Been running their bots for over 6 months now. PROFIT 0 on 2k investment. Pluses: Very easy to use, probably the only auto trading site out there that anyone can use- very easy to get started. Customer service is great when they know the answer. Also you can upgrade to next level using your remaining balance for current level - AWESOME FEATURE!!!
Minuses: BUGY BUGY BUGY, you have too triple check how the orders are placed and cancelled. Bots do not respect grid spacing which results in poor bot performance and money loss. Upper and lower limits for grid settings are also ignored. Trailing up is almost useless - to slow. Customer support is a black hole when it comes down to the question that is not in faq's= worthless. Sent multiple screenshots and examples on bugs mentioned above - no response. The so called S-bot will gap on you 9 times as much as your grid setting around current price trading kinematics will go down the drain - bot will sit there for an hour or so with no trades, or will be doing only buying like 20 times in a row. (due to gap between buy in sell being to high - which in its own is big NO on big down price movements= and that exactly why the platform is not profitable.)  In their webinars they claim AI - it's not AI just poorly coded grid strategy by quantum trader wanna be. I run multiple deep ;learning analyzers on my trades on that platform and it is just grid with bunch of bugs. Back test results is a trap - those numbers never work out - if you will start bot that is in the top 5 suggestions you will loose money 100% - you probably will make it back in a few months but 3 days week month = LOSS. Even though some times I managed to pull 60% weekly gains only to loose it all on new thread which will present bunch of bugs. The way i did, I took a notice of what pairs are frequently in top suggestions and just ran very small investment bots on them, when it kinda hits a bottom and starts showing 1+ % a day I will put more money into it. NO CHANGE CONTROL - changes implemented with out any notices on the web site and what is being changed. Don't buy the pro version only because of Arbitrage - first of all it is not automatic, second is very questionable if you will make money due to speed of execution (which is slow) and accuracy of placed orders that I mentioned above.

If you want to get an idea what quantum trading is all about it is a good starting point just run a free version of it and don't put a lot of money into exchange pair that you will be running bot on. Its a good toy but total JUNK from professional stand point.

Please be advised of false advertising - Mining on luxor will have DEV fees. Obviously eFu**k is  a small time crook but Luxor is quite sizeble so will be interewsting to see if false advertising charges can be filed against them.

Arbitrage.export suxx big time it is just display of paths and spreads that are probably 75% not usable. It is almost ridiculous
 
So here are some examples: One - buy for btc on binance sell One on Huobi for btc – you can’t deposit One to huobi, and if you will try to withdraw it - it will be lost until they upgrade their network

Sell BCH for USDT on Huobi then Sell BCH for BTC on OKex buy ITC for btc OKex sell ITC for USDT on Huobi - You can’t deposit ITC to Huobi if you will try to deposit or withdraw it - it will be lost until they upgrade their network

 Buy xzc for usdt Huobi sell xzc for eth Binance sell eth for btc binance buy steem for btcf binance sell steem for usdt huobi : You can’t deposit STEEM to Huobi. As a matter of fact none of the irc20 tokens can be deposited to huobi right now.

 they show huge spreads on EOS and LSK between Yobit and others but:  You can’t deposit or withdraw EOS or LSK on Yobit they’ve been under maintenance for over 3 weeks now.

300% spread for FSN between okex and Huobi – you can't withdraw from okex and you can not deposit or withdraw from Huobi

200% spread on bloc between Okex and Kukoin  – you can’t deposit bloc to Okex


I also caught them displaying non existing pairs in their paths - like ZIP / BTC on okex does not exist but was shown a s part of the arbitrage chain with prices - which in its turn raises a question of accuracy of prices, pairs and spreads

It will work but you need to adjust firmware so it initiates the 4th board or the 4th chane (for z9 mini). But what I've done is simply loaded firm from big z9 onto mini with 4 boards - z9 big one has  2 chains per board so it will load what you need - works like a charm at 681 I get stable 24K. I will be immersing them in a little bit   one thing though it shows stupid temps like 1C or 7c but as long as you keep fan at 75% or above or in my case immerse them you should be ok

Jason,
I have a question about 2.2 and chip / board temperatures. Did something crazy here: I took 2.2 firm for a big guy and put it on the z9 mini with 4 hash boards (it will be immersed in a little while) - the sucker is kicking ass at 681 it is stable and I get 22-24 K the only thing is it shows stupid temperatures like 7C or 1C   - not a big deal cause it will be immersed after all but was wondering if I can adjust something so it shows correct ones....


