Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 33 results by larue05
Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux]
Anyone wanna help me figure out why ccMiner isn't hashing?
I have a 6 x 750TI rig, and I'm wanting to mine HVC. My .bat looks like this:
ccminer35.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://<> -u <> -p <> -v 512
It connects to the stratum and starts detecting new blocks however this is the only output on the window.
Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
And that's it. It never actually starts hashing, and yet the stratum keeps detecting new blocks.
Also via Hardware Monitor I can see that none of my cards are under any load at all.
Thoughts?
I have a 6 x 750TI rig, and I'm wanting to mine HVC. My .bat looks like this:
ccminer35.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://<> -u <> -p <> -v 512
It connects to the stratum and starts detecting new blocks however this is the only output on the window.
Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
And that's it. It never actually starts hashing, and yet the stratum keeps detecting new blocks.
Also via Hardware Monitor I can see that none of my cards are under any load at all.
Thoughts?
Still looking for someone to help out here, please.
Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux]
Anyone wanna help me figure out why ccMiner isn't hashing?
I have a 6 x 750TI rig, and I'm wanting to mine HVC. My .bat looks like this:
ccminer35.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://<> -u <> -p <> -v 512
It connects to the stratum and starts detecting new blocks however this is the only output on the window.
Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
And that's it. It never actually starts hashing, and yet the stratum keeps detecting new blocks.
Also via Hardware Monitor I can see that none of my cards are under any load at all.
Thoughts?
I have a 6 x 750TI rig, and I'm wanting to mine HVC. My .bat looks like this:
ccminer35.exe -a heavy -o stratum+tcp://<> -u <> -p <> -v 512
It connects to the stratum and starts detecting new blocks however this is the only output on the window.
Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
Binding thread 3 to cpu 3
Binding thread 4 to cpu 4
Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
And that's it. It never actually starts hashing, and yet the stratum keeps detecting new blocks.
Also via Hardware Monitor I can see that none of my cards are under any load at all.
Thoughts?
Cool site, great idea.
It's just a shame that your charging almost 80% more than the going rate on any other exchange.
Current Doge to USD price at the time of this post. 1k coins = $.00040
You're charging 1k coins = $.0007 (and that's if I buy 100k) The price only jumps in lower quantities, up to 100% more than the exchanges.
I'd gladly purchase on this site if prices were much more aligned with the exchanges. In fact I've been waiting for something like this. But even at 80% it's WAY to high to consider.
It's just a shame that your charging almost 80% more than the going rate on any other exchange.
Current Doge to USD price at the time of this post. 1k coins = $.00040
You're charging 1k coins = $.0007 (and that's if I buy 100k) The price only jumps in lower quantities, up to 100% more than the exchanges.
I'd gladly purchase on this site if prices were much more aligned with the exchanges. In fact I've been waiting for something like this. But even at 80% it's WAY to high to consider.
Re: Mining with Windows Azure Cloud Service - 20 cores free for 100 hours
another update.
I got back on my first 2 azure accounts and they are back up and activated. All my VMs still there and cpuminer still installed on them all. have 40cores all mining again now. So I have no clue what was happening last night with them being rejected.
Account 3 is still rejecting the CC used from the first 2 however.
I got back on my first 2 azure accounts and they are back up and activated. All my VMs still there and cpuminer still installed on them all. have 40cores all mining again now. So I have no clue what was happening last night with them being rejected.
Account 3 is still rejecting the CC used from the first 2 however.
Re: Mining with Windows Azure Cloud Service - 20 cores free for 100 hours
I tried it, but you can't sign up more than two times with the same creditcard. Ip didn't matter (tried through tor/proxy as well).
Oh, and you need to verify your account with a text message, and they will call you to ask whether you need assistance
Oh, and you need to verify your account with a text message, and they will call you to ask whether you need assistance
And what message do you see with the third time?
Got something like "This payment method is not available at the moment".
That's the same message I got while trying to setup a 3rd account. And shortly after that the first 2 accounts free trials were canceled and they said, "You have already used your free trial or are ineligible"
Re: Mining with Windows Azure Cloud Service - 20 cores free for 100 hours
FYI,
I finally got around to trying this out. I setup my first 20cores and let em run for about 5 hours. I then came back and setup my second account and the next 20 cores. Using the same CC for both accounts. I got them all online and running. 30min Later I created a 3rd account and got to the payment screen and entered in the CC info. This time it said it was unable to process the card.
Which didn't surprise me as someone else here mentioned they could only get 2 accounts running.
Well low and behold this flagged the card and the first 2 accounts related to it. In no less than 3minutes the first 2 accounts were completely wiped out and the $200 free trials were instantly revoked. All the VMs were removed and the first two accounts both now say that "your free trial has already been used"
Kinda wondering if I'm IP blocked as well. Tomorrow I'm going to try brand new email accounts with a brand new CC card.
