $600,000
0.14% < $1,000,000
0.13% < $2,000,000
0.12% < $4,000,000
0.11% < $20,000,000
0.10% > $20,000,000
Please note: All non-USD trading volumes are converted to USD using a spot exchange rate at the time of each trade.
Market makers and institutional clients that expect to be trading higher volumes than those specified in the Unified Fee Schedule should contact partners@bitstamp.net for a customized fee arrangement.
SEPA Deposit
Free of charge
Withdrawal
0.90 EUR
Credit card purchase
Any amount 5% (additional fee may be charged by the card issuer)
International wire
Deposit 0.05%
deposit fee on our side (minimum fee = 7.5 USD/EUR, maximum fee = 300 USD/EUR)
Withdrawal 0.09%
fee, minimum fee is 15.00 USD/EUR on Bitstamp's end and may incur additional international bank fees
Our minimum order size is 5 for Euro denominated trading pairs, $5 for USD denominated trading pairs, and 0.001 BTC for Bitcoin denominated trading pairs.
Were adding additional fee tiers that will allow our high-volume customers to operate with lower or zero fees. The new fee schedule will look like this:
< $10K: 0.5%
< $20K: 0.25%
< $100K: 0.24%
< $200K: 0.22%
< $400K: 0.20%
< $600K: 0.15%
< $1M: 0.14%
< $2M: 0.13%
< $4M: 0.12%
< $20M 0.11%
< $50M: 0.1%
< $100M: 0.07%
< $500M: 0.05%
< $2B: 0.03%
< $6B: 0.01%
< $10B: 0.005%
> $10B: 0%
The fee schedule will remain based on your total trading volume over the past 30 days.
1. Crypto withdrawals
The new crypto withdrawal fees will be as follows:
Bitcoin: 0.0005 BTC
Ethereum: 0.001 ETH
XRP: 0.02 XRP
Bitcoin Cash: 0.0001 BCH
Litecoin: 0.001 LTC
2. Fiat Withdrawals
For bank withdrawals the following fees will apply:
SEPA payments (Europe) 3 EUR flat fee
International wire transfer 0.1%, 25 USD/EUR minimum fee
Minimum Order Size
Lastly, we are also changing the minimum order size to 25 EUR/USD or 0.001 BTC (for BTC denominated trading pairs).
The changes we are introducing will allow us to keep providing a trading venue that meets the demands of the quickly evolving crypto markets. Were grateful for your support and will continue offering the most secure and reliable trading services possible.
As a reference, the current fees are:
All trading pairs (cumulative)
Fee %
30 days USD volume
0.25% < $20,000
0.24% < $100,000
0.22% < $200,000
0.20% < $400,000
0.15% < $600,000
0.14% < $1,000,000
0.13% < $2,000,000
0.12% < $4,000,000
0.11% < $20,000,000
0.10% > $20,000,000
Please note: All non-USD trading volumes are converted to USD using a spot exchange rate at the time of each trade.
Market makers and institutional clients that expect to be trading higher volumes than those specified in the Unified Fee Schedule should contact partners@bitstamp.net for a customized fee arrangement.
SEPA Deposit
Free of charge
Withdrawal
0.90 EUR
Credit card purchase
Any amount 5% (additional fee may be charged by the card issuer)
International wire
Deposit 0.05%
deposit fee on our side (minimum fee = 7.5 USD/EUR, maximum fee = 300 USD/EUR)
Withdrawal 0.09%
fee, minimum fee is 15.00 USD/EUR on Bitstamp's end and may incur additional international bank fees
Our minimum order size is 5 for Euro denominated trading pairs, $5 for USD denominated trading pairs, and 0.001 BTC for Bitcoin denominated trading pairs.
The correct value for litecoin is the bitcoin value divided by four.
Which factors lead you to such formula to estimate value of Litecoin, based on Bitcoin? Can you share it with more details, and reasons behind the estimation, please. I guess you meant the Litecoin value in USD, not in LTC/ BTC pair, didn't you?I think the formula is not so seriously difficult, most likely based on the ratio of max number of coins.