Thank You

and I never said you did - I actually wasn't even paying attention to what it was supposed to be I just simply noticed the oddities on the z-farm and started looking into whats going on. When I mentioned 1% I simply wanted to say that I am not accusing you in dishonesty - my apologies if that didn't come out right. So..... like I mentioned in my post I set 5 big ones and 5 small ones on 2.1c to run on equihash overnight- disabled all custom scripts, rules etc. on awesome miner side. The only one I left running was a script that checks the pool after disconnect and if it is not correct one it switches it via SSH. I choose equihash just for the reason that it is the most screwy one with a lot of disconnects and rejects. The dev fee came out to be 4.11% http://www.u-ok.net/images1/miningrep1.png Looking through  some of the logs I can see that a few times miners got socket error and when reconcted they came to the pool that is specified in the first row of the set up thats is the reason you see a few other pools beside nicehash. One thing I can say for sure that the issue with not returning to the last pool mined on after dev cycle is definitely fixed and it doesn't matter if last pool was switched to using SSH command or it was just a default set up. Now it works the way it should. I will set the same bunch to run 24 hours on the luckpool mining hash this time - that should be much more stable compare to nicehash and will post results again tomorrow.  I know you guys talked about temps and hash rate so here are a few graphs (2 big ones and 2 small ones on 2.1.c) that displays hash rate vs temperature. If anyone is interested i can post a larger sample which will have less spikes and easier to see correlation between two.http://www.u-ok.net/images1/perf1.png http://www.u-ok.net/images1/perf2.png http://www.u-ok.net/images1/perf3.png http://www.u-ok.net/images1/perf4.png

I will differ with that - in clinical diagnosis support modules in major EMR's it is easy to submit data for analysis - as a matter of fact all of them integrate with data warehouse solutions and data is easily manipulated to the right format. All of the data is indexed and transcribed on the EMR side  appropriate CPT and ICDN9 (10) codes entered on the procedure and diagnosis levels so all you need as a working interface to send and receive data. So the workflow might be that during the visit physician places an order for the MRI breast cancer screening - when the procedure is performed and then transcribed ordering physician typically receives some kind of message within EMR with results; at this moment it is supper easy to grab that image and send it to a third party via HL7 interface for analysis - typically that will be another order (billable or not billable) placed within an EMR - the question is how usable are the results from the legal standpoint and how they will be transcribed. No One stops me as physician to consult a psychic about patients diagnosis but legally I can't treat patients based on that From the patient's prospective that is slightly easier - solution can be integrated into the patient portal as a second opinion module and images that are available on this portal can be submitted for analysis. However that opens up a huge can of worms from the legal and customer service prospective in the scenario if the results will differ from physician diagnosys .... However - in the hospital world it is all about profits and knowing that majority of them operate on very thin budget if that solution can be used to cut some of the costs that will really fly 

Hmmm 1% ?  not even close - I use awesome miner to run my miners and what its reports show me  that zec-bj.poolin.com (I do not mine on that pool so I assume that is a dev fee pool) in the last 7 days was mined on  5.98%  and 6.7%  in last 24 hours.

I will provide more details on it later. There is something really strange that is going on with 2.1c. I am not 100% sure if that has to do with new awesome miner update or 2.1c I have dedicated 5 minis and 5 bigies to run some tests and get to the bottom of it and will provide mining history reports shortly. But so far I definitely noticed increased traffic to poolin.com on the firewall; Slush poll mining became really unpredictable - meaning some miners will be reported on the pool side some will not even though awesome miner and miners web gui will show them mining with 0 rejects on Slush.  (may be it is what spoonwzd described- I will check on this) Also miners started to get disconnected more often due to socket error and even though they haven't been rebooted  when they re-connecte they will start dev cycle again... On the side note: Sorry Jason, I am not trying to bash your work and definitely not trying to accuse you in being dishonest about 1%. For all I know it might be just my set up and I apologies in advance if it is  - I will post an update with reports shortly