For what it's worth the 8core 7GB VMs runs just the same as the 8core 64GB VMs as far as k/hash is concerned. The 8core 7GB VM according to their pricing calculator would get you hashing for 8 days straight before exhausting the $200 trial ammount.
I finally got around to trying this out. I setup my first 20cores and let em run for about 5 hours. I then came back and setup my second account and the next 20 cores. Using the same CC for both accounts. I got them all online and running. 30min Later I created a 3rd account and got to the payment screen and entered in the CC info. This time it said it was unable to process the card.
Which didn't surprise me as someone else here mentioned they could only get 2 accounts running.
Well low and behold this flagged the card and the first 2 accounts related to it. In no less than 3minutes the first 2 accounts were completely wiped out and the $200 free trials were instantly revoked. All the VMs were removed and the first two accounts both now say that "your free trial has already been used"
Kinda wondering if I'm IP blocked as well. Tomorrow I'm going to try brand new email accounts with a brand new CC card.
For what it's worth the 8core 7GB VMs runs just the same as the 8core 64GB VMs as far as k/hash is concerned. The 8core 7GB VM according to their pricing calculator would get you hashing for 8 days straight before exhausting the $200 trial ammount.
What's better More Miners Less Ghash, or Less Miners more Ghash
Simple question. When it comes to alt currency mining pools what is the bigger payout for your average joe?
A Pool with more miners but lower G/Hash or a pool with less miners but a higher G/hash.
For comparision purposes look at DogeCoin on multipool and dogehouse.com
Multipoool - 5.2 G/Hash with 4700 Miners.
DogeHouse - 4.0 G/Hash with 6500 Miners.
Thoughts?
A Pool with more miners but lower G/Hash or a pool with less miners but a higher G/hash.
For comparision purposes look at DogeCoin on multipool and dogehouse.com
Multipoool - 5.2 G/Hash with 4700 Miners.
DogeHouse - 4.0 G/Hash with 6500 Miners.
Thoughts?
im looking to get about .38-.40 btc per million depending on if you buy all or 1 million
Meh, you ninja edited your post after I pointed it out. Whatever.
All,
What a day again, but at the end, clients popping up, source code released, Wesley was here with new work etc...
Just to remind you all what a great community this is and I want to thank everyone for his great efforts.
We will succeed.
That said:
The only black spot today was dgex and its founder, as I cannot find myself in all what is happening there, and as I cannot accept the dictatorship of one person on the exchange and the forum I will leave the forum nextcoin.org.
I hope many will follow because staying there is supporting his acts and supporting that kind of behavior.
Only the best is good enough for NXT and imo dgex and its founder doesnt fit in there.
NXT is more than some code and a client, it involves people also, it involves a way of thinking, what happened today with dgex cant be further away from what NXT stands for. NXT is strong and getting stronger every day, and it will survive without dgex and nextcoin.org.
You can find me on https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/ where I shall maintain 24/7 support and helping people out if they having trouble
I dont want to split the community but what happened today was a bridge to far and harmed us all, in favor of one.
Gooooooooo NXT
Pin
What a day again, but at the end, clients popping up, source code released, Wesley was here with new work etc...
Just to remind you all what a great community this is and I want to thank everyone for his great efforts.
We will succeed.
That said:
The only black spot today was dgex and its founder, as I cannot find myself in all what is happening there, and as I cannot accept the dictatorship of one person on the exchange and the forum I will leave the forum nextcoin.org.
I hope many will follow because staying there is supporting his acts and supporting that kind of behavior.
Only the best is good enough for NXT and imo dgex and its founder doesnt fit in there.
NXT is more than some code and a client, it involves people also, it involves a way of thinking, what happened today with dgex cant be further away from what NXT stands for. NXT is strong and getting stronger every day, and it will survive without dgex and nextcoin.org.
You can find me on https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/ where I shall maintain 24/7 support and helping people out if they having trouble
I dont want to split the community but what happened today was a bridge to far and harmed us all, in favor of one.
Gooooooooo NXT
Pin
For those of us that are new.... I just set up my first NXT account today. What happened with DGEX exactly? Are they an untrustworthy exchange now?
Re: Mining with Windows Azure Cloud Service - 20 cores free for 100 hours
Your mileage may vary, but I ran two separate Azure trial accounts like this, and a friend ran eight (160 cores!). Neither of us ran into any problems from Microsoft, even though we each used a single credit card for all our trials.
Wow, that's an idea I hadn't considered. I have that $h1tty paypal CC, I think I'll attempt it with that one.
Im guessing you're gonna need 8+ new emails to register right?
Re: [ANN][OGC] *OnlineGamingCoin* LAUNCHED !!! Crypto designed for Online Gaming \o/
Valid-Error pool seems to be working fine with the new 3345 port
Showing us finding blocks and unconfirmed balance
Showing us finding blocks and unconfirmed balance
confirmed started working for me now too. 35min late to the party. This will be a fail coin. See what I get in a couple hours.