84Mill / 21 Mill = 4
Would be nice to have stable coin usdt pairing trades. Also what happened with kwatt coin to use it to pay for maintenance. That was a great idea.
USDT is not good. BTC trading pairs are better. Nothing is "stable" in BTC and mining business, stable coin cannot help and will not stabilize it. Also US economy does not seem to be stable either :-)
Curious why the G32 is not selling. Seems to be the best nominal value among Hashnest offerings.
Price 4000 USD not very cheap?
August pre-order is 3 months away?
GRIN is not a well known coin?
I checked DASH mining on Bitdeer, it does not seem to be profitable at all. according to my calculations ROI is Infinity.
Intestingly, 120 day plans are sold out. Do they know more ?
Intestingly, 120 day plans are sold out. Do they know more ?
Why is S17 trading is USDT instead of BTC? I don't even have access to USDT and I really don't want it.
If hashnest wants to use USDT there should at least be the option to instantly convert it to BTC. This seems crazy to me. I mine, get paid in BTC but have to buy in sell TH/s in USDT? It doesn't make seen. Also there seems to be a lot of dark scandal clouds hanging around USDT. It doesn't even seem to be fully backed by USDT so holding it is a double risk. You risk the long-term growth of BTC and you risk a collapse of USDT if Bitfinex goes down.
If hashnest wants to use USDT there should at least be the option to instantly convert it to BTC. This seems crazy to me. I mine, get paid in BTC but have to buy in sell TH/s in USDT? It doesn't make seen. Also there seems to be a lot of dark scandal clouds hanging around USDT. It doesn't even seem to be fully backed by USDT so holding it is a double risk. You risk the long-term growth of BTC and you risk a collapse of USDT if Bitfinex goes down.
Same opinion here. I just cannot trust USDT.
Works on Firefox android.
Maybe it is only intended to work on mobile browsers.
HashNest page works for me on Firefox desktop machine
Re: EUROPECOIN [ERC] 🌟 GOLD 🌟 FINANCECLOUD: IOT VOICE SMARTHUB release 1.NOV 🌟
Hello!
Anyone with problems to synch wallet?
I'm stuck at block 250872.
I am using these nodes:
addnode=104.131.160.119
addnode=109.193.112.226
addnode=128.69.33.174
addnode=158.69.126.193
addnode=188.68.36.105
addnode=193.105.134.196
addnode=217.240.136.235
addnode=5.189.136.83
addnode=5.189.187.91
addnode=58.153.110.164
addnode=62.44.96.129
addnode=67.169.72.137
addnode=77.165.46.69
addnode=78.90.217.184
addnode=79.132.111.195
addnode=85.17.242.97
addnode=90.109.97.59
addnode=91.48.219.166
addnode=91.48.223.232
But still 0 connections and no block source available.
In the debug file i saw some errors:
2019-03-31 20:07:16 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader: incorrect proof of work
2019-03-31 20:07:16 Misbehaving: 144.76.238.2:8881 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED
2019-03-31 20:07:16 ERROR: invalid header received
2019-03-31 20:07:16 ProcessMessages(headers, 164208 bytes) FAILED peer=1
What I'm doing wrong?
Anyone with problems to synch wallet?
I'm stuck at block 250872.
I am using these nodes:
addnode=104.131.160.119
addnode=109.193.112.226
addnode=128.69.33.174
addnode=158.69.126.193
addnode=188.68.36.105
addnode=193.105.134.196
addnode=217.240.136.235
addnode=5.189.136.83
addnode=5.189.187.91
addnode=58.153.110.164
addnode=62.44.96.129
addnode=67.169.72.137
addnode=77.165.46.69
addnode=78.90.217.184
addnode=79.132.111.195
addnode=85.17.242.97
addnode=90.109.97.59
addnode=91.48.219.166
addnode=91.48.223.232
But still 0 connections and no block source available.
