Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 46 results by l30z1n
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v12.0 (Windows/Linux)
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
@nazarpechka
The story repeats, XVGminingclub began to have disconnections and orphan blocks. I saw that you reported there was an update in the Pool, but the shares response time is still very high(>1000ms).
Will all Pools have this problem whenever they get a large amount of miners?
Are you suffering DDoS attack?
The story repeats, XVGminingclub began to have disconnections and orphan blocks. I saw that you reported there was an update in the Pool, but the shares response time is still very high(>1000ms).
Will all Pools have this problem whenever they get a large amount of miners?
Are you suffering DDoS attack?
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
@mine_phun
NL adm. There must be something wrong with the pool. The number of orphan blocks remains very high. No other pool has as many orphan blocks as NL. The stability has improved a lot, only need to solve the amount of orphan blocks for now.
NL adm. There must be something wrong with the pool. The number of orphan blocks remains very high. No other pool has as many orphan blocks as NL. The stability has improved a lot, only need to solve the amount of orphan blocks for now.
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
Because it's the same Algo i think.
Also, there are problems with hashrate and that is because your pool might need a faster internet connection to accommodate the users or you need to disable the torrents. I'm not joking, or if is nothing of what I said then it might be something holding your pool internet connection back cause the hashrate is nothing like used to me.
Maybe the payment is not as good as antminer because of the internet connection issues. Download and upload speed is the key here, need to be top notch.
The pool ADM has already reported a few pages back that the pool is receiving attack packages, and he has already informed that he is working to do the update on the firewall.
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v11.0 (Windows/Linux)
Only I started mining XSH on nl pool? Anyone else with the same problem? I did not change anything in the bat file.
https://ibb.co/nimBwS
https://ibb.co/nimBwS
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v10.0 (Windows/Linux)
I know it's kind of off topic. Does anyone know this store? It's trustable?
https://boston-electronics.us/
https://boston-electronics.us/
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.4 (Windows/Linux)
Is anyone using a b250 chipset?
Specifically, Asus STRIX B250F GAMING can handle 6 GPUs without problems?
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813132933&cm_re=Strix_B250F-_-13-132-933-_-Product
Specifically, Asus STRIX B250F GAMING can handle 6 GPUs without problems?
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813132933&cm_re=Strix_B250F-_-13-132-933-_-Product
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v9.1 (Windows/Linux)
@claymore
Hey Claymore, it looks like you prioritized who uses dual mode in these latest updates. For me that mine only ETH, I still use version 8.1 that continues faster (briefly). Do you have any plans to improve performance for eth only?
Hey Claymore, it looks like you prioritized who uses dual mode in these latest updates. For me that mine only ETH, I still use version 8.1 that continues faster (briefly). Do you have any plans to improve performance for eth only?
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v8.0 (Windows/Linux)
Did someone happen turn off the system when try dual mining mode?
I have 1 RIG with 5 cards(2 RX 480/ 1 R9 390/ 1 R9 290x/ 1 R9 290)
and 2 PSU( Corsair CX 750 and Cougar GS 800).
And that's only happened when I tried dual mining with Pasc.
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
Yep, ocminer has always been open and honest. He's inspired me to want to build my own pool, so I'll attempt that over the next week or two. That way in the future we can have more than 1 honest pool.
Thanks for your efforts. Take your time mate.
Still hope the miners would switch to suprnova ...the good side of the might..
Its like Jedi vs. Sith
somehow i like the transparency and honesty ocminer is working with the community.
Still hope the miners would switch to suprnova ...the good side of the might..
Its like Jedi vs. Sith
somehow i like the transparency and honesty ocminer is working with the community.
Yep, ocminer is a first class operator.
I have to stay in the Nano. When I try on Suprnova, I have a lot of rejections >10%.
Maybe it's because I'm mining from Brazil, and latency is not very good. I am not sure
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
I cannot get the pool synched back to the "other" chain, looks like not everyone has updated and there are still invalid blocks sent which are rejected by the newer daemon.
Well, thats what you have with new technology, this is not a well known and good working Bitcoin based coin, it's a new source based on Pascal with all the exploits available fixed in bitcoin versions
I'll try to get switched to a backup node running the old version.
Well, thats what you have with new technology, this is not a well known and good working Bitcoin based coin, it's a new source based on Pascal with all the exploits available fixed in bitcoin versions
I'll try to get switched to a backup node running the old version.
OC miner.
Others miners, just like me, did not have their withdrawals confirmed at Polo. What will be done?
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
What will Polo now do? they accepted allready wrong coins...
I think Polo did not accept wrong coins. I made a withdrawal from Suprnova to Polo and even TXid does not exist on Pascal Blockchain explorer:
TX id = 00000000C86F0400721500003030424530353939314236443146434245343043
http://explorer.pascalcoin.org/findoperation.php?ophash=00000000C86F0400721500003030424530353939314236443146434245343043
Edit:
One valid TX id before fork:
00000000C86F04006B1200004232374244393939444144363432313334353634
http://explorer.pascalcoin.org/findoperation.php?ophash=00000000C86F04006B1200004232374244393939444144363432313334353634
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
With the current difficulty and price, PASC mining is less profitable than ZEC, but I will continue in the PASC because I believe that the value can increase at least 50%.
But I'm really worried about the current number of video cards that are in cryptpo world. People are buying video cards like crazy, and they forget to calculate the correct ROI. When I started mining (~ 6 months ago), I used to make a good profit with 2 r9 290, about 5 USD per day on ETH, Nowadays with 6 gpus, I get maximum ~ 7 USD a day on ZEC.
And the future seems to be even worse. :
But I'm really worried about the current number of video cards that are in cryptpo world. People are buying video cards like crazy, and they forget to calculate the correct ROI. When I started mining (~ 6 months ago), I used to make a good profit with 2 r9 290, about 5 USD per day on ETH, Nowadays with 6 gpus, I get maximum ~ 7 USD a day on ZEC.
And the future seems to be even worse. :
Re: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, deletable blockchain & bank account system [PASA]
=1 / (86400/Last 100 Blocks avg time (s))*(Your Hash rate (MH/s)/NET Hash rate (MH/s))
For me, (3600 MH/s) 1 block take 9,24 day long
= 1 / (86400/278,2)*(10332468/3600) = 9,24
For me, (3600 MH/s) 1 block take 9,24 day long
= 1 / (86400/278,2)*(10332468/3600) = 9,24
I know, but I want to calculate how long to solve a block from the difficulty specifically, not nethashrate.
I do not know, it's difficult to say, I've seen low difficulties that now take more time to find a block.