In the debug file i saw some errors:
2019-03-31 20:07:16 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader: incorrect proof of work
2019-03-31 20:07:16 Misbehaving: 144.76.238.2:8881 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED
2019-03-31 20:07:16 ERROR: invalid header received
2019-03-31 20:07:16 ProcessMessages(headers, 164208 bytes) FAILED peer=1
What I'm doing wrong?
I have the following 2 peers visible:
"addr" : "145.239.65.23:8881",
"addr" : "80.208.141.155:8881",
Please make sure, you are using wallet version at least V3.0.2
You can also check the block explorers what peers they see.
e.g: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/erc/#!network
+click node list
Do not forget filling in the KYC form of bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/kyc.php
Re: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY
Block time = 60sec
1 block / minute
60 blocks / hour
60*24 = 1440 blocks/day ?
something like that
The one who made the countdown page, somehow counts it as 3600 and not 1440.
Re: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY
Block time = 60sec
1 block / minute
60 blocks / hour
60*24 = 1440 blocks/day ?
Re: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY
Code:
Approximate blocks generated per day: 3600
How do you count the blocks per day?
Re: EUROPECOIN [ERC] 🌟 GOLD 🌟 FINANCECLOUD: IOT VOICE SMARTHUB release 1.NOV 🌟
In a three days can't sinc my wallet. I have made .conf file with active nodes but still wrote i have zero connections
I have fully synced wallet. At the time of writing, I have the following 3 peers connected:
Code:
[
{
"id" : 2,
"addr" : "185.194.140.60:8881",
},
{
"id" : 3,
"addr" : "37.187.167.145:8881",
},
{
"id" : 4,
"addr" : "5.44.127.134:8881",
}
]
Optionally, you can add peers from debug console by using:
Code:
addnode "node" add
command.
Re: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY
Hi,
I have just installed wallet version 0.13.5.0, and I see lot of small transactions in the log, mostly 0.001 EMC2 in value.
Also I have a new watch-only wallet appeared which is constantly changing.
What is this watch-only wallet for?
I have just installed wallet version 0.13.5.0, and I see lot of small transactions in the log, mostly 0.001 EMC2 in value.
Also I have a new watch-only wallet appeared which is constantly changing.
What is this watch-only wallet for?
Re: EUROPECOIN [ERC] 🌟 GOLD 🌟 FINANCECLOUD: IOT VOICE SMARTHUB release 1.NOV 🌟
"cloudy" pespective
:
have fun
Matthias
.
Watch out! there is a giant spider in the corner! Ready for attacking the stocked bricks !
I vote for Europium!
I made a withdrawal from Dnotes vault. The system sends out a confirmation email with a link to click.
The link looks like this:
Confirmation Link: https://dnotesvault.com/users/confirm?cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
but actually refers to: https://u1554482.ct.sendgrid.net/
My email client think that this is a spam. It is mainly because the link name is different to the one it redirects to.
I wonder if it is intended to be like this?
The link looks like this:
Confirmation Link: https://dnotesvault.com/users/confirm?cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
but actually refers to: https://u1554482.ct.sendgrid.net/
My email client think that this is a spam. It is mainly because the link name is different to the one it redirects to.
I wonder if it is intended to be like this?
Hi kz3d8fc7, that is the correct and intended link. You can either copy and paste the DNotesVault link, or click the redirected one. Both are safe though, even though the mail client sees it as spam.
Thank you.
I made a withdrawal from Dnotes vault. The system sends out a confirmation email with a link to click.
The link looks like this:
Confirmation Link: https://dnotesvault.com/users/confirm?cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
but actually refers to: https://u1554482.ct.sendgrid.net/
My email client thinks that this is a spam. It is mainly because the link name is different to the one it redirects to.
I wonder if it is intended to be like this?
The link looks like this:
Confirmation Link: https://dnotesvault.com/users/confirm?cn=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
but actually refers to: https://u1554482.ct.sendgrid.net/
My email client thinks that this is a spam. It is mainly because the link name is different to the one it redirects to.
I wonder if it is intended to be